TY - JOUR A1 - Kauss, Norman A1 - Heyn, A. A1 - Halle, T. A1 - Rosemann, Paul T1 - Detection of sensitisation on aged lean duplex stainless steel with different electrochemical methods N2 - Ageing at 600 °C (from 0.1 h up to 20 h) leads to the formation of precipitations at the ferrite-ferrite (α/α) and ferrite-austenite (α/γ) grain boundaries of the lean duplex stainless steel (LDSS) X2CrNiN22-2. This leads to sensitisation due to chromium depletion and decreased pitting corrosion resistance proven by the results of various electrochemical methods (DL-EPR and determination of CPT, Epit). These results were compared with the KorroPad method, which uses an agar-based gel-electrolyte for the detection of stainless steel surfaces prone to pitting corrosion. However, the standard configuration of the KorroPad showed no differentiation for the various ageing conditions. Therefore, modified versions of the KorroPad with two, five and ten times higher NaCl and potassium ferrocyanide III (K3[Fe(CN)6]) concentrations were successfully used to visualise the behaviour detected by DL-EPR, Epit and CPT. Therefore, the KorroPad method can also detect a microstructure related reduction of pitting corrosion resistance, which can drastically reduce the experimental effort to generate sensitisation diagrams for stainless steels. KW - Lean duplex KW - Stainless steel KW - Sensitisation KW - Polarisation KW - Critical pitting temperature KW - Pitting corrosion KW - KorroPad KW - Ageing treatment PY - 2019 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2019.05.081 SN - 0013-4686 SN - 1873-3859 VL - 317 SP - 17 EP - 24 PB - Elsevier AN - OPUS4-48374 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Reinemann, Steffi A1 - Rosemann, P. A1 - Babutzka, Martin A1 - Lehmann, Jens A1 - Burkert, Andreas T1 - Influence of grinding parameters on the corrosion behavior of austenitic stainless steel N2 - Samples of the austenitic stainless steel grade X5CrNi18‐10 (1.4301, AISI 304) were ground industrially with various grinding parameters to study their influence on corrosion resistance. The ability of the mechanically ground surfaces to form a stable passive layer was evaluated by KorroPad test and a modified electrochemical potentiodynamic reactivation test based on a single loop (EPR‐SL). Furthermore, the surfaces were characterized by surface analytical methods. The main influence was determined regarding abrasive belt type. Surfaces mechanically ground with granulate abrasive belts constantly had a lower corrosion resistance than surfaces ground with single‐coated grain. The granulate abrasive belts generated more sensitized surface areas and left formations of welded sample material on the mechanically ground surfaces. A post‐treatment with a nonwoven abrasive proved to be an effective finishing process by which the surface defects and sensitized material got removed and the surfaces regained the expected corrosion resistance. KW - Abrasive belt KW - Austenitic stainless steel KW - Electrochemical potentiodynamic reactivation KW - Grinding KW - KorroPad KW - Surface KW - Corrosion PY - 2019 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1002/maco.201910874 SN - 0947-5117 SN - 1521-4176 VL - 70 IS - 10 SP - 1776 EP - 1787 PB - Wiley-VCH Verlag CY - Weinheim AN - OPUS4-47871 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER -