TY - CONF A1 - Evans, Alexander A1 - Sprengel, Maximilian A1 - Ulbricht, Alexander A1 - Kromm, Arne A1 - Mishurova, Tatiana A1 - Serrano Munoz, Itziar A1 - Fritsch, Tobias A1 - Schröder, Jakob A1 - Kannengießer, Thomas A1 - Bruno, Giovanni T1 - Residual Stresses in Additive Manufacturing (L-PBF) N2 - Additive manufacturing (AM) technologies are experiencing an exceedingly rapid growth, driven by their potential through layer wise deposition for transformational improvements of engineering design, leading to efficiency and performance improvements. Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) is an Additive Manufacturing (AM) method which permits the fabrication of complex structures that cannot otherwise be produced via conventional subtractive manufacturing methods. Nevertheless, the rapid cooling rates associated with this process results in the formation of significant and complex residual stress (RS) fields. A large body of both experimental and simulation research has been dedicated in recent years to the control and mitigation of RS in AM. In order to validate simulations with the end goal of being able to model the residual stress state in AM components and to devise strategies for their reduction during manufacturing, experimental methods need to be able to accurately determine 3D residual stresses fields in complex geometries. Several destructive and non-destructive methods can be used to analyze the RS state, the choice of which depends on the geometry and the information required. Diffraction-based methods using penetrating neutron and synchrotron X-rays at large scale facilities offer the possibility to non-destructively spatially resolve both surface and bulk residual stresses in complex components and track their changes following applied thermal or mechanical loads. This presentation will overview the success stories of using large scale facilities by the BAM for the characterization of residual stresses in additively manufactured metallic alloys. In particular, the study of the influence of process parameters on the residual stress state and the relaxation of these stresses through heat treatment will be presented. However there remains challenges to overcome particularly of the hypotheses underlying the experimental determination of residual stresses, which will be discussed. T2 - 10th International Conference on Mechanical Stress Evaluation by Neutron and Synchrotron Radiation – MECASENS 2021 CY - Prague, Czech Republic DA - 25.11.2021 KW - Residual stress KW - Additive manufacturing KW - Diffraction KW - L-PBF KW - AGIL PY - 2021 AN - OPUS4-54105 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - CONF A1 - Evans, Alexander A1 - Sprengel, Maximilian A1 - Ulbricht, Alexander A1 - Kromm, Arne A1 - Mishurova, Tatiana A1 - Serrano Munoz, Itziar A1 - Fritsch, Tobias A1 - Schröder, Jakob A1 - Kannengießer, Thomas A1 - Bruno, Giovanni T1 - Residual Stresses in Additive Manufacturing (L-PBF) N2 - Metal Additive manufacturing (AM) technologies such as Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) enable the fabrication of complex structures, giving rise to potential improvements in component and manufacturing efficiency. However, the processes are typically characterized by the generation of high magnitude residual stress (RS) which can have detrimental consequences for subsequent applications. Therefore, the characterization of these RS fields and the understanding of their formation and mitigation through optimized processing is crucial for the wider uptake of the technology. Due to the potential complex nature and high value of components manufactured by LPBF, it is important to have suitable characterisation methods which can determine the spatial variations of RS in a non-destructive manner. Neutron diffraction is considered to be the best suited for these requirements. However, the microstructures developed in the complex thermal cycles experience in the production can pose challenges to the ND method for RS analysis. The BAM has conducted significant research over the past years to overcome these obstacles, enabling higher confidence in the RS determined in LPBF materials by neutron diffraction. This contribution will overview some of these advancements made recently at European neutron sources including on Stress-Spec at FRM2/MLZ. T2 - MLZ User Meeting 2021 CY - Online meeting DA - 07.12.2021 KW - Residual stress KW - Additive manufacturing KW - Diffraction KW - AGIL KW - Manufact PY - 2021 AN - OPUS4-54044 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - CONF A1 - Bruno, Giovanni A1 - Mishurova, Tatiana A1 - Serrano Munoz, Itziar A1 - Ulbricht, Alexander A1 - Fritsch, Tobias A1 - Sprengel, Maximilian A1 - Evans, Alexander A1 - Kromm, Arne A1 - Madia, Mauro ED - Bruno, Giovanni T1 - A Critical Discussion on the Diffraction-Based Experimental Determination of Residual Stress in AM Parts N2 - As opposed to reviewing results on experimental determination of residual stress by diffraction, this paper discusses the open issues when dealing with residual stress determination in additive manufactured parts, in particular those manufactured with laser powder bed fusion techniques. Three points are addressed in detail: (a) the proper determination of the strain-free reference d0, (b) the problem of the determination of the principal axes, and (c) the use of the correct diffraction elastic constants. It is shown that all methods to determine the strain-free reference d0 suffer from caveats, and care must be taken in evaluating the most suitable for the problem being tackled. In addition, it is shown that, in some systems, the principal axes do correspond to the geometrical axes of the specimen, but this needs to be systematically checked, especially in the case of uni- or bidirectional hatching strategies. Finally, the need to experimentally determine the proper diffraction elastic constants is underlined, especially in the case of strongly textured specimens, which again depends on the deposition strategy. T2 - ASTM ICAM 2020 – ASTM International Conference on Additive Manufacturing CY - Online meeting DA - 16.11.2020 KW - Additive Manufacturing KW - Diffraction KW - Residual Stress PY - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1520/STP163120190148 VL - STP1631 SP - 122 EP - 138 PB - ASTM International CY - USA AN - OPUS4-51347 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - CONF A1 - Evans, Alexander A1 - Bruno, Giovanni A1 - Sprengel, Maximilian A1 - Madia, Mauro A1 - Kromm, Arne T1 - Residual stresses in Laser Beam Melting (LBM) – Critical Review and outlook of activities at BAM N2 - Additive manufacturing (AM) technologies have experienced an exceedingly rapid growth, which is coupled with the knowledge about the resulting material properties and performance. In particular, residual stress (RS) was soon recognized as an important issue in AM parts, such that parts are usually subjected to a post build-heat-treated. Significant effort has been spent on simulations of RS in AM, especially using finite element methods. As a consequence, the experimental determination of RS has thereby become increasingly important as a validation tool for simulations, as well as a method for assessing the influence of process parameters. In particular, diffraction methods, which are fundamentally non-destructive, offer enormous possibilities to gain knowledge on the residual stress state in real components, since synchrotron radiation and neutrons can penetrate even heavy metals up to several millimeters or centimeters, respectively. Indeed, significant progress has been achieved, in the understanding of the origins of the RS fields as a function of process parameters, as well as their stability under thermal and/or mechanical exposure. In this paper, a few success stories will be outlined. It will be shown how the determination of RS in metallic parts (with the focus on those produced by laser powder bed fusion) has even revealed that process parameters that were previously considered unimportant (e.g. the position and orientation on the base plate) play a major role in the onset of residual stress accumulation. However, while RS characterization is starting to be considered in the component design, deposition strategy (e.g. build plate temperature), and even in the definition of the relevant metric to assess the quality of a part, much is still to be investigates about the hypotheses underlying its experimental determination. Therefore, some aspects to be aware of, or even those which to date are unclear, will also be discussed. These include the determination of the stress-free reference and of the principal axes of stress. All of these aspects will lead towards a comprehensive understanding of the process-structure-performance relationships in AM materials and parts. T2 - Fourth ASTM Symposium on Structural Integrity of Additive Manufactured Materials and Parts CY - Gaylord National Resort And Convention Center; National Harbor, MD DA - 07.10.2019 KW - Diffraction KW - Additive Manufacturing KW - Residual stress PY - 2019 AN - OPUS4-49367 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - CONF A1 - Madia, Mauro A1 - Bruno, Giovanni A1 - Evans, Alexander A1 - Sprengel, Maximilian A1 - Kromm, Arne T1 - Residual stresses in Laser Beam Melting (LBM) – Critical Review and outlook of activities at BAM N2 - Additive manufacturing (AM) technologies have experienced an exceedingly rapid growth, which is coupled with the knowledge about the resulting material properties and performance. In particular, residual stress (RS) was soon recognized as an important issue in AM parts, such that parts are usually subjected to a post build-heat-treated. Significant effort has been spent on simulations of RS in AM, especially using finite element methods. As a consequence, the experimental determination of RS has thereby become increasingly important as a validation tool for simulations, as well as a method for assessing the influence of process parameters. In particular, diffraction methods, which are fundamentally non-destructive, offer enormous possibilities to gain knowledge on the residual stress state in real components, since synchrotron radiation and neutrons can penetrate even heavy metals up to several millimeters or centimeters, respectively. Indeed, significant progress has been achieved, in the understanding of the origins of the RS fields as a function of process parameters, as well as their stability under thermal and/or mechanical exposure. In this paper, a few success stories will be outlined. It will be shown how the determination of RS in metallic parts (with the focus on those produced by laser powder bed fusion) has even revealed that process parameters that were previously considered unimportant (e.g. the position and orientation on the base plate) play a major role in the onset of residual stress accumulation. However, while RS characterization is starting to be considered in the component design, deposition strategy (e.g. build plate temperature), and even in the definition of the relevant metric to assess the quality of a part, much is still to be investigates about the hypotheses underlying its experimental determination. Therefore, some aspects to be aware of, or even those which to date are unclear, will also be discussed. These include the determination of the stress-free reference and of the principal axes of stress. All of these aspects will lead towards a comprehensive understanding of the process-structure-performance relationships in AM materials and parts. T2 - Fourth ASTM Symposium on Structural Integrity of Additive Manufactured Materials and Parts CY - Gaylord National Resort And Convention Center; National Harbor, MD, USA DA - 07.10.2019 KW - Residual stress KW - Additive Manufacturing KW - Diffraction PY - 2019 AN - OPUS4-49822 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - CONF A1 - Evans, Alexander A1 - Thiede, Tobias A1 - Mishurova, Tatiana A1 - Kromm, Arne A1 - Cabeza, Sandra A1 - Serrano Munoz, Itziar A1 - Ulbricht, Alexander A1 - Sprengel, Maximilian A1 - Bruno, Giovanni T1 - Residual stresses in am review and oulook of activities at BAM N2 - Critical discussion of residual stress Analysis in additive manufacturing from examples in literature and an overview of activities at BAM T2 - Workshop on Fatigue of Additive Manufactured Metallic Components CY - BAM, Berlin, Germany DA - 16.05.2019 KW - Diffraction KW - Additive Manufacturing KW - Residual stress PY - 2019 AN - OPUS4-49843 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - CONF A1 - Sprengel, Maximilian A1 - Kromm, Arne A1 - Cabeza, S. A1 - Mishurova, Tatiana A1 - Nadammal, N. A1 - Thiede, Tobias A1 - Serrano Munoz, Itziar A1 - Ulbricht, Alexander A1 - Evans, Alexander A1 - Bruno, Giovanni T1 - Combining diffraction methods to non-destructively characterize through thickness residual stress gradients in L-PBF IN718 N2 - Laser based Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF) is an additive manufacturing technique that has been continuously developed in the past years. It offers unparalleled design freedom and the resulting mechanical properties match, in some cases even exceed, those of materials processed by conventional manufacturing techniques. Nonetheless the process is prone to create Residual Stresses (RS) resulting from the sequential melting and solidification of the material. RS can reduce load bearing capacity and generate unwanted distortions thus diminishing the potential of L-PBF. This research activity aimed at characterizing the RS state in Inconel 718 L-PBF specimens using multiple diffraction methods. The microstructure as well as the surface and bulk residual stresses were investigated. The RS analysis was performed using X-ray, synchrotron and neutron diffraction methods to provide information at different depths within the specimen. The measurements were performed at the Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und –prüfung (BAM), the EDDI beamline at BESSY II synchrotron and E3 line at BER II neutron reactor of the Helmholtz-Zentrum für Materialien und Energie (HZB) Berlin. The results revealed a depth depending RS state. The longitudinal and transverse stress components measured by X-ray and synchrotron at the surface agree well, exhibiting stress values around the yield strength of the material. In addition, synchrotron mapping showed gradients along the width and length of the sample for the longitudinal and transverse stress components. Lower RS values compared to surface RS were measured in the bulk of the material using neutron diffraction. The longitudinal stress component in the bulk was tensile and gradually decreased towards the edge of the specimen. The normal component however did not change significantly along the specimen dimensions and was of compressive nature. The transversal component was almost negligible. The results indicate that a stress re-distribution takes place during the deposition of the consecutive layers, which has to be further investigated. T2 - First European Conference on Structural Integrity of Additively Manufactured Materials CY - Trondheim, Norway DA - 09.09.2019 KW - Additive Manufacturing KW - Residual Stress KW - Diffraction PY - 2019 AN - OPUS4-49804 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - THES A1 - Sprengel, Maximilian Franz-Arthur T1 - Study on the determination and the assessment of the residual stress in laser powder bed fused stainless steel structures N2 - Additive manufacturing processes offer extensive advantages for the design freedom of structures through layer-by-layer production. This enables high weight savings as well as the integration of functions such as cooling channels. This technology thus offers great potential to contribute to a sustainable future. The pioneer among these manufacturing processes is the powder bed fusion of metals with laser beams (PBF-LB/M). This process is characterised by high laser scanning speeds and highly localised heat input, which have a strong effect on the microstructure and thus also on the mechanical properties. For example, the austenitic steel 316L exhibits a cellular structure at the subgrain level. This microstructure feature leads to higher yield strengths and comparable ductility to conventionally processed 316L. In addition to the traditional applications of 316L steel in the petrochemical and nuclear industries, this enables new applications such as medical stents or bipolar plates for fuel cells with proton exchange membranes. However, the layer-by-layer production with high scanning speeds and localised heat input induces cooling rates in the order of 106 K.s-1. The large temperature gradients and the shrinkage restraints of each weld bead and layer lead to the development of complex residual stress fields. These reduce the material performance and can even lead to premature failure. Thus, the fatigue properties are severely affected by rapid crack growth or prematurely developing cracks. Furthermore, specimens may warp during PBF-LB/M or immediately when the components are separated from the build plate. Therefore, residual stress is one of the main disadvantages of PBF-LB/M, making it difficult for this technology to be more widely accepted in the industry. Based on the current state of the literature, the procedure for determining residual stress employing diffraction methods, the influence of the component geometry, as well as the inter-layertime (ILT) on residual stress and, lastly, suitable heat treatment strategies for relaxing residual stress in PBF-LB/M/316L, were identified as insufficiently researched areas. Determining residual stress is a major challenge. X-ray and neutron diffraction are particularly suitable for filigree structures, which can preferably be produced using PBF-LB/M. Here, the microscopic strain of the lattice planes is used to calculate the macroscopic residual stress. These methods are nondestructive and allow the spatial resolution of the bi-axial and tri-axial residual stress. In the present work, in-situ neutron diffraction tensile tests were performed to analyse the micromechanical behaviour of PBF-LB/M/316L. The suitability of the lattice planes for calculating the macroscopic residual stress was investigated. The (311) lattice plane was found to be the best option for determining the macroscopic residual stress in PBF-LB/M/316L. Furthermore, it was shown that the Kröner model can be used to calculate the X-ray diffraction constants despite the texture. Currently, both aspects are common practices in the determination of residual stress. The results presented here support the validity of this approach and increase the confidence in the experimentally determined residual stress, which has a positive effect on the assessment of quality concerning the safety of a component manufactured by PBF-LB/M. The geometry of a structure manufactured by PBF-LB/M determines the component stiffness and influences the thermal gradients during manufacture and ultimately the residual stress. The effect of smaller or larger dimensions (larger than 10 mm) on the residual stress is rarely considered. To investigate this aspect, representative test specimens with different thicknesses and lengths were produced. Hence, the influence of the geometry i.e., component stiffness on the residual stress was evaluated. The residual stress was determined using X-ray and neutron diffraction. The analysis of the residual stress showed that an increase in thickness leads to overall higher residual stress. In addition, it was shown that increasing the sample dimension leads to smaller residual stress gradients. Above a threshold value of a few millimetres, no significant change in the residual stress was observed. The ILT is inherent in every PBF-LB/M construction job and influences the thermal gradients during production and thus the residual stress. A change in wall thickness in a geometrically complex structure or a variation in the number of specimens in the construction process leads directly to a change in the ILT. To simulate this, specimens with different ILT were produced. The residual stress was determined by X-ray and neutron diffraction. The use of a short ILT resulted in higher surface residual stress, but lower volume residual stress. Here, the surface residual stress and the residual stress in the volume showed contrary behaviour. This was attributed to the complex heat conduction during the process, as shown by the thermographic measurements. To avoid distortion of the specimens or real components upon separation from the build plate or during post-processing steps, stress relief annealing is usually performed after the PBF-LB/M process. Based on standards for heat treatment of welded austenitic steels, heat treatments were performed at low (450 °C for four hours) and high (800 °C and 900 °C for one hour) temperatures. The results show that the heat treatment at 450 °C relaxed the residual stress by only 5 %. This low relaxation is due to the stability of the cell structures. The high-temperature heat treatment showed that 900 °C is required to dissolve the cell structure and achieve a relaxation of about 85 %. This result is in good agreement with the standards for stress relief annealing of welded austenitic steels. N2 - Additive Fertigungsverfahren bieten durch die schichtweise Herstellung weitreichende Vorteile für die Gestaltungsfreiheit von Strukturen und ermöglichen somit hohe Gewichtseinsparungen. Auch die Integration von Funktionen, beispielsweise Kühlkanäle, können unmittelbar während der Herstellung eingebracht werden. Damit bietet diese Technologie ein hohes Potential zu einer nachhaltigen Zukunft beizutragen. Der Vorreiter unter diesen Fertigungsprozessen ist das Pulverbettbasierte Schmelzen von Metallen mittels Laserstrahlen (PBF-LB/M). Dieser Prozess zeichnet sich durch hohe Laserscangeschwindigkeiten und eine stark lokalisierte Wärmeeinbringung aus, welche sich auf die Mikrostruktur und damit auch auf die mechanischen Eigenschaften auswirken. So weist der austenitische Stahl 316L eine zelluläre Struktur auf Subkornniveau auf, welche zu höheren Streckgrenzen jedoch nicht verringerter Duktilität im Vergleich zu konventionell verarbeitetem 316L führt. Dies ermöglicht, neben den traditionellen Einsatzgebieten des Stahls 316L in der petrochemischen und nuklearen Industrie, neue Anwendungen wie medizinische Stents oder Bipolarplatten für Brennstoffzellen mit Protonenaustauschmembran. Die schichtweise Fertigung mit hohen Scangeschwindigkeiten und lokaler Wärmeeinbringung bedingt jedoch Abkühlraten in der Größenordnung von 106 K.s-1. Die hohen Temperaturgradienten im Zusammenspiel mit den Schrumpfbehinderungen jeder Schweißraupe und Lage sorgen für die Entstehung komplexer Eigenspannungsfelder. Diese verringern die Beanspruchbarkeit des Materials und können sogar zu einem vorläufigen Versagen führen. So sind die Ermüdungseigenschaften durch ein rapides Risswachstum bzw. ein vorzeitig entstehender Riss durch Eigenspannungen stark beeinträchtigt. Des Weiteren kommt es vor, dass sich die Proben während des PBF-LB/M oder unmittelbar bei der Trennung der Bauteile von der Bauplatte verziehen. Daher sind die Eigenspannungen eines der Hauptnachteile des PBF-LB/M, die eine breitere Akzeptanz dieses Verfahrens in der Industrie erschweren. Ausgehend vom aktuellen Literaturstand, wurde die Vorgehensweise bei der Bestimmung der Eigenspannungen mittels Beugungsmethoden, der Einfluss der Bauteilgeometrie bzw. Bauteilsteifigkeit sowie der Zwischenlagenzeit auf die Eigenspannungen und zuletzt geeignete Wärmebehandlungsstrategien zur Relaxation der Eigenspannungen in PBF-LB/M/316L als unzureichend erforschte Bereiche identifiziert. Die Bestimmung der Eigenspannung ist eine große Herausforderung. Insbesondere bei filigranen Strukturen, welche vorzugsweise mittels PBF-LB/M hergestellt werden können, eignen sich die Röntgen- und Neutronenbeugung. Hierbei wird die mikroskopische Dehnung der Gitterebenen zur Berechnung der makroskopischen Eigenspannung verwendet. Diese Methoden sind zerstörungsfrei und ermöglichen die räumliche Auflösung der bi-axialen und tri-axialen Eigenspannungen. In der vorliegenden Arbeit wurden in-situ Neutronenbeugungszugversuche durchgeführt, um das mikromechanische Verhalten des PBF-LB/M/316L zu analysieren. Die Eignung der Gitterebenen zur Berechnung der makroskopischen Eigenspannung wurde untersucht. Die (311) Gitterebene erwies sich als die beste Option für die Bestimmung der makroskopischen Eigenspannung in PBF-LB/M/316L. Darüber hinaus wurde gezeigt, dass das Kröner-Modell trotz Textur zur Berechnung der Röntgenbeugungskonstanten verwendet werden kann. Derzeit werden beide Aspekte in der Bestimmung der Eigenspannungen standardmäßig angewandt. Die hier präsentierten Ergebnisse untermauern die Gültigkeit dieses Vorgehens und erhöhen das Vertrauen in den experimentell bestimmten Eigenspannungen, welches sich positiv auf die Beurteilung der Qualität hinsichtlich der Sicherheit eines durch PBF-LB/M gefertigten Bauteils auswirkt. Die Geometrie einer durch PBF-LB/M hergestellten Struktur bestimmt maßgeblich die Bauteilsteifigkeit und beeinflusst die thermischen Gradienten während der Herstellung und letztendlich die Eigenspannungen. Die Auswirkung kleinerer oder größerer Abmessungen (größer 10 mm) auf die Eigenspannungen wird derzeit oft nicht berücksichtigt. Um diesen Aspekt zu untersuchen, wurden repräsentative Probekörper mit unterschiedlichen Dicken und Längen hergestellt. Damit konnte der Einfluss der Geometrie bzw. Bauteilsteifigkeit auf die Eigenspannungen gezielt bewertet werden. Die Eigenspannungen wurden mittels Röntgen- als auch Neutronenbeugung bestimmt. Die Analyse der Eigenspannungen ergab, dass eine Erhöhung der Dicke zu insgesamt höheren Eigenspannungen führt. Zusätzlich wurde gezeigt, dass eine Vergrößerung der Probenabmessung zu kleineren Eigenspannungsgradienten führt. Oberhalb eines Schwellenwerts von wenigen Millimetern ändern sich die Eigenspannungen nicht mehr signifikant. Die sogenannte Zwischenlagenzeit (ILT) ist jedem PBF-LB/M-Bauauftrag inhärent und beeinflusst die thermischen Gradienten während der Herstellung und damit maßgeblich die Eigenspannungen. Ein Wanddickensprung in einer geometrisch komplexen Struktur bzw. einer Variation der Probenanzahl im Bauprozess führt unmittelbar zu einer Änderung der ILT. Um dies nachzubilden, wurden Proben mit unterschiedlichen ILT hergestellt. Die Eigenspannungen wurden mittels Röntgen- und Neutronenbeugung bestimmt. Die Verwendung einer kurzen ILT hat zu höheren Oberflächeneigenspannungen geführt, jedoch zu geringeren Volumeneigenspannungen. Hierbei zeigten die Oberflächeneigenspannungen und die Eigenspannungen im Volumen ein konträres Verhalten. Dies wurde auf die komplexe Wärmeleitung während des Prozesses zurückgeführt, wie die thermografischen Messungen zeigten. Um den Verzug der hergestellten Probekörper oder realen Bauteile bei der Abtrennung der Bauplatte oder in Nachbearbeitungsschritten zu vermeiden, wird in der Regel ein Spannungsarmglühen nach dem PBF-LB/M Prozess durchgeführt. Basierend auf Standards für die Wärmebehandlung von geschweißten austenitischen Stählen, wurden Wärmebehandlungen bei niedrigen (450 °C für vier Stunden) und hohen (800 °C bzw. 900 °C für eine Stunde) Temperaturen durchgeführt. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass die Wärmebehandlung bei 450 °C die Eigenspannungen um lediglich 5 % relaxierte. Diese geringe Relaxation ist auf die Stabilität der Zellstrukturen zurückzuführen. Die Hochtemperatur-Wärmebehandlung zeigte, dass 900 °C erforderlich sind, um die Zellstruktur aufzulösen und eine Relaxation von etwa 85 % zu erreichen. Dieses Ergebnis steht in guter Übereinstimmung mit den Standards für das Spannungsarmglühen geschweißter austenitischer Stähle. T3 - BAM Dissertationsreihe - 173 KW - Residual Stress KW - Powder Bed Fusion of Metals with Laser Beams KW - Austenitic Stainless Steel KW - Diffraction KW - Heat Treatment KW - Eigenspannungen KW - Pulverbettbasiertes Laserstrahlschmelzen KW - Austenitischer Rostfreier Stahl KW - Beugung KW - Wärmbehandlung PY - 2023 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:b43-579802 SN - 1613-4249 VL - 173 SP - 1 EP - 256 PB - Eigenverlag CY - Berlin AN - OPUS4-57980 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - CONF A1 - Evans, Alexander A1 - Sprengel, Maximilian A1 - Ulbricht, Alexander A1 - Kromm, Arne A1 - Mishurova, Tatiana A1 - Serrano-Munoz, Itziar A1 - Fritsch, Tobias A1 - Schröder, Jakob A1 - Kannengießer, Thomas A1 - Bruno, Giovanni T1 - Residual stresses Analysis in Additively Manufactured alloys using neutron diffraction (L-PBF) N2 - An overview of recent progress at BAM of residual stress analysis in additively manufactured, in particular Laser Powder Bed Fusion of metallics materials, using neutron diffraction will be presented. This will cover important topics of the stress-free reference, the diffraction elastic moduli and principal stress determination. T2 - AWT-Fachausschuss 13 "Eigenspannungen" CY - Berlin, Germany DA - 28.03.2023 KW - AGIL KW - Residual stress KW - Additive manufacturing KW - Laser Powder Bed Fusion KW - Diffraction PY - 2023 AN - OPUS4-59177 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - CONF A1 - Schröder, Jakob A1 - Evans, Alexander A1 - Polatidis, E. A1 - Čapek, J. A1 - Mohr, Gunther A1 - Serrano Munoz, Itziar A1 - Kromm, Arne A1 - Luzin, V. A1 - Bruno, Giovanni T1 - Fundamentals of diffraction-based residual stress and texture analysis of PBF-LB Inconel 718 N2 - Laser powder bed fusion (PBF-LB/M) of metallic alloys is a layer wise additive manufacturing process which provides significant scope for more efficient designs of components, benefiting performance and weight, leading to efficiency improvements for various sectors of industry. However, to benefit from these design freedoms, knowledge of the high produced induced residual stress and mechanical property anisotropy associated with the unique microstructures is critical. X-ray and neutron diffraction are considered the benchmark for non-destructive characterization of surface and bulk internal residual stress. The latter, characterized by the high penetration power in most engineering alloys, allows for the use of diffraction angle close to 90° enabling a near cubic sampling volume to be specified. However, the complex microstructures of columnar growth with inherent crystallographic texture typically produced during PBF-LB/M of metallics present significant challenges to the assumptions typically required for time efficient determination of residual stress. These challenges include the selection of an appropriate set of diffraction elastic constants and a representative strain-free reference for the material of interest. In this presentation advancements in the field of diffraction-based residual stress analysis of L-PBF Inconel 718 will be presented. The choice of an appropriate set of diffraction-elastic constants depending on the underlying microstructure will be described. T2 - MLZ User Meeting 2022 CY - Munich, Germany DA - 08.12.2022 KW - Diffraction KW - Residual Stress KW - Microstructure KW - Texture KW - Mechanical behavior PY - 2022 AN - OPUS4-56804 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER -