TY - JOUR A1 - Modena, Mario M. A1 - Rühle, Bastian A1 - Burg, Thomas P. A1 - Wuttke, Steffan T1 - Nanoparticle characterization: What to measure? JF - Advanced Materials N2 - What to measure? is a key question in nanoscience, and it is not straightforward to address as different physicochemical properties define a nanoparticle sample. Most prominent among these properties are size, shape, surface charge, and porosity. Today researchers have an unprecedented variety of measurement techniques at their disposal to assign precise numerical values to those parameters. However, methods based on different physical principles probe different aspects, not only of the particles themselves, but also of their preparation history and their environment at the time of measurement. Understanding these connections can be of great value for interpreting characterization results and ultimately controlling the nanoparticle structure–function relationship. Here, the current techniques that enable the precise measurement of these fundamental nanoparticle properties are presented and their practical advantages and disadvantages are discussed. Some recommendations of how the physicochemical parameters of nanoparticles should be investigated and how to fully characterize these properties in different environments according to the intended nanoparticle use are proposed. The intention is to improve comparability of nanoparticle properties and performance to ensure the successful transfer of scientific knowledge to industrial real‐world applications. KW - Nanoparticle characterization KW - Nanoparticles KW - Porosity KW - Shape KW - Size PY - 2019 DO - https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201901556 SN - 0935-9648 SN - 1521-4095 VL - 31 IS - 32 SP - 1901556, 1 EP - 26 PB - Wiley AN - OPUS4-49129 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - CONF A1 - Biegler, M. A1 - Wang, J. A1 - Graf, B. A1 - Rethmeier, Michael T1 - Automated tool-path generation for rapid manufacturing and numerical simulation of additive manufacturing LMD geometries T2 - ESTAD N2 - In additive manufacturing (AM) Laser Metal Deposition (LMD), parts are built by welding layers of powder feedstock onto a substrate. Applications for steel powders include forging tools and structural components for various industries. For large parts, the choice of tool-paths influences the build-rate, the part performance and the distortions in a highly geometry-dependent manner. With weld-path lengths in the range of hundreds of meters, a reliable, automated tool path generation is essential for the usability of LMD processes. In this contribution, automated tool-path generation approaches are shown and their results are discussed for arbitrary geometries. The investigated path strategies are the classical approaches: “Zig-zag-” and “contour-parallel-strategies”. After generation, the tool-paths are automatically formatted into g-code for experimental build-up and ASCII for a numerical simulation model. Finally, the tool paths are discussed in regards to volume-fill, microstructure and porosity for the experimental samples. This work presents a part of the IGF project 18737N “Welding distortion simulation” (FOSTA P1140) T2 - 4th European Steel Technology and Application Days CY - Dusseldorf, Germany DA - 24.06.2019 KW - Additive manufacturing KW - Directed Energy Deposition KW - Path planning KW - DED KW - Mechanical properties KW - Porosity PY - 2019 SP - 1 AN - OPUS4-50045 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Petrat, T. A1 - Brunner-Schwer, C. A1 - Graf, B. A1 - Rethmeier, Michael T1 - Microstructure of Inconel 718 parts with constant mass energy input manufactured with direct energy deposition JF - Procedia Manufacturing - ScienceDirect N2 - The laser-based direct energy deposition (DED) as a technology for additive manufacturing allows the production of near net shape components. Industrial applications require a stable process to ensure reproducible quality. Instabilities in the manufacturing process can lead to faulty components which do not meet the required properties. The DED process is adjusted by various parameters such as laser power, velocity, powder mass flow and spot diameter, which interact with each other. A frequently used comparative parameter in welding is the energy per unit length and is calculated from the laser power and the velocity in laser welding. The powder per unit length comparative parameter in the DED process has also be taken into account, because this filler material absorbs energy in addition to the base material. This paper deals with the influence of mass energy as a comparative parameter for determining the properties of additively manufactured parts. The same energy per unit length of 60 J/mm as well as the same powder per unit length of 7.2 mg/mm can be adjusted with different parameter sets. The energy per unit length and the powder per unit length determine the mass energy. The laser power is varied within the experiments between 400 W and 900 W. Energy per unit length and powder per unit length are kept constant by adjusting velocity and powder mass flow. Using the example of Inconel 718, experiments are carried out with the determined parameter sets. In a first step, individual tracks are produced and analyzed by means of micro section. The geometry of the tracks shows differences in height and width. In addition, the increasing laser power leads to a higher dilution of the base material. To determine the suitability of the parameters for additive manufacturing use, the individual tracks are used to build up parts with a square base area of 20x20 mm². An investigation by Archimedean principle shows a higher porosity with lower laser power. By further analysis of the micro sections, it can be seen that at low laser power, connection errors occur between the tracks. The results show that laser power, velocity and powder mass flow have to be considered in particular, because a constant mass energy can lead to different geometric as well as microscopic properties. KW - Direct energy deposition KW - Porosity KW - Inconel 718 KW - Additive manufacturing KW - Laser metal deposition PY - 2019 SN - 2351-9789 SP - 1 EP - 12 PB - Elsevier B.V. AN - OPUS4-50007 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - CONF A1 - Thiede, Tobias A1 - Farahbod, L. A1 - Serrano Munoz, Itziar A1 - Gollwitzer, Christian A1 - Léonard, Fabien A1 - Bruno, Giovanni T1 - µCT Surface Analysis of LBM Struts - Influence of the Build Angle N2 - In this work, the structural integrity of LBM fabricated IN625 small cylinders (d = 1 mm, h = 6 mm) was investigated regarding the porosity and the surface roughness by means of computed tomography. The measurements were carried out on a GE v|tome|x L 300/180 with a reconstructed voxel size of 2 µm. The pores were analyzed for size, shape and spatial distribution. The correlation between compactness C and spatial distribution showed that elongated pores (C < 0.2) appear exclusively within a distance of 80 µm to the sample surface. The reconstructed surface was digitally meshed and unwrapped to evaluate the mean roughness Ra. Since the gravity correlates linearly with the sine of the build angle, the influence of gravity on porosity and surface roughness was determined. T2 - iCT 2019 CY - Padua, Italien DA - 13.02.2019 KW - Additive Manufacturing KW - Laser Beam Melting KW - Selective Laser Melting KW - Computed Tomography KW - Roughness KW - Porosity KW - Build Angle PY - 2019 AN - OPUS4-47775 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER -