TY - JOUR A1 - Mirwald, Johannes A1 - Khalighi, Sadaf A1 - Varveri, Aikaterini A1 - Hofko, Bernhard A1 - Adwani, Dheeraj A1 - Cannone-Falchetto, Augusto A1 - Elwardany, Michael A1 - Kleiziené, Rita A1 - Konieczna, Katarzyna A1 - Maliszewski, Maciej A1 - Mouillet, Virginie A1 - Nahar, Sayeda A1 - Piérard, Nathalie A1 - Pipintakos, Georgios A1 - Porot, Laurent A1 - Primerano, Kristina A1 - Sharma, Aditi A1 - Tavassoti, Pejoohan A1 - Weigel, Sandra A1 - Wetekam, Jens A1 - Zhu, Jiqing T1 - Evaluating the reproducibility and consistency of different sample preparation techniques used for ATR-FTIR spectroscopy from the RILEM 295-FBB TG1 round robin test N2 - Attenuated Total Reflection Fourier Transform Infrared spectroscopy has become a popular spectroscopic technique in bituminous binder analysis. However, comparable results are not obtainable yet due to differences in devices, measurement routines, sample preparation procedures, and spectral evaluation. Thus, the Task Group 1 of the RILEM TC 295-FBB: “Fingerprinting bituminous binders using physicochemical analysis” focuses on bringing this method towards pre-standardization. This study evaluates the reproducibility and consistency from round robin test, where 21 participating laboratories performed six different preparation techniques on three different binders in an unaged, short-term, and long-term aged state. A total of 6461 spectra were recorded and evaluated for their mean, standard deviation and coefficient of variation (CV) in the spectral region between 1800 and 600 cm−1. The results show that the solid sample preparation methods provide excellent reproducibility, with a coefficient of variation below 2%. Only the solvent method showed a higher coefficient of variation at 7.18%. Outliers with a high CV were detected and categorized into two groups: one where only one of the four samples differed and the other where all 16 spectra showed slight scattering in the overall absorption. The consistency of the method is significantly influenced by the accuracy of sample preparation, which is crucial for minimizing differences in slope, baseline, and noise in the spectra. These findings show the excellent reproducibility of these sample preparation methods and will be further examined to establish universal indices for evaluating effects such as ageing, bringing the method closer towards standardization. KW - Bitumen KW - FTIR-Spektroskopie KW - Reproducibility KW - Round robin test KW - Material handling KW - preparation routine PY - 2025 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b43-645386 DO - https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-025-02755-1 SN - 1359-5997 VL - 58 IS - 8 SP - 1 EP - 21 PB - Springer Science and Business Media LLC AN - OPUS4-64538 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - RPRT A1 - Frost, K. A1 - Lüth, Peter A1 - Schmidt, Martin A1 - Simon, K. A1 - Uhlig, S. T1 - Interlaboratory test 2023 on the method DIN EN 15188:2021-07 "Determination of the spontaneous ignition behaviour of dust accumulations" - Final report of results N2 - The test method DIN EN 15188:2021-07 “Determination of the spontaneous ignition behaviour of dust accumulations” is applied to characterize the self-ignition behaviour of combustible dusts. The experimental basis for describing the self-ignition behaviour of a given dust is the determination of the self-ignition temperatures (TSI) of differently-sized volumes of the dust sample by isoperibolic hot storage experiments (storage at constant oven temperatures) in commercially available ovens. The results measured this way reflect the dependence of the self-ignition temperatures on the volume of a dust accumulation. Several internal investigations in the past (e.g. interlaboratory tests in 2010-2011 and 2015-2016) have shown significant differences between the lab-specific results of hot storage tests of the former version of the revised DIN EN 15188:2021-07 (DIN EN 15188:2007). Therefore, an improvement of the test method DIN EN 15188:2007 was necessary. After a rather long and extensive series of various improvements (methodological modifications), the interlaboratory test in 2015-2016 demonstrated an acceptable reliability of the test method and a satisfactory measurement uncertainty if the modifications described in the interlaboratory test are taken into account. On the basis of this interlaboratory test in 2015, this subsequently led to a revision of the standard, whereby, in addition to the methodological improvements, the measurement uncertainty to be taken into account could now also be specified for the first time in this standard. The revised DIN EN 15188:2021-07 was published in 2021 and can now be applied by laboratories. This report provides the laboratory results of the first interlaboratory test 2023 on the revised method DIN EN 15188:2021-07 and summarizes the results of the assessment of laboratory performance. KW - DIN EN 15188:2021-07 KW - Spontaneous ignition KW - Interlaboratory test KW - Round robin test KW - Proficiency test KW - Dangerous goods KW - Hazardous substances KW - Measurement uncertainty KW - Gefahrgut KW - Gefahrstoff KW - Qualitätssicherung KW - Ringversuch KW - Selbstentzündung KW - Staub KW - Dust PY - 2024 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b43-614560 SN - 978-3-9818564-6-0 DO - https://doi.org/10.26272/opus4-61456 SP - 1 EP - 51 PB - Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung (BAM) CY - Berlin ET - 1. AN - OPUS4-61456 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - CONF A1 - Reetz, U. T1 - Load- and path-controlled determination of bonding strength of butt joints - Comparison between tensile testing machine and centrifuge technology N2 - The round robin test proves that the CAT-Technology provides statistically indistinguishable test results compared to TTM. A supplement to DIN EN 15870 taking into account CAT-Technology (with reference to equivalent increases of load and displacement) as second normative test method appears to make sense. A presentation of a revision proposal at CEN TC 193 has been introduced with the decision to conduct a survey using the unchanged German revision proposal. T2 - EURADH 2021 - 13 th European Adhesion Conference CY - Online meeting DA - 11.10.2021 KW - CAT – Technology KW - Tensile testing machine (TTM) KW - Round robin test KW - Validation PY - 2021 AN - OPUS4-53948 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Lüth, Peter A1 - Frost, K. A1 - Kurth, Lutz A1 - Malow, Marcus A1 - Michael-Schulz, Heike A1 - Schmidt, Martin A1 - Schulte, Petra A1 - Uhlig, S. A1 - Zakel, S. T1 - CEQAT-DGHS Interlaboratory Test Programme for Chemical Safety - Need of Test Methods Validation N2 - Safety experts, manufacturers, suppliers, importers, employers or consumers must be able to rely on the validity of safety-related test methods and on correct test results and assessments in the laboratory. Via the eChemPortal lots of data from the REACH registration dossiers are available. However, the quality and correctness of the information remains in the responsibility of the data submitter. Unfortunately, we found more or less appropriate information on physicochemical properties and concluded that more quality or adequacy of any data submitted will be needed. Interlaboratory tests play a decisive role in assessing the reliability of test results. Interlaboratory tests on different test methods have been performed by Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und –prüfung (BAM) and Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB) in collaboration with the QuoData GmbH during the last 10 years. Significant differences between the results of the participating laboratories were observed in all interlaboratory tests. The deviations of the test results were not caused only by laboratory faults but also by deficiencies of the test method. In view of the interlaboratory test results the following conclusions can be drawn: • To avoid any discrepancy on classification and labelling of chemicals it should become state of the art to use validated test methods and the results accompanied by the measurement uncertainty. • A need for improvement is demonstrated for all examined test methods. Thus, interlaboratory tests shall initially aim at the development, improvement and validation of the test methods and not on proficiency tests. • The laboratory management and the practical execution of the tests need to be improved in many laboratories. • The term "experience of the examiner" must be seen critically: A "long experience with many tests" is not necessarily a guarantee for correct results. T2 - 16th International Symposium on Loss Prevention and Safety Promotion in the Process Industries and accompanying exhibition. Loss prevention 2019 CY - Delft, The Netherlands DA - 16.06.2019 KW - Dangerous goods KW - Hazardous substances KW - Round robin test KW - Interlaboratory comparison KW - Test method KW - Validation KW - Quality assurance PY - 2019 UR - https://www.aidic.it/cet/19/77/001.pdf SN - 978-88-95608-74-7 DO - https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1977001 SN - 2283-9216 VL - 77 SP - 1 EP - 6 PB - Italian Association of Chemical Engineering AN - OPUS4-49496 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - CONF A1 - Lüth, Peter T1 - CEQAT-DGHS Interlaboratory tests for method validation and measurement uncertainty determination N2 - An explosion in a chemical plant or a fire on a dangerous goods vessel - the reason for such accidents can be numerous. Prevention starts in the laboratory where chemicals are tested for their hazardous properties in order to be able to assess the risks involved in their handling. For this purpose, test methods have been developed and published. They are applied globally nowadays. Safety experts, manufacturers, suppliers, importers, employers or consumers must be able to rely on the validity of safety-related test methods and on correct test results and assessments in the laboratory. Interlaboratory tests play a decisive role in assessing the reliability of test results. Participation in interlaboratory tests is not only a crucial element of the quality assurance of laboratories; as such it is explicitly recommended in DIN EN ISO/IEC 17025. In addition, interlaboratory tests are also used to develop and validate test methods and can be used for the determination of the measurement uncertainty. Interlaboratory tests on different test methods have been performed by Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und –prüfung (BAM) and Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB) in collaboration with the QuoData GmbH during the last 10 years. Significant differences between the results of the participating laboratories were observed in all interlaboratory tests. The deviations of the test results were not caused only by laboratory faults but also by deficiencies of the test method (see interlaboratory test reports of the CEQAT-DGHS Centre for quality assurance for testing of dangerous goods and hazardous substances: www.ceqat-dghs.bam.de). In view of the interlaboratory test results the following conclusions can be drawn: • To avoid any discrepancy on classification and labelling of chemicals it should become state of the art to use validated test methods and the results accompanied by the measurement uncertainty. • A need for improvement is demonstrated for all examined test methods. Thus, interlaboratory tests shall initially aim at the development, improvement and validation of the test methods (including the determination of the measurement uncertainty) and not on proficiency tests. • The laboratory management and the practical execution of the tests need to be improved in many laboratories. • The term "experience of the examiner" must be seen critically: A "long experience with many tests" is not necessarily a guarantee for correct results. T2 - Eurachem International Workshop Uncertainty from sampling and analysis for accredited laboratories CY - Berlin, Germany DA - 19.11.2019 KW - Gefahrgut KW - Gefahrstoff KW - Ringversuch KW - Prüfmethode KW - Validierung KW - Qualitätssicherung KW - Messunsicherheit KW - Dangerous goods KW - Hazardous substances KW - Interlaboratory comparison KW - Quality assurance KW - Round robin test KW - Test method KW - Validation KW - Measurement uncertainty PY - 2019 UR - https://www.eurachem.org/index.php/events/completed/277-wks-mu2019#posters AN - OPUS4-49832 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - RPRT A1 - Brandes, E. A1 - Colson, B. A1 - Frost, K. A1 - Lüth, Peter A1 - Simon, K. A1 - Stolz, T. A1 - Uhlig, S. T1 - Evaluation of the interlaboratory test 2015 – 2016 on the method UN Test L.2 “Sustained combustibility test” / EN ISO 9038:2013 “Determination of sustained combustibility of liquids" N2 - The test methods UN Test L.2 / EN ISO 9038:2013 DIN EN 15188:2007 are applied to characterize the sustained combustibility of liquids i.e. the behaviour of a material under specified test conditions, whereby its vapour can be ignited by an ignition source and sufficient flammable vapour is produced to continue burning for at least 15 s after the source of ignition has been removed. The aims of this interlaboratory test (IT) are the verification and/or the improvement (if necessary) of the verification data (reference material) in Annex B of EN ISO 9038:2013, the assessment of influencing (disturbing) factors (laboratory specific factors, which possibly may have an influence on the test result) and the assessment of the performance of the participating laboratories. It could be demonstrated that the reference materials n-Dodecane, n-Decane and n-Undecane as mentioned in the standard are suitable and the verification shall continue to be valid. Sustained combustibility tests are influenced by several factors like the presence of a draught shield, the experience of the laboratory assistant, verification of the apparatus, calibration of the metering device. Based on the interlaboratory test, the gained experience and the actual results, well-founded measures / actions can be recommended to improve execution of the method. The IT was organized by PTB, BAM and QuoData GmbH in the framework of the co-operation project CEQAT-DGHS Centre for Quality Assurance for Testing of Dangerous Goods and Hazardous Substances. KW - Dangerous goods KW - Hazardous substances KW - Test method KW - Quality assurance KW - Interlaboratory comparison KW - Round robin test KW - Validation KW - Sustained combustibility KW - Reference material KW - Gefahrgut KW - Gefahrstoff KW - Prüfmethode KW - Qualitätssicherung KW - Ringversuch KW - Validierung KW - Selbstunterhaltende Verbrennung KW - Referenzmaterial PY - 2017 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b43-410270 SN - 978-3-9818270-3-3 SP - 1 EP - 103 PB - Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung (BAM) CY - Berlin AN - OPUS4-41027 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - RPRT A1 - Frost, K. A1 - Lüth, Peter A1 - Schmidt, Martin A1 - Simon, K. A1 - Uhlig, St. T1 - Evaluation of the interlaboratory test 2015-2016 on the method DIN EN 15188:2007 "Determination of the spontaneous ignition behaviour of dust accumulations" N2 - For the classification, safe handling and use of the chemicals, special standardized testing procedures have been developed and are used worldwide. Safety experts must be able to fully rely on the precise execution of the respective laboratory tests and assessments. In this context, interlaboratory tests are a crucial element of a laboratory's quality system. Participation in interlaboratory tests is explicitly recommended by the standard ISO/IEC 17025. The present document reports the results of the interlaboratory test 2015-2016, which was performed on the test method DIN EN 15188:2007 “Determination of the spontaneous ignition behaviour of dust accumulations”. It was organized by BAM in the frame of the co-operation project CEQAT-DGHS Centre for Quality Assurance for Testing of Dangerous Goods and Hazardous Substances. The test method DIN EN 15188:2007 is applied to characterize the self-ignition behaviour of combustible dusts. The experimental basis for describing the self-ignition behaviour of a given dust is the determination of the self-ignition temperatures (TSI) of differently-sized volumes of the dust sample by isoperibolic hot storage experiments (storage at constant oven temperatures) in commercially available ovens. The results measured this way reflect the dependence of the self-ignition temperatures on the volume of a dust accumulation. The interlaboratory test 2015-2016 on the method DIN EN 15188:2007 is the latest in a systematic stepwise built up series of method validation interlaboratory tests and internal laboratory investigations. The aim of this interlaboratory test was to determine measurement uncertainties of the modified method DIN EN 15188 for different substances, covering a sufficiently wide range of self-ignition behaviours in the scope of the DIN EN 15188 of the four basket test to extrapolate to storage volumes up to 1000 m³ and the single basket test for a basket volume of 1000 cm³. The precision of the four basket test and the single basket of the modified method DIN EN 15188 can be assessed as acceptable for the four sample materials investigated in the current interlaboratory test 2015-2016. It was possible to derive a functional equation for the measurement uncertainty U depending on the storage volume V. The measurement uncertainty cannot be ignored and must be considered, if TSI results should be used in practice. KW - Gefahrgut KW - Gefahrstoff KW - Ringversuch KW - Prüfmethode KW - Validierung KW - Qualitätssicherung KW - Messunsicherheit KW - Dangerous goods KW - Hazardous substances KW - Round robin test KW - Interlaboratory comparison KW - Test method KW - Validation KW - Measurement uncertainty PY - 2016 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b43-387343 SN - 978-3-9818270-0-2 SP - 1 EP - 106 PB - Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung (BAM) CY - Berlin AN - OPUS4-38734 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER -