TY - JOUR A1 - Baensch, Franziska A1 - Baer, Wolfram A1 - Wossidlo, Peter A1 - Habib, Abdel Karim T1 - Damage evolution detection in a pipeline segment under bending by means of acoustic emission N2 - A steel pipeline segment of 2.5 m length was subjected to quasi-static four-point bending load in three steps for studying the initial cracking and damage accumulation based on the Acoustic Emission (AE) technique and by the direct current potential drop (DCPD) technique. For the latter, a new post-test analysis method was established. AE is found more sensitive to crack initiation than DCPD. Formation of mesoscopic and macroscopic cracks as well as their closure and the resulting friction generate weighted peak frequencies below 400 kHz, whereas microscopic cracking produces AE with broad band spectra identifiable by weighted peak frequencies above 400 kHz. Critical states alike the maximum load level and the leak opening were accompanied by peak amplitudes above 85 dBAE. This rather fundamental study provides a data base for possibly developing advanced strategies of detection and alarm systems based on acoustic monitoring of pipelines, or at least, steel structures. KW - Crack KW - Accoustic emission KW - Frequency domain KW - Potential drop technique KW - Fracture PY - 2023 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b43-565171 DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2022.104863 SN - 0308-0161 VL - 201 IS - 104863 SP - 1 EP - 9 PB - Elsevier Science CY - Amsterdam AN - OPUS4-56517 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Krietsch, Arne A1 - Reyes Rodriguez, M. A1 - Kristen, A. A1 - Kadoke, D. A1 - Abbas, Z. A1 - Krause, U. T1 - Ignition temperatures and flame velocities of metallic nanomaterials N2 - The production of materials with dimensions in the nanometre range has continued to increase in recent years. In order to ensure safety when handling these products, the hazard potential of such innovative materials must be known. While several studies have already investigated the effects of explosions (such as maximum explosion pressure and maximum pressure rise) of powders with primary particles in the nanometre range, little is known about the ignition temperatures and flame velocities. Therefore, the minimum ignition temperature (MIT) of metallic nano powders (aluminium, iron, copper and zinc) was determined experimentally in a so called Godbert-Greenwald (GG) oven. Furthermore, the flame velocities were determined in a vertical tube. In order to better classify the test results, the tested samples were characterised in detail and the lower explosion limits of the tested dust samples were determined. Values for the burning velocity of aluminium nano powders are higher compared to values of micrometre powd ers (from literature). While MIT of nanometre aluminium powders is within the range of micrometre samples, MIT of zinc and copper nano powders is lower than values reported in literature for respective micrometre samples. KW - Dust explosions KW - Nanomaterial KW - Flame propagation KW - Minimum ignition temperature PY - 2021 DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2021.104482 SN - 0950-4230 VL - 2021 IS - 71 SP - 1 EP - 9 PB - Elsevier Ltd. AN - OPUS4-54076 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - CONF A1 - Krietsch, Arne A1 - Reyes Rodriguez, M. A1 - Kristen, A. A1 - Kadoke, D. A1 - Abbas, Z. A1 - Krause, U. T1 - Ignition temperatures and flame velocities of metallic nanomaterials N2 - The production of materials with dimensions in the nanometre range has continued to increase in recent years. In order to ensure safety when handling these products, the hazard potential of such innovative materials must be known. While several studies have already investigated the effects of explosions (such as maximum explosion pressure and maximum pressure rise) of powders with primary particles in the nanometre range, little is known about the ignition temperatures and flame velocities. Therefore, the minimum ignition temperature (MIT) of metallic nano powders (aluminium, iron, copper and zinc) was determined experimentally in a so called Godbert-Greenwald (GG) oven. Furthermore, the flame velocities were determined in a vertical tube. In order to better classify the test results, the tested samples were characterised in detail and the lower explosion limits of the tested dust samples were determined. Values for the burning velocity of aluminium nano powders are higher compared to values of micrometre powders (from literature). While MIT of nanometre aluminium powders is within the range of micrometre samples, MIT of zinc and copper nano powders is lower than values reported in literature for respective micrometre samples. T2 - 13th Symposium International Symposium on Hazards, Prevention and Mitigation of Industrial Explosions (ISHPMIE) CY - Online meeting DA - 27.07.2021 KW - Dust explosions KW - Nanomaterial KW - Flame propagation KW - Minimum ignition temperature PY - 2021 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b43-540930 DO - https://doi.org/10.7795/810.20200724 SP - 591 EP - 605 PB - Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt AN - OPUS4-54093 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Abdelkhalik, A. A1 - Askar, Enis A1 - Markus, D. A1 - Stolz, T. A1 - Brandes, E. A1 - Zakel, S. T1 - Explosion regions of 1,3-dioxolane/nitrous oxide and 1,3-dioxolane/air with different inert gases - Experimental data and numerical modelling N2 - In this study, experimental determination and modelling investigations for the explosion regions of 1,3-dioxolane/inert gas/N2O and 1,3-dioxolane/inert gas/air mixtures were carried out and compared. The experimental measurements were carried out at 338 K and atmospheric pressure according to EN1839 method T using the inert gases N2, CO2, He and Ar. The results showed that the ratio of the lower explosion limit in N2O (LELN2O) to the lower explosion limit in air (LELair) is 0.52 and the ratio of the maximum oxygen content in air (MOCair) to the limiting oxidizer fraction in nitrous oxide (LOFN2O) is 0.36 ± 0.02 independent of the inert gas. When comparing the inert gas amount at the apex based on the pure oxidizing component, which is O2 in case of air, N2O-containing mixtures need less inert gas to reach the limiting oxidizer quantity whereas the efficiency of inert gases is in the same order. The coefficients of nitrogen equivalency however were found to differ to some extent. The explosion regions of 1,3-dioxolane/inert gas/oxidizer mixtures were modelled using the calculated adiabatic flame temperature profile (CAFTP) method as well as corrected adiabatic flame temperatures. The results indicate good agreement with experimental data for CO2, N2 and Ar- containing mixtures. The noticeable deviations that occur when He is the inert gas are due to the lacking transport data of that mixture. KW - Explosion limits KW - Flammability KW - CAFTP KW - Adiabatic Flame Temperatures PY - 2021 DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2021.104496 SN - 0950-4230 VL - 71 SP - 4496 PB - Elsevier Ltd AN - OPUS4-52849 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Lüth, Peter A1 - Uhlig, S. A1 - Frost, K. A1 - Malow, Marcus A1 - Michael-Schulz, Heike A1 - Schmidt, Martin A1 - Zakel, Sabine T1 - CEQAT-DGHS interlaboratory tests for chemical safety: Validation of laboratory test methods by determining the measurement uncertainty and probability of incorrect classification including so-called “Shark profiles” N2 - Laboratory test results are of vital importance for correctly classifying and labelling chemicals as “hazardous” as defined in the UN Globally Harmonized System (GHS) / EC CLP Regulation or as “dangerous goods” as defined in the UN Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods. Interlaboratory tests play a decisive role in assessing the reliability of laboratory test results. Interlaboratory tests performed over the last 10 years have examined different laboratory test methods. After analysing the results of these interlaboratory tests, the following conclusions can be drawn: 1. There is a need for improvement and validation for all laboratory test methods examined. 2. To avoid any discrepancy concerning the classification and labelling of chemicals, the use of validated laboratory test methods should be state of the art, with the results accompanied by the measurement uncertainty and (if applicable) the probability of incorrect classification. This paper addresses the probability of correct/incorrect classification (for example, as dangerous goods) on the basis of the measurement deviation obtained from interlaboratory tests performed by the Centre for quality assurance for testing of dangerous goods and hazardous substances (CEQAT-DGHS) to validate laboratory test methods. This paper outlines typical results (e.g. so-called “Shark profiles” – the probability of incorrect classification as a function of the true value estimated from interlaboratory test data) as well as general conclusions and steps to be taken to guarantee that laboratory test results are fit for purpose and of high quality. T2 - 13th International Symposium on Hazards, Prevention and Mitigation of Industrial Explosions (ISHPMIE 2020) CY - Brunswick, Germany DA - 27.07.2020 KW - Dangerous goods KW - Hazardous substances KW - Interlaboratory test KW - Test method KW - Validation KW - Quality assurance KW - Measurement uncertainty KW - Incorrect classification KW - Shark profiles PY - 2021 DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2021.104532 SN - 0950-4230/ VL - 72 SP - 104532 PB - Elsevier Ltd. AN - OPUS4-52751 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Wilrich, Cordula A1 - Brandes, E. A1 - Michael-Schulz, Heike A1 - Schröder, Volkmar A1 - Schwarz, Silke T1 - Classification of chemicals according to UN-GHS and EU-CLP: A review of physical hazard classes and their intricate interfaces to transport and former EU legislation N2 - The Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (UN-GHS) is being implemented in more and more countries all over the world; the EU has done so with the CLP-Regulation (EU-CLP). Compared to the undeniably important questions on health and environmental hazards, the classification of physical hazards of chemicals often has not been in the focus, although their implementation can be challenging and there are traps and pitfalls to be avoided. The following overview of the classification systematics for physical hazards aims at a principle understanding without detailing all criteria or test methods. Similarities and differences between the classification systems of the UN-GHS and EU-CLP, the transport of dangerous goods and the former EU system are reviewed with regard to the physical hazard classes. Available physical hazard classifications for the transport of dangerous goods and according to the former EU system can be used as available information when classifying according to the GHS. However, the interfaces of these classification systems and their limitations have to be understood well when concluding on GHS/CLP classifications. This applies not only to industry when applying CLP but especially to legislators when adapting legislation that in one way or another refers to the classification of chemicals. KW - Chemicals classification KW - Globally harmonized system of classification and labelling of chemicals KW - Hazardous chemicals KW - Physical hazards KW - UN-GHS KW - EU-CLP KW - CLP-regulation PY - 2018 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b43-450012 UR - https://osjournal.org/ojs/index.php/OSJ/article/view/1389 DO - https://doi.org/10.23954/osj.v3i2.1389 SN - 2466-4308 VL - 3 IS - 2 SP - 1 EP - 24 PB - NVO Start CY - Temerin AN - OPUS4-45001 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Szypkowski, Marko T1 - Abriss von Flaschenventilen bei Atemluftflaschen N2 - Beim Abreißen von Flaschenventilen an Druckgasflaschen wird sehr viel Energie frei. Im Beitrag wird auf Unfälle im Zusammenhang mit Atemschutzgeräten und der Prävention eingegangen. KW - Flaschenventile KW - Atemschutz KW - Tauchen KW - Druck KW - Ventile PY - 2018 VL - 52 IS - 1 SP - 10 EP - 15 PB - Landesverband der Freiwilligen Feuerwehren Südtirols CY - Vilpian AN - OPUS4-44665 LA - deu AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - CONF A1 - Schröder, Volkmar A1 - Wilrich, Cordula T1 - Aktuelles zu Gasen und Gasgemischen in ISO 10156 und im Globally Harmonized System (GHS) N2 - Im Vortrag wird eine Übersicht über die Behandlung der Gase im internationalen sicherheitstechnischen Regelwerk gegeben. Insbesondere werden neue Regelungen im GHS im Jahr 2017, z. B. die neue Klassifizierung im Hinblick auf die Entzündbarkeit vorgestellt. Darüber hinaus wird die bei UN-GHS vorgeschlagene Implementierung der "Chemikalien unter Druck" gezeigt. T2 - 25. Jahrestreffen BAM/DIN/DVFG/IGV CY - Berlin, Germany DA - 21.02.2018 KW - UN-GHS KW - Klassifizierung KW - Gefahrstoff KW - Entzündbarkeit KW - Chemikalien unter Druck PY - 2018 AN - OPUS4-44624 LA - deu AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - CONF A1 - Baensch, Franziska A1 - Hüsken, Götz A1 - Pirskawetz, Stephan A1 - Gründer, Klaus-Peter A1 - Kadoke, Daniel A1 - Baer, Wolfram A1 - Wossidlo, Peter A1 - Homann, Tobias A1 - Prager, Jens A1 - Stajanca, Pavol A1 - Habib, Abdel Karim A1 - Zauner, Michaela A1 - Sause, Markus G. R. A1 - Vergeynst, Lidewei A1 - Brunner, Andreas J. A1 - Niemz, Peter T1 - Acoustic emission testing N2 - The phenomenon of acoustic emission (AE) and fundamentals of AE testing procedures are presented. AE based failure analysis of reinforced concrete beam under bending load, steel pipe segments under bending load and wood based materials under tension load are discussed. T2 - INFRASTAR, Training Week #03 at AAU CY - Aalborg, Denmark DA - 04.06.2018 KW - Acoustic emission PY - 2018 AN - OPUS4-45147 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Abdelkhalik, A. A1 - Askar, Enis A1 - Markus, D. A1 - Brandes, E. A1 - Stolz, T. T1 - Explosion regions of acetone and alcohol/inert gas/air mixtures at high temperatures and atmospheric pressure N2 - The explosion regions of 1-propanol, 2-propanol, acetone and 1-butanol in air were measured in the presence of CO2, He, N2 and Ar in accordance with EN1839 method T at high temperatures and at atmospheric pressure. The experimental results show that 1-propanol, 2-propanol and acetone have very similar lower explosion limits (LELs). 1-Butanol shows a slightly wider explosion area near the LEL line. In addition, the explosion regions of all combustible/inert gas/air mixtures were calculated with the method of constant adiabatic flame temperature profiles (CAFTP), using the flame temperature profile along the explosion region boundary curve of each combustible/N2/air mixture as a reference to determine the explosion regions of combustible/inert gas/air mixtures with inert gases other than N2 at different initial temperatures. To calculate the explosion regions for systems containing He, the calculation method was modified to include the very different physical transport properties of He. Moreover, the procedure for calculating the apexes in the ternary explosion diagrams was modified. The calculation results show good agreement with the experimental results. KW - Explosion limits KW - Elevated temperatures KW - Alcohols KW - CAFTP KW - Acetone PY - 2019 DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2019.103958 SN - 0950-4230 VL - 62 SP - 103958, 1 EP - 8 PB - Elsevier AN - OPUS4-49030 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER -