TY - JOUR A1 - Oster, Simon A1 - Scheuschner, Nils A1 - Chand, Keerthana A1 - Altenburg, Simon T1 - Local porosity prediction in metal powder bed fusion using in-situ thermography: A comparative study of machine learning techniques N2 - The formation of flaws such as internal porosity in parts produced by Metal-based Powder Bed Fusion with Laser Beam (PBF-LB/M) significantly hinders its broader industrial application, as porosity can potentially lead to part failure. Addressing this issue, this study explores the efficacy of in-situ thermography, particularly short-wave infrared thermography, for detecting and predicting porosity during manufacturing. This technique is capable of monitoring the part’s thermal history which is closely connected to the flaw formation process. Recent advancements in Machine Learning (ML) have been increasingly leveraged for porosity prediction in PBF-LB/M. However, previous research primarily focused on global rather than localized porosity prediction which simplified the complex prediction task. Thereby, the opportunity to correlate the predicted flaw position with expected part strain to judge the severity of the flaw for part performance is neglected. This study aims to bridge this gap by studying the potential of SWIR thermography for predicting local porosity levels using regression models. The models are trained on data from two identical HAYNES®282® specimens. We compare the effectiveness of feature-based and raw data-based models in predicting different porosity types and examine the importance of input data in porosity prediction. We show that models trained on SWIR thermogram data can identify systematic trends in local flaw formation. This is demonstrated for forced flaw formation using process parameter shifts and, moreover, for randomly formed flaws in the specimen bulk. Furthermore, we identify features of high importance for the prediction of lack-of-fusion and keyhole porosity from SWIR monitoring data. KW - PBF-LB/M KW - In situ monitoring KW - Thermography KW - Additive Manufacturing KW - Process monitoring KW - Porosity prediction KW - Machine Learning KW - Feature extraction PY - 2024 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b43-621798 DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2024.104502 SN - 2214-7810 VL - 95 SP - 1 EP - 17 PB - Elsevier B.V. AN - OPUS4-62179 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Altenburg, Simon A1 - Straße, Anne A1 - Gumenyuk, Andrey A1 - Maierhofer, Christiane T1 - In-situ monitoring of a laser metal deposition (LMD) process: comparison of MWIR, SWIR and high-speed NIR thermography N2 - Additive manufacturing offers a range of novel applications. However, the manufacturing process is complex and the production of almost defect-free parts with high reliability and durability is still a challenge. Thermography is a valuable tool for process surveillance, especially in metal additive manufacturing processes. The high process temperatures allow one to use cameras usually operating in the visible spectral range. Here, we compare the results of measurements during the manufacturing process of a commercial laser metal deposition setup using a mid wavelength infrared camera with those from a short wavelength infrared camera and those from a visual spectrum high-speed camera with band pass filter in the near infrared range. KW - Additive Manufacturing KW - Process monitoring KW - Thermography KW - LMD KW - Metal KW - MWIR KW - SWIR KW - NIR PY - 2020 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b43-516318 DO - https://doi.org/10.1080/17686733.2020.1829889 VL - 19 IS - 2 SP - 97 EP - 114 PB - Taylor & Francis Group CY - London, UK AN - OPUS4-51631 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Maierhofer, Christiane A1 - Altenburg, Simon A1 - Scheuschner, Nils ED - Meyendorf, N. ED - Ida, N. ED - Singh, R. ED - Vrana, J. T1 - In Situ Real-Time Monitoring Versus Post NDE for Quality Assurance of Additively Manufactured Metal Parts N2 - In this chapter, the current state-of-the-art of in situ monitoring and in situ NDE methods in additive manufacturing is summarized. The focus is set on methods, which are suitable for making statements about the quality and usability of a component currently being manufactured. This includes methods which can be used to determine state properties like temperature or density, other physical properties like electrical or thermal conductivity, the microstructure, the chemical composition, the actual geometry, or which enable the direct detection of defects like cracks, voids, delaminations, or inclusions. Thus, optical, thermographic, acoustic, and electromagnetic methods, as well as methods being suitable for investigating particle and fume emission are presented. The requirements of in situ monitoring methods with a focus on thermographic methods are discussed by considering different additive manufacturing processes like laser powder bed fusion (PBF-LB/M) and direct energy deposition (DED-LB/M). Examples of the successful implementation and applications of such monitoring methods at BAM are given. The in situ monitoring and NDE methods are compared against post-process NDE methods. The advantages and challenges of in situ methods concerning real-time data analysis and the application of AI algorithms are addressed and discussed. KW - Additive manufacturing KW - In situ monitoring KW - In situ NDE KW - Post NDE KW - Thermography KW - Laser powder bed fusion KW - Direct energy deposition PY - 2021 SN - 978-3-030-48200-8 DO - https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48200-8_51-1 SP - 1 EP - 37 PB - Springer Nature Switzerland AG CY - Cham, Switzerland ET - 1 AN - OPUS4-52824 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - CONF A1 - Altenburg, Simon A1 - Scheuschner, Nils A1 - Straße, Anne A1 - Gumenyuk, Andrey A1 - Maierhofer, Christiane T1 - Towards the determination of real process temperatures in the LMD process by multispectral thermography N2 - Due to the rapid thermal cycles involved in additive manufacturing of metals, high internal stresses and peculiar microstructures occur, which influence the parts mechanical properties. To systematically examine their formation, in-process measurements of the temperature are needed. Since the part emissivity is strongly inhomogeneous and rapidly changing in the process, the applicability of thermography for the determination of thermodynamic temperatures is limited. Measuring the thermal radiation in different wavelengths simultaneously, temperature and emissivity can be separated. Here, we present results of a preliminary study using multispectral thermography to obtain real temperatures and emissivities in directed energy deposition (DED) processes. T2 - Thermosense: Thermal Infrared Applications XLIII CY - Online meeting DA - 12.04.2021 KW - Additive Manufacturing KW - Process monitoring KW - Multispectral thermography KW - Laser metal deposition KW - TES KW - LMD KW - Temperature emissivity separation PY - 2021 DO - https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2587881 VL - 2021 SP - 77 EP - 83 PB - SPIE AN - OPUS4-52516 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - CONF A1 - Altenburg, Simon T1 - Introduction to ProMoAM N2 - A brief introduction to the project ProMoAM is given. T2 - 2nd Workshop on In-situ Monitoring and Microstructure Development in Additive Manufactured Alloys CY - Online meeting DA - 19.04.2021 KW - Additive Manufacturing KW - Process monitoring KW - ProMoAM PY - 2021 AN - OPUS4-52513 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - CONF A1 - Altenburg, Simon T1 - Unraveling thermal radiation by multispectral thermography: Real temperatures in LMD N2 - Additive manufacturing of metals offers the opportunity to build parts with a high degree of complexity without additional costs, opening a new space for design optimization. However, the processes are highly complex and due to the rapid thermal cycles involved, high internal stresses and peculiar microstructures occur, which influence the parts mechanical properties. To systematically examine the formation of internal stresses and the microstructure, in-process spatially resolved measurements of the part temperature are needed. If the emissivity of the inspected part is known, its thermodynamic temperature can be reconstructed by a suited radiometric model. However, in additive manufacturing of metals, the emissivity of the part surface is strongly inhomogeneous and rapidly changing due to variations of, e.g., the degree of oxidation, the material state and temperature. Thus, here, the applicability of thermography in the determination of thermodynamic temperatures is limited. However, measuring the process thermal radiation at different wavelengths simultaneously enables one to separate temperature and emissivity spatially resolved to obtain further insight into the process. Here, we present results of an initial study using multispectral thermography to obtain real temperatures and emissivities in the powderfree LMD process. T2 - 2nd Workshop on In-situ Monitoring and Microstructure Development in Additive Manufactured Alloys CY - Online meeting DA - 19.04.2021 KW - Additive Manufacturing KW - Process monitoring KW - Multispectral thermography KW - Laser metal deposition KW - TES KW - LMD KW - Temperature emissivity separation PY - 2021 AN - OPUS4-52514 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - CONF A1 - Altenburg, Simon T1 - Towards the determination of real process temperatures in the LMD process my multispectral thermography N2 - Due to the rapid thermal cycles involved in additive manufacturing of metals, high internal stresses and peculiar microstructures occur, which influence the parts mechanical properties. To systematically examine their formation, in-process measurements of the temperature are needed. Since the part emissivity is strongly inhomogeneous and rapidly changing in the process, the applicability of thermography for the determination of thermodynamic temperatures is limited. Measuring the thermal radiation in different wavelengths simultaneously, temperature and emissivity can be separated. Here, we present results of a preliminary study using multispectral thermography to obtain real temperatures and emissivities in directed energy deposition (DED) processes. T2 - Thermosense: Thermal Infrared Applications XLIII CY - Online meeting DA - 12.04.2021 KW - Additive Manufacturing KW - Process monitoring KW - Multispectral thermography KW - Laser metal deposition KW - TES KW - LMD KW - Temperature emissivity separation PY - 2021 DO - https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2587881 AN - OPUS4-52515 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - CONF A1 - Altenburg, Simon T1 - Improving additive manufacturing technologies by in-situ monitoring: Thermography N2 - Additive manufacturing of metals gains increasing relevance in the industrial field for part production. However, especially for safety relevant applications, a suitable quality assurance is needed. A time and cost efficient route to achieve this goal is in-situ monitoring of the build process. Here, the BAM project ProMoAM (Process monitoring in additive manufacturing) is briefly introduced and recent advances of BAM in the field of in-situ monitoring of the L-PBF and the LMD process using thermography are presented. T2 - Anwenderkonferenz Infratec GmbH CY - Online meeting DA - 04.11.2021 KW - Additive Manufacturing KW - Process monitoring KW - Thermography PY - 2021 AN - OPUS4-54026 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - CONF A1 - Altenburg, Simon T1 - Process monitoring in metal AM @ BAM - The project ProMoAM N2 - Results of the project ProMoAM (Process monitoring in additive manufacturing) presented. Results from in-situ eddy current testing, optical emission spectroscopy, thermography, optical tomography as well as particle and gas emission spectroscopy are summarized and correlated to results from computed tomography for future in-situ defect detection. T2 - 3rd Meeting of WG6 (NDT in AM) of the EFNDT CY - Online meeting DA - 15.03.2022 KW - Additive Manufacturing KW - Process monitoring KW - ProMoAM PY - 2022 AN - OPUS4-54484 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - CONF A1 - Altenburg, Simon T1 - Towards hyperspectral in-situ temperature measurement in metal additive manufacturing N2 - The industrial use of additive manufacturing for the production of metallic parts with high geometrical complexity and lot sizes close to one is rapidly increasing as a result of mass individualisation and applied safety relevant constructions. However, due to the high complexity of the production process, it is not yet fully understood and controlled, especially for changing (lot size one) part geometries. Due to the thermal nature of the Laser-powder bed fusion (L-PBF) process – where parts are built up layer-wise by melting metal powder via laser - the properties of the produced part are strongly governed by its thermal history. Thus, a promising route for process monitoring is the use of thermography. However, the reconstruction of temperature information from thermographic data relies on the knowledge of the surface emissivity at each position on the part. Since the emissivity is strongly changing during the process due to phase changes, great temperature gradients, possible oxidation, and other potential influencing factors, the extraction of real temperature data from thermographic images is challenging. While the temperature development in and around the melt pool, where melting and solidification occur is most important for the development of the part properties. Also, the emissivity changes are most severe in this area, rendering the temperature deduction most challenging. A possible route to overcome the entanglement of temperature and emissivity in the thermal radiation is the use of hyperspectral imaging in combination with temperature emissivity separation (TES) algorithms. As a first step towards the combined temperature and emissivity determination in the L-PBF process, here, we use a hyperspectral line camera system operating in the short-wave infrared region (0.9 µm to 1.7 µm) to measure the spectral radiance emitted. In this setup, the melt pool of the L-PBF process migrates through the camera’s 1D field of view, so that the radiation intensities are recorded simultaneously for multiple different wavelength ranges in a spatially resolved manner. At sufficiently high acquisition frame rate, an effective melt pool image can be reconstructed. Using the grey body approximation (emissivity is independent of the wavelength), a first, simple TES is performed, and the resulting emissivity and temperature values are compared to literature values. Subsequent work will include reference measurements of the spectral emissivity in different states allowing its analytical parametrisation as well as the adaption and optimisation of the TES algorithms. An illustration of the proposed method is shown in Fig.1. The investigated method will allow to gain a deeper understanding of the L-PBF process, e.g., by quantitative validation of simulation results. Additionally, the results will provide a data basis for the development of less complex and cheaper sensor technologies for L-PBF in-process monitoring (or for related process), e.g., by using machine learning. T2 - 21st International Conference on Photoacoustic and Photothermal Phenomena CY - Bled, Slovenia DA - 19.06.2022 KW - Thermography KW - Additive manufacturing KW - L-PBF KW - Hyperspectral PY - 2022 AN - OPUS4-55152 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - CONF A1 - Oster, Simon A1 - Scheuschner, Nils A1 - Chand, Keerthana A1 - Breese, Philipp Peter A1 - Becker, Tina A1 - Heinrichsdorff, F. A1 - Altenburg, Simon T1 - From Thermographic In-situ Monitoring to Porosity Detection – A Deep Learning Framework for Quality Control in Laser Powder Bed Fusion N2 - In this study, we present an enhanced deep learning framework for the prediction of porosity based on thermographic in-situ monitoring data of laser powder bed fusion processes. The manufacturing of two cuboid specimens from Haynes 282 (Ni-based alloy) powder was monitored by a short-wave infrared camera. We use thermogram feature data and x-ray computed tomography data to train a convolutional neural network classifier. The classifier is used to perform a multi-class prediction of the spatially resolved porosity level in small sub-volumes of the specimen bulk. T2 - SMSI - Sensor and Measurement Science International 2023 CY - Nürnberg, Germany DA - 08.05.2023 KW - Porosity KW - Laser powder bed fusion KW - In-situ monitoring KW - Thermography KW - Machine Learning PY - 2023 UR - https://www.ama-science.org/proceedings/details/4404 DO - https://doi.org/10.5162/SMSI2023/C5.4 SP - 179 EP - 180 AN - OPUS4-57616 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Mohr, Gunther A1 - Sommer, Konstantin A1 - Knobloch, Tim A1 - Altenburg, Simon A1 - Recknagel, Sebastian A1 - Bettge, Dirk A1 - Hilgenberg, Kai T1 - Process Induced Preheating in Laser Powder Bed Fusion Monitored by Thermography and Its Influence on the Microstructure of 316L Stainless Steel Parts N2 - Undetected and undesired microstructural variations in components produced by laser powder bed fusion are a major challenge, especially for safety-critical components. In this study, an in-depth analysis of the microstructural features of 316L specimens produced by laser powder bed fusion at different levels of volumetric energy density and different levels of inter layer time is reported. The study has been conducted on specimens with an application relevant build height (>100 mm). Furthermore, the evolution of the intrinsic preheating temperature during the build-up of specimens was monitored using a thermographic in-situ monitoring set-up. By applying recently determined emissivity values of 316L powder layers, real temperatures could be quantified. Heat accumulation led to preheating temperatures of up to about 600 °C. Significant differences in the preheating temperatures were discussed with respect to the individual process parameter combinations, including the build height. A strong effect of the inter layer time on the heat accumulation was observed. A shorter inter layer time resulted in an increase of the preheating temperature by more than a factor of 2 in the upper part of the specimens compared to longer inter layer times. This, in turn, resulted in heterogeneity of the microstructure and differences in material properties within individual specimens. The resulting differences in the microstructure were analyzed using electron back scatter diffraction and scanning electron microscopy. Results from chemical analysis as well as electron back scatter diffraction measurements indicated stable conditions in terms of chemical alloy composition and austenite phase content for the used set of parameter combinations. However, an increase of the average grain size by more than a factor of 2.5 could be revealed within individual specimens. Additionally, differences in feature size of the solidification cellular substructure were examined and a trend of increasing cell sizes was observed. This trend was attributed to differences in solidification rate and thermal gradients induced by differences in scanning velocity and preheating temperature. A change of the thermal history due to intrinsic preheating could be identified as the main cause of this heterogeneity. It was induced by critical combinations of the energy input and differences in heat transfer conditions by variations of the inter layer time. The microstructural variations were directly correlated to differences in hardness. KW - Additive manufacturing KW - Laser powder bed fusion KW - In-situ process monitoring KW - Thermography KW - Heat accumulation KW - Inter layer time KW - Cellular substructure PY - 2021 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b43-529240 DO - https://doi.org/10.3390/met11071063 VL - 11 IS - 7 SP - 1063 PB - MDPI CY - Basel, Schweiz AN - OPUS4-52924 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Becker, Tina A1 - Breese, Philipp Peter A1 - Metz, Christian A1 - Altenburg, Simon T1 - In-situ monitoring for PBF-LB/M processes: Does multispectral optical tomography add value in recognizing process deviations? N2 - Laser powder bed fusion of metallic components (PBF-LB/M) is gaining acceptance in industry. However, the high costs and lengthy qualification processes required for printed components create the need for more effective in-situ monitoring and testing methods. This article proposes multispectral Optical Tomography (OT) as a new approach for monitoring the PBF-LB/M process. Compared to other methods, OT is a low-cost process monitoring method that uses long-time exposure imaging to observe the build process. However, it lacks time resolution compared to expensive thermographic sensor systems. Monochromatic OT (1C-OT) is already commercially available and observes the building process layer-wise using a single wavelength window in the NIR range. Multispectral OT (nC-OT) utilizes a similar setup but can measure multiple wavelength ranges per location simultaneously. By comparing the classical 1C-OT and nC-OT approaches, this article examines the advantages of nC-OT (two channel OT and RGB-OT) in reducing the false positive rate for process deviations and approximating maximum temperatures for a better comparison between different build processes and materials. This could ultimately reduce costs and time for part qualification. The main goal of this contribution is to assess the advantages of nC-OT compared to 1C-OT for in-situ process monitoring of PBF-LB/M. T2 - Nolamp 2023 CY - Turku, Finland DA - 22.08.2023 KW - Thermography KW - Process Monitoring KW - Additive manufacturing KW - BPF-LB/M KW - In-situ PY - 2023 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b43-592498 DO - https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1296/1/012008 VL - 1296 SP - 1 EP - 11 PB - IOP Publishing CY - Bristol, UK AN - OPUS4-59249 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Oster, Simon A1 - Scheuschner, Nils A1 - Chand, Keerthana A1 - Altenburg, Simon A1 - Gerlach, G. T1 - Potentials and challenges of deep-learning-assisted porosity prediction based on thermographic in-situ monitoring in laser powder bed fusion N2 - Laser powder bed fusion is one of the most promising additive manufacturing techniques for printing complex-shaped metal components. However, the formation of subsurface porosity poses a significant risk to the service lifetime of the printed parts. In-situ monitoring offers the possibility to detect porosity already during manufacturing. Thereby, process feedback control or a manual process interruption to cut financial losses is enabled. Short-wave infrared thermography can monitor the thermal history of manufactured parts which is closely connected to the probability of porosity formation. Artificial intelligence methods are increasingly used for porosity prediction from the obtained large amounts of complex monitoring data. In this study, we aim to identify the potential and the challenges of deep-learning-assisted porosity prediction based on thermographic in-situ monitoring. Therefore, the porosity prediction task is studied in detail using an exemplary dataset from the manufacturing of two Haynes282 cuboid components. Our trained 1D convolutional neural network model shows high performance (R² score of 0.90) for the prediction of local porosity in discrete sub-volumes with dimensions of (700 x 700 x 40) μm³. It could be demonstrated that the regressor correctly predicts layer-wise porosity changes but presumably has limited capability to predict differences in local porosity. Furthermore, there is a need to study the significance of the used thermogram feature inputs to streamline the model and to adjust the monitoring hardware. Moreover, we identified multiple sources of data uncertainty resulting from the in-situ monitoring setup, the registration with the ground truth X-ray-computed tomography data and the used pre-processing workflow that might influence the model’s performance detrimentally. T2 - XXXVII. Messtechnisches Symposium 2023 CY - Freiburg, Germany DA - 27.09.2023 KW - Porosity prediction KW - Defect detection KW - Laser powder bed fusion (PBF-LB/M, L-PBF) KW - Selective laser melting KW - Thermography KW - Machine learning PY - 2023 DO - https://doi.org/10.1515/teme-2023-0062 SN - 0171-8096 SN - 2196-7113 VL - 90 SP - 85 EP - 96 PB - De Gruyter CY - Berlin AN - OPUS4-58366 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Becker, Tina A1 - Altenburg, Simon A1 - Scheuschner, Nils A1 - Breese, Philipp Peter A1 - Metz, C. A1 - Hilgenberg, Kai A1 - Maierhofer, Christiane T1 - In-situ monitoring of the Laser Powder Bed Fusion build process via bi- chromatic optical tomography N2 - As metal additive manufacturing (AM) is entering industrial serial production of safety relevant components, the need for reliable process qualification is growing continuously. Especially in strictly regulated industries, such as aviation, the use of AM is strongly dependent on ensuring consistent quality of components. Because of its numerous influencing factors, up to now, the metal AM process is not fully controllable. Today, expensive part qualification processes for each single component are common in industry. This contribution focusses on bi-chromatic optical tomography as a new approach for AM in-situ quality control. In contrast to classical optical tomography, the emitted process radiation is monitored simultaneously with two temperature calibrated cameras at two separate wavelength bands. This approach allows one to estimate the local maximum temperatures during the manufacturing process, thus increases the comparability of monitoring data of different processes. A new process information level at low investment cost is reachable, compared to, e.g., infrared thermography. T2 - LANE 2022 CY - Fürth, Germany DA - 04.08.2022 KW - Optical tomography KW - Additive Manufacturing KW - L-PBF KW - In-process monitoring PY - 2022 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b43-560270 DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2022.08.035 SN - 2212-8271 VL - 111 SP - 340 EP - 344 PB - Elsevier B.V. CY - Amsterdam AN - OPUS4-56027 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - CONF A1 - Breese, Philipp Peter A1 - Becker, Tina A1 - Oster, Simon A1 - Metz, C. A1 - Altenburg, Simon T1 - In-situ defect detection via active laser thermographic testing for PBF-LB/M N2 - Great complexity characterizes Additive Manufacturing (AM) of metallic components via laser powder bed fusion (PBF-LB/M). Due to this, defects in the printed components (like cracks and pores) are still common. Monitoring methods are commercially used, but the relationship between process data and defect formation is not well understood yet. Furthermore, defects and deformations might develop with a temporal delay to the laser energy input. The component’s actual quality is consequently only determinable after the finished process. To overcome this drawback, thermographic in-situ testing is introduced. The defocused process laser is utilized for nondestructive testing performed layer by layer throughout the build process. The results of the defect detection via infrared cameras are shown for a research PBF-LB/M machine. This creates the basis for a shift from in-situ monitoring towards in-situ testing during the AM process. Defects are detected immediately inside the process chamber, and the actual component quality is determined. T2 - Lasers in Manufacturing (LiM) CY - Munich, Germany DA - 26.06.2023 KW - Additive manufacturing KW - Laser powder bed fusion KW - Nondestructive testing KW - Laser thermography KW - Defect detection PY - 2023 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b43-585060 SP - 1 EP - 10 PB - Wissenschaftliche Gesellschaft Lasertechnik und Photonik (WLT) CY - Hannover AN - OPUS4-58506 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Becker, Tina A1 - Stark, T. A1 - Arduini, M. A1 - Manara, J. A1 - Altenburg, Simon T1 - Knowing the spectral directional emissivity of 316L and AlSi10Mg PBF-LB/M surfaces: Gamechanger for quantitative in situ monitoring N2 - For a deep process understanding of the laser powder bed fusion process (PBF-LB/M), recording of the occurring surface temperatures is of utmost interest and would help to pave the way for reliable process monitoring and quality assurance. A notable number of approaches for in-process monitoring of the PBF-LB/M process focus on the monitoring of thermal process signatures. However, due to the elaborate calibration effort and the lack of knowledge about the occurring spectral directional emissivity, only a few approaches attempt to measure real temperatures. In this study, to gain initial insights into occurring in the PBF-LB/M process, measurements on PBF-LB/M specimens and metal powder specimens were performed for higher temperatures up to T = 1290 °C by means of the emissivity measurement apparatus (EMMA) of the Center for Applied Energy Research (CAE, Wuerzburg, Germany). Also, measurements at ambient temperatures were performed with a suitable measurement setup. Two different materials—stainless steel 316L and aluminum AlSi10Mg—were examined. The investigated wavelength λ ranges from the visible range (λ-VIS= 0.40–0.75 µm) up to the infrared, λ = 20 µm. The influence of the following factors were investigated: azimuth angle φ, specimen temperature TS, surface texture as for PBF-LB/M surfaces with different scan angles α, and powder surfaces with different layer thicknesses t. T2 - Rapid.Tech 3D 2024 CY - Erfurt, Germany DA - 14.05.2024 KW - PBF-LB/M KW - In situ monitoring KW - Emissivity KW - Additive manufacturing PY - 2024 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b43-601471 DO - https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-024-00665-2 SN - 2363-9520 SP - 1 EP - 10 PB - Springer CY - Cham, Switzerland AN - OPUS4-60147 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - CONF A1 - Altenburg, Simon T1 - SAMMIE – PBF-LB/M Research System for the Development of in-situ Monitoring methods N2 - The additive manufacturing of metals has now reached a level of maturity that enables its use in many branches of industry or brings it within reach. The main advantages are the ability to produce complex components that cannot be produced conventionally or only at great expense, as well as in the production of highly individualized components in small quantities. However, the additive manufacturing process is highly complex and prone to errors. In order to guarantee the quality control required particularly for safety-relevant components, complex downstream nondestructive testing NDT of the individual components is currently necessary. In-situ process monitoring and testing could offer alternatives, but these have not yet reached a sufficient level of functionality. Industrial production facilities offer little or no flexibility and accessibility to enable extensive investigations in this area. For this reason, we developed a system for the powder bed fusion process of metals (PBF-LB/M) called SAMMIE. It offers a completely open system architecture with full control over the process and flexible access to the build chamber, e.g., optically both on-axis and off-axis to the production laser. In this contribution, we present the system and show first experimental results of in-situ monitoring and testing, e.g., high-resolution thermographic melt pool monitoring, multispectral optical tomography, and high-speed videos of the process. SAMMIE enables us to conduct fundamental investigations that will help to further develop in-situ process monitoring and testing, gain new insights into the process, and improve its safety and reliability. T2 - 48th MPA-Seminar CY - Stuttgart, Germany DA - 08.10.2024 KW - PBF-LB/M KW - In situ monitoring KW - Custom machine KW - Additive Manufacturing KW - Process monitoring PY - 2024 AN - OPUS4-61350 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Breese, Philipp Peter A1 - Altenburg, Simon T1 - Absolute temperature determination in laser powder bed fusion (PBF-LB/M) via hyperspectral thermography N2 - Temperature is a key characteristic in laser powder bed fusion of metals (PBF-LB/M). As a quantitative physical property, the temperature can determine the actual process quality independently from the nominal process parameters. Thus, establishing a process evaluation on temperatures rather than the comparison of process conditions is expected to be more effective. However, quantitative in situ temperature measurements with classical thermographic methods are virtually impossible. The reason is that the required emissivity value changes drastically throughout the process. Additionally, large temperature ranges along with the highly dynamic nature of the PBF-LB/M process make temperature measurements difficult. Based on this challenge, this work presents a method for hyperspectral temperature determination. The spectral exitance (in W/m2⋅nm) was measured in situ at many adjacent wavelengths in the short-wave infrared (SWIR). This enabled a local temperature determination via Planck’s law in combination with a spectral emissivity function. The temperature field of the melt pool crossing the 1D measurement line was reconstructed from the information, gathered at nearly 20 kHz sampling rate. The reconstructed melt pool had a spatial resolution of 17 µm by 40 µm, and temperatures between 2700 and 1300 K were observable. Comparison of the 316L stainless steel solidification temperature and the observed solidification plateau in the gathered thermal data revealed a relative error of less than 6% in the absolute temperature measurement. These initial results of hyperspectral temperature determination in PBF-LB/M show the potential in the method. It allows for physically founded process evaluation, and the prospects for tuning and validation of numerical simulations are highly promising. KW - Additive Manufacturing KW - Infrared Thermography KW - In-situ Monitoring KW - Quantitative Temperature Measurement KW - Emissivity PY - 2025 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b43-631977 DO - https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-025-01148-8 SN - 2363-9512 SP - 1 EP - 10 PB - Springer Science and Business Media LLC AN - OPUS4-63197 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - CONF A1 - Breese, Philipp Peter A1 - Becker, Tina A1 - Oster, Simon A1 - Metz, C. A1 - Altenburg, Simon T1 - In-situ defect detection for laser powder bed fusion with active laser thermography N2 - Defects are still common in metal components built with Additive Manufacturing (AM). Process monitoring methods for laser powder bed fusion (PBF-LB/M) are used in industry, but relationships between monitoring data and defect formation are not fully understood yet. Additionally, defects and deformations may develop with a time delay to the laser energy input. Thus, currently, the component quality is only determinable after the finished process. Here, active laser thermography, a nondestructive testing method, is adapted to PBF-LB/M, using the defocused process laser as heat source. The testing can be performed layer by layer throughout the manufacturing process. We study our proposed testing method along experiments carried out on a custom research PBF-LB/M machine using infrared (IR) cameras. Our work enables a shift from post-process testing of components towards in-situ testing during the AM process. The actual component quality is evaluated in the process chamber and defects can be detected between layers. T2 - 2023 International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium CY - Austin, TX, USA DA - 14.08.2023 KW - Additive Manufacturing KW - Laser Powder Bed Fusion KW - Nondestructive Testing KW - Thermography KW - Defect Detection PY - 2023 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b43-606288 DO - https://doi.org/10.26153/tsw/51096 SP - 1978 EP - 1989 PB - University of Texas at Austin CY - Austin, TX, USA AN - OPUS4-60628 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER -