TY - JOUR A1 - Eifert, T. A1 - Eisen, K. A1 - Maiwald, Michael A1 - Herwig, C. T1 - Current and future requirements to industrial analytical infrastructure—part 2: smart sensors N2 - Complex processes meet and need Industry 4.0 capabilities. Shorter product cycles, flexible production needs, and direct assessment of product quality attributes and raw material attributes call for an increased need of new process analytical technologies (PAT) concepts. While individual PAT tools may be available since decades, we need holistic concepts to fulfill above industrial needs. In this series of two contributions, we want to present a combined view on the future of PAT (process analytical technology), which is projected in smart labs (Part 1) and smart sensors (Part 2). Part 2 of this feature article series describes the future functionality as well as the ingredients of a smart sensor aiming to eventually fuel full PAT functionality. The smart sensor consists of (i) chemical and process information in the physical twin by smart field devices, by measuring multiple components, and is fully connected in the IIoT 4.0 environment. In addition, (ii) it includes process intelligence in the digital twin, as to being able to generate knowledge from multi-sensor and multi-dimensional data. The cyber-physical system (CPS) combines both elements mentioned above and allows the smart sensor to be self-calibrating and self-optimizing. It maintains its operation autonomously. Furthermore, it allows—as central PAT enabler—a flexible but also target-oriented predictive control strategy and efficient process development and can compensate variations of the process and raw material attributes. Future cyber-physical production systems—like smart sensors—consist of the fusion of two main pillars, the physical and the digital twins. We discuss the individual elements of both pillars, such as connectivity, and chemical analytics on the one hand as well as hybrid models and knowledge workflows on the other. Finally, we discuss its integration needs in a CPS in order to allow is versatile deployment in efficient process development and advanced optimum predictive process control. KW - Smart sensors KW - Industry 4.0 KW - Digital twins KW - Process intelligence KW - Process analytical technology KW - Physical twin KW - Cyber-physical system PY - 2020 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:b43-503980 SN - 1618-2642 VL - 412 IS - 9 SP - 2037 EP - 2045 PB - Springer CY - Berlin Heidelberg AN - OPUS4-50398 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kern, Simon A1 - Meyer, Klas A1 - Guhl, Svetlana A1 - Gräßer, Patrick A1 - Paul, Andrea A1 - King, R. A1 - Maiwald, Michael T1 - Online low-field NMR spectroscopy for process control of an industrial lithiation reaction—automated data analysis N2 - Monitoring specific chemical properties is the key to chemical process control. Today, mainly optical online methods are applied, which require time- and cost-intensive calibration effort. NMR spectroscopy, with its advantage being a direct comparison method without need for calibration, has a high potential for closed-loop process control while exhibiting short set-up times. Compact NMR instruments make NMR spectroscopy accessible in industrial and rough environments for process monitoring and advanced process control strategies. We present a fully automated data analysis approach which is completely based on physically motivated spectral models as first principles information (Indirect Hard Modelling – IHM) and applied it to a given pharmaceutical lithiation reaction in the framework of the European Union’s Horizon 2020 project CONSENS. Online low-field NMR (LF NMR) data was analysed by IHM with low calibration effort, compared to a multivariate PLS-R (Partial Least Squares Regression) approach, and both validated using online high-field NMR (HF NMR) spectroscopy. KW - Online NMR spectroscopy KW - Process analytical technology KW - Partial Least Squares Regression KW - Indirect Hard Modeling KW - Benchtop NMR Spectroscopy KW - Smart Sensors KW - CONSENS PY - 2018 UR - https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00216-018-1020-z U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-018-1020-z SN - 1618-2642 SN - 1618-2650 VL - 410 IS - 14 SP - 3349 EP - 3360 PB - Springer CY - Berlin, Heidelberg AN - OPUS4-44847 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER -