TY - JOUR A1 - European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), A1 - European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), A1 - European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), A1 - European Environment Agency (EEA), A1 - European Medicines Agency (EMA), A1 - European Commission's Joint Research Centre (JRC), T1 - Scientific report - Impact of the use of azole fungicides, other than as human medicines, on the development of azole‐resistant Aspergillus spp. N2 - The use of azoles in the European Union and European Economic Area (EU/EEA) other than as human medicines has raised concerns about emergence and spread of azole‐resistant Aspergillus species. EU agencies, with the support of JRC, reviewed the evidence and provided conclusions and recommendations on this topic. Although incomplete, data from 2010 to 2021 showed that around 120,000 tonnes of azoles were sold in EU/EEA for uses other than as human medicines. The majority are used as plant protection products (119,000 tonnes), with a stable temporal trend. Evidence supported a link between environmental azole exposure and cross‐resistance selection to medical azoles in Aspergillus species (primarily shown for A. fumigatus). Prevalence of azole‐resistant A. fumigatus in human A. fumigatus infections ranges from 0.7% to 63.6% among different disease presentations and geographic regions; mortality rates range from 36% to 100% for invasive aspergillosis (IA). It was concluded that azole usage outside the human domain is likely or very likely to contribute to selection of azole‐resistant A. fumigatus isolates that could cause severe disease like IA. Environmental hotspots for resistance selection were identified, including stockpiling of agricultural waste and their possible use as soil amendment/fertiliser for certain agricultural crops (for plant protection products) and freshly cut wood (for biocides). Recommendations were formulated on measures to prevent and control selection of azole resistance in A. fumigatus, including implementation of good agricultural/horticultural practices, proper agricultural and wood waste storage and management, and on approval of new azole fungicides or renewal of existing fungicides. Recommendations on topics to be covered by studies provided when submitting applications for the approval of azole fungicides were listed. For the evaluation of such studies within the approval procedure, a preliminary framework for risk assessment was developed and should be further refined. Data gaps and uncertainties were identified, alongside with respective recommendations to address them. KW - Antimicrobial surfaces KW - Biocides KW - Antimicrobial resistance KW - Azoles KW - Fungi KW - Wood preservatives PY - 2025 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b43-652175 DO - https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9200 SN - 1831-4732 VL - 23 IS - 1 SP - 1 EP - 35 PB - Wiley CY - Hoboken, NJ AN - OPUS4-65217 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - RPRT A1 - European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), A1 - European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), A1 - European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), A1 - European Environment Agency (EEA), A1 - European Medicines Agency (EMA), A1 - European Commission's Joint Research Centre (JRC), T1 - Annex to: Scientific report 'Impact of the use of azole fungicides, other than as human medicines, on the development of azole-resistant Aspergillus spp.' doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9200 - Annex E - Detailed answer to Term of Reference 5 'Environmental hotspots' and Term of Reference 6 'Prevention and control options' N2 - The widespread use of azole compounds in various sectors has led to the emergence of azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus (ARAf), which poses a significant challenge for treating fungal infections, especially in immunocompromised patients. Certain environmental conditions and practices, particularly in agricultural settings and the use of azoles as biocides, have been identified as hotspots for the selection and dispersal of azole-resistant strains of Aspergillus spp. Factors contributing to the selection of resistance include the use of azoles in crop protection, wood preservation and, to a much lesser extent, veterinary medicine. For plant protection products (PPPs), a number of scenarios (green waste of indoor-grown vegetables, uses with the production of wet pomace used as fertiliser, maize or sugar beet silage, and field heaps including flower bulbs) are deemed high risk for hotspot development. Based on EU authorised use patterns, these scenarios are characterised by the hazard characteristics of the azole fungicides in terms of activity against the wild-type Aspergillus spp. compared to resistant strains, substrate characteristics and residue levels, and environmental conditions that promote the growth of the fungus. For biocidal azole applications, products (biocidal product [BP]) for temporary preservation of freshly cut wood have been identified to have the potential for hotspot formation because freshly cut wood allows the growth of Aspergillus spp., and azole concentrations in treated wood are above the predicted no effect concentration (PNEC) for resistance selection (PNECres) and below the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of ARAf for most analysed products on the EU market. Following identification of environmental hotspots, the report recommends measures to prevent the selection of azole-resistant strains in the environment, including controlled storage of organic waste, proper waste management, and responsible use and disposal of azole-treated products. Azole use in veterinary medicinal products (VMPs) represents a very small percentage of total azole use and is unlikely to be a significant source of selection of resistance in the environment. As such, the focus for mitigating resistance should be on other uses of azoles. The report stresses the importance of ongoing surveillance to monitor the presence of ARAf in the environment and to inform risk assessments and management strategies. As industrial chemicals, the azole substances are mostly used as intermediates (precursors) to manufacture yet a different substance, are formulated into a mixture or are reported to be manufactured as active substances in PPP, BP or VMP (therefore already covered above). There are only a few industrial azole substances with widespread use, and as for the moment, there is no evidence from the literature that industrial azoles would be a source of a possible hotspot; thus, the industrial chemicals were not further investigated. There are several areas where further research is needed, including understanding the environmental conditions that support the growth of Aspergillus spp. in different agricultural matrices or on wood, assessing human exposure to resistant strains, regional waste practices and the impact of active substance combinations for azole resistance selection. There is also a need for more comprehensive data on the use and quantities of azole-containing products. Furthermore, industrial substances with widespread use and having antifungal effects, e.g. an antidandruff substance in cosmetics, could be further investigated. Measures were identified that could be implemented with respect to the use of azole fungicides in PPPs as well as in BPs and with respect to the storage, processing and disposal of crop (waste) materials containing azole residues to prevent or minimise the selection of environmental resistance or to minimise the spread of resistant Aspergillus spp. to patients. Any measures that slow down or prevent growth in the presence of azoles, sporulation and dispersal of Aspergillus spp. should be encouraged. A coordinated effort among various stakeholders, including farmers, manufacturers, industrial users, waste managers, regulatory bodies and scientists, is essential to effectively address the challenge of azole resistance in A. fumigatus. KW - Antimicrobial surfaces KW - Biocides KW - Antimicrobial resistance KW - Azoles KW - Fungi KW - Wood preservatives PY - 2025 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b43-652187 UR - https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14223436 DO - https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14223435 SP - 1 EP - 76 PB - Zenodo CY - Geneva AN - OPUS4-65218 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - CONF A1 - Schreiber, Frank T1 - Biocides As Drivers For Antimicrobial Resistance Evolution In The Environment N2 - Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global health problem with the environment being an important compartment for the evolution, selection and transmission of AMR. These processes are impacted by pollution with antibiotics. However, biocides used as disinfectants and material preservatives are major pollutants by far excceding the market for antibiotics in terms of mass. Our work shows that biocides have the potential to affect evolutionary processes towards AMR by increasing the rates of de-novo mutation and conjugation. These effects depend on the species and biocidal substance. Importantly, chlorhexidine and quaternary ammonium compounds (QACs) affect rates of mutation and conjugation at environmentally relevant concentrations in E. coli. Moreover, our results show a connection between the RpoS-mediated general stress and the RecA-linked SOS response with increased rates of mutation and conjugation, but not for all biocides. Furthermore, our work highlights the potential of biocides to contribute to selection and transmission of AMR. We show that the application of biocides, especially QAC disinfectants, leads to the rapid evolution of tolerance (i.e. increased survival) in adaptive laboratory evolution (ALE) experiments. The evolved tolerant strains have a selective advantage in the presence of environmentally-relevant concentrations of antibiotics, which could lead to the stabilization of biocide tolerance in environments where biocides and antibiotics co-occur (e.g. wastewater, animal stables). ALE experiments with biocide tolerant strains indicate a decreased evolvability of resistance to antibiotics. Taken together, our work shows the importance of assessing the contribution of biocides on evolution, selection and transmission of AMR in the environment. T2 - 6th Environmental Dimension of Antibiotic Resistance (EDAR6) CY - Gothenburg, Sweden DA - 22.09.2022 KW - Antimicrobial resistance KW - Antimicrobial coating KW - Biofilms KW - Biocides KW - Risk assessment PY - 2022 AN - OPUS4-56262 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Schmidt, Selina A1 - Rodríguez-Rojas, A. A1 - Rolff, J. A1 - Schreiber, Frank T1 - Biocides used as material preservatives modify rates of de novo mutation and horizontal gene transfer in bacteria N2 - Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global health problem with the environment being an important compartment for the evolution and transmission of AMR. Previous studies showed that de-novo mutagenesis and horizontal gene transfer (HGT) by conjugation or transformation – important processes underlying resistance evolution and spread - are affected by antibiotics, metals and pesticides. However, natural microbial communities are also frequently exposed to biocides used as material preservatives, but it is unknown if these substances induce mutagenesis and HGT. Here, we show that active substances used in material preservatives can increase rates of mutation and conjugation in a species- and substance-dependent manner, while rates of transformation are not increased. The bisbiguanide chlorhexidine digluconate, the quaternary ammonium compound didecyldimethylammonium chloride, the metal copper, the pyrethroid-insecticide permethrin, and the azole-fungicide propiconazole increase mutation rates in Escherichia coli, whereas no increases were identified for Bacillus subtilis and Acinetobacter baylyi. Benzalkonium chloride, chlorhexidine and permethrin increased conjugation in E. coli. Moreover, our results show a connection between the RpoS-mediated general stress and the RecA-linked SOS response with increased rates of mutation and conjugation, but not for all biocides. Taken together, our data show the importance of assessing the contribution of material preservatives on AMR evolution and spread. KW - Mutation rate KW - Horizontal gene transfer KW - Biocides PY - 2022 DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129280 SN - 0304-3894 VL - 437 SP - 1 EP - 13 PB - Elsevier CY - Amsterdam AN - OPUS4-55261 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - CONF A1 - Schreiber, Frank T1 - Resistance evolution towards biocides and antimicrobial surfaces N2 - This talk discusses the work at BAM concerning Resistance evolution towards biocides and antimicrobial surfaces. It shows (i) that biocides affect rates of mutation and horizontal gene transfer, (ii) that biocides show heterogeneous killing facilitating tolerance evolution, and (iii) that biocides and antibiotics show strong combination effect on growth and selection. T2 - Exchange seminar with Nottingham Trent University CY - Berlin, Germany DA - 03.09.2024 KW - Antimicrobial resistance KW - Bacteria KW - Standardization KW - Biocides KW - Antimicrobial surfaces PY - 2024 AN - OPUS4-61548 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - GEN A1 - Schreiber, Frank T1 - Differential selection for survival and for growth in adaptive laboratory evolution experiments with benzalkonium chloride N2 - Biocides are used to control microorganisms across different applications, but emerging resistance may pose risks for those applications. Resistance to biocides has commonly been studied using adaptive laboratory evolution (ALE) experiments with growth at subinhibitory concentrations linked to serial subculturing. It has been shown recently that E. coli adapts to repeated lethal stress imposed by the biocide benzalkonium chloride (BAC) by increased survival (i.e. tolerance) and not by evolving the ability to grow at increased concentrations (i.e. resistance). Here, we investigate the contributions of evolution for tolerance as opposed to resistance for the outcome of ALE experiments with E. coli exposed to BAC. We find that BAC concentrations close to the half maximal effective concentration (EC50, 4.36 µg mL-1) show initial killing (~40%) before the population resumes growth. This indicates that cells face a two-fold selection pressure: for increased survival and for increased growth. To disentangle the effects of both selection pressures, we conducted two ALE experiments: (i) one with initial killing and continued stress close to the EC50 during growth and (ii) another with initial killing and no stress during growth. Phenotypic characterization of adapted populations showed that growth at higher BAC concentrations was only selected for when BAC was present during growth. Whole genome sequencing revealed distinct differences in mutated genes across treatments. Treatments selecting solely for survival led to mutations in genes for metabolic regulation (cyaA) and cellular structure (flagella fliJ), while treatments selecting for growth and survival led to mutations in genes related to stress response (hslO and tufA). Our results demonstrate that serial subculture ALE experiments with an antimicrobial at sub-inhibitory concentrations can select for increased growth and survival. This finding has implications for the design of ALE experiments to assess resistance risks of antimicrobials in different scenarios such as disinfection, preservation, and environmental pollution. KW - Antimicrobial resistance KW - Bacteria KW - Standardization KW - Biocides PY - 2024 DO - https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.2jm63xszx PB - Dryad AN - OPUS4-61558 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - CONF A1 - Nordholt, Niclas T1 - Phenotypic heterogeneity in disinfection: sources and consequences for antimicrobial resistance N2 - A summary of projects here at BAM which investigate the influence of phenotypic heterogeneity on the outcome of disinfection and the influence on antimicrobial resistance. This presentation was given in the Theory Seminar of the Quantitative and Theoretical Biology group of Prof. Oliver Ebenhöh at HHU Düsseldorf T2 - Theory Seminar in the Quantitative and Theoretical Biology group at HHU Düsseldorf CY - Düsseldorf, Germany DA - 24.02.2022 KW - Disinfection KW - Biocides KW - Heterogeneity KW - Resistance PY - 2022 AN - OPUS4-54442 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - CONF A1 - Schreiber, Frank T1 - Selection of resistance by antimicrobials used in coatings N2 - Antimicrobial surfaces have broad use in multiple settings including touch surfaces in hospitals, implanted devices, or consumer products. Their aim is to support existing hygiene procedures, and to help combat the increasing threat of antimicrobial resistance. However, concerns have been raised over the potential selection pressure exerted by such surfaces, which might drive the evolution and spread of antimicrobial resistance. In my presentation, I will highlight the risks and knowledge gaps associated with resistance on antimicrobial surfaces by different processes including evolution by de novo mutations and horizontal gene transfer, and species sorting of inherently resistant bacteria dispersed onto antimicrobial surfaces. The latter process has the potential to select for antibiotic resistance via cross-resistance between traits that confer resistance to both the antimicrobial surface coating and antibiotics. Conditions in which antibiotics and antimicrobial coatings are present simultaneously (e.g. implants) will lead to more complex interactions that can either result in the selection for or against antibiotic resistance. We mapped these interactions between several antimicrobials and antibiotics on growth and selection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. We find prevalent physiological (i.e. synergy and antagonism) and evolutionary (i.e. cross-resistance and collateral sensitivity) combination effects. Understanding these interactions opens the door to tailor therapeutic interventions to select against resistance. In additions, we need new methods and translational studies that investigate resistance development to antimicrobial surfaces under realistic conditions. Therefore, I will present recent developments in our lab on the development of such a method based on existing efficacy standards. T2 - 2021 Fall Meeting of the European Materials Research Society (E-MRS) CY - Online meeting DA - 20.09.2021 KW - Antimicrobial resistance KW - Antimicrobial coating KW - Biofilms KW - Biocides PY - 2021 AN - OPUS4-53645 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER -