TY - RPRT A1 - Hodoroaba, Vasile-Dan A1 - Fontanges, R. A1 - Delvallée, A. A1 - Deumer, J. A1 - Salzmann, C. A1 - Crouzier, L. A1 - Gollwitzer, C. A1 - Klein, T. A1 - Koops, R. A1 - Sebaihi, N. A1 - Pauw, Brian Richard A1 - Smales, Glen Jacob A1 - Artous, S. A1 - Taché, O. A1 - Feltin, N. T1 - Report on full algorithm sequences for nanoparticle detection and size measurement as developed on both a physical basis and by machine learning N2 - he main objective of the nPSize project is to improve the measurement capabilities for nanoparticle size based on both measurement methods traceable to SI units and new reference materials. Two basic approaches have been used in order to develop measurement procedures resulting in traceable results of the nanoparticle size distribution: physical modelling for the methods used in the project (TSEM, SEM, AFM and SAXS) and machine learning. Physical modelling: In this part, the physical models associated with different shape measurements for the techniques TSEM, SEM, AFM and SAXS have been collected and further developed with the aim to simulate the resulting signal as measured by the individual methods. Uncertainties and traceability associated with each model were investigated and evaluated. In the following, the progress on these physical models is reported for each individual method. Machine Learning modelling: The aim of this part is to use machine learning to enable automatic measurement of nanoparticle shape from expert a-priori information only. No physical model will be used as a-priori information in this task. The accuracy and traceability of the size results obtained by each technique will be analyzed and compared with the physical modelling. A machine learning database will then be used to create automatic detection algorithms. KW - Nanoparticles KW - Particle size distribution KW - SEM KW - TSEM KW - TEM KW - SAXS KW - AFM PY - 2022 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b43-546531 DO - https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5807864 SP - 1 EP - 20 PB - Zenodo CY - Geneva AN - OPUS4-54653 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - RPRT A1 - Bartczak, D. A1 - Hodoroaba, Vasile-Dan T1 - Report on the development and validation of the reference material candidates with non-spherical shape, non-monodisperse size distributions and accurate nanoparticle concentrations N2 - One aim of the EMPIR nPSize project 17NRM04 was to develop and validate three classes of candidate reference (test) materials (RTMs), with i) well-defined non-spherical shape, ii) relatively high polydispersity index, and iii) accurate particle concentrations. To fulfil the requirements of the project, 11 different types of materials were prepared. Following the initial assessment of the materials suitability, nPSize5_PT_UNITO, nPSize6_AC_UNITO and nPSize7_GN_CEA materials were found unsuitable for the project, due to various reasons. PT material was deemed unsuitable due to its predominantly agglomerated nature. AC material contained relatively high amount of impurities (other particle forms). GN material was found too heterogeneous in both the length and width for the purpose of the project. The remaining 8 candidate RTMs were assessed for their homogeneity and stability and used for successful delivery of the associated activities within the nPSize project. KW - Nanoparticles KW - Particle size distribution KW - Reference materials KW - Non-spherical shape KW - EMPIR nPSize KW - Electron microscopy KW - AFM KW - SAXS PY - 2022 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b43-556015 DO - https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7016466 SP - 1 EP - 22 PB - Zenodo CY - Geneva AN - OPUS4-55601 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - RPRT A1 - Rades, Steffi A1 - Natte, Kishore A1 - Unger, Wolfgang T1 - NanoValid D.5.47 Annex 1, Inter-laboratory comparison on measurand particle size/particle size distribution - Report of the results N2 - An inter-laboratory comparison on the particle size, expressed as mean diameter d, of nanoscaled SiO2 (#14 BAM Silica (see NanoValid DoW, D.5.41/5.42)) has been performed. The majority of participants used Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS). A few used Electron Microscopy as method. Following methods had been applied by only one partner, respectively: Small Angle X-ray Scattering, Analytical Ultracentrifugation, Atomic Force Microscopy and Atomizer with electric mobility spectrometer. KW - Nanoparticle size measurement KW - Silica nanoparticles KW - Inter-laboratory comparison KW - EU FP7 project NanoValid PY - 2019 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b43-488117 DO - https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3380570 SP - 1 EP - 23 PB - Zenodo CY - Geneva AN - OPUS4-48811 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - RPRT A1 - Rades, Steffi A1 - Natte, Kishore A1 - Unger, Wolfgang T1 - NanoValid D.5.47 Annex 2 Inter-laboratory comparison on measurand surface charge (Zeta Potential) of silica particles: Report of the results N2 - An inter-laboratory comparison on the surface charge, expressed as zeta potential ζ, of nanoscaled SiO2 has been performed using #14 BAM Silica (see D.5.41/5.42) nanoparticles. The comparability of results delivered by participants has been tested. The Task 5.4 of NanoValid is designed to test, compare and validate current methods to measure and characterize physicochemical properties of selected engineered nanoparticles. The measurand is Surface charge expressed as zeta-Potential. The measurements are to be accompanied by estimates of the uncertainties at a confidence level of 95%, deduced from the standard uncertainties. Therefore an uncertainty budget comprising statistical (Type A) and systematic (Type B) errors has to be established and delivered for the measurand. The protocol comprises two Annexes addressing the establishment of uncertainty budgets following GUM. The final goal of the comparison is to identify those methods of measurement which have potential as reference methods in pc characterization of nanoparticles for the determination of a given measurand. KW - Inter-laborator comparison KW - Surface charge KW - Zeta potential KW - Uncertainty budget KW - Silica nanoparticles KW - NanoValid PY - 2019 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b43-488483 DO - https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3379815 SP - 1 EP - 10 PB - Zenodo CY - Geneva AN - OPUS4-48848 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - RPRT A1 - Rades, Steffi A1 - Unger, Wolfgang T1 - NanoValid D.5.47 Annex 3 Inter-laboratory comparison on measurand specific surface area (BET) of nanoparticular Titania (#15 BAM Titania): Report of the results N2 - This Report describes an inter-laboratory comparison aiming on the establishment of the used method (BET) as a reference method. Another purpose was the certification of the porous reference material #15 BAM Titania as CRM BAM-P110 (cf. D 5.41/42). The certified values determined by nitrogen ad-sorption at 77.3 K according to the international standards ISO 15901-2 and ISO 9277 are summarized in the Table below. KW - Inter-laboratory comparison KW - Specific Surface Area (BET) KW - Nanoparticular TiO2 (Anatase) KW - EU FP7 project NanoValid PY - 2019 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b43-488491 DO - https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3379612 SP - 1 EP - 22 PB - Zenodo CY - Geneva AN - OPUS4-48849 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - RPRT A1 - Potthoff, A. A1 - Unger, Wolfgang T1 - Report on SOP for dispersing nanomaterials in water and report on round robin test. N2 - This report describes a standard operation procedure for dispersion of nanomaterials in liquids prior to toxicological or ecotoxicological testing. Main factors, who determine the state of agglomeration and aggregation of ENMs after dispersion are specific energy input, particle concentration and fluid composition. The method was validated in two round robin tests, where two typical nanomaterials (a nanopowder and a nanodispersion) were investigated. One main result arising out of the data comparison was that only those participants, who were able to follow the instructions in the SOPs completely, received similar results regarding particle size and zeta potential. The SOP is easy to adapt for other types of nanomaterials. The results provide the standardization process and were presented at DIN working group. KW - Dispersion of nano materials KW - AEROSIL® OX50 KW - LEVASIL 50/50 PY - 2019 UR - http://publica.fraunhofer.de/documents/N-541033.html DO - https://doi.org/10.24406/ikts-n-541033 SP - 1 EP - 24 AN - OPUS4-48022 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - RPRT A1 - Bartczack, Dorota A1 - Taché, Olivier A1 - Hodoroaba, Vasile-Dan T1 - Report on the homogeneity assessment of bimodal gold materials (nPSize1 and nPSize2) and particle number concentration by frequency method N2 - The main objective was to assess homogeneity of two bimodal gold materials, namely nPsize1 and nPSize2, containing approximately 1:1 and 10:1 particle number-based ratio of ~30nm and ~60nm particles. Particle number-based concentration within the two size fractions was determined with spICP-MS using the particle frequency method of calibration. KW - Nanoparticles KW - Homogeneity KW - Particle number concentration KW - Gold KW - nPSize PY - 2023 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b43-595451 DO - https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10654245 SP - 1 EP - 5 PB - Zenodo CY - Geneva AN - OPUS4-59545 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER -