TY - RPRT A1 - Schmidt, Alexandra A1 - Bresch, Harald A1 - Kämpf, K. A1 - Bachmann, V. A1 - Peters, T. A1 - Kuhlbusch, T. T1 - Development of a specific OECD Test Guideline on Particle Size and Particle Size Distribution of Nanomaterials N2 - In this research project, a new OECD Test Guideline (TG) for the determination of “Particle Size and Particle Size Distributions of Nanomaterials” was developed as the existing OECD TG 110 is considered to be outdated in terms of applicable size range (not covering sizes <200 nm) and methods. By its scope with an applicable size range from 1 to 1000 nm the new Test Guideline (TG PSD) covers the whole nanoscale. The TG PSD is applicable for particulate and fibrous nanomaterials. The prescribed, pairwise measurement of fibre diameter and length in the TG PSD allows for the first time to differen-tiate fibres with regard to their size-dependent hazard properties. Measurement instructions for each included method were validated within two separated interlaboratory comparisons, as a distinction between near spherical particles and fibres when applying the methods has to be made. Besides information on content and structure of the TG PSD, this final report outlines essential steps, considerations and organisational aspects during the development of the TG. Insights into the selec-tion, preparation and prevalidation of test materials used in the interlaboratory comparison are given. Finally, main results of the interlaboratory comparisons and their impacts on the TG PSD are pre-sented. N2 - Im Rahmen des Forschungsprojekts wurde eine neue OECD-Prüfrichtlinie (TG) für die Bestimmung von Partikelgrößen und Partikelgrößenverteilungen von Nanomaterialien entwickelt, da die existie-rende OECD TG 110 zur Bestimmung von Partikelgrößen in Bezug auf den anwendbaren Größenbe-reich und die gegebenen Methoden veraltet ist bzw. den Nanometerbereich < 200 nm nicht abdeckt. Mit ihrem Anwendungsbereich von 1 bis 1000 nm deckt die neue Prüfrichtlinie (TG PSD) die gesamte Nanoskala ab. Die TG PSD ist für partikel- und faserförmige Nanomaterialien anwendbar. Durch die, in der TG PSD vorgeschriebene, paarweise Messung von Faserdurchmesser und -länge ermöglicht diese TG zum ersten Mal Fasern hinsichtlich ihrer größenabhängigen Gefahrstoffeigenschaften zu unter-scheiden. Die Messanweisungen aller enthaltenen Methoden wurden im Rahmen von zwei getrennten Ringversuchen validiert, da bei der Anwendung der Methoden eine Unterscheidung zwischen Parti-keln und Fasern gemacht werden muss. Neben Angaben zum Inhalt und Struktur der TG PSD, befasst sich der vorliegende Abschlussbericht mit den wesentlichen Schritten, Überlegungen und organisatorischen Aspekten bei der Entwicklung der Prüfrichtlinie. Darüber hinaus werden Einblicke in die Auswahl, Vorbereitung und Prävalidierung der im Ringversuch verwendeten Testmaterialien gegeben. Schließlich werden die wichtigsten Ergeb-nisse aus den Ringversuchen und ihre Auswirkungen auf die TG PSD vorgestellt. KW - Nano KW - OECD KW - Particle size distribution KW - Testguideline KW - Nanoparticle PY - 2021 VL - 2021 SP - 1 EP - 47 PB - German Environment Agency CY - Dessau AN - OPUS4-54021 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - RPRT A1 - European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), A1 - European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), A1 - European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), A1 - European Environment Agency (EEA), A1 - European Medicines Agency (EMA), A1 - European Commission's Joint Research Centre (JRC), T1 - Annex to: Scientific report 'Impact of the use of azole fungicides, other than as human medicines, on the development of azole-resistant Aspergillus spp.' doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9200 - Annex E - Detailed answer to Term of Reference 5 'Environmental hotspots' and Term of Reference 6 'Prevention and control options' N2 - The widespread use of azole compounds in various sectors has led to the emergence of azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus (ARAf), which poses a significant challenge for treating fungal infections, especially in immunocompromised patients. Certain environmental conditions and practices, particularly in agricultural settings and the use of azoles as biocides, have been identified as hotspots for the selection and dispersal of azole-resistant strains of Aspergillus spp. Factors contributing to the selection of resistance include the use of azoles in crop protection, wood preservation and, to a much lesser extent, veterinary medicine. For plant protection products (PPPs), a number of scenarios (green waste of indoor-grown vegetables, uses with the production of wet pomace used as fertiliser, maize or sugar beet silage, and field heaps including flower bulbs) are deemed high risk for hotspot development. Based on EU authorised use patterns, these scenarios are characterised by the hazard characteristics of the azole fungicides in terms of activity against the wild-type Aspergillus spp. compared to resistant strains, substrate characteristics and residue levels, and environmental conditions that promote the growth of the fungus. For biocidal azole applications, products (biocidal product [BP]) for temporary preservation of freshly cut wood have been identified to have the potential for hotspot formation because freshly cut wood allows the growth of Aspergillus spp., and azole concentrations in treated wood are above the predicted no effect concentration (PNEC) for resistance selection (PNECres) and below the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of ARAf for most analysed products on the EU market. Following identification of environmental hotspots, the report recommends measures to prevent the selection of azole-resistant strains in the environment, including controlled storage of organic waste, proper waste management, and responsible use and disposal of azole-treated products. Azole use in veterinary medicinal products (VMPs) represents a very small percentage of total azole use and is unlikely to be a significant source of selection of resistance in the environment. As such, the focus for mitigating resistance should be on other uses of azoles. The report stresses the importance of ongoing surveillance to monitor the presence of ARAf in the environment and to inform risk assessments and management strategies. As industrial chemicals, the azole substances are mostly used as intermediates (precursors) to manufacture yet a different substance, are formulated into a mixture or are reported to be manufactured as active substances in PPP, BP or VMP (therefore already covered above). There are only a few industrial azole substances with widespread use, and as for the moment, there is no evidence from the literature that industrial azoles would be a source of a possible hotspot; thus, the industrial chemicals were not further investigated. There are several areas where further research is needed, including understanding the environmental conditions that support the growth of Aspergillus spp. in different agricultural matrices or on wood, assessing human exposure to resistant strains, regional waste practices and the impact of active substance combinations for azole resistance selection. There is also a need for more comprehensive data on the use and quantities of azole-containing products. Furthermore, industrial substances with widespread use and having antifungal effects, e.g. an antidandruff substance in cosmetics, could be further investigated. Measures were identified that could be implemented with respect to the use of azole fungicides in PPPs as well as in BPs and with respect to the storage, processing and disposal of crop (waste) materials containing azole residues to prevent or minimise the selection of environmental resistance or to minimise the spread of resistant Aspergillus spp. to patients. Any measures that slow down or prevent growth in the presence of azoles, sporulation and dispersal of Aspergillus spp. should be encouraged. A coordinated effort among various stakeholders, including farmers, manufacturers, industrial users, waste managers, regulatory bodies and scientists, is essential to effectively address the challenge of azole resistance in A. fumigatus. KW - Antimicrobial surfaces KW - Biocides KW - Antimicrobial resistance KW - Azoles KW - Fungi KW - Wood preservatives PY - 2025 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b43-652187 UR - https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14223436 DO - https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14223435 SP - 1 EP - 76 PB - Zenodo CY - Geneva AN - OPUS4-65218 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - RPRT A1 - Hahn, Oliver A1 - Nehring, G. A1 - Freisitzer, R. A1 - Rabin, Ira T1 - A study on early european inks from St. Paul in lavanttal N2 - Typology of Inks Archives and museums around the world contain a vast number of manuscripts that were written in different inks: carbon inks, plant inks, iron-gall inks and mixed inks. Yet most archaeometric studies of manuscripts focus on the palette of pigments found in illuminated manuscripts whereas identification of the inks is still largely based on cultural-historical studies and visual inspections. One of the reasons of this disproportion in the studies can be explained by the properties of Raman spectroscopy, the technique of choice for identification of pigments. In contrast, this technique is only partially viable when dealing with organic colourants. Brown and Clark discuss these difficulties and the uncertainties of identification of iron-gall inks by Raman spectroscopy in their pioneering work on early medieval Anglo-Saxon manuscripts (K. Brown and R. Clark 2004). To facilitate instrumental analysis of inks, we have developed a protocol that starts with the identification of the inks type (Rabin et al. 2012) which doesn’t require complicated instrumentation and can be carried out by paleographers and codicologists. Three typological ink classes The black writing materials used in manuscript production in Antiquity und Middle Ages can be sorted in three typologically different ink classes: soot, plant and iron-gall. Soot ink is a fine dispersion of carbon pigments in a water soluble binding agent; plant-based ink consists of a solution of the tannins extracted from gallnuts or tree bark; iron-gall ink, is produced by mixing a soluble compound of iron (II) with gallic or tannic acid extracted from gallnuts or tree bark. Therefore, iron-gall ink presents a boundary case between solution and dispersion ink, in which a water-soluble preliminary stage oxidizes and evolves into a black, insoluble precipitate similar to the carbon pigments when the writing is exposed to air (Krekel 1999). The additional category of mixed inks, i.e. inks produced by addition of various metals to the soot inks or intentional mixing of iron-gall and soot - based inks started attracting scholarly attention only recently because their significance was established only a short while ago (Brun et al. 2016, Colini 2018, Nehring et al. 2021). We suggest that plant and mixed inks build a bridge from the carbon ink of Antiquity to the properly formulated iron-gall ink that became a standard black ink from the late Middle Ages to the 19th century when it gave way to modern inks. KW - Early european inks KW - Typology of Inks KW - Raman spectroscopy KW - Illuminated manuscripts KW - Archaeometric studies KW - Dispersion of carbon pigments PY - 2021 VL - 2021 SP - 56 EP - 75 PB - Gazette du livre médiéval CY - Paris AN - OPUS4-53844 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER -