TY - JOUR A1 - Kato, K. A1 - Watanabe, T. A1 - Heine, Hans-Joachim A1 - Boissière, Claudia A1 - Schulz, Gert A1 - Woo, J.-C. A1 - Kim, J.S. A1 - Sang-Hyub, O. A1 - Bae, H. K. A1 - Kim, Y.D. A1 - Qiao, H. A1 - Guenther, F.R. A1 - Roderick, G. C. A1 - Miller, W. A1 - Smeulders, D. A1 - Botha, A. A1 - van Rensburg, M.J. A1 - Tshilongo, J. A1 - Leshabane, N. A1 - Ntsasa, N. A1 - Milton, M. A1 - Vargha, G. A1 - Harling, A. A1 - Konopelko, L. A1 - Kustikov, Y.A. A1 - Vasserman, I.I. A1 - Zavyalov, S. V. A1 - Popova, T.A. A1 - Pankratov, V.V. A1 - Pir, M.N. A1 - Maltsev, M.A. A1 - Oudwater, R. A1 - Persijn, S. A1 - van Wijk, J. A1 - Wessel, R. M. T1 - International comparison CCQM-K66: Impurity analysis of methane N2 - This key comparison was performed to demonstrate the capability of NMIs to analyse the purity of methane for use as a source gas in the preparation of standard gas mixtures. This capability is an essential requirement for the preparation of accurate standards of natural gas and some other fuels. Since it is difficult to carry out a comparison with individual samples of pure gas, the sample for this comparison was a synthetic mixture of high purity methane with selected added impurities of nitrogen, argon, carbon dioxide and ethane. These mixtures were prepared by a gas company as a batch of 10 cylinders and their homogeneity and stability were evaluated by NMIJ. The KCRVs for the four different analytes in this key comparison are based on a consensus of values reported by participants. The uncertainties in the degrees of equivalence were calculated by combining the reported uncertainties with the homogeneity of the samples and the uncertainty of the KCRV. The results submitted are generally consistent with the KCRV within the estimated uncertainties. Finally, this comparison demonstrates that the analysis of nitrogen, argon, carbon dioxide and ethane in methane at amount fractions of 1 µmol/mol to 5 µmol/mol is generally possible with an uncertainty of 5% to 10%. Main text. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database kcdb.bipm.org/. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCQM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA). DatesIssue 1A (Technical Supplement 2012) KW - Ringversuch KW - Methan KW - Spurenverunreinigungen KW - Gaschromatographie PY - 2012 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/49/1A/08001 SN - 0026-1394 SN - 1681-7575 VL - 49 IS - 08001 SP - 1 EP - 76 PB - Inst. of Physics Publ. CY - Bristol AN - OPUS4-25929 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Naka, A. A1 - Yasutaka, T. A1 - Sakanakura, H. A1 - Kalbe, Ute A1 - Watanabe, Y. A1 - Inoba, S. A1 - Takeo, M. A1 - Inui, T. A1 - Katsumi, T. A1 - Fujikawa, T. A1 - Sato, K. A1 - Higashinog, K. A1 - Someyaga, M. T1 - Column percolation test for contaminated soils: Key factors for standardization N2 - Column percolation tests may be suitable for prediction of chemical leaching from soil and soil materials. However, compared with batch leaching tests, they are time-consuming. It is therefore important to investigate ways to shorten the tests without affecting the quality of results. In this study, we evaluate the feasibility of decreasing testing time by increasing flow rate and decreasing equilibration time compared to the conditions specified in ISO/TS 21268-3, with equilibration periods of 48 h and flow rate of 12 mL/h. We tested three equilibration periods (0, 12–16, and 48 h) and two flow rates (12 and 36 mL/h)on four different soils and compared the inorganic constituent releases. For soils A and D, we observed similar values for all conditions except for the 0 h–36 mL/h case. For soil B, we observed no appreciable differences between the tested conditions, while for soil C there were no consistent trends probably due to the difference in ongoing oxidation reactions between soil samples. These results suggest that column percolation tests can be shortened from 20 to 30 days to 7–9 days by decreasing the equilibration time to 12–16 h and increasing the flow rate to 36 mL/h for inorganic substances. KW - Contaminated soils KW - Column percolation PY - 2016 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:b43-372038 SN - 0304-3894 VL - 320 SP - 326 EP - 340 PB - Elsevier B.V. AN - OPUS4-37203 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER -