TY - JOUR A1 - Buckle, T. A1 - van der Wal, S. A1 - van Malderen, S. A1 - Müller, Larissa A1 - Kuil, J. A1 - van Unen, V. A1 - Peters, R. A1 - van Bemmel, M. A1 - McDonnell, L. A1 - Velders, A. A1 - Koning, F. A1 - Vanhaeke, F. A1 - van Leeuwen, F. T1 - Hybrid imaging labels: providing the link between mass spectrometry-based molecular pathology and theranostics N2 - Development of theranostic concepts that include inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and laser ablation ICP-MS (LA-ICP-MS) imaging can be hindered by the lack of a direct comparison to more standardly used methods for in vitro and in vivo evaluation; e.g. fluorescence or nuclear medicine. In this study a bimodal (or rather, hybrid) tracer that contains both a fluorescent dye and a chelate was used to evaluate the existence of a direct link between mass spectrometry (MS) and in vitro and in vivo molecular imaging findings using fluorescence and radioisotopes. At the same time, the hybrid label was used to determine whether the use of a single isotope label would allow for MS-based diagnostics. KW - Imaging KW - Laser Ablation ICP-MS KW - Diagnostics PY - 2017 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b43-396813 DO - https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.17484 VL - 7 IS - 3 SP - 624 EP - 633 PB - IvySpring AN - OPUS4-39681 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Blasenbauer, D. A1 - Huber, F. A1 - Lederer, J. A1 - Quina, M. A1 - Blanc-Biscarat, D. A1 - Bogush, A. A1 - Bontempi, E. A1 - Blondeau, J. A1 - Chimenos, J. A1 - Dahlbo, H. A1 - Fagerqvist, J. A1 - Giro-Paloma, J. A1 - Hjelmar, O. A1 - Hyks, J. A1 - Keaney, J. A1 - Lupsea-Toader, M. A1 - O’Caollai, C. A1 - Orupõld, K. A1 - Pajak, T. A1 - Simon, Franz-Georg A1 - Svecova, L. A1 - Syc, M. A1 - Uvang, R. A1 - Vaajasaari, K. A1 - van Caneghem, J. A1 - van Zomeren, A. A1 - Vasarevičius, S. A1 - Wégner, K. A1 - Fellner, J. T1 - Legal situation and current practice of waste incineration bottom ash utilisation in Europe N2 - Almost 500 municipal solid waste incineration plants in the EU, Norway and Switzerland generate about 17.6 Mt/a of incinerator bottom ash (IBA). IBA contains minerals and metals. Metals are mostly separated and sold to the scrap market and minerals are either disposed of in landfills or utilised in the construction sector. Since there is no uniform regulation for IBA utilisation at EU level, countries developed own rules with varying requirements for utilisation. As a result from a cooperation network between European experts an up-to-date overview of documents regulating IBA utilisation is presented. Furthermore, this work highlights the different requirements that have to be considered. Overall, 51 different parameters for the total content and 36 different parameters for the emission by leaching are defined. An analysis of the defined parameter reveals that leaching parameters are significantly more to be considered compared to total content parameters. In order to assess the leaching behaviour nine different leaching tests, including batch tests, up-flow percolation tests and one diffusion test (monolithic materials) are in place. A further discussion of leaching parameters showed that certain countries took over limit values initially defined for landfills for inert waste and adopted them for IBA utilisation. The overall utilisation rate of IBA in construction works is approximately 54 wt%. It is revealed that the rate of utilisation does not necessarily depend on how well regulated IBA utilisation is, but rather seems to be a result of political commitment for IBA recycling and economically interesting circumstances. KW - Bottom ash KW - Leaching tests KW - Utilisation PY - 2020 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b43-500161 DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.11.031 SN - 0956-053X VL - 102 SP - 868 EP - 883 PB - Elsevier Ltd. CY - Amsterdam AN - OPUS4-50016 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kato, K. A1 - Watanabe, T. A1 - Heine, Hans-Joachim A1 - Boissière, Claudia A1 - Schulz, Gert A1 - Woo, J.-C. A1 - Kim, J.S. A1 - Sang-Hyub, O. A1 - Bae, H. K. A1 - Kim, Y.D. A1 - Qiao, H. A1 - Guenther, F.R. A1 - Roderick, G. C. A1 - Miller, W. A1 - Smeulders, D. A1 - Botha, A. A1 - van Rensburg, M.J. A1 - Tshilongo, J. A1 - Leshabane, N. A1 - Ntsasa, N. A1 - Milton, M. A1 - Vargha, G. A1 - Harling, A. A1 - Konopelko, L. A1 - Kustikov, Y.A. A1 - Vasserman, I.I. A1 - Zavyalov, S. V. A1 - Popova, T.A. A1 - Pankratov, V.V. A1 - Pir, M.N. A1 - Maltsev, M.A. A1 - Oudwater, R. A1 - Persijn, S. A1 - van Wijk, J. A1 - Wessel, R. M. T1 - International comparison CCQM-K66: Impurity analysis of methane N2 - This key comparison was performed to demonstrate the capability of NMIs to analyse the purity of methane for use as a source gas in the preparation of standard gas mixtures. This capability is an essential requirement for the preparation of accurate standards of natural gas and some other fuels. Since it is difficult to carry out a comparison with individual samples of pure gas, the sample for this comparison was a synthetic mixture of high purity methane with selected added impurities of nitrogen, argon, carbon dioxide and ethane. These mixtures were prepared by a gas company as a batch of 10 cylinders and their homogeneity and stability were evaluated by NMIJ. The KCRVs for the four different analytes in this key comparison are based on a consensus of values reported by participants. The uncertainties in the degrees of equivalence were calculated by combining the reported uncertainties with the homogeneity of the samples and the uncertainty of the KCRV. The results submitted are generally consistent with the KCRV within the estimated uncertainties. Finally, this comparison demonstrates that the analysis of nitrogen, argon, carbon dioxide and ethane in methane at amount fractions of 1 µmol/mol to 5 µmol/mol is generally possible with an uncertainty of 5% to 10%. Main text. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database kcdb.bipm.org/. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCQM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA). DatesIssue 1A (Technical Supplement 2012) KW - Ringversuch KW - Methan KW - Spurenverunreinigungen KW - Gaschromatographie PY - 2012 DO - https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/49/1A/08001 SN - 0026-1394 SN - 1681-7575 VL - 49 IS - 08001 SP - 1 EP - 76 PB - Inst. of Physics Publ. CY - Bristol AN - OPUS4-25929 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Duewer, D. L. A1 - Sander, L. C. A1 - Wise, S. A. A1 - Philipp, Rosemarie A1 - Hein, Sebastian A1 - Hackenberg, R. A1 - Polzer, J. A1 - Avila, M. A. A1 - Serrano, V. A1 - Kakoulides, E. A1 - Alexopoulos, C. A1 - Giannikopoulou, P. A1 - Chan, P. A1 - Lee, H. A1 - Tang, H. A1 - Tang, P. A1 - Yip, Y. A1 - Lu, T. A1 - Cheow, P. S. A1 - Teo, T. L. A1 - Sega, M. A1 - Rolle, F. A1 - Baek, S. A1 - Kim, B. A1 - Lee, S. A1 - Cabillic, J. A1 - Fallot, C. A1 - Hua, T. A1 - Dazhou, C. A1 - Changjun, Y. A1 - Chunxin, L. A1 - Hongmei, L. A1 - Lippa, K. A1 - Itoh, N. A1 - Quinn, L. A1 - Prevoo-Franzsen, D. A1 - Fernandes-Whaley, M. A1 - Gören, A. C. A1 - Gökcen, T. A1 - Gündüz, S. A1 - Krylov, A. A1 - Mikheeva, A. A1 - Baldan, A. A1 - van der Hout, J. W. A1 - van der Veen, A. M. H. T1 - CCQM-K131 Low-polarity analytes in a multicomponent organic solution: Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in acetonitrile N2 - Solutions of organic analytes of known mass fraction are typically used to calibrate the measurement processes used to determine these compounds in matrix samples. Appropriate value assignments and uncertainty calculations for calibration solutions are critical for accurate measurements. Evidence of successful participation in formal, relevant international comparisons is needed to document measurement capability claims (CMCs) made by national metrology institutes (NMIs) and designated institutes (DIs). To enable NMIs and DIs to update or establish their claims, in 2015 the Organic Analysis Working Group (OAWG) sponsored CCQM-K131 "Low-Polarity Analytes in a Multicomponent Organic Solution: Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Acetonitrile". Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) result from combustion sources and are ubiquitous in environmental samples. The PAH congeners, benz[a]anthracene (BaA), benzo[a]pyrene (BaP), and naphthalene (Nap) were selected as the target analytes for CCQM-K131. These targets span the volatility range of PAHs found in environmental samples and include potentially problematic chromatographic separations. Nineteen NMIs participated in CCQM-K131. The consensus summary mass fractions for the three PAHs are in the range of (5 to 25) μg/g with relative standard deviations of (2.5 to 3.5) %. Successful participation in CCQM-K131 demonstrates the following measurement capabilities in determining mass fraction of organic compounds of moderate to insignificant volatility, molar mass of 100 g/mol up to 500 g/mol, and polarity pKow < −2 in a multicomponent organic solution ranging in mass fraction from 100 ng/g to 100 μg/g: (1) value assignment of primary reference standards (if in-house purity assessment carried out), (2) value assignment of single and/or multi-component organic solutions, and (3) separation and quantification using gas chromatography or liquid chromatography. KW - Benz[a]anthracene (BaA) KW - Benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) KW - Gas chromatography (GC) KW - Isotope dilution (ID) KW - Liquid chromatography (LC) KW - Mass spectrometry (MS) KW - Naphthalene (Nap) KW - Organic calibration solution KW - Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) PY - 2019 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b43-471442 DO - https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/56/1A/08003 SN - 0026-1394 SN - 1681-7575 VL - 56 IS - 1A SP - 08003, 1 EP - 102 PB - IOP Science AN - OPUS4-47144 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Oudwater, R. J. A1 - van Wijk, J. I. T. A1 - Persijn, S. A1 - Wessel, R. M. A1 - van der Veen, A. M. H. A1 - Mace, T. A1 - Sutour, C. A1 - Couette, J. A1 - Milton, M. A1 - Harling, A. A1 - Vargha, G. A1 - Uprichard, I. A1 - Haerri, H.-P. A1 - Niederhauser, B. A1 - Tuma, Dirk A1 - Maiwald, Michael A1 - Boissière, Claudia T1 - Final report on EURAMET QM-S8: Analysis of impurities in pure and balance gases used to prepare primary standard gas mixtures by the gravimetric method N2 - This project concerns the purity analysis of nitrogen as used in reference gas mixture preparation. This project was carried out without adding impurities to the gas used for this comparison, and is therefore more representative to evaluate the analysis of CO, CO2, CH4, O2, Ar and H2O impurities in high purity nitrogen. The analysis of the amount–of–substance fraction water was optional. Two 50 litre high purity nitrogen cylinders were purchased from a well-qualified supplier of specialty gases. The listed components were expected to be present in the pure nitrogen at the target levels as a result of the purification of the nitrogen. From the start of this comparison it was clear that the comparison may not lead to reference values for the constituents analysed. The results indicate that analyses of high purity gases are often limited by the limits of detection of analytical equipment used. The reports of the participating laboratories also indicate that there is no agreed method of determination of the uncertainty on a detection Limit value. The results provide useful information on the Performance of participants. For all analysed components there is reasonable agreement in results for LNE, VSL, Metas and NPL. For BAM only the Argon result is in agreement. KW - Gas analysis KW - Nitrogen KW - Purity analysis PY - 2013 DO - https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/50/1A/08023 SN - 0026-1394 SN - 1681-7575 VL - 50 IS - 08023 SP - 1 EP - 58 PB - Institute of Physics Publishing CY - Bristol AN - OPUS4-35896 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - RPRT A1 - Culleton, L.P. A1 - Brown, A. A1 - Murugan, A. A1 - Van der Veen, A. A1 - Van Osselen, D. A1 - Ziel, P. R. A1 - Li, J. A1 - Tuma, Dirk A1 - Schulz, Gert A1 - Näther, Stephanie A1 - Arrhenius, K. A1 - Kühnemuth, D. A1 - Beránek, J. A1 - Fuko, J. A1 - Val'ková, M. T1 - Results of an international comparison on the analysis of real nonconventional energy gases N2 - The requirement for a metrological infrastructure to ensure the interchangability of 'nonconventional’ energy gases within existing European infrastructure1 was the driving force behind the work undertaken in the three-year EMRP Characterisation of energy gases project EMRP ENG01 (June 2010 - May 2013). As part of work package one of the project, Standards and methods were used to perform composition and impurity measurements on samples of real energy gases collected from around Europe. The aim of this study was to compare the results obtained from different labs, and thereby provide an evaluation of the labs’ capabilities and provide insight into the feasibility of different analytical methodologies for use with future measurements. KW - Energy gases KW - Real samples KW - Sampling KW - Analysis PY - 2013 SN - 1754-2928 IS - July SP - 1 EP - 28 PB - Queen's Printer and Controller of HMSO CY - Teddington, Middlesex, UK AN - OPUS4-29449 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - RPRT A1 - Schoknecht, Ute A1 - Mathies, Helena A1 - Morsing, N. A1 - Lindegaard, B. A1 - van der Sloot, H. A1 - van Zomeren, A. A1 - Deroubaix, G. A1 - Legay, S. A1 - Tadeo, J. L. A1 - García-Valcárcel, A. I. A1 - Gigliotti, G. A1 - Zadra, C. A1 - Hajslová, J. A1 - Tomaniová, M. A1 - Wegner, R. A1 - Bornkessel, C. A1 - Fürhapper, C. T1 - Inter-laboratory evaluation of laboratory test methods to estimate the leaching from treated wood - Agreement No. 04/375757/C4 KW - Emission KW - Leaching KW - Wood preservatives KW - Inter-laboratory evaluation KW - Test methods KW - OECD guideline proposals PY - 2005 SP - 1 EP - 211 CY - Berlin AN - OPUS4-7365 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - van der Hout, J. W. A1 - van der Veen, A. M. H. A1 - Ziel, P. R. A1 - Kipphardt, Heinrich A1 - Tuma, Dirk A1 - Maiwald, Michael A1 - Fernández, T. E. A1 - Gómez, C. A1 - Cieciora, D. A1 - Ochman, G. A1 - Dias, F. A1 - Silvino, V. A1 - Macé, T. A1 - Sutour, C. A1 - Marioni, F. A1 - Ackermann, A. A1 - Niederhauser, B. A1 - Fükő, J. A1 - Büki, T. A1 - Szilágyi, Z. N. A1 - Tarhan, T. A1 - Engin, E. T1 - International Comparison Euramet.QM-K111 – Propane in Nitrogen N2 - This key comparison aims to assess the core capabilities of the participants in gas analysis. Such competences include, among others, the capabilities to prepare Primary Standard gas Mixtures (PSMs), perform the necessary purity analysis on the materials used in the gas mixture preparation, the verification of the composition of newly prepared PSMs against existing ones, and the capability of calibrating the composition of a gas mixture. According to the Strategy for Key Comparisons of the Gas Analysis Working Group, this key comparison is classified as an RMO track A key comparison. The artefacts were binary mixtures of propane in nitrogen at a nominal amount-of-substance fraction level of 1000 μmol/mol. The values and uncertainties from the gravimetric gas mixture preparation were used as key comparison reference values (KCRVs). Each transfer standard had its own KCRV. The results are generally good. All results are within ± 1 % of the KCRV. KW - EURAMET.QM-K111 KW - Propane in nitrogen PY - 2017 DO - https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/54/1A/08020 SN - 0026-1394 VL - 54 IS - Technical Supplement SP - 08020, 1 EP - 34 PB - IOP Science AN - OPUS4-44471 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Zhou, Z. A1 - Han, Q. A1 - Wang, D. A1 - Macé, T. A1 - Kipphardt, Heinrich A1 - Maiwald, Michael A1 - Tuma, Dirk A1 - Uehara, S. A1 - Akima, D. A1 - Shimosaka, T. A1 - Jung, J. A1 - Oh, S.-H. A1 - van der Veen, A. A1 - van Wijk, J.I.T. A1 - Ziel, P. R. A1 - Konopelko, L. A1 - Valkova, M. A1 - Mogale, D.M. A1 - Botha, A. A1 - Brewer, P. A1 - Murugan, A. A1 - Minnaro, M.D. A1 - Miller, M. A1 - Guenther, F. A1 - Kelly, M.E. T1 - CCQM K101 Final report international comparison CCQM-K101:Oxygen in nitrogen-a track B comparison and that the matrix contains argon N2 - This key comparison aims to assess the capabilities of the participants to determine the amount-of-substance fraction oxygen in nitrogen. The GAWG has classified this as a track B comparison, due to the unexpected 50 μmol/mol argon mole fraction content of the transfer standards, which effects the achievable performance of some measurement techniques such a GC-TCD. The separation of oxygen and argon is challenging, and not all systems in use are equally well designed for it. As this analytical challenge due to a substantial fraction of argon in the transfer standards became a reality, the Gas Analysis Working Group (GAWG) decided to qualify this key comparison as a regular key comparison and not as a core comparison, which may be used to support calibration and measurement capabilities (CMCs) for oxygen in nitrogen, or for oxygen in nitrogen mixtures containing argon only (see also the section on support to CMCs). KW - CCQM-K101 KW - Gas analysis PY - 2016 UR - http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0026-1394/53/1A/08013 SN - 1681-7575 SN - 0026-1394 VL - 53 IS - Techn Suppl SP - 08013, 1 EP - 71 PB - IOP publishing AN - OPUS4-40013 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - GEN A1 - van Beek, F. A1 - Kuijper, P. A1 - Voskuilen, J. A1 - Hean, S. A1 - Recknagel, Christoph A1 - Mookhoek, S. D. A1 - van Vliet, D. T1 - Guidlines for flexible joint transition systems RTD 1007-4:2020 N2 - Flexible joint transition systems in the form of bituminous joint transitions, type 4.1a according to RTD1007-1, have been used in the Netherlands with varying success. The lifespan in practice was found to vary greatly: between 1 and 5 years. This is too short a lifespan in relation to the lifespan of the layers of asphalt pavement. Ideally, the replacement of these bituminous joint transitions should take place simultaneously as the maintenance of the asphalt layers. In the meantime, research has been carried out nationally and internationally into improving the life span of bituminous joint transitions. In Germany and Switzerland, the regulations have been shown to lead to a life span of more than 10 years. On this basis, ETAG032-3 was established in the context of EOTA in 2013. In a competition "Silent sustainable joint transitions" held by the Dutch Directorate-General for Public Works and Water Management in the period 2007-2012, three flexible bituminous joint transitions have already been tested, two of which were ultimately found to be suitable. These have been included in the multi-choice matrix (RTD 1007-1) as concept 4.1b (anchored bituminous joint transition) and 4.1c (unanchored bituminous joint transition with stretch-spreading inlay and poured asphalt edge beams). Monitoring these joint transitions in practice over the past 8 years has shown that the desired life span is achievable with these improved joint transitions. It is expected that the improvement in life span achieved abroad can also be realised in the Netherlands if several aspects specific to the Netherlands are taken into account:  For large parts of the Dutch main road network, the traffic intensity of 500,000 heavy vehicles per year assumed in the ETAG032-3 is insufficient. This is a factor 4 to 5 higher on the busiest main roads in the Netherlands.  On 90% of the Dutch main road network, in contrast to countries such as Germany and Switzerland, an open layer (ZOAB (zeer open asfaltbeton [very open asphalt concrete])) is used.  In the Netherlands, in contrast to countries such as Germany and Switzerland, bridges and viaducts are made on a large scale of prefabricated beams and 'floating' support systems that consist entirely of rubber supports that can be deformed all-round. Such constructions have a less favourable, high-frequency deformation behaviour under traffic load.  In Germany and Switzerland, a minimum joint mass temperature of -20 °C is assumed to test bituminous joint transitions. For the Netherlands, -15 °C is assumed, which has a favourable effect. The present second version of RTD 1007-4 is a guideline for the development and realisation of a new generation of more durable flexible joint transitions with a minimum design life of 10-15 years and is a guideline for contractors to demonstrate that a flexible joint transition system meets the requirements as set out in the Directorate-General for Public Works and Water Management guideline RTD 1007-2. KW - Technical rule KW - Approval requirements KW - Extension joints KW - Highway pavements PY - 2020 VL - Version 2.0 SP - 1 EP - 77 CY - Rijkswaterstaat AN - OPUS4-54599 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER -