TY - JOUR A1 - Zerbst, Uwe A1 - Madia, Mauro A1 - Kiyak, Yusuf A1 - Breidung, Marc A1 - Baer, Wolfram A1 - Küppers, M. ED - Madia, Mauro T1 - Stiffness/constraint effects in analytical flaw assessment - A technical note N2 - Using the case study of a fail-safe design criterion for a steering knuckle of a commercial vehicle, the effect of stiffness/constraint on the crack driving force in the component is discussed. The problem arises when assessment procedures such as R6, BS 7910 or SINTAP/FITNET are applied in conjunction with substitute geometries for determining the model parameters K-factor and limit load (or a substitute for the latter), as it is common practice. In the example, the conservatism was so pronounced that this procedure was in fact unusable. A way out could be the finite element-based determination of the model parameters and their use in the analytical framework. This procedure is useful and effective if the finite element-based calculations are used in parameter sensitivity analyses. KW - Fail-safe design KW - Fracture resistance KW - Fracture assessment KW - Stiffness KW - Constraint PY - 2022 DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108728 SN - 0013-7944 IS - 273 SP - 1 EP - 15 PB - Elsevier Science CY - Kidlington AN - OPUS4-55544 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Zerbst, Uwe A1 - Bruno, Giovanni A1 - Buffière, J.-Y. A1 - Wegener, T. A1 - Niendorf, T. A1 - Wu, T. A1 - Zhang, X. A1 - Kashaev, N. A1 - Meneghetti, G. A1 - Hrabe, Nik A1 - Madia, Mauro A1 - Werner, Tiago A1 - Hilgenberg, Kai A1 - Koukolikova, M. A1 - Prochazka, R. A1 - Dzugan, J. A1 - Möller, B. A1 - Beretta, S. A1 - Evans, Alexander A1 - Wagener, R. A1 - Schnabel, K. T1 - Damage tolerant design of additively manufactured metallic components subjected to cyclic loading: State of the art and challenges N2 - This article is an outcome of a workshop on Fatigue of Additive Manufactured Metallic Components jointly organized by the Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing (BAM) Berlin, Germany and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Boulder, CO, U.S.A. The aim of the workshop was a comprehensive discussion of the specific aspects of additively manufactured (AM) components in regard to failure under cyclic loading. Undoubtedly, a better understanding and the further development of approaches for damage tolerant component design of AM parts are among the most significant challenges currently facing the use of these new technologies. This article presents a thorough overview of the workshop discussions. It aims to provide a review of the parameters affecting the damage tolerance of AM parts with special emphasis on the process parameters intrinsic to the AM technologies, the resulting defects and residual stresses. Based on these aspects, concepts for damage tolerant component design for AM are reviewed and critically discussed. KW - Additive manufacturing KW - Fatigue loading KW - Component assessment KW - Damage tolerance KW - Defects KW - Residual stresses PY - 2021 DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2021.100786 SN - 0079-6425 VL - 121 PB - Elsevier CY - Amsterdam AN - OPUS4-51937 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Zerbst, Uwe A1 - Madia, Mauro A1 - Bruno, Giovanni A1 - Hilgenberg, Kai T1 - Towards a Methodology for Component Design of Metallic AM Parts Subjected to Cyclic Loading N2 - The safe fatigue design of metallic components fabricated by additive manufacturing (AM) is still a largely unsolved problem. This is primarily due to (a) a significant inhomogeneity of the material properties across the component; (b) defects such as porosity and lack of fusion as well as pronounced surface roughness of the asuilt components; and (c) residual stresses, which are very often present in the as‐built parts and need to be removed by post‐fabrication treatments. Such morphological and microstructural features are very different than in conventionally manufactured parts and play a much bigger role in determining the fatigue life. The above problems require specific solutions with respect to the identification of the critical (failure) sites in AM fabricated components. Moreover, the generation of representative test specimens characterized by similar temperature cycles needs to be guaranteed if one wants to reproducibly identify the critical sites and establish fatigue assessment methods taking into account the effect of defects on crack initiation and early propagation. The latter requires fracture mechanics‐based approaches which, unlike common methodologies, cover the specific characteristics of so‐called short fatigue cracks. This paper provides a discussion of all these aspects with special focus on components manufactured by laser powder bed fusion (L‐PBF). It shows how to adapt existing solutions, identifies fields where there are still gaps, and discusses proposals for potential improvement of the damage tolerance design of L‐PBF components KW - L‐PBF KW - Fatigue KW - Fracture KW - Defects PY - 2021 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b43-525822 DO - https://doi.org/10.3390/met11050709 VL - 11 IS - 5 SP - 709 PB - MDPI CY - Basel AN - OPUS4-52582 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER -