TY - JOUR A1 - Örnemark, U. A1 - Fostel, H. A1 - Straub, R. A1 - van de Kreeke, Johannes T1 - Policies, requirements and surveys concerning frequency for participation in proficiency testing schemes N2 - This paper focuses on policies and requirements concerning the frequency for participation in proficiency testing (PT) and provides an overview of the frequency for which PT activities are offered in 25 testing fields. Recent international surveys are summarised. KW - Proficiency testing KW - External quality assessment KW - Frequency KW - Accreditation KW - Policy documents KW - Eptis PY - 2004 DO - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-004-0858-2 SN - 0949-1775 SN - 1432-0517 IS - 9 SP - 729 EP - 732 PB - Springer CY - Berlin AN - OPUS4-5198 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Boley, N. A1 - van der Veen, A.M.H. A1 - Robouch, P. A1 - Golze, Manfred A1 - van de Kreeke, Johannes A1 - Örnemark, U. A1 - Tylee, B. T1 - Comparability of PT schemes - what did we learn from COEPT? N2 - Abstract The use of proficiency testing schemes (PTS) by laboratories as an integral part of their quality system has been increasing in recent years. Accreditation bodies, regulators and the laboratories’ customers are increasingly using results from PTS in their relationship with laboratories. There are many PTS available in Europe in analytical chemistry; EPTIS indicates over 400. The comparability of these PTS is now a real issue, as many organisers of PTS move into new markets. The COEPT project has systematically demonstrated (in four technical sectors – water, soil, food and occupational hygiene), that there are many similarities between PTS in each sector. For example, nearly all use the z-score as a performance index. One significant difference between many PTS is the value used for the term s in the z-score equation, and this gives a range of evaluations for the same data point. Despite this, the agreement between PTS in the same sector for the evaluation of data is approximately 85%. COEPT has given us a basis for establishing the comparability of PTS and showing us where further harmonisation could occur. KW - Proficiency testing KW - Comparability KW - Harmonisation PY - 2006 SN - 0949-1775 SN - 1432-0517 VL - 11 IS - 8-9 SP - 391 EP - 399 PB - Springer CY - Berlin AN - OPUS4-14162 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Schmidt, Anita A1 - Örnemark, U. A1 - Golze, Manfred A1 - Henriksen, G.M. T1 - Surveys on the accreditation of providers of proficiency testing and external quality assessment schemes KW - Interlaboratory comparison KW - Proficiency testing KW - External quality assessment KW - Accreditation KW - Certification PY - 2006 DO - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-006-0161-5 SN - 0949-1775 SN - 1432-0517 VL - 11 IS - 8-9 SP - 379 EP - 384 PB - Springer CY - Berlin AN - OPUS4-12814 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER -