TY - CONF A1 - Schwirn, K. A1 - Völker, D. A1 - Ahtianinen, J. A1 - Schmidt, Alexandra A1 - Bresch, Harald A1 - Kämpf, K. A1 - Bachmann, V. A1 - Kuhlbusch, T. ED - Bosse, H. ED - Buhr, E. ED - Dziomba, T. ED - Hodoroaba, Vasile-Dan ED - Klein, T. ED - Krumrey, M. T1 - OECD Test Guidelines development for chemicals safety assessment of nanomaterials N2 - The OECD test guidelines (TGs) for testing chemicals have been widely used for regulatory purposes all over the world since the establishment of the Mutual Acceptance of Data (MAD) principle in 1984. This MAD principle ensures that, if a chemical is tested under the Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) conditions accordingly to an OECD TG, the data should be accepted in all OECD countries. The TGs have been developed, harmonized, internationally validated (round robin tests) and adopted by OECD countries to be used for the physical-chemical characterisation, fate estimation, and hazard identification for risk assessment of various chemicals. In addition to the TGs, OECD Guidance Documents (GDs) usually provide guidance on how to use TGs and how to interpret the results. These GDs do not have to be fully experimentally validated, and hence they are not under MAD, but they are based on relevant published scientific research. But are the existing TGs and the related GDs applicable and adequate for the regulatory testing of nanomaterials? In general, for nanomaterials it is accepted that most of the "endpoints" or more precisely measurement variables are applicable. However, for some endpoints new or amended TGs are needed. In addition, several GDs are needed to give more precise advice on the test performance in order to gain regulatory relevant data on nanomaterials. T2 - NanoWorkshop 2018: Workshop on Reference Nanomaterials CY - Berlin, Germany DA - 14.05.2018 KW - OECD KW - Nano KW - Guideline KW - Nanomaterials KW - Prüfrichtlinie PY - 2019 SN - 978-3-95606-440-1 DO - https://doi.org/10.7795/110.20190412 SN - 0179-0609 VL - F-61 SP - 279 EP - 279 PB - Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt CY - Braunschweig und Berlin AN - OPUS4-49515 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kim, K.J. A1 - Unger, Wolfgang A1 - Kim, J.W. A1 - Moon, D.W. A1 - Gross, Thomas A1 - Hodoroaba, Vasile-Dan A1 - Schmidt, Dieter A1 - Wirth, Thomas A1 - Jordaan, W. A1 - van Staden, M. A1 - Prins, S. A1 - Zhang, L. A1 - Fujimoto, T. A1 - Song, X.P. A1 - Wang, H. T1 - Inter-laboratory comparison: quantitative surface analysis of thin Fe-Ni alloy films N2 - An international interlaboratory comparison of the measurement capabilities of four National Metrology Institutes (NMIs) and one Designated Institute (DI) in the determination of the chemical composition of thin Fe-Ni alloy films was conducted via a key comparison (K-67) of the Surface Analysis Working Group of the Consultative Committee for Amount of Substance. This comparison was made using XPS (four laboratories) and AES (one laboratory) measurements. The uncertainty budget of the measured chemical composition of a thin alloy film was dominated by the uncertainty of the certified composition of a reference specimen which had been determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry using the isotope dilution method. Pilot study P-98 showed that the quantification using relative sensitivity factors (RSFs) of Fe and Ni derived from an alloy reference sample results in much more accurate result in comparison to an approach using RSFs derived from pure Fe and Ni films. The individual expanded uncertainties of the participants in the K-67 comparison were found to be between 2.88 and 3.40 atomic %. The uncertainty of the key comparison reference value (KCRV) calculated from individual standard deviations and a coverage factor (k) of 2 was 1.23 atomic %. KW - Quantification KW - Fe-Ni alloy KW - Uncertainty KW - Key comparison KW - Traceability PY - 2012 DO - https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.3795 SN - 0142-2421 SN - 1096-9918 VL - 44 IS - 2 SP - 192 EP - 199 PB - Wiley CY - Chichester AN - OPUS4-24505 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - CONF A1 - Schmidt, Dirk A1 - T., Heidermann T1 - Ergebnisse der experimentellen Untersuchungen zur Visualisierung der Wirksamkeit von Deflagrationsrohrsicherungen in einer PVC-U Rohrleitung N2 - Deflagrationsrohrsicherungen sind Sicherheitseinrichtungen, die den Durchfluss von brennbaren Gasen und Dämpfen brennbarer Flüssigkeiten ermöglichen, den Flammendurchschlag und eine weitere Explosionsausbreitung nach der Zündung von explosionsfähigen Gas-/Dampf-Luftgemischen jedoch verhindern sollen. Die Einbaubedingungen sind dabei von besonderer Bedeutung für die Wirksamkeit der Deflagrationsrohrsicherungen. Oft lassen sich aus betrieblichen bzw. verfahrenstechnischen Gründen entsprechende Einbaubedingungen nur schwer oder nicht realisieren. So können beispielsweise Rohrleitungsverzweigungen zusätzliche Turbulenzen induzieren und dadurch zu erhöhten Flammenausbreitungsgeschwindigkeiten und Explosionsdrücken und ggf. zum Versagen der Deflagrationsrohrsicherung führen. Neben den „klassischen“ Untersuchungsmethoden dieser Belastungssituationen von Deflagrationsrohrsicherungen, wie die Erfassung des Explosionsdruckes und der Flammenausbreitungsgeschwindigkeiten, werden in diesem Beitrag die Ergebnisse der visuellen Beobachtungen des Reaktionsverlaufes sowie die Belastungen der Flammendurchschlagsicherung bei unterschiedlichen Einbaubedingungen in den Vordergrund gestellt. Gegenübergestellt wird die Belastungssituation der Flammensperre in einer geraden und einer verzweigten Rohrleitung. Verwendet wurde dafür eine speziell gefertigte Deflagrationsrohrsicherung, die eine Beobachtung des Reaktionsverlaufs im Bereich der spiralförmig gewickelten Metallbändern erlaubt. Zusätzlich wurde im geschützten Bereich in der Rohrleitung eine Kamera installiert, die die Belastungssituation bei den einzelnen Versuchen dokumentierte. Die Ergebnisse bestätigen sehr eindrucksvoll, dass die Belastungssituation der Deflagrationsrohrsicherung sich in Abhängigkeit von der Konfiguration der Rohrleitung entscheidend ändert T2 - 15. BAM/PTB-Kolloquium zur chemischen und physikalischen Sicherheitstechnik CY - Brunswick, Germany DA - 21.05.2019 KW - Flammendurchschlagsicherungen KW - Rohrleitungen KW - Deflagrationen PY - 2019 DO - https://doi.org/10.7795/210.20190521A VL - 15. SP - 1 EP - 10 PB - PTB CY - Braunschweig AN - OPUS4-48084 LA - deu AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Baytekin, H.T. A1 - Wirth, Thomas A1 - Gross, Thomas A1 - Treu, Dieter A1 - Sahre, Mario A1 - Theisen, J. A1 - Schmidt, M. A1 - Unger, Wolfgang T1 - Determination of wettability of surface-modified hot-embossed polycarbonate wafers used in microfluidic device fabrication via XPS and ToF-SIMS N2 - The wettability of the surfaces inside the microchannels of a microfluidic device is an important property considering a liquid flows through them. Contact angle measurements usually applied to test the wettability of surfaces cannot be used for an analysis of microchannel walls within microfluidic devices. A workaround is the use of surface analytical methods, which are able to reach points of interest in microchannels and may provide information on the surface chemistry established there. In calibrating these methods by using flat polymer wafers, where the contact angle can be measured as usual, data measured in real microchannels can be evaluated in terms of wetting properties. Reference wafers of bisphenol-A polycarbonate, a polymeric material that is often used in fluidic microdevice fabrication, were treated under different oxygen plasma conditions. The modified surfaces were characterized by using XPS, time of flight (ToF)-SIMS and atomic force microscope (AFM). Surface chemistry and surface topography have been correlated with contact angle measurements. In addition, effects of ageing or rinsing after plasma treatment have also been investigated. KW - Oxygen plasma KW - Polycarbonate KW - XPS KW - ToF-SIMS KW - Principal component analysis PY - 2008 DO - https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.2724 SN - 0142-2421 SN - 1096-9918 VL - 40 IS - 3-4 SP - 358 EP - 363 PB - Wiley CY - Chichester AN - OPUS4-17340 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER -