TY - JOUR A1 - Kosár, László A1 - Szabová, Zuzana A1 - Kuracina, Richard A1 - Spitzer, Stefan A1 - Mynarz, Miroslav A1 - Filipi, Bohdan T1 - Study of the Safety Characteristics of Different Types of Pepper Powder (Capsicum L.) N2 - This research was aimed at comparing the fire characteristics of different types of pepper in the context of explosion prevention. The following characteristics were studied: explosion pressure Pmax and Kst at selected concentrations, ignition temperature of the deposited dust layer from the hot surface, and minimum ignition energy. The comparison of the chemical properties of the used types of pepper was performed using TG/DSC. The results of the measurements suggest that different types of peppers exhibit different explosion characteristics. Each sample reached the maximum value of the explosion pressure and rate of pressure rise at different concentrations. The volume of the explosion chamber used also influenced the explosion characteristics. It is a consequence of the fact that the explosion characteristics strongly depend on the mechanism of action of a particular igniter. The minimum effect on the safety characteristics was observed when measuring the minimum ignition energy and the minimum ignition temperature of the dust layer from the hot surface. The results of the measurements suggest that different types of peppers exhibit different explosion characteristics. This information should then be considered in explosion prevention. KW - Dust explosions KW - Pepper samples KW - Explosion characteristics KW - Explosion protection PY - 2024 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b43-605965 DO - https://doi.org/10.3390/fire7070229 VL - 7 IS - 7 SP - 1 EP - 14 PB - MDPI AG AN - OPUS4-60596 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Spitzer, Stefan A1 - Reitmeier, Fabian A1 - Danzi, Enrico A1 - Janovsky, Bretislav A1 - Paul, Michael T1 - The Exploding Wire: A novel ignition source for the determination of safety characteristics of dusts and hybrid mixtures N2 - For the determination of safety characteristics of dusts there are mainly chemical igniters in use. Especially for the maximum explosion pressure and the maximum rate of pressure rise there is no standard with another ignition source. The chemical igniters have the disadvantage of being very hard to obtain in most countries and they are even illegal in some. This leads to the fact, that those countries are not able to investigate the safety characteristics or only with a high effort by sending dust samples to facilities outside the country. This article presents a novel ignition source and describes how to build it. It is also the first step to place this ignition source into the dust standards in the future. KW - Explosion protection KW - Dust explosions KW - Pressure rise PY - 2025 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b43-645209 DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elstat.2025.104188 SN - 0304-3886 VL - 138 SP - 1 EP - 8 PB - Elsevier B.V. AN - OPUS4-64520 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Spitzer, Stefan A1 - Pandal, Adrián A1 - Rodríguez, Manuel Velasco A1 - Schmidt, Martin A1 - Danzi, Enrico A1 - Dufaud, Olivier A1 - Janovsky, Bretislav T1 - Investigations on different distribution systems for dusts inside the 20L-sphere N2 - The determination of several safety characteristics for dusts requires the dispersion of it in air. This is normally conducted using two vessels, one with an overpressure holding the dust and dispersing it into the second one, where the explosion takes place, through a nozzle. This procedure has the disadvantage that some dusts cannot be conveyed through the nozzle properly. Another disadvantage is that the pressure balancing between the two vessels depends on the dust loading and especially for heavy dusts and high loadings the initial pressure inside the explosion vessel might be reduced. Flocky dusts or dusts that might be dangerous to convey through a thin nozzle with an overpressure (nano powders, zirconium) are also difficult to test according to the existing standards and may not be tested with the standard nozzles, that are so far used for the determination of safety characteristics. One very recent example, testing nitrocellulose, raised the question, whether some dusts even pose a risk being distributed and pressed through a nozzle for the testing device and, in worst case, for the operator. Previous researchers have developed alternative types of nozzles for specific types of dust, but provide limited evaluation of their performance relative to standard nozzles. Additionally, researchers have not provided sufficient geometry so that they can be reproduced by others. One alternative nozzle for the dispersion of flocky or coarse dusts is stated in the ISO standard but not described there either. This article investigates four types of nozzles: The two standard ones that are widely used already, an alternative type, that got introduced into the international standard in 2016 but is still seldomly used and one that was constructed to overcome some of the observed disadvantages. The injection curves are compared with and without dust loadings as well as the explosion characteristics. Eventually, a suggestion is given for different types of dusts. KW - Dust explosions KW - Safety characteristics PY - 2024 DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2024.105492 SN - 0950-4230 VL - 92 SP - 1 EP - 12 PB - Elsevier B.V. AN - OPUS4-61697 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER -