TY - JOUR A1 - Yang, L. A1 - Vogl, Jochen A1 - Mann, J. A1 - Kraft, R. A1 - Vocke, R. A1 - Pramann, A. A1 - Eberhardt, J. A1 - Rienitz, O. A1 - Lee, K.-S. A1 - Lim, J. S. A1 - Sobina, E. A1 - Song, P. A1 - Wang, J. A1 - Mester, Z. A1 - Meija, J. T1 - Copper isotope delta measurements in high purity materials: CCQM-P213 pilot study N2 - Accurate and precise isotope ratio measurements of heavy elements are playing an increasinglyimportant role in modern analytical sciences and have numerous applications. Today, isotope ratio measurements are typically performed with two principal techniques: thermal ionization mass spectrometry (TIMS) and multiple collector-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (MC-ICP-MS). To obtain accurate results by mass spectrometry, isotopic certified reference materials (iCRMs) are needed for mass bias correction and for the validation of the method used for analysis.Thus, it is of paramount importance to achieve measurement comparability of all data reported, and to assess measurement capability of each CRM producer/National Metrology Institute (NMI). Therefore, the international comparison (CCQM-P213) was performed to assess the analytical capabilities of NMIs for the accurate determination of copper isotope ratio delta values in high purity materials. The study was proposed by the coordinating laboratories, National Research Council Canada (NRC), National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung (BAM) and Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), as an activity of the Isotope Ratio Working Group (IRWG) of the Consultative Committee for Amount of Substance - Metrology in Chemistry and Biology (CCQM). Participants included six NMIs and one designated institute (DI) from the six countries. Although no measurement method was prescribed by the coordinating laboratories, MC-ICP-MS with either standard-sample bracketing (SSB) or combined SSB with internal normalization (C-SSBIN) models for mass bias correction were recommended. Results obtained from the six NMIs and one DI were in good agreement. KW - Comparability KW - Traceability KW - Metrology KW - Isotope delta KW - Copper PY - 2023 DO - https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/60/1A/08019 VL - 60 IS - 1A SP - 1 EP - 23 PB - IOP Science AN - OPUS4-58040 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kim, K.J. A1 - Unger, Wolfgang A1 - Kim, J.W. A1 - Moon, D.W. A1 - Gross, Thomas A1 - Hodoroaba, Vasile-Dan A1 - Schmidt, Dieter A1 - Wirth, Thomas A1 - Jordaan, W. A1 - van Staden, M. A1 - Prins, S. A1 - Zhang, L. A1 - Fujimoto, T. A1 - Song, X.P. A1 - Wang, H. T1 - Inter-laboratory comparison: quantitative surface analysis of thin Fe-Ni alloy films N2 - An international interlaboratory comparison of the measurement capabilities of four National Metrology Institutes (NMIs) and one Designated Institute (DI) in the determination of the chemical composition of thin Fe-Ni alloy films was conducted via a key comparison (K-67) of the Surface Analysis Working Group of the Consultative Committee for Amount of Substance. This comparison was made using XPS (four laboratories) and AES (one laboratory) measurements. The uncertainty budget of the measured chemical composition of a thin alloy film was dominated by the uncertainty of the certified composition of a reference specimen which had been determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry using the isotope dilution method. Pilot study P-98 showed that the quantification using relative sensitivity factors (RSFs) of Fe and Ni derived from an alloy reference sample results in much more accurate result in comparison to an approach using RSFs derived from pure Fe and Ni films. The individual expanded uncertainties of the participants in the K-67 comparison were found to be between 2.88 and 3.40 atomic %. The uncertainty of the key comparison reference value (KCRV) calculated from individual standard deviations and a coverage factor (k) of 2 was 1.23 atomic %. KW - Quantification KW - Fe-Ni alloy KW - Uncertainty KW - Key comparison KW - Traceability PY - 2012 DO - https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.3795 SN - 0142-2421 SN - 1096-9918 VL - 44 IS - 2 SP - 192 EP - 199 PB - Wiley CY - Chichester AN - OPUS4-24505 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER -