TY - JOUR A1 - Alvisi, M. A1 - Blome, M. A1 - Griepentrog, Michael A1 - Hodoroaba, Vasile-Dan A1 - Karduck, P. A1 - Mostert, M. A1 - Nacucchi, M. A1 - Procop, Mathias A1 - Rohde, M. A1 - Scholze, F. A1 - Statham, P. A1 - Terborg, R. A1 - Thiot, J.-F. T1 - The Determination of the Efficiency of Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectrometers by a New Reference Material N2 - A calibration procedure for the detection efficiency of energy dispersive X-ray spectrometers (EDS) used in combination with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) for standardless electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) is presented. The procedure is based on the comparison of X-ray spectra from a reference material (RM) measured with the EDS to be calibrated and a reference EDS. The RM is certified by the line intensities in the X-ray spectrum recorded with a reference EDS and by its composition. The calibration of the reference EDS is performed using synchrotron radiation at the radiometry laboratory of the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt. Measurement of RM spectra and comparison of the specified line intensities enables a rapid efficiency calibration on most SEMs. The article reports on studies to prepare such a RM and on EDS calibration and proposes a methodology that could be implemented in current spectrometer software to enable the calibration with a minimum of operator assistance. KW - Energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry KW - Standardless analysis KW - X-ray detectors KW - Detection efficiency KW - Spectrometer calibration PY - 2006 DO - https://doi.org/10.1017/S1431927606060557 SN - 1431-9276 SN - 1435-8115 VL - 12 IS - 5 SP - 406 EP - 415 PB - Cambridge University Press CY - New York, NY AN - OPUS4-13135 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - CONF A1 - Terborg, R. A1 - Hodoroaba, Vasile-Dan T1 - Determination of Thin Film Thickness and Composition using Energy Dispersive EPMA N2 - Electron probe microanalysis (EPMA)is a non-destructive technique which assumes a sample of homogenous (bulk) chemical composition and can, therefore, not be used for thin film samples. However, in combination with one of the possible thin film software packages, STRATAGEM, the thickness as well as the composition of such films on a substrate can be determined. This has been demonstrated for FeNi on Si and SiGe on Al2O3 film systems. For both systems five samples with different elemental composition and a reference were produced and characterised by the Korean research institute KRISS using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), Rutherford backscattering (RBS), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). In 2021, a new and open source thin film evaluation programme called BADGERFILM has been released. It can also be used to determine thin film composition and thickness from intensity ratios of the unknown sample and standards (k-ratios). In this contribution, we re-evaluated the data acquired for the FeNi and SiGe systems using the BADGERFILM software package and compared the resulting composition and thickness with the results of the established STRATAGEM software and other reference methods. With the current evaluation, the BADGERFILM software shows good agreement with the composition and thickness calculated by STRATAGEM and provided by the KRISS. These results between two well-known layered material systems analysed with available conventional EMPA approaches (STRATAGEM and direct thickness measurement by TEM) and a new one (BADGERFILM) proves that reliable non-destructive thin film analysis is possible. In this way, we validate the performance of the new software, which is not at all self-explanatory for such complex quantification algorithms lying behind the final quantified results. T2 - EMAS 2023 - 17th European Workshop on Modern Developments and Applications in Microbeam Analysis CY - Krakow, Poland DA - 07.05.2023 KW - Thin films KW - BADGER film KW - Electron probe microanallysis (EPMA) KW - FeNi thin film KW - Al2O3 thin films PY - 2023 UR - https://www.microbeamanalysis.eu/events/event/60-emas-2023-17th-european-workshop-on-modern-developments-and-applications-in-microbeam-analysis AN - OPUS4-57484 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Hodoroaba, Vasile-Dan A1 - Terborg, R. A1 - Procop, M. T1 - Determination of the effective EDS detector area using experimental and theoretical X-ray emission yields N2 - An energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer operating with a semiconductor detector should be specified in compliance with the ISO standard 15632 [1]. Requirements for specification are: a) a general description of the spectrometer to evaluate its performance, b) the energy resolution with corresponding dead time, c) the P/B ratio in the Fe55 spectrum and, finally, d) the L/K intensity Ratio in a Ni or Cu spectrum to estimate spectrometer efficiency at low energies. Items b) to d) can be easily checked by the user. Related procedures are recommended in the annexes of the standard. KW - EDS KW - X-rays KW - Effective solid angle PY - 2015 DO - https://doi.org/10.1017/S1431927615008181 SN - 1431-9276 SN - 1435-8115 VL - 21 IS - Suppl. 3 SP - Paper 0739, 1481 EP - 1482 PB - Cambridge University Press CY - New York, NY AN - OPUS4-34342 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Procop, Mathias A1 - Terborg, R. T1 - Measurement and calculation of x-ray production efficiencies for copper, zirconium, and tungsten N2 - Electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) is based on physical relations between measured X-ray intensities of characteristic lines and their Xray production efficiency, which depends on the specimen composition. The quality of the analysis results relies on how realistically the physical relations describe the generation and emission of X-rays. Special experiments are necessary to measure X-ray production efficiencies. A challenge in these experiments is the determination of the detection efficiency of the spectrometer as a function of the photon energy. An energy-dispersive spectrometer was used in this work, for which the efficiency was determined at metrological synchrotron beamlines with an accuracy of ±2%. X-ray production efficiencies for the L series and the Kα series of copper and zirconium and for the M and L series of tungsten were determined at energies up to 30 keV in a scanning electron microscope. These experimental values were compared with calculated X-ray production efficiencies using physical relations and material constants applied in EPMA. The objective of the comparison is the further improvement of EPMA algorithms as well as extending the available database for X-ray production efficiencies. Experimental data for the X-ray production efficiency are also useful for the assessment of spectrum simulation software. KW - Copper KW - Electron probe microanalysis KW - Tungsten KW - X-ray production efficiency KW - Zirconium PY - 2022 DO - https://doi.org/10.1017/S1431927622012351 VL - 28 IS - 6 SP - 1865 EP - 1877 PB - Oxford University Press CY - Oxford AN - OPUS4-55711 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Terborg, R. A1 - Hodoroaba, Vasile-Dan A1 - Falke, M. A1 - Käppel, A. T1 - On the characterization of the geometrical collection efficiency of modern EDS systems N2 - To compare the performance of different energy dispersive X-ray spectrometers (EDS), it is important to define characteristic spectrometer parameters. The ISO 15632 standard defines parameters like energy resolution as FWHM for the Kα lines of carbon, fluorine and manganese. The quantum efficiency, which is the ratio of the detected photons divided by the number of incoming photons for different energies, is another significant spectrometer property. It is important for the light element and low energy line detection sensitivity as well as for higher photon energies above 10 keV. A striking EDS feature, provided and marketed by many manufactures, is the active area of the detector, although actually, the solid angle available for photon collection is the more relevant geometrical parameter. It is defined as: Ω = A /r2 with A being the active area of a spherical detector and r being the distance between the point of the radiation origin and the center of the surface of the active detector chip. A more accurate calculation should be used for large flat detector areas. One should note that the solid angle Ω is not an intrinsic spectrometer property. It can only be defined for a specific detector in combination with a specific system (e.g. SEM, EPMA or TEM). Thus, the minimal possible distance r is determined by the particular geometry e.g. a possible interference with the pole piece or other detectors/components in the chamber of a microscope. New EDS technologies use e.g. integrated SDD chips or inclined chips in thinner detector fingers which can be placed closer to the sample with the final result of larger real solid angles. Therefore, the knowledge of the real solid angle is one of the crucial parameters of an EDS microscope combination. A straightforward way to estimate the real solid angle is to simply determine A and r. If respective data are not provided by the manufacturer, this approach can be difficult. KW - EDS KW - EDX KW - Geometrical collection efficiency KW - Solid angle PY - 2014 DO - https://doi.org/10.1017/S1431927614007454 SN - 1431-9276 SN - 1435-8115 VL - 20 IS - Suppl. S 3 SP - 1144 EP - 1145 PB - Cambridge University Press CY - New York, NY AN - OPUS4-31388 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - CONF A1 - Terborg, R. A1 - Hodoroaba, Vasile-Dan A1 - Falke, M. A1 - Käppel, A. ED - Hozak, P. T1 - Characterization of EDS systems with respect to the geometrical collection efficiency T2 - IMC 2014 - 18th International microscopy congress CY - Prague, Czech Republic DA - 07.09.2014 KW - EDS KW - EDX KW - Geometrical collection efficiency KW - Solid angle PY - 2014 SN - 978-80-260-6720-7 SP - IT-5-P-1533, 1-2 AN - OPUS4-31945 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER -