TY - CONF A1 - Schulte, Petra T1 - Physikalische Gefahren: Prüf- und Bewertungsstrategien N2 - Der Vortrag vermittelt einen Überblick über die physikalischen Gefahren nach der CLP-Verordnung (Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1272/2008), die Schnittstelle zum global harmonisierten System zur Einstufung und Kennzeichnung auf Grundlage des UN Manual of Tests and Criteria, die Bedeutung der Qualitätssicherung bei Prüfungen auf physikalische Gefahren, sowie die Prüf- und Bewertungsstrategien und welche Tests dabei unverzichtbar sind. T2 - SCHEK-Infotag 2019 CY - Berlin, Germany DA - 12.12.2019 KW - Einstufung KW - Physikalische Gefahren KW - GHS KW - CLP KW - Prüfmethoden KW - Einstufungskriterien KW - Gefahrenklasse KW - Manual of Tests and Criteria PY - 2019 AN - OPUS4-50224 LA - mul AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - CONF A1 - Schulte, Petra T1 - Physikalische Gefahren: Einstufungskriterien, Prüfmethoden, Vergleich mit Gefahrgutvorschriften N2 - Vorgehensweise und Verfahren für die Validierung von Informationen zur Bewertung der Eigenschaften von Stoffen und Gemischen, die zu einer Einstufung und Kennzeichnung der physikalischen Gefahren nach der CLP-Verordnung (Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1272/2008) führen. T2 - Haus der Technik e.V.: GHS/CLP-Basisseminar - Einstufen und Kennzeichnen mit dem GHS (CLP-Verordnung) CY - Wolfsburg, Germany DA - 28.08.2019 KW - Einstufung KW - Kennzeichnung KW - GHS KW - CLP KW - Prüfmethoden PY - 2019 AN - OPUS4-49005 LA - deu AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Lüth, Peter A1 - Frost, K. A1 - Kurth, Lutz A1 - Malow, Marcus A1 - Michael-Schulz, Heike A1 - Schmidt, Martin A1 - Schulte, Petra A1 - Uhlig, S. A1 - Zakel, S. T1 - CEQAT-DGHS Interlaboratory Test Programme for Chemical Safety - Need of Test Methods Validation N2 - Safety experts, manufacturers, suppliers, importers, employers or consumers must be able to rely on the validity of safety-related test methods and on correct test results and assessments in the laboratory. Via the eChemPortal lots of data from the REACH registration dossiers are available. However, the quality and correctness of the information remains in the responsibility of the data submitter. Unfortunately, we found more or less appropriate information on physicochemical properties and concluded that more quality or adequacy of any data submitted will be needed. Interlaboratory tests play a decisive role in assessing the reliability of test results. Interlaboratory tests on different test methods have been performed by Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und –prüfung (BAM) and Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB) in collaboration with the QuoData GmbH during the last 10 years. Significant differences between the results of the participating laboratories were observed in all interlaboratory tests. The deviations of the test results were not caused only by laboratory faults but also by deficiencies of the test method. In view of the interlaboratory test results the following conclusions can be drawn: • To avoid any discrepancy on classification and labelling of chemicals it should become state of the art to use validated test methods and the results accompanied by the measurement uncertainty. • A need for improvement is demonstrated for all examined test methods. Thus, interlaboratory tests shall initially aim at the development, improvement and validation of the test methods and not on proficiency tests. • The laboratory management and the practical execution of the tests need to be improved in many laboratories. • The term "experience of the examiner" must be seen critically: A "long experience with many tests" is not necessarily a guarantee for correct results. T2 - 16th International Symposium on Loss Prevention and Safety Promotion in the Process Industries and accompanying exhibition. Loss prevention 2019 CY - Delft, The Netherlands DA - 16.06.2019 KW - Dangerous goods KW - Hazardous substances KW - Round robin test KW - Interlaboratory comparison KW - Test method KW - Validation KW - Quality assurance PY - 2019 UR - https://www.aidic.it/cet/19/77/001.pdf SN - 978-88-95608-74-7 U6 - https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1977001 SN - 2283-9216 VL - 77 SP - 1 EP - 6 PB - Italian Association of Chemical Engineering AN - OPUS4-49496 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER -