TY - JOUR A1 - Pham-Van, S. A1 - Hinkelmann, R. A1 - Nehrig, Marko A1 - Martinez, I. T1 - A comparison of model concepts and experiments for seepage processes through a dike with a fault zone N2 - eepage processes through a dike with a fault zone on the landside and on the seaside are numerically and experimentally investigated. The numerical simulation is based on a two-phase (water-gas) flow model concept for porous media. Different discrete model concepts accounting for the fault zones are compared among each other and with the experiments. A good agreement between experimental and numerical results was obtained when the fault zones were discretized with 1D elements or with highly resolved 2D elements. We generally recommend choosing 1D elements. When the fault zone is modeled as an open pipe, the seepage velocity is considerably overestimated. Concerning dike stability, a fault zone on the landside is much worse compared to a fault zone on the seaside. KW - Fault zones KW - Fractured-porous media KW - Water-gas flow KW - Numerical modelling KW - Dike PY - 2011 DO - https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2011.11015359 SN - 1997-003X SN - 1994-2060 VL - 5 IS - 1 SP - 149 EP - 158 PB - CSE Dept., the H.K. PolyU CY - Hong Kong AN - OPUS4-23281 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - CONF A1 - Nehrig, Marko A1 - Wille, Frank A1 - Quercetti, Thomas A1 - Masslowski, Jörg-Peter A1 - Droste, Bernhard A1 - Pope, R. T1 - Historical view and experiences with the crush test for light weight packages T2 - PATRAM 2010 - 16th International symposium on the packaging and transport of radioactive materials CY - London, UK DA - 2010-10-03 KW - Crush test KW - IAEA regulations KW - Type-B PY - 2010 SP - 1 EP - 8(?) AN - OPUS4-23303 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - CONF A1 - Nehrig, Marko T1 - Historical view and experiences with the crush test for light weight packages T2 - 16th International Symposium on the Packaging and Transport of Radioactive Materials PATRAM CY - London, England DA - 2010-10-03 PY - 2010 AN - OPUS4-23334 LA - deu AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Nehrig, Marko A1 - Wille, Frank A1 - Quercetti, Thomas A1 - Masslowski, Jörg-Peter A1 - Droste, Bernhard A1 - Pope, R. T1 - Historical view and experiences with crush test for light weight packages N2 - The crush test for light weight and low density type B packages was introduced for the first time into the 1985 edition of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) transport safety regulations. In the early 1970s, the need for an additional mechanical test besides or instead of the well known 9 m drop test was deliberated. Various authors and test facilities, including BAM and Sandia National Laboratories (SNL), were able to prove that the level of safety provided by IAEA drop and puncture tests in the regulations did not protect against dynamic crush forces to smaller packages. As early as the third PATRAM symposium held in 1971 (Richland, WA, USA), Robert F. Barker asked for '... a more strenuous crushing test for protecting small, light weight packages ...' BAM developed from research activities a proposal as to which types of packages should be subject to crush tests and how the crush tests should be performed, which was presented at the 5th PATRAM symposium held in 1978 (Las Vegas, NV, USA). At the IAEA, the possible need for a crush test was first mentioned in 1977. The subject for a discussion, besides the principal need for this test, was also the development of suitable set of crush test boundary conditions. It took more than four years of discussion until a dynamic crush test similar to today's test was recommended by experts to the IAEA regulatory revision panel. Finally, after a rigorous evaluation process in which also the boundary conditions were determined, the crush test was proposed to be incorporated into the IAEA regulations. BAM and SNL participated in the crush test development and implementation process right from the beginning in the early 1970s until its implementation in the IAEA regulations in 1985. Today, BAM performs crush test procedures according to para. 727(c) of TS-R-1, which have not been changed since their first implementation. Crush tests performed in 2002 at BAM will be discussed. These approval design tests were performed on birdcage pellet transport containers under normal and accident conditions according to the IAEA regulations. KW - Package testing KW - Crush testing KW - Regulations PY - 2011 DO - https://doi.org/10.1179/1746510911Y.0000000016 SN - 1746-5095 SN - 1746-5109 SN - 0957-476X VL - 22 IS - 3 SP - 125 EP - 129 PB - Ramtrans Publ. CY - Ashford AN - OPUS4-25349 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - CONF A1 - Nehrig, Marko A1 - Bletzer, Claus Wilhelm A1 - Wille, Frank T1 - Pressure build-up inside packages containing wet intermediate level radioactive waste due to thermal loads N2 - Over the last years several transport approval procedures were finished for ductile cast iron containers containing wet intermediate level waste. BAM was involved in the assessment of mechanical and thermal aspects, activity release and material and component behavior regarding fulfillment of the regulatory requirements. The radioactive contents of these package designs which were not dried, only drained, consist of saturated ion exchange resin and a small amount of free water. Regarding wet contents, the most interesting point, however, is the pressure build-up inside the package due to vaporization. This could be aused by radiolysis of the liquid and must be taken into account for the storage period. The paper deals primarily with the pressure build-up inside the package aused by the regulatory thermal test (30 min at 800°C) as part of the cumulative test scenario under accident conditions of transport. The pressure build-up is estimated by calculation in a very conservative way regarding conduction and heat radiation. To get trustworthy results without an exact specification of the content, physical fire tests should be conducted. This paper will result in the strong advice, that contents should be dried to ensure a positive outcome of the safety assessment. T2 - ASME 2012 Pressure vessels & piping division conference CY - Toronto, Ontario, Canada DA - 15.07.2012 KW - Radioactive material KW - Pressure build-up KW - Wet intermediate level waste PY - 2012 SP - PVP2012-78282, 1-6 PB - American Society of Mechanical Engineers CY - New York AN - OPUS4-26321 LA - deu AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - CONF A1 - Nehrig, Marko T1 - Safety Assessment Aspects of Type-B(U) Packages Containing Wet Intermediate Level Waste T2 - RAMTRASNPORT 2012 CY - London, England DA - 2012-05-22 PY - 2012 AN - OPUS4-26325 LA - deu AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - CONF A1 - Nehrig, Marko T1 - Pressure build-up Inside Packages Containing Wet Intermediate Level Radioactive Waste due to Thermal Loads T2 - ASME PVP 2012 CY - Toronto, Canada DA - 2012-07-15 PY - 2012 AN - OPUS4-26327 LA - deu AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - CONF A1 - Feldkamp, Martin A1 - Nehrig, Marko A1 - Bletzer, Claus Wilhelm A1 - Wille, Frank T1 - Pressure build-up during the fire test in type B(U) packages containing water - 13280 N2 - The safety assessment of packages for the transport of radioactive materials with content containing liquids requires special consideration. The main focus is on water as supplementary liquid content in Type B(U) packages. A typical content of a Type B(U) package is ion exchange resin, waste of a nuclear power plant, which is not dried, normally only drained. Besides the saturated ion exchange resin, a small amount of free water can be included in these contents. Compared to the safety assessment of packages with dry content, attention must be paid to some more specific issues. An overview of these issues is provided. The physical and chemical compatibility of the content itself and the content compatibility with the packages materials must be demonstrated for the assessment. Regarding the mechanical resistance the package has to withstand the forces resulting from the freezing liquid. The most interesting point, however, is the pressure build-up inside the package due to vaporization. This could for example be caused by radiolysis of the liquid and must be taken into account for the storage period. If the package is stressed by the total inner pressure, this pressure leads to mechanical loads to the package body, the lid and the lid bolts. Thus, the pressure is the driving force on the gasket system regarding the activity release and a possible loss of tightness. The total pressure in any calculation is the sum of partial pressures of different gases which can be caused by different effects. The pressure build-up inside the package caused by the regulatory thermal test (30 min at 800 deg. C), as part of the cumulative test scenario under accident conditions of transport is discussed primarily. To determine the pressure, the temperature distribution in the content must be calculated for the whole period from beginning of the thermal test until cooling-down. In this case, while calculating the temperature distribution, conduction and radiation as well as evaporation and condensation during the associated process of transport have to be considered. This paper discusses limiting amounts of water inside the cask which could lead to unacceptable pressure and takes into account saturated steam as well as overheated steam. However, the difficulties of assessing casks containing wet content will be discussed. From the authority assessment point of view, drying of the content could be an effective way to avoid the above described pressure build-up and the associated difficulties for the safety assessment T2 - WM2013 Conference CY - Phoenix, Arizona, USA DA - 24.02.2013 KW - Fire test KW - B(U) KW - Thermal test KW - Pressure KW - Water PY - 2013 SN - 978-0-9836186-2-1 SP - 1 EP - 12(?) CY - Phoenix, Arizona, USA AN - OPUS4-27997 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - CONF A1 - Bletzer, Claus Wilhelm A1 - Nehrig, Marko A1 - Feldkamp, Martin A1 - Wille, Frank A1 - Völzke, Holger T1 - Druckaufbau in Behältern mit feuchtem Inventar N2 - Beim Betrieb von Kernkraftwerken fallen kontaminierte feuchte Abfallstoffe, wie z. B. Ionenaustauscherharze an, die in Transport- und Lagerbehältern der Entsorgung zugeführt werden. In Deutschland ist die BAM die zuständige Behörde für die Bauartprüfung von Typ B-Versandstücken. Im Zulassungsverfahren wird die Einhaltung der Schutzziele solcher Verpackungen überprüft. Basis für die Bewertung sind hierbei nationale und internationale gesetzliche Grundlagen sowie Regularien, welche in direkter Linie auf den IAEA SSR-6 [1] basieren. Die BAM ist ebenfalls im Rahmen einer Verwaltungsvereinbarung durch das BfS mit der Behälterbauartprüfung sowie der Beurteilung der qualitätssichernden Maßnahmen auf Grundlage von Kapitel 7 in [3] beauftragt. Typ-B(U) Verpackungen dienen zur Aufnahme verschiedenster radioaktiver oder radioaktiv kontaminierter Inhalte wie Brennelemente, Core-Bauteile, Rückbaurückstände oder belasteter Reinigungs- und Hilfsstoffe. In den meisten Fällen werden trockene bzw. getrocknete Inhalte verpackt. Potentiell feuchte oder nasse Inhalte wie z.B. Verdampferkonzentrate werden oftmals innerhalb der Verpackung getrocknet und können somit als trockene Inhalte behandelt werden. Beladene Ionenaustauscherharze werden i.d.R. mittels Transportwasser in die Verpackung eingespült und nur entwässert, aber nicht getrocknet. Die BAM war bereits in verschiedenen Zulassungsverfahren für Behälter mit feuchtem radioaktivem Inventar involviert. Bezüglich des Konrad Endlagers sind solche Verpackungen für feuchte, nicht Wärme entwickelnden Inhalte in der Regel als „Störfallfest verpackte Abfälle der Abfallbehälterklasse II [ABK II] mit spezifizierter Leckrate“ klassifiziert. In diesem Beitrag soll direkt Bezug zu den thermischen Prüfungen genommen werden. Im Transportfall sind hierbei die Unfallbeförderungsbedingungen zu unterstellen, die neben den mechanischen Prüfungen ein den Behälter vollständig einhüllendes Feuer von mindestens 800°C über 30 Minuten sowie der notwendigen Abkühldauer vorschreiben. Für eine geplante Endlagerung der Behälter ist im Zuge der Endlager-Bauartprüfung eine Branddauer von 60 Minuten mit nachfolgender 24-stündiger Abkühlphase unter abweichenden Randbedingungen gegenüber den verkehrsrechtlichen Regelwerksanforderungen zu beachten ([2] Kap. 5.3.). Bei einer möglichen Vorgehensweise zur Bestimmung des Druckaufbaus in einem Behälter aus den vorgeschriebenen Feuertests wird zuerst die Temperaturverteilung im Inhalt über den Zeitraum des Brands sowie der Abkühlphase berechnet. Der hier betrachtete Inhalt, der lediglich entwässert, aber nicht getrocknet ist, besteht sowohl aus gesättigtem Ionenaustauscherharz als auch aus einem geringen Anteil an freiem Wasser. Die Verdampfung von Wasser ist dabei ein kritischer Prozess der zum Druckaufbau im Behälter führt. Zur Einschätzung der aus dem thermischen Lastfall resultierenden Beanspruchungen des Behälters bis hin zur Gefährdung seiner Dichtheit und Integrität können sowohl rechnerische, als auch experimentelle Methoden Anwendung finden. Während sich die durch eine Brandbeanspruchung einstellenden Temperaturen in der Verpackung relativ genau berechnen lassen, erweist sich die Bestimmung der Temperatur- und Druckverteilung im Inventar aufgrund des komplexen thermischen und strömungsdynamischen Verhaltens als Herausforderung. Dabei ist der Wärmeübergang von der Behälterinnenwand in das Inventar sowie das thermische Verhalten des Inventars als inhomogen zu erhitzendes Gemisch aus Feststoffen, Fluiden (z.B. Wasser) und Gasen sehr komplex. Diese Vorgänge bestimmen jedoch den resultierenden und für die Sicherheitsbewertung maßgebenden Druckaufbau im Behälterinnenraum. Unter Berücksichtigung von Konvektion, Wärmeleitung und -strahlung werden thermische Zustände für den gewählten generischen Behälter aufgezeigt und die Effekte hinsichtlich Verdampfung und Druckaufbau erklärt. Anschließend werden zwei Ansätze zur Bestimmung des Partialdrucks durch Verdampfung im Behälter aufgezeigt. Para 663 und Para 664 der IAEA SSR-6 [1] der Transportbedingungen besagen, das - je nach Auslegung - der Feuertest bereits mit einem Innendruck von bis zu 700 kPa begonnen wird. Die beim Feuertest entstehenden Überdrücke müssen dann zum max. Auslegungsdruck hinzugefügt werden und der Behälter muss den Nachweis der Integrität mit den durch die Hitze reduzierten Werkstoffkennwerten des Behälters (Körper, Deckel, Verschlusssystem, Dichtung) nach der Vorschädigung durch die mech. Unfalltests erbringen. Bezüglich der Endlagerung besagt die Endlagerungsbestimmung [3] in Kap. 7.1.4.2.4, dass das “…Abfallprodukt so beschaffen sein muss, das bei der gemäß Unterkapitel 7.1.5.6 durchzuführenden thermischen Prüfung der maximal auftretende Innendruck 15 bar beträgt.”. T2 - KONTEC 2013 - 11. Internationales Symposium 'Konditionierung radioaktiverBetriebs- und Stilllegungsabfälle' CY - Dresden, Germany DA - 13.0,3.2013 KW - Druckaufbau KW - Radioaktive Abfälle KW - Endlager PY - 2013 IS - Sektion 4 / Vortrag 031 SP - 1 EP - 11 AN - OPUS4-28094 LA - deu AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - CONF A1 - Bletzer, Claus Wilhelm A1 - Nehrig, Marko A1 - Feldkamp, Martin A1 - Wille, Frank A1 - Völzke, Holger T1 - Pressure build up in casks containing wet waste T2 - KONTEC 2013 - 11. Internationales Symposium 'Konditionierung radioaktiverBetriebs- und Stilllegungsabfälle' CY - Dresden, Germany DA - 2013-03-13 KW - Pressure build up KW - Radioactive waste KW - Disposal PY - 2013 IS - Sektion 4 / Vortrag 031 SP - 1 EP - 10(?) AN - OPUS4-28095 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Nehrig, Marko A1 - Bletzer, Claus Wilhelm A1 - Wille, Frank T1 - Safety assessment aspects of type B(U) packages containing wet intermediate level waste N2 - In Germany, the mechanical and thermal safety assessment of approved packages for the transport of RAM is carried out by BAM as the competent authority according to the International Atomic Energy Agency regulations. BAM was involved in several approval procedures with ductile cast iron containers containing wet intermediate level waste. These contents, which are not dried, only drained, consist of saturated ion exchange resin and a small amount of free water. Compared to the safety assessment of packages with dry content, attention must be paid to some more specific points. The physical and chemical compatibility of the content itself and of the content with materials of the package must be shown. From the mechanical resistance point of view, the package has to withstand the forces resulting from the freezing liquid. The most interesting point, however, is the pressure build-up inside the package due to vapourisation. This could be caused by radiolysis of the liquid and must be taken into account for the storage period. The paper deals primarily with the pressure build-up inside the package caused by the regulatory thermal test (30 min at 800°C) as part of the cumulative test scenario under accident conditions of transport. To determine the pressure, the temperature distribution in the content must be calculated for the whole period from the beginning of the thermal test until cooling down. In this case, calculating the temperature distribution requires, besides the consideration of conduction and heat radiation, consideration of evaporation and condensation including the associated processes of transport. KW - Type B KW - Wet content KW - Pressure build-up KW - Vapourisation KW - Thermal test KW - Radioactive waste KW - Thermal analysis PY - 2012 DO - https://doi.org/10.1179/1746510913Y.0000000024 SN - 1746-5095 SN - 1746-5109 SN - 0957-476X VL - 23 IS - 3-4 SP - 187 EP - 190 PB - Ramtrans Publ. CY - Ashford AN - OPUS4-29935 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - CONF A1 - Nehrig, Marko A1 - Bletzer, Claus Wilhelm A1 - Wille, Frank T1 - Safety assessment aspects of type B(U) packages containing wet intermediate level waste N2 - In Germany, the mechanical and thermal safety assessment of approved packages for the transport of RAM is carried out by BAM as the competent authority according to the International Atomic Energy Agency regulations. BAM was involved in several approval procedures with ductile cast iron containers containing wet intermediate level waste. These contents, which are not dried, only drained, consist of saturated ion exchange resin and a small amount of free water. Compared to the safety assessment of packages with dry content, attention must be paid to some more specific points. The physical and chemical compatibility of the content itself and of the content with materials of the package must be shown. From the mechanical resistance point of view, the package has to withstand the forces resulting from the freezing liquid. The most interesting point, however, is the pressure build-up inside the package due to vapourisation. This could be caused by radiolysis of the liquid and must be taken into account for the storage period. The paper deals primarily with the pressure build-up inside the package caused by the regulatory thermal test (30 min at 800°C) as part of the cumulative test scenario under accident conditions of transport. To determine the pressure, the temperature distribution in the content must be calculated for the whole period from the beginning of the thermal test until cooling down. In this case, calculating the temperature distribution requires, besides the consideration of conduction and heat radiation, consideration of evaporation and condensation including the associated processes of transport. T2 - RAMTRANSPORT 2012 - 9th International Conference on the Radioactive Materials Transport and Storage CY - London, UK DA - 22.05.2012 KW - Radioactive materials KW - Safety assessment KW - Pressure build-up KW - Wet intermediate level waste PY - 2012 SP - 1 EP - 7 AN - OPUS4-26314 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER -