TY - CONF A1 - Kazlagic, Anera A1 - Rosner, M. A1 - Vogl, Jochen A1 - Cipriani, A. A1 - Frick, D. A. A1 - Glodny, J. A1 - Hoffmann, J. E. A1 - Hora, J. M. A1 - Irrgeher, J. A1 - Lugli, F. A1 - Magna, T. A1 - Meisel, T. C. A1 - Meixner, A. A1 - Possolo, A. A1 - Pramann, A. A1 - Pribil, M. A1 - Prohaska, T. A1 - Retzmann, A. A1 - Rienitz, O. A1 - Rutherford, D. A1 - Paula-Santos, G. A1 - Tatzel, M. A1 - Widhalm, S. A1 - Willbold, M. A1 - Zuliani, T. T1 - Investigating the differences between MC-ICP-MS and MC-TIMS using conventional 87Sr/86Sr isotope ratios in limestone and slate reference materials N2 - The Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing (BAM) organised an interlaboratory comparison (ILC) for the characterisation of 87Sr/86Sr isotope ratios in limestone (IAG/CGL ML-3) and Penrhyn slate (IAG OU-6) reference materials by applying the conventional method for 87Sr/86Sr isotope ratios. Samples were sent to thirteen analytical laboratories . Since both samples are powdered, rock materials, dissolution of the sample and Sr isolation via ion exchange chromatography were mandatory. This was done using acid, microwave/acid, bomb/acid digestion or borate fusion and subsequent isolation of Sr by means of commercially available ion exchange resins. In this study, we present and discuss the potential effects that differences between laboratories, and between two instrumental measurement techniques (i.e., MC-ICP-MS and MC-TIMS), may have upon the dispersion of measurement results of the 87Sr/86Sr isotope ratio in the two aforementioned reference materials. We used a statistical mixed effects model to assess the potential effects of both the laboratory and the measurement technique. Consensus values for both materials and associated standard uncertainties {(IAG/CGL ML-3 (0.708245±0.000004) mol/mol; IAG OU-6 (0.729769±0.000008) mol/mol} were estimated by fitting a linear, Gaussian mixed effects model (Pinheiro and Bates 2000) using the R function “lmer” defined in package “lme4”. The statistical results showed that there is no significant effect attributable to differences between instrumental techniques when both materials are considered together, or separately. The p-value of the test of significance of the measurement technique effect is greater than 0.54. For both materials there were statistically significant effects attributable to differences between laboratories when the measurement results for both materials were considered together and separately. This effect is less than 0.00004 in absolute value. However, for neither material did consideration or disregard for such differences induce significant changes in the estimate of the consensus value for the 87Sr/86Sr isotope ratio. Therefore, the effects attributable to differences between instrumental techniques or between laboratories can safely be disregarded when computing the best estimate for the true value of 87Sr/86Sr isotope ratio in these materials, by the community of expert laboratories represented in this study. T2 - GeoAnalysis 2022 CY - Freiberg, Germany DA - 06.08.2022 KW - Isotope ratio KW - Conventional isotope ratio KW - ILC KW - Traceability KW - Uncertainty KW - Isotope reference materials PY - 2022 AN - OPUS4-56848 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - CONF A1 - Vogl, Jochen A1 - Rienitz, O. A1 - Rosner, M. A1 - Mieller, Björn A1 - Kasemann, S. A1 - Kraft, R. A1 - Malinovskiy, D. A1 - Meixner, A. A1 - Noordmann, J. A1 - Rabb, S. A1 - Schuessler, J. A. A1 - Vocke, R. D. T1 - Calibration of Mg isotope amount ratios and delta values N2 - In the past, δ26/24Mg measurements were referenced to NIST SRM 980, the initial zero of the δ26/24Mg scale. With the development of MC-ICPMS, the detection of small but measurable isotopic differences in different chips of SRM 980 became apparent. To solve this problem a suite of magnesium isotope reference materials, ERM-AE143, -AE144 and -AE145, has been certified in a first study by applying an ab initio calibration for absolute Mg isotope ratios without any a priori assumptions, a procedure which fulfils all requirements of a primary method of measurement. We could achieve for the first time measurement uncertainties for isotope amount ratios close to the typical precision of magnesium delta values, δ26/24Mg, which are at the 0.1 ‰ level (2SD). In addition, it was demonstrated that commonly used fractionation laws are invalid for correcting Mg isotope ratios in multi-collector ICPMS as they result in a bias which is not covered by its associated uncertainty. Depending on their type, fractionation laws create a bias up to several per mil, with the exponential law showing the smallest bias between 0.1 ‰ to 0.7 ‰. With these isotope reference materials, it is possible to establish SI-traceability for magnesium delta measurements. To realize this, we organized a second study within which five expert laboratories participated to cross-calibrate all available magnesium isotope standards, which are NIST SRM 980, IRMM-009, ERM-AE143, ERM-AE144, ERM-AE145 and the standards DSM3 and Cambridge-1. The mean δ26/24Mg values for the individual iRMs, calculated from the laboratory means show 2 SD reproducibilities varying between 0.025 and 0.093 ‰. Propagated measurement uncertainties suggest a standard uncertainty of about 0.1‰ for δ26/24Mg determinations (2SD). Thus, SI traceability for magnesium isotope amount ratios and delta values is demonstrated to be established. T2 - 53rd annual conference of the DGMS including 27th ICP-MS User's Meeting CY - Münster, Germany DA - 01.03.2020 KW - Isotope ratio KW - Delta value KW - Metrology KW - Magnesium KW - Magnesium isotope ratios PY - 2020 N1 - Geburtsname von Mieller, Björn: Brandt, B. - Birth name of Mieller, Björn: Brandt, B. AN - OPUS4-50549 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER -