TY - JOUR A1 - Klingelhoeffer, Hellmuth A1 - Aegerter, J. A1 - Scherm, T. A1 - Schenuit, E. A1 - Sotheran, S. A1 - Loveday, M. A1 - Bosch, P. A1 - Bloching, H. A1 - Olbricht, Jürgen A1 - McEnteggart, I. T1 - Discussion on "Analysis on the issues in ISO 6892-1 and TENSTAND WP4 report based on the data of confirm tests by 21 laboratories" N2 - The authors, Li et al., of the paper entitled “Analysis on the Issues in ISO 6892-1 and TENSTAND WP4 Report Based on Data to Confirm Tests by 21 Laboratories” (J. Test. Eval. DOI: 10.1520/JTE20150479 (online only)) have expressed views that the authors of this rebuttal believe to be based on fundamental misunderstandings and misinterpretations of the tensile testing standard ISO 6892-1:2009, ISO 6892-1:2016, and its former versions, thus leading to erroneous conclusions. This refutation is intended to clarify the understanding of ISO 6892-1 and to address the misunderstandings and the misinterpretations of the authors of the paper. The present standard ISO 6892-1:2016 has a long history dating back to the 1970s. At that time, the tensile testing procedure was standardized on the National and International scale in parallel. To understand the present standard, the knowledge of the history helps to understand the background of details of the testing procedure implemented today. The history of the tensile testing standard has been discussed extensively during the annual international standardization meeting of ISO committee TC 164 SC1 for the last few years, at which some of the authors of the Li et al. paper attended. The authors continue to disagree with facts that were agreed by the consortium of the European research project TENSTAND and by the present international experts involved in ISO TC 164 SC1. It appears that the principal objective of the authors regarding their present publication was to increase the testing speed during tensile testing. However, the international standardization community has previously declined similar proposals by some of the authors. Many arguments presented by Li et al. were thus refuted. The conclusions of their paper are misleading and the international standardization community for tensile testing refused to revise the present standard, ISO 6892-1 (2016), according the authors’ proposals. KW - Tensile testing procedure KW - ISO 6892-1 KW - TENSTAND WP4 Final Report PY - 2017 DO - https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20160526 SN - 0090-3973 SN - 1945-7553 VL - 45 IS - 3 SP - 1105 EP - 1114 PB - ASTM International CY - West Conshohocken, PA, USA AN - OPUS4-40267 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - CONF A1 - Klingelhoeffer, Hellmuth T1 - Actual developments in fatigue standardisation N2 - Standardization of fatigue testing procedures takes place mainly on the international scale. The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and ASTM International (formerly American Society for Testing and Materials) are the most important global players in fatigue standardization. The actual developments in fatigue standardization on ISO scale are shown. Several ISO fatigue testing standards are currently under revision. These are the strain controlled low cycle fatigue testing standard ISO 12106, the strain controlled thermo-mechanical fatigue standard ISO 12111, the force controlled axial fatigue test ISO 1099, the rotating bar bending fatigue test ISO 1134, the cyclic fatigue test DIN 50100, the statistical planning and analysis standard ISO 12107, the fatigue crack growth test ISO 12108 and the Multi-axis fatigue test ISO / TR 12112. Additionally, suggestions for measurement uncertainty annexes of ISO standards are given. Problems regarding the temperature stability of extensometers are reported. In this presentation, an overview over the actual developments in the progress of fatigue testing standards will be given. T2 - LCF8 CY - Dresden, Germany DA - 27.06.2017 KW - Fatigue standardisation KW - ISO 12106 KW - ISO 12111 KW - DIN 50100 PY - 2017 SN - 978-3-9814516-5-8 SP - 239 EP - 244 PB - DVM CY - Berlin AN - OPUS4-40889 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER -