TY - JOUR A1 - Rienitz, O. A1 - Pramann, A. A1 - Vogl, Jochen A1 - Lee, K.-S. A1 - Yim, Y.-H. A1 - Malinovskiy, D. A1 - Hill, S. A1 - Dunn, P. A1 - Goenaga-Infante, H. A1 - Ren, T. A1 - Wang, J. A1 - Vocke jr., R. D. A1 - Rabb, S: A. A1 - Narukawa, T. A1 - Yang, L. A1 - Mester, Z. A1 - Meija, J. A1 - Aref'ev, D. G. A1 - Marchin, V. A1 - Sharin, A. G. A1 - Bulanov, A. D. A1 - Potapov, A. M. A1 - Otopkova, P. A. A1 - Kessel, R. T1 - The comparability of the determination of the molar mass of silicon highly enriched in 28Si: results of the CCQM-P160 interlaboratory comparison and additional external measurements N2 - An international comparison study on the accurate determination of the molar mass M(Si) of silicon artificially enriched in 28Si (x(28Si) > 0.9999 mol mol−1) has been completed. The measurements were part of the high level CCQM-P160 pilot study assessing the ability of National Metrology Institutes (NMIs) and Designated Institutes (DIs) to make such measurements at the lowest possible levels of measurement uncertainty and to identify possible difficulties when measuring this kind of sample. This study supports the molar mass measurements critical to disseminating the silicon route to realizing the new definitions for the kilogram and the mole. Measurements were also made by one external research institute and an external company. The different institutes were free to choose their experimental (mass spectrometric) set-ups and equipment, thereby enabling also the comparison of different techniques. The investigated material was a chemically pure, polycrystalline silicon material. The subsequent modified single crystalline secondary product of this material was intended for the production of silicon which was used for two additional spheres in the context of the redetermination of the Avogadro constant NA, required for the revision of the International System of Units (SI) via fundamental constants which came into force from May 2019. The CCQM pilot study was organized by Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB). Aqueous silicon solutions were shipped to all participating institutions. The data analysis as well as the uncertainty modelling and calculation of the results was predefined. The participants were provided with an uncertainty budget as a GUM Workbench® file as well as a free software license for the duration of the comparison. The agreement of the values of the molar mass (M(Si) = 27.976 942 577 g mol−1) was excellent with ten out of 11 results reported within the range of relative uncertainty of 1 × 10−8 required for the revision of the SI. KW - Absolute isotope ratio KW - Molar mass KW - Avogadro constant KW - Revision of the SI PY - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1088/1681-7575/abbdbf VL - 57 IS - 6 SP - 065028 PB - IOP Science CY - Cambridge AN - OPUS4-51500 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Vogl, Jochen A1 - Yim, Y.-H. A1 - Lee, K.-S. A1 - Goenaga-Infante, H A1 - Malinovskiy, D. A1 - Hill, S. A1 - Ren, T. A1 - Wang, J. A1 - Vocke, R. D. A1 - Murphy, K. E. A1 - Nonose, N. A1 - Rienitz, O. A1 - Noordmann, J. T1 - Certification of ERM-EB400, the first matrix reference material for lead isotope amount ratios, and ERM-AE142, a lead solution providing a lead isotopic composition at the edge of natural variation N2 - Lead isotope amount ratios are commonly used in diverse fields such as archaeometry, geochemistry and forensic science. Currently, five reference materials with certified lead isotope amount ratios are available, namely NIST SRM 981, 982 and 983, GBW-04442 and NMIJ 3681-a. Only NIST SRM 981 and NMIJ 3681-a have approximately natural isotopic compositions, and NIST SRM 981 is predominantly used for correcting mass discrimination/mass fractionation in the applied mass spectrometric procedures. Consequently, there is no other certified reference material available to be used for validation and/or quality control of the analytical procedures applied to lead isotope amount ratio measurements. To fill this gap, two new reference materials have been produced and certified for their lead isotope amount ratios. For both certified reference materials, complete uncertainty budgets have been calculated and SI traceability has been established. This provides the users with independent means for validating and verifying their analytical procedures and for conducting quality control measures. ERM-EB400 is a bronze material with a nominal lead mass fraction of 45 mg kg-1 and certified lead isotope amount ratios of n(206Pb)/n(204Pb) = 18.072(17) mol mol-1, n(207Pb)/n(204Pb) = 15.578(18) mol mol-1 and n(208Pb)/n(204Pb) = 38.075(46) mol mol-1 with the associated expanded uncertainties (k = 2) given in brackets. ERM-AE142 is a high-purity solution of lead in 2% nitric acid with a nominal mass fraction of 100 mg kg-1 and certified Pb isotope amount ratios of n(206Pb)/n(204Pb) = 21.114(17) mol mol-1, n(207Pb)/n(204Pb) = 15.944(17) mol mol-1 and n(208Pb)/n(204Pb) = 39.850(44) mol mol-1 with the associated expanded uncertainties (k = 2) given in brackets. Both materials are specifically designed to fall within the natural lead isotopic variation and to assist users with the validation and verification of their analytical procedures. Note that while one of these reference materials requires the chemical separation of Pb from its matrix (ERM-EB400), the other does not (ERM-AE142). As additional information, δ208/206PbNIST SRM981 values are provided for both materials. For ERM-AE142, a delta value of δ208/206PbNIST SRM981 = -28.21(30) ‰ was obtained, and for ERM-EB400, a delta value of δ208/206PbNIST SRM981 = -129.47(38) ‰ was obtained, with the associated expanded uncertainties (k = 2) given in brackets. KW - Lead isotope variations KW - Radiogenic isotopes KW - Isotope reference material KW - Metrology in chemistry KW - Measurement uncertainty PY - 2019 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1111/ggr.12253 SN - 1751-908X SN - 1639-4488 VL - 43 IS - 1 SP - 23 EP - 37 PB - John Wiley & Sons AN - OPUS4-47383 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Vogl, Jochen A1 - Kipphardt, Heinrich A1 - Richter, Silke A1 - Bremser, Wolfram A1 - Arvizu Torres, M. A1 - Lara Manzano, J. A1 - Buzoianu, M. A1 - Hill, S. A1 - Petrov, P. A1 - Goenaga-Infante, H. A1 - Sargent, M. A1 - Fisicaro, P. A1 - Labarraque, G. A1 - Zhou, T. A1 - Turk, G. C. A1 - Winchester, M. A1 - Miura, T. A1 - Methven, B. A1 - Sturgeon, R. A1 - Jährling, R. A1 - Rienitz, O. A1 - Mariassy, M. A1 - Hankova, Z. A1 - Sobina, E. A1 - Krylov, A. I. A1 - Kustikov, Y. A. A1 - Smirnov, V. V. T1 - Establishing comparability and compatibility in the purity assessment of high purity zinc as demonstrated by the CCQM-P149 intercomparison N2 - For the first time, an international comparison was conducted on the determination of the purity of a high purity element. Participants were free to choose any analytical approach appropriate for their institute’s applications and services. The material tested was a high purity zinc, which had earlier been assessed for homogeneity and previously used in CCQM-K72 for the determination of six defined metallic impurities. Either a direct metal assay of the Zn mass fraction was undertaken by EDTA titrimetry, or an indirect approach was used wherein all impurities, or at least the major ones, were determined and their sum subtracted from ideal purity of 100 %, or 1 kg/kg. Impurity assessment techniques included glow discharge mass spectrometry, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry and carrier gas hot extraction/combustion analysis. Up to 91 elemental impurities covering metals, non-metals and semi-metals/metalloids were quantified. Due to the lack of internal experience or experimental capabilities, some participants contracted external laboratories for specific analytical tasks, mainly for the analysis of non-metals. The reported purity, expressed as zinc mass fraction in the high purity zinc material, showed excellent agreement for all participants, with a relative standard deviation of 0.011 %. The calculated reference value, w(Zn) = 0.999 873 kg/kg, was assigned an asymmetric combined uncertainty of + 0.000025 kg/kg and – 0.000028 kg/kg. Comparability amongst participating metrology institutes is thus demonstrated for the purity determination of high purity metals which have no particular difficulties with their decomposition / dissolution process when solution-based analytical methods are used, or which do not have specific difficulties when direct analysis approaches are used. Nevertheless, further development is required in terms of uncertainty assessment, quantification of non-metals and the determination of purity of less pure elements and/or for those elements suffering difficulties with the decomposition process. KW - Purity assessment KW - Direct metal assay KW - Impurity assessment KW - Non-metal analysis KW - High-purity elements KW - SI-traceability PY - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1088/1681-7575/aaa677 SN - 1681-7575 SN - 0026-1394 VL - 55 IS - 2 SP - 211 EP - 221 PB - Institute of Physics Publishing CY - Bristol AN - OPUS4-44257 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - RPRT A1 - Vogl, Jochen A1 - Yim, Y.-H. A1 - Lee, K.-S. A1 - Goenaga-Infante, H. A1 - Malinovskiy, D. A1 - Vocke, R. D. A1 - Murphy, K. A1 - Nonose, N. A1 - Rienitz, O. A1 - Noordmann, J. A1 - Näykki, T. A1 - Sara-Aho, T. A1 - Ari, B. A1 - Cankur, O. T1 - CCQM-P134 Pb isotope amount ratios and delta-values in bronze N2 - Isotope amount ratios (hereafter referred to as simply isotope ratios) are proving useful in an ever increasing array of applications that range from studies unravelling transport processes, to pinpointing the provenance of specific samples as well as trace element quantification by using isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS). These expanding applications encompass fields as diverse as archaeology, food chemistry, forensic science, geochemistry, medicine and metrology. However, to be effective tools, the isotope ratio data must be reliable and traceable to enable the comparability of measurement. The importance of traceability and comparability in isotope ratio analysis has already been recognized by the Inorganic Analysis Working Group (IAWG) within the CCQM. Three pilot studies have focused on the quality of isotope ratio determinations (P48 “U isotope ratios in urine”, P75 “stable isotopes in Methionine”, P105 “87Sr/86Sr in wine”). Moreover, isotope ratio measurements are fundamental to IDMS amount of substance determinations. For example, when Pb quantification using IDMS is undertaken, this requires the measurements of Pb isotope ratios. While the requirements for isotope ratio accuracy and precision in the case of of IDMS are generally quite modest, “absolute” Pb isotope ratio measurements for geochemical age dating and source rock characterization as well as forensic provenance and fingerprinting studies require Pb isotope ratio measurements of the highest quality. To support present and future CMCs on isotope ratio determinations, a Key Comparison was urgently needed. Therefore, it was decided at the IAWG meeting in Paris in April 2011 that a Key Comparison on the determination of Pb isotope ratios in a pure Pb solution and in a bronze sample should be organized and accompanied by a pilot study. Measuring Pb isotope amount ratios in a pure Pb solution, while seemingly straight forward, rigorously tests the ability of analyst to correct for any instrumental effects (such as mass discrimination and blank correction) on the measured ratios. Pb, present in trace amounts in a metal matrix sample (e.g. Pb in bronze), provides a real world test of the whole chemical and instrumental procedure, from chemical separation and sample purification to analysis and subsequent correction of appropriate instrumental effects on the separated samples. A suitable bronze material with a Pb mass fraction between 10 and 100 mg·kg-1 was available at BAM. A high purity solution of Pb with a mass fraction of approximately 100 mg·kg-1 was also available. By comparing the Pb isotope ratio results obtained for the bronze sample with the Pb isotope ratio results from the Pb solution, potential biases arising from the processing of the bronze sample could be effectively identified and separated from the instrumental effects arising from the measurement and data processing protocol. KW - Isotope ratio KW - Delta value KW - Molar mass KW - Measurement uncertainty KW - Traceability PY - 2017 UR - https://www.bipm.org/wg/CCQM/IAWG/Allowed/IAWG_Pilot_Studies/CCQM-P134.pdf SP - 1 EP - 42 PB - BIPM (Bureau International des Poids et Mesures) CY - Paris AN - OPUS4-47709 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - RPRT A1 - Vogl, Jochen A1 - Becker, Dorit A1 - Koenig, Maren A1 - Yim, Y.-H. A1 - Lee, K.-S. A1 - Goenaga-Infante, H. A1 - Malinowskiy, D. A1 - Hill, S. A1 - Ren, T. A1 - Wang, J. A1 - Vocke, R. D. A1 - Murphy, K. A1 - Nonose, N. A1 - Rienitz, O. A1 - Noordmann, J. T1 - Certification Report for the Isotopic Reference Materials ERM-AE142 and ERM-EB400 N2 - Lead (Pb) isotope amount ratios are commonly used in applications ranging from archaeology and forensic sciences to terrestrial and extra-terrestrial geochemistry. Despite their utility and frequency of use, only three certified isotope amount ratio reference materials are currently available for Pb: NIST SRMs 981, 982 and 983. Because SRM 981 has a natural Pb isotopic composition, it is mainly used for correcting instrumental mass discrimination or fractionation. This means that, at present, there are no other certified isotope reference materials with natural Pb isotopic composition that could be used for validating or verifying an analytical procedure involving the measurement of Pb isotope amount ratios. To fill this gap, two new reference materials, both certified for their Pb isotopic composition, have been produced together with a complete uncertainty assessment. These new reference materials offer SI traceability and an independent means of validating or verifying analytical procedures used to produce Pb isotope amount ratio measurements. ERM-EB400 is a bronze material containing a nominal Pb mass fraction of 45 mg/kg. ERM-AE142 is a high purity solution of Pb with a nominal mass fraction of 100 mg/kg. Both materials have been specifically produced to assist analysts in verifying or validating their analytical procedures. Note that while one of these reference materials requires the chemical separation of Pb from its matrix (ERM-EB400), the other does not (ERM-AE142). Details on the certification of these isotope reference materials are provided in this report. KW - Lead isotopic composition KW - Isotope ratio KW - Reference material KW - Mass spectrometry PY - 2016 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:b43-392060 SP - 1 EP - 16 PB - Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung (BAM) CY - Berlin AN - OPUS4-39206 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Vogl, Jochen A1 - Yim, Y.-H. A1 - Lee, K.-S. A1 - Goenaga-Infante, H. A1 - Malinowskiy, D. A1 - Ren, T. A1 - Wang, J. A1 - Vocke Jr., R.D. A1 - Murphy, K. A1 - Nonose, N. A1 - Rienitz, O. A1 - Noordmann, J. A1 - Näykki, T. A1 - Sara-Aho, T. A1 - Ari, B. A1 - Cankur, O. T1 - Final report of the key comparison CCQM-K98: Pb isotope amount ratios in bronze KW - CCQM KW - Metrology KW - Isotope amount ratios KW - Lead PY - 2014 UR - http://www.bipm.org/utils/common/pdf/final_reports/QM/K98/CCQM-K98.pdf U6 - https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/51/1A/08017 SN - 0026-1394 SN - 1681-7575 VL - 51 IS - 1A Tech. Suppl. SP - 08017-1 EP - 08017-47 PB - Inst. of Physics Publ. CY - Bristol AN - OPUS4-31929 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER -