TY - CONF A1 - Apel, Andreas A1 - Wille, Frank A1 - Moutarde, M. A1 - Sert, G. A1 - Caillard-Lizot, M.-T. A1 - Eckert, B. A1 - Konnai, A. A1 - Pstrak, D. A1 - Harvey, J. A1 - Desnoyers, B. A1 - Purcell, P. A1 - Fiaccabrino, V. T1 - Stowage during transport: a proposal for harmonization N2 - For stowage and retention during transport, the International Atomic EnergyAgency (IAEA) Transport regulations (SSR-6) only require that the package shall be securely stowed. Additional information is given in the IAEA guidance material (SSG-26), that includes specific load factors that should be considered in the safety demonstrations. Nevertheless, applicants commonly use other load factors to justify the design of the packaging attachment points. In particular, acceleration values vary between different countries and this may lead to difficulties during the validation of foreign approval certificates. Discussions with applicants identified that the load factors presented in the IAEA guidance material are not necessarily relevant for the different transport modes. For some modes, the load factors are representative of situations occurring in routine conditions of transport. For other modes, the load factors are more representative of situations occurring in normal or accident conditions of transport. Furthermore, the origins of the specified values are not clear. In this context, some IAEA TRANSSC members decided to review the stowage guidance. An international working group was constituted in 2013, including representatives of competent authorities, technical support organizations, and transport stakeholders. Several topics were discussed and many questions were raised during the two year review. For example, some discussions focused on Paper No.1031 2 the conditions which have to be considered for stowage design, both as relevant to the load factors used for strength and fatigue analysis, as well as the criteria which have to be considered for the package attachment points. In addition, related questions on operational aspects were also discussed. Overall, the working group concluded that new guidance material was warranted as input into SSG-26. As a result of those discussions, the international working group produced new guidance material for stowage in transport, addressing each of these topics. The proposal to modify the IAEA guidance material (SSG-26, Appendix IV), presented by France to the TRANSSC in the 2015 initiated Review cycle of the Regulations, was unanimously accepted and will be implemented in the next edition of the guidance material. T2 - PATRAM 2016 CY - Kobe, Japan DA - 18.09.2016 KW - Packages for radioactive material KW - IAEA regulations (SSR-6, SSG-26) KW - Tie-down and stowage KW - Load cases for transport KW - Design of the packaging attachment points PY - 2016 SP - Paper 1031, 1 EP - 8 AN - OPUS4-38644 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - CONF A1 - Debruyne, M. A1 - Eckert, B. A1 - Wille, Frank A1 - Gauthier, F. A1 - Le Bars, I. A1 - Cordier, N. A1 - Jouve, A.-C. T1 - Assessment of safety demonstrations relative to packages containing UF6 N2 - Specific attention should be paid on safety demonstrations transmitted by applicants in the case of approval request for the package designs containing enriched UF6. Concerning the shipment of enriched UF6, the package designs consist in general of a filled 30B cylinder surrounded by an overpack. The description of the content, considering the UF6 origin, i.e. natural or reprocessed, shall be clearly justified especially when the UF6 isotopic composition exceeds the limits specified in ASTM standards. Concerning the containment of the UF6, the applicant shall demonstrate in all conditions of Transport the leak-tightness of the valve and plug of the cylinders filled with enriched UF6. In this regard, when justifications are based on numerical calculations, the absence of contact between These components of the cylinder and the internal surfaces of the overpack after the regulatory drop tests shall be shown. In particular, absence of contact between the valve and any other component of the packaging shall be confirmed to respect the current IAEA regulations [3]. If complementary calculations show a contact between the plug and the internal surfaces of the overpack, additional tests are required to confirm that the strength resulting from this contact will not affect the plug leak-tightness. It can be noticed that the future revision of the IAEA regulations will include additional provision in case of contact of the plug with any other component of the packaging. In addition, the applicant shall demonstrate that the melting temperature of the valve, including the tinned joint, will not be exceeded during the regulatory fire test. Furthermore, the representativeness of the ballast used to simulate the behaviour of the UF6 loaded within the cylinder shall be justified if drop tests are performed. Finally, specific provisions relative to the use of plugs and the maintenance of cylinders should be included in the safety analysis reports. T2 - 11th International Conference on the Transport, Storage and Disposal of Radioactive Materials CY - London, UK DA - 15.05.2018 KW - Uranhexaflourid KW - Package safety KW - Valve KW - Drop testing KW - Radioactive material PY - 2018 SP - 18523, 1 EP - 8 AN - OPUS4-45295 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - CONF A1 - Wille, Frank A1 - Debruyne, M. A1 - Eckert, B. A1 - Gauthier, F. A1 - Ben Ouaghrem, K. A1 - Le Bars, I. A1 - Jouve, A.-C. A1 - Cordier, N. T1 - Assessment of safety demonstrations relative to packages containing UF6 N2 - The safety demonstrations realized by applicants in the case of approval request for the package designs containing enriched UF6 have to take into account some specific technical issues. Concerning the shipment of enriched UF6, the package designs consist in general of a filled 30B cylinder surrounded by an overpack. The description of the content, considering the UF6 origin, i.e. natural or reprocessed, shall be clearly justified especially when the UF6 isotopic composition exceeds the limits specified in ASTM standards. Concerning the containment of the UF6, the applicant shall demonstrate in all conditions of transport the leak-tightness of the valve and plug of the cylinders filled with enriched UF6. In this regard, when mechanical justifications are based on numerical calculations, the absence of contact between these components of the cylinder and the internal surfaces of the overpack after the regulatory drop tests shall be shown to respect the IAEA regulations. Furthermore, the representativeness of the ballast used to simulate the behaviour of the UF6 loaded within the cylinder shall be justified if drop tests are performed. The representativeness of the ballast should also be justified for numerical calculations. In addition, the applicant shall demonstrate that the melting temperature of the valve and the plug, including the tinned joint, will not be exceeded during the regulatory fire test. Finally, specific provisions relative to the use of plugs and the maintenance of cylinders should be included in the safety analysis report. T2 - 19th International Symposium on the Packaging and Transportation of Radioactive Materials PATRAM 2019 CY - New Orleans, LA, USA DA - 04.08.2019 KW - Valve KW - Fire test KW - Content simulation KW - UF6 KW - Intumescent material PY - 2019 SP - Paper 1208, 1 EP - 8 AN - OPUS4-49094 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Knisz, J. A1 - Eckert, R. A1 - Gieg, L. A1 - Koerdt, Andrea A1 - Lee, J. A1 - Silva, E. A1 - Skovhus, T. L. A1 - An-Stepec, B. A. A1 - Wade, S. A. T1 - Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion - More than just Microorganisms N2 - Microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC) is a phenomenon of increasing concern which affects various materials and sectors of society. MIC describes the effects, often negative, that a material can experience due to the presence of microorganisms. Unfortunately, although several research groups and industrial actors worldwide have already addressed MIC, discussions are fragmented, while information sharing and willingness to reach out to other disciplines is limited. A truly interdisciplinary approach, that would be logical for this material/biology/chemistry-related challenge, is rarely taken. In this review we highlight critical non-biological aspects of MIC that can sometimes be overlooked by microbiologists working on MIC but are highly relevant for an overall understanding of this phenomenon. Here, we identify gaps, methods and approaches to help solve MIC related challenges, with an emphasis on the MIC of metals. We also discuss the application of existing tools and approaches for managing MIC and propose ideas to promote an improved understanding of MIC. Furthermore, we highlight areas where the insights and expertise of microbiologists are needed to help progress this field. KW - MIC KW - Biodeterioration KW - Biocorrosion KW - Interdisciplinarity KW - Multiple lines of evidence PY - 2023 DO - https://doi.org/10.1093/femsre/fuad041 SN - 0168-6445 VL - 47 IS - 5 SP - 1 EP - 70 PB - FEMS Microbiology Reviews AN - OPUS4-58066 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER -