TY - JOUR A1 - Oudwater, R. J. A1 - van Wijk, J. I. T. A1 - Persijn, S. A1 - Wessel, R. M. A1 - van der Veen, A. M. H. A1 - Mace, T. A1 - Sutour, C. A1 - Couette, J. A1 - Milton, M. A1 - Harling, A. A1 - Vargha, G. A1 - Uprichard, I. A1 - Haerri, H.-P. A1 - Niederhauser, B. A1 - Tuma, Dirk A1 - Maiwald, Michael A1 - Boissière, Claudia T1 - Final report on EURAMET QM-S8: Analysis of impurities in pure and balance gases used to prepare primary standard gas mixtures by the gravimetric method N2 - This project concerns the purity analysis of nitrogen as used in reference gas mixture preparation. This project was carried out without adding impurities to the gas used for this comparison, and is therefore more representative to evaluate the analysis of CO, CO2, CH4, O2, Ar and H2O impurities in high purity nitrogen. The analysis of the amount–of–substance fraction water was optional. Two 50 litre high purity nitrogen cylinders were purchased from a well-qualified supplier of specialty gases. The listed components were expected to be present in the pure nitrogen at the target levels as a result of the purification of the nitrogen. From the start of this comparison it was clear that the comparison may not lead to reference values for the constituents analysed. The results indicate that analyses of high purity gases are often limited by the limits of detection of analytical equipment used. The reports of the participating laboratories also indicate that there is no agreed method of determination of the uncertainty on a detection Limit value. The results provide useful information on the Performance of participants. For all analysed components there is reasonable agreement in results for LNE, VSL, Metas and NPL. For BAM only the Argon result is in agreement. KW - Gas analysis KW - Nitrogen KW - Purity analysis PY - 2013 DO - https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/50/1A/08023 SN - 0026-1394 SN - 1681-7575 VL - 50 IS - 08023 SP - 1 EP - 58 PB - Institute of Physics Publishing CY - Bristol AN - OPUS4-35896 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - van der Hout, J. W. A1 - van der Veen, A. M. H. A1 - Ziel, P. R. A1 - Kipphardt, Heinrich A1 - Tuma, Dirk A1 - Maiwald, Michael A1 - Fernández, T. E. A1 - Gómez, C. A1 - Cieciora, D. A1 - Ochman, G. A1 - Dias, F. A1 - Silvino, V. A1 - Macé, T. A1 - Sutour, C. A1 - Marioni, F. A1 - Ackermann, A. A1 - Niederhauser, B. A1 - Fükő, J. A1 - Büki, T. A1 - Szilágyi, Z. N. A1 - Tarhan, T. A1 - Engin, E. T1 - International Comparison Euramet.QM-K111 – Propane in Nitrogen N2 - This key comparison aims to assess the core capabilities of the participants in gas analysis. Such competences include, among others, the capabilities to prepare Primary Standard gas Mixtures (PSMs), perform the necessary purity analysis on the materials used in the gas mixture preparation, the verification of the composition of newly prepared PSMs against existing ones, and the capability of calibrating the composition of a gas mixture. According to the Strategy for Key Comparisons of the Gas Analysis Working Group, this key comparison is classified as an RMO track A key comparison. The artefacts were binary mixtures of propane in nitrogen at a nominal amount-of-substance fraction level of 1000 μmol/mol. The values and uncertainties from the gravimetric gas mixture preparation were used as key comparison reference values (KCRVs). Each transfer standard had its own KCRV. The results are generally good. All results are within ± 1 % of the KCRV. KW - EURAMET.QM-K111 KW - Propane in nitrogen PY - 2017 DO - https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/54/1A/08020 SN - 0026-1394 VL - 54 IS - Technical Supplement SP - 08020, 1 EP - 34 PB - IOP Science AN - OPUS4-44471 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Zhou, Z. A1 - Han, Q. A1 - Wang, D. A1 - Macé, T. A1 - Kipphardt, Heinrich A1 - Maiwald, Michael A1 - Tuma, Dirk A1 - Uehara, S. A1 - Akima, D. A1 - Shimosaka, T. A1 - Jung, J. A1 - Oh, S.-H. A1 - van der Veen, A. A1 - van Wijk, J.I.T. A1 - Ziel, P. R. A1 - Konopelko, L. A1 - Valkova, M. A1 - Mogale, D.M. A1 - Botha, A. A1 - Brewer, P. A1 - Murugan, A. A1 - Minnaro, M.D. A1 - Miller, M. A1 - Guenther, F. A1 - Kelly, M.E. T1 - CCQM K101 Final report international comparison CCQM-K101:Oxygen in nitrogen-a track B comparison and that the matrix contains argon N2 - This key comparison aims to assess the capabilities of the participants to determine the amount-of-substance fraction oxygen in nitrogen. The GAWG has classified this as a track B comparison, due to the unexpected 50 μmol/mol argon mole fraction content of the transfer standards, which effects the achievable performance of some measurement techniques such a GC-TCD. The separation of oxygen and argon is challenging, and not all systems in use are equally well designed for it. As this analytical challenge due to a substantial fraction of argon in the transfer standards became a reality, the Gas Analysis Working Group (GAWG) decided to qualify this key comparison as a regular key comparison and not as a core comparison, which may be used to support calibration and measurement capabilities (CMCs) for oxygen in nitrogen, or for oxygen in nitrogen mixtures containing argon only (see also the section on support to CMCs). KW - CCQM-K101 KW - Gas analysis PY - 2016 UR - http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0026-1394/53/1A/08013 SN - 1681-7575 SN - 0026-1394 VL - 53 IS - Techn Suppl SP - 08013, 1 EP - 71 PB - IOP publishing AN - OPUS4-40013 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Nieuwenkamp, G. A1 - Wessel, R. M. A1 - van der Veen, A.M.H. A1 - Ziel, P. R. A1 - Han, Q. A1 - Tuma, Dirk A1 - Woo, J.-C. A1 - Fuko, J.T. A1 - Szilágyi, N. A1 - Büki, T. A1 - Konopelko, L. A1 - Kustikov, Y.A. A1 - Popova, T.A. A1 - Pankratov, V.V. A1 - Pir, M.N. A1 - Nazarov, E.V. A1 - Ehvalov, L.V. A1 - Timofeev, A.U. A1 - Kuzmina, T.A. A1 - Meshkov, A.V. A1 - Valková, M. A1 - Pätoprsty, V. A1 - Downey, M. A1 - Vargha, G. A1 - Brown, A. A1 - Milton, M. T1 - International comparison CCQM-K77: Refinery gas N2 - Refinery gas is a complex mixture of hydrocarbons and non-combustible gases (e.g., carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, nitrogen, helium). It is obtained as part of the refining and conversion of crude oil. This key comparison aims to evaluate the measurement capabilities for these types of mixtures. The results of the key comparison indicate that the analysis of a refinery-type gas mixture is for some laboratories a challenge. Overall, four laboratories (VSL, NIM, NPL and VNIIM) have satisfactory results. The results of some participants highlight some non-trivial issues, such as appropriate separation between saturated and unsaturated hydrocarbons, and issues with the measurement of nitrogen, hydrogen and helium. Main text. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database kcdb.bipm.org/. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCQM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA). DatesIssue 1A (Technical Supplement 2012) KW - Ringversuch KW - Raffineriegas KW - Chromatographische Analyse PY - 2012 DO - https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/49/1A/08003 SN - 0026-1394 SN - 1681-7575 VL - 49 IS - 08003 SP - 1 EP - 71 PB - Inst. of Physics Publ. CY - Bristol AN - OPUS4-25931 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Richter, Matthias A1 - Baldan, A. A1 - Beelen, R. A1 - de Boed, E. J.J. A1 - Tuma, Dirk A1 - Kipphardt, Heinrich A1 - Wilke, Olaf A1 - van der Veen, A. M.H. T1 - Primary gas standards for the determination of sulfur-based impurities at trace level in hydrogen N2 - Hydrogen fuel quality needs to comply with ISO 14687:2025 to avoid harmful impact on applications using proton-exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cells. For total sulfur as one of the most impactful contaminants, an amount fraction of 4 nmol/mol has been set as threshold (so-called Grade D quality). In this study, novel gaseous primary gas standards (PGS) of seven sulfur compounds were prepared either gravimetrically at 1000 nmol/mol, 100 nmol/mol, and 10 nmol/mol, or dynamically diluted down to 4 nmol/mol in hydrogen and argon matrices with relative expanded uncertainties well below 10 % (k = 2) and proven stability of at least 9–12 months. Two different cylinder passivation treatments were compared, with one treatment identified as unsuitable since reactions took place within the mixture. By performing a cross-check study, equivalence between both sets of PGS could be demonstrated (≤ 5 % relative deviation for most of the sulfur species). KW - Hydrogen quality KW - ISO 14687 KW - Sulfur impurities KW - Primary gas standards KW - TD-GC/SCD PY - 2026 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b43-656759 DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2026.154461 SN - 0360-3199 VL - 224 SP - 1 EP - 13 PB - Elsevier Ltd. AN - OPUS4-65675 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - van der Veen, A. M H A1 - Zalewska, E. T. A1 - Kipphardt, Heinrich A1 - Beelen, R. R. A1 - Tuma, Dirk A1 - Maiwald, Michael A1 - Fükő, J. A1 - Büki, T. A1 - Szilágyi, Z. N. A1 - Beránek, J. A1 - Cieciora, D. A1 - Ochman, G. A1 - e.t al., T1 - Metrologia International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM), find out more - KEY COMPARISON International comparison CCQM-K118 natural gas N2 - CCQM-K118 was an international key comparison on natural gas composition with two types of gases, i.e., a low calorific hydrogen-enriched natural gas and a high calorific LNG type of gas. There were 14 participating laboratories. The traveling standards (i.e., 14 mixtures each) were obtained from an external source and checked for homogeneity and stability before and after the participants' measurements at the two coordinating laboratories. The data evaluation was performed using a consensus value and a laboratory effect model. The results of the participants were benchmarked against a key comparison reference value computed from the largest consistent subset (LCS) of the submitted results, adjusted for the differences between the travelling standards. For the first time in a key comparison in gas analysis, the model included a term to account for excess variability in the LCS. Most of the participants reported one or a few (slightly) discrepant results. Partly this is due to the heterogeneity and heteroscedasticity of the datasets. In all, the results in this key comparison demonstrate the good comparability of the national measurement standards for natural gas composition maintained by the participating NMIs. Main text. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database kcdb.bipm.org/. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCQM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA). To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCQM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA). KW - CCQM-K PY - 2022 DO - https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/59/1A/08017 SN - 0026-1394 VL - 59 IS - 1A PB - IOP Publishing LTD AN - OPUS4-56308 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER -