TY - CONF A1 - Sproesser, G. A1 - Schenker, S. A1 - Pittner, Andreas A1 - Borndörfer, R. A1 - Rethmeier, Michael A1 - Chang, Y.-J. A1 - Finkbeiner, M. T1 - Sustainable welding process selection based on weight space partitions N2 - Selecting a welding process for a given application is crucial with respect to the sustainability of part manufacturing. Unfortunately, since welding processes are evaluated by a number of criteria, preferences for one or the other process can be contradictory. However, the prevalent procedure of weight assignment for each criterion is subjective and does not provide information about the entire solution space. From the perspective of a decision maker it is important to be able to assess the entire set of possible weightings and answer the question which welding process is optimal for which set of weights. This issue is investigated by means of a weight space partitioning approach. Two welding processes are considered with respect to three criteria that reflect their economic and environmental performance. In order to find the most sustainable welding process the underlying weight space partition is evaluated. T2 - 13th Global Conference on Sustainable Manufacturing – Decoupling Growth from Resource Use CY - Bình Dương New City, Vietnam DA - 16.09.2015 KW - Welding costs KW - Multi-criteria decision support KW - LCA KW - Welding process selection KW - GMAW KW - Multi-attribute decision method PY - 2016 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:b43-353740 SN - 2212-8271 VL - 40 SP - 127 EP - 132 PB - Elsevier B.V. AN - OPUS4-35374 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Sproesser, G. A1 - Change, Y.-J. A1 - Pittner, Andreas A1 - Finkbeiner, M. A1 - Rethmeier, Michael ED - Stark, R. ED - Bonvoisin, J. ED - Seliger, G. T1 - Sustainable technologies for thick metal plate welding N2 - Welding is the most important joining technology. In the steel construction industry, e.g. production of windmill sections, welding accounts for a main part of the manufacturing costs and resource consumption. Moreover, social issues attached to welding involve working in dangerous environments. This aspect has unfortunately been neglected so far, in light of a predominant focus on economics combined with a lack of suitable assessment methods. In this chapter, exemplary welding processes are presented that reduce the environmental and social impacts of thick metal plate welding. Social and environmental Life Cycle Assessments for a thick metal plate joint are conducted for the purpose of expressing and analysing the social and environmental impacts of welding. Furthermore, it is shown that state-of-the-art technologies like Gas Metal Arc Welding with modified spray arcs and Laser Arc-Hybrid Welding serve to increase social and environmental performance in contrast to common technologies, and therefore offer great potential for sustainable manufacturing. KW - Human health G. KW - Life cycle assessment (LCA) KW - Arc welding KW - Laser arc-hybrid welding KW - Resource efficiency KW - Social life cycle assessment (SLCA) PY - 2017 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:b43-390025 SN - 978-3-319-48513-3 SN - 978-3-319-48514-0 SN - 2194-0541 SN - 2194-055X SP - 71 EP - 84 PB - Springer CY - Cham, Switzerland AN - OPUS4-39002 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Sproesser, Gunther A1 - Chang, Y.-J. A1 - Pittner, Andreas A1 - Finkbeiner, M. A1 - Rethmeier, Michael T1 - Life cycle assessment of welding technologies for thick metal plate welds N2 - Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is applied in evaluating environmental impacts of state-of-the-art welding technologies. Manual Metal Arc Welding (MMAW), Laser Arc-Hybrid Welding (LAHW) and two Gas Metal Arc Welding (GMAW) variants are used to join a plate of 20 mm thick structural steel. The LCA results indicate that for 1 m weld seam, MMAW causes the highest environmental impacts in global warming potential (GWP), eutrophication potential (EP), acidification potential (AP), and photochemical ozone creation potential (POCP) among the selected processes, and the LAHW variant performances the least. Filler material and electricity consumptions generally dominate the impacts and reach shares of up to 80% and 61% in the respective impact categories. However, electrode coating consumption in MMAW remarkably contributes impacts on AP and EP, for instance 52% of AP and 76% of EP. Strategies for improvement of the applied welding technologies are discussed. KW - Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) KW - Arc welding KW - Laser arc-hybrid welding KW - Resource efficiency PY - 2015 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.121 SN - 0959-6526 VL - 108 IS - Part: A SP - 46 EP - 53 PB - Elsevier Science CY - Amsterdam AN - OPUS4-34969 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Sproesser, G. A1 - Chang, Y.-J. A1 - Pittner, Andreas A1 - Finkbeiner, M. A1 - Rethmeier, Michael T1 - Environmental energy efficiency of single wire and tandem gas metal arc welding N2 - This paper investigates gas metal arc welding (GMAW) with respect to energy consumption and its associated environmental impacts. Different material transfer modes and power levels for single wire GMAW (SGMAW) and tandem GMAW (TGMAW) are evaluated by means of the indicator electrical deposition efficiency. Furthermore, the wall-plug efficiency of the equipment is measured in order to describe the total energy consumption from the electricity grid. The results show that the energy efficiency is highly affected by the respective process and can be significantly enhanced by a TGMAW process. The wall-plug efficiency of the equipment shows no significant dependency on the power range or the material transfer mode. Moreover, the method of life cycle assessment (LCA) is adopted in order to investigate the influences of energy efficient welding on the environmental impacts. In the comparative LCA study, the demand of electrical energy is reduced up to 24%. In consequence, the indicator values for global warming potential (100), acidification potential, eutrophication potential, and photochemical ozone creation potential are reduced up to 11%. KW - Energy input KW - Tandem welding KW - MAG welding KW - Environment KW - Lifetime PY - 2017 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-017-0460-y SN - 0043-2288 SN - 1878-6669 VL - 61 IS - 4 SP - 733 EP - 743 PB - Springer CY - Heidelberg AN - OPUS4-39877 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Chang, Y.-J. A1 - Sproesser, G. A1 - Neugebauer, S. A1 - Wolf, K. A1 - Scheumann, R. A1 - Pittner, Andreas A1 - Rethmeier, Michael A1 - Finkbeiner, M. T1 - Environmental and social life cycle assessment of welding technologies N2 - Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Social Life Cycle Assessment (SLCA) are applied in evaluating possible social and environmental impacts of the state-of-art welding technologies, such as Manual Metal Arc Welding (MMAW), Manual Gas Metal Arc Welding (GMAW), Automatic GMAW and Automatic Laser-Arc Hybrid Welding (LAHW). The LCA results indicate that for 1 meter weld seam, MMAW consumes the largest amount of resources (like filler material and coating on electrodes) and energy, which contributes to comparatively higher environmental impacts in global warming potential, acidification, photochemical ozone creation potential and eutrophication than other chosen processes. With regard to social aspects, the health issues and fair salary are under survey to compare the relative potential risk on human health caused by fumes in different welding technologies, and to indicate the sufficiency of current salary of welders in Germany. The results reflect that the wage status of welders is still fair and sufficient. The manual processes bring much higher potential risk of welders’ health than the automatic processes, especially MMAW. KW - Fair salary KW - Human health KW - Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) KW - Social Life Cycle Assessment (SLCA) KW - Welding PY - 2015 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.07.084 SN - 2212-8271 VL - 26 SP - 293 EP - 298 PB - Elsevier CY - Amsterdam [u.a.] AN - OPUS4-33036 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Sproesser, G. A1 - Chang, Y.-J. A1 - Pittner, Andreas A1 - Finkbeiner, M. A1 - Rethmeier, Michael T1 - Energy efficiency and environmental impacts of high power gas metal arc welding N2 - Single-wire gas metal arc welding (SGMAW) and high power tandem GMAW (TGMAW) are evaluated with respect to energy efficiency. The key performance indicator electrical deposition efficiency is applied to reflect the energy efficiency of GMAW in different material transfer modes. Additionally, the wall-plug efficiency of the equipment is determined in order to identify the overall energy consumption. The results show that energy efficiency can be increased by 24% and welding time is reduced over 50% by application of the tandem processes. A comparative life cycle assessment of a 30-mm-thick weld is conducted to investigate the influences of the energy efficiency on the environmental impacts. The environmental impacts on the categories global warming potential, acidification potential, eutrophication potential, and photochemical ozone creation potential can be reduced up to 11% using an energy-efficient TGMAW process. KW - Tandem gas metal arc welding KW - Life cycle assessment (LCA) KW - Energy efficiency KW - High power welding PY - 2017 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-9996-7 SN - 0268-3768 SN - 1433-3015 VL - 91 IS - 9-12 SP - 3503 EP - 3513 PB - Springer CY - London AN - OPUS4-39564 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER -