TY - JOUR A1 - Rienitz, O. A1 - Schiel, D. A1 - Görlitz, V. A1 - Jährling, R. A1 - Vogl, Jochen A1 - Lara-Manzano, J.V. A1 - Zon, A. A1 - Fung, W.-H. A1 - Buzoianu, M. A1 - De Sena, R.C. A1 - Dos Reis, L.A. A1 - Valiente, L. A1 - Yim, Y.-H. A1 - Hill, S. A1 - Champion, R. A1 - Fisicaro, P. A1 - Bing, W. A1 - Turk, G.C. A1 - Winchester, M. R. A1 - Saxby, D. A1 - Merrick, J. A1 - Hioki, A. A1 - Miura, T. A1 - Suzuki, T. A1 - Linsky, M. A1 - Barzev, A. A1 - Máriássy, M. A1 - Cankur, O. A1 - Ari, B. A1 - Tunc, M. A1 - Konopelko, L.A. A1 - Kustikov, Y.A. A1 - Bezruchko, M. T1 - Final report on CCQM-K87: Mono-elemental calibration solutions N2 - The aim of this comparison was to demonstrate the capability of national metrology institutes to measure elemental mass fractions at a level of w(E) ≈ 1 g/kg as found in almost all mono-elemental calibration solutions. These calibration solutions represent an important link in traceability systems in inorganic analysis. Virtually all traceable routine measurements are linked to the SI through these calibration solutions. Every participant was provided with three solutions of each of the three selected elements chromium, cobalt and lead. This comparison was a joint activity of the Inorganic Analysis Working Group (IAWG) and the Electrochemical Analysis Working Group (EAWG) of the CCQM and was piloted by the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB, Braunschweig, Germany) with the help of the Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung (BAM, Berlin, Germany), the Centro Nacional de Metrología (CENAM, Querétaro, Mexico) and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST, Gaithersburg, USA). A small majority of participants applied inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP OES) in combination with a variety of calibration strategies (one-point-calibration, bracketing, calibration curve, each with and without an internal standard). But also IDMS techniques were carried out on quadrupole, high resolution and multicollector ICP-MS machines as well as a TIMS machine. Several participants applied titrimetry. FAAS as well as ICP-MS combined with non-IDMS calibration strategies were used by at least one participant. The key comparison reference values (KCRV) were agreed upon during the IAWG/EAWG meeting in November 2011 held in Sydney as the added element content calculated from the gravimetric sample preparation. Accordingly the degrees of equivalence were calculated. Despite the large variety of methods applied no superior method could be identified. The relative deviation of the median of the participants' results from the gravimetric reference value was equal or smaller than 0.1% (with an average of 0.05%) in the case of all three elements. KW - CCQM KW - Metrology KW - IDMS PY - 2012 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/49/1A/08010 SN - 0026-1394 SN - 1681-7575 VL - 49 IS - 08010, 1A (Technical Supplement 2012) SP - 1 EP - 104 PB - Inst. of Physics Publ. CY - Bristol AN - OPUS4-30458 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Vogl, Jochen A1 - Kipphardt, Heinrich A1 - Richter, Silke A1 - Bremser, Wolfram A1 - Arvizu Torres, M. A1 - Lara Manzano, J. A1 - Buzoianu, M. A1 - Hill, S. A1 - Petrov, P. A1 - Goenaga-Infante, H. A1 - Sargent, M. A1 - Fisicaro, P. A1 - Labarraque, G. A1 - Zhou, T. A1 - Turk, G. C. A1 - Winchester, M. A1 - Miura, T. A1 - Methven, B. A1 - Sturgeon, R. A1 - Jährling, R. A1 - Rienitz, O. A1 - Mariassy, M. A1 - Hankova, Z. A1 - Sobina, E. A1 - Krylov, A. I. A1 - Kustikov, Y. A. A1 - Smirnov, V. V. T1 - Establishing comparability and compatibility in the purity assessment of high purity zinc as demonstrated by the CCQM-P149 intercomparison N2 - For the first time, an international comparison was conducted on the determination of the purity of a high purity element. Participants were free to choose any analytical approach appropriate for their institute’s applications and services. The material tested was a high purity zinc, which had earlier been assessed for homogeneity and previously used in CCQM-K72 for the determination of six defined metallic impurities. Either a direct metal assay of the Zn mass fraction was undertaken by EDTA titrimetry, or an indirect approach was used wherein all impurities, or at least the major ones, were determined and their sum subtracted from ideal purity of 100 %, or 1 kg/kg. Impurity assessment techniques included glow discharge mass spectrometry, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry and carrier gas hot extraction/combustion analysis. Up to 91 elemental impurities covering metals, non-metals and semi-metals/metalloids were quantified. Due to the lack of internal experience or experimental capabilities, some participants contracted external laboratories for specific analytical tasks, mainly for the analysis of non-metals. The reported purity, expressed as zinc mass fraction in the high purity zinc material, showed excellent agreement for all participants, with a relative standard deviation of 0.011 %. The calculated reference value, w(Zn) = 0.999 873 kg/kg, was assigned an asymmetric combined uncertainty of + 0.000025 kg/kg and – 0.000028 kg/kg. Comparability amongst participating metrology institutes is thus demonstrated for the purity determination of high purity metals which have no particular difficulties with their decomposition / dissolution process when solution-based analytical methods are used, or which do not have specific difficulties when direct analysis approaches are used. Nevertheless, further development is required in terms of uncertainty assessment, quantification of non-metals and the determination of purity of less pure elements and/or for those elements suffering difficulties with the decomposition process. KW - Purity assessment KW - Direct metal assay KW - Impurity assessment KW - Non-metal analysis KW - High-purity elements KW - SI-traceability PY - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1088/1681-7575/aaa677 SN - 1681-7575 SN - 0026-1394 VL - 55 IS - 2 SP - 211 EP - 221 PB - Institute of Physics Publishing CY - Bristol AN - OPUS4-44257 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Rienitz, O. A1 - Jährling, R. A1 - Noordmann, J. A1 - Pape, C. A1 - Röhker, K. A1 - Vogl, Jochen A1 - Manzano, J. V. L. A1 - Kozlowski, W. A1 - Caciano de Siena, R. A1 - Marques Rodrigues, J. A1 - Galli, A. H. A1 - Yim, Y.-H. A1 - Lee, K.-S. A1 - Lee, J. H. A1 - Min, H.-S. A1 - Chingbo, C. A1 - Naijie, S. A1 - Qian, W. A1 - Ren, T. A1 - Jun, W. A1 - Tangpaisarnkul, N. A1 - Suzuki, T. A1 - Nonose, N. A1 - Mester, Z. A1 - Yang, L. A1 - Pagliano, E. A1 - Greenberg, P. A1 - Mariassy, M. A1 - Näykki, T. A1 - Cankur, O. A1 - Coskun, F. G. A1 - Ari, B. A1 - Can, S. Z. T1 - CCQM-K122 "Anionic impurities and lead in salt solutions" N2 - The determination of the mass fractions of bromide, sulfate, and lead as well as the isotopic composition of the lead (expressed as the molar mass and the amount fractions of all four stable lead isotopes) in an aqueous solution of sodium chloride with a mass fraction of 0.15 g/g was the subject of this comparison. Even though the mass fractions ranged from 3 μg/g (bromide) to 50 ng/g (lead), almost all results reported agreed with the according KCRVs. KW - Absolute isotope ratio KW - Lead isotope ratios KW - Metrology KW - Traceability PY - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/57/1A/08012 VL - 57 IS - 1A SP - 8012 PB - IOP Science AN - OPUS4-51156 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER -