TY - JOUR A1 - Dürig, Wiebke A1 - Lindblad, Sofia A1 - Golovko, Oksana A1 - Gkotsis, Georgios A1 - Aalizadeh, Reza A1 - Nika, Maria-Christina A1 - Thomaidis, Nikolaos A1 - Alygizakis, Nikiforos A. A1 - Plassmann, Merle A1 - Haglund, Peter A1 - Fu, Qiuguo A1 - Hollender, Juliane A1 - Chaker, Jade A1 - David, Arthur A1 - Kunkel, Uwe A1 - Macherius, André A1 - Belova, Lidia A1 - Poma, Giulia A1 - Preud'Homme, Hugues A1 - Munschy, Catherine A1 - Aminot, Yann A1 - Jaeger, Carsten A1 - Lisec, Jan A1 - Hansen, Martin A1 - Vorkamp, Katrin A1 - Zhu, Linyan A1 - Cappelli, Francesca A1 - Roscioli, Claudio A1 - Valsecchi, Sara A1 - Bagnati, Renzo A1 - González, Belén A1 - Prieto, Ailette A1 - Zuloaga, Olatz A1 - Gil-Solsona, Ruben A1 - Gago-Ferrero, Pablo A1 - Rodriguez-Mozaz, Sara A1 - Budzinski, Hélène A1 - Devier, Marie-Helene A1 - Dierkes, Georg A1 - Boulard, Lise A1 - Jacobs, Griet A1 - Voorspoels, Stefan A1 - Rüdel, Heinz A1 - Ahrens, Lutz T1 - What is in the fish? Collaborative trial in suspect and non-target screening of organic micropollutants using LC- and GC-HRMS JF - Environment International N2 - A collaborative trial involving 16 participants from nine European countries was conducted within the NORMAN network in efforts to harmonise suspect and non-target screening of environmental contaminants in whole fish samples of bream (Abramis brama). Participants were provided with freeze-dried, homogenised fish samples from a contaminated and a reference site, extracts (spiked and non-spiked) and reference sample preparation protocols for liquid chromatography (LC) and gas chromatography (GC) coupled to high resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS). Participants extracted fish samples using their in-house sample preparation method and/or the protocol provided. Participants correctly identified 9-69% of spiked compounds using LC-HRMS and 20-60% of spiked compounds using GC-HRMS. From the contaminated site, suspect screening with participants’ own suspect lists led to putative identification of on average ~145 and ~20 unique features per participant using LC-HRMS and GC-HRMS, respectively, while non-target screening identified on average ~42 and ~56 unique features per participant using LC-HRMS and GC-HRMS, respectively. Within the same sub-group of sample preparation method, only a few features were identified by at least two participants in suspect screening (16 features using LC-HRMS, 0 features using GC-HRMS) and non-target screening (0 features using LC-HRMS, 2 features using GC-HRMS). The compounds identified had log octanol/water partition coefficient (KOW) values ranging from -9.9 to 16 and mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) of 68 to 761 (LC-HRMS and GC-HRMS). A significant linear trend was found between log KOW and m/z for the GC-HRMS data. Overall, these findings indicate that differences in screening results are mainly due to the data analysis workflows used by different participants. Further work is needed to harmonise the results obtained when applying suspect and non-target screening approaches to environmental biota samples. KW - General Environmental Science KW - Suspect and non-target analysis KW - Biota KW - Expobome KW - Collaborative trial PY - 2023 DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2023.108288 VL - 181 SP - 1 EP - 24 PB - Elsevier B.V. AN - OPUS4-58681 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Vogel, Christian A1 - Roesch, Philipp A1 - Wittwer, Philipp A1 - Piechotta, Christian A1 - Lisec, Jan A1 - Sommerfeld, Thomas A1 - Kluge, Stephanie A1 - Herzel, Hannes A1 - Huthwelker, T. A1 - Borca, C. A1 - Simon, Franz-Georg T1 - Levels of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in various wastewater-derived fertilizers – analytical investigations from different perspectives JF - Environmental Science: Advances N2 - Solid wastewater-based fertilizers were screened for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) by the extractable organic fluorine (EOF) sum parameter method. The EOF values for ten sewage sludges from Germany and Switzerland range from 154 to 7209 mg kg−1. For thermal treated sewage sludge and struvite the EOF were lower with values up to 121 mg kg−1. Moreover, the application of PFAS targeted and suspect screening analysis of selected sewage sludge samples showed that only a small part of the EOF sum parameter values can be explained by the usually screened legacy PFAS. The hitherto unknown part of EOF sum parameter contains also fluorinated pesticides, pharmaceutical and aromatic compounds. Because these partly fluorinated compounds can degrade to (ultra-)short PFAS in wastewater treatment plants they should be considered as significant sources of organic fluorine in the environment. The combined results of sum parameter analysis and suspect screening reveal the need to update current regulations, such as the German fertilizer ordinance, to focus not solely on a few selected PFAS such as perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) but consider an additional sum parameter approach as a more holistic alternative. Moreover, diffusion gradient in thin-films (DGT) passive samplers were utilized as an alternative simplified extraction method for PFAS in solid wastewater-based fertilizers and subsequently quantified via combustion ion chromatography. However, the DGT method was less sensitive and only comparable to the EOF values of the fertilizers in samples with >150 mg kg−1, because of different diffusion properties for various PFAS, but also kinetic exchange limitations. KW - Combustion Ion Chromatography KW - Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) KW - Sewage sludge KW - Fertilizer PY - 2023 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b43-583429 DO - https://doi.org/10.1039/d3va00178d VL - 2 IS - 10 SP - 1436 EP - 1445 PB - Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) AN - OPUS4-58342 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER -