TY - CONF A1 - Charmi, Amir T1 - Mechanical anisotropy of additively manufactured stainless steel 316l: an experimental and numerical study N2 - This work aims for a yield function description of additively manufactured (AM) parts of stainless steel 316L at the continuum-mechanical macro-scale by means of so-called virtual experiments using a crystal plasticity model at meso-scale. T2 - 1st Workshop on In-situ Monitoring and Microstructure Development in Additive Manufacturing CY - BAM, Berlin DA - 10.12.2020 KW - Anisotropy KW - Crystal plasticity KW - Additive manufacturing PY - 2020 AN - OPUS4-51941 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - CONF A1 - Charmi, Amir T1 - Mechanical anisotropy of LPBF 316L: a modeling approach N2 - The underlying cause of mechanical anisotropy in additively manufactured (AM) parts is not yet fully understood and has been attributed to several different factors like microstructural defects, residual stresses, melt pool boundaries, crystallographic and morphological textures. To better understand the main contributing factor to the mechanical anisotropy of AM stainless steel 316L, bulk specimens were fabricated via laser powder bed fusion (LPBF). Tensile specimens were machined from these AM bulk materials for three different inclinations relative to the build plate. Dynamic Young's modulus measurements and tensile tests were used to determine the mechanical anisotropy. Some tensile specimens were also subjected to residual stress measurement via neutron diffraction, porosity determination with X-ray micro-computed tomography, and texture analysis with electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD). A crystal plasticity model was used to analyze the elastic anisotropy and the anisotropic yield behavior of the AM specimens, and it was able to capture and predict the experimental behavior accurately. Overall, it was shown that the mechanical anisotropy of the tested specimens was mainly influenced by the crystallographic texture. T2 - 2. Online-Workshop "In-situ Monitoring and Microstructure Development in Additive Manufactured Alloys " CY - Online meeting DA - 20.04.2021 KW - Anisotropy KW - Crystal plasticity KW - Additive manufacturing PY - 2021 AN - OPUS4-52603 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Charmi, Amir A1 - Falkenberg, Rainer A1 - Ávila Calderón, Luis A1 - Mohr, Gunther A1 - Sommer, Konstantin A1 - Ulbricht, Alexander A1 - Sprengel, Maximilian A1 - Saliwan Neumann, Romeo A1 - Evans, Alexander A1 - Skrotzki, Birgit T1 - Mechanical anisotropy of additively manufactured stainless steel 316L: An experimental and numerical study N2 - The underlying cause of mechanical anisotropy in additively manufactured (AM) parts is not yet fully understood and has been attributed to several different factors like microstructural defects, residual stresses, melt pool boundaries, crystallographic and morphological textures. To better understand the main contributing factor to the mechanical anisotropy of AM stainless steel 316L, bulk specimens were fabricated via laser powder bed fusion (LPBF). Tensile specimens were machined from these AM bulk materials for three different inclinations: 0◦, 45◦, and 90◦ relative to the build plate. Dynamic Young’s modulus measurements and tensile tests were used to determine the mechanical anisotropy. Some tensile specimens were also subjected to residual stress measurement via neutron diffraction, porosity determination with X-ray micro-computed tomography (μCT), and texture analysis with electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD). These investigations revealed that the specimens exhibited near full density and the detected defects were spherical. Furthermore, the residual stresses in the loading direction were between −74 ± 24 MPa and 137 ± 20 MPa, and the EBSD measurements showed a preferential ⟨110⟩ orientation parallel to the build direction. A crystal plasticity model was used to analyze the elastic anisotropy and the anisotropic yield behavior of the AM specimens, and it was able to capture and predict the experimental behavior accurately. Overall, it was shown that the mechanical anisotropy of the tested specimens was mainly influenced by the crystallographic texture. KW - Mechanical anisotropy KW - Residual stress KW - Crystal plasticity KW - Selective laser melting (SLM) KW - Laser beam melting (LBM) PY - 2021 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b43-511719 DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2020.140154 SN - 0921-5093 VL - 799 SP - 140154 PB - Elsevier B.V. AN - OPUS4-51171 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - THES A1 - Charmi, Amir T1 - A multiscale numerical framework for the simulation of anistropic material response of additively manufactured stainless steel 316L undergoing large plastic deformation N2 - Additive manufacturing (AM) offers significantly greater freedom of design compared to conventional manufacturing processes since the final parts are built layer by layer. This enables metal AM, also known as metal 3D printing, to be utilized for improving efficiency and functionality, for the production of parts with very complex geometries, and rapid prototyping. However, despite many technological advancements made in recent years, several challenges hinder the mass adoption of metal AM. One of these challenges is mechanical anisotropy which describes the dependency of material properties on the material orientation. Therefore, in this work, stainless steel 316L parts produced by laser-based powder bed fusion are used to isolate and understand the root cause of anisotropy in AM parts. Furthermore, an efficient and accurate multiscale numerical framework is presented for predicting the deformation behavior of actual AM parts on the macroscale undergoing large plastic deformations. Finally, a novel constitutive model for the plastic spin is formulated to capture the influence of the microstructure evolution on the material behavior on the macroscale. KW - Additive Fertigung KW - Austenitischer Stahl KW - Finite-Elemente-Methode KW - Mehrskalenmodell KW - Simulation PY - 2024 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20240207-173356-002 DO - https://doi.org/10.25643/dbt.59550 SP - 1 EP - 163 PB - Bauhaus-Universität Weimar CY - Weimar AN - OPUS4-59511 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER -