TY - RPRT A1 - Culleton, L.P. A1 - Brown, A. A1 - Murugan, A. A1 - Van der Veen, A. A1 - Van Osselen, D. A1 - Ziel, P. R. A1 - Li, J. A1 - Tuma, Dirk A1 - Schulz, Gert A1 - Näther, Stephanie A1 - Arrhenius, K. A1 - Kühnemuth, D. A1 - Beránek, J. A1 - Fuko, J. A1 - Val'ková, M. T1 - Results of an international comparison on the analysis of real nonconventional energy gases N2 - The requirement for a metrological infrastructure to ensure the interchangability of 'nonconventional’ energy gases within existing European infrastructure1 was the driving force behind the work undertaken in the three-year EMRP Characterisation of energy gases project EMRP ENG01 (June 2010 - May 2013). As part of work package one of the project, Standards and methods were used to perform composition and impurity measurements on samples of real energy gases collected from around Europe. The aim of this study was to compare the results obtained from different labs, and thereby provide an evaluation of the labs’ capabilities and provide insight into the feasibility of different analytical methodologies for use with future measurements. KW - Energy gases KW - Real samples KW - Sampling KW - Analysis PY - 2013 SN - 1754-2928 IS - July SP - 1 EP - 28 PB - Queen's Printer and Controller of HMSO CY - Teddington, Middlesex, UK AN - OPUS4-29449 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - van der Veen, A. M H A1 - Zalewska, E. T. A1 - Kipphardt, Heinrich A1 - Beelen, R. R. A1 - Tuma, Dirk A1 - Maiwald, Michael A1 - Fükő, J. A1 - Büki, T. A1 - Szilágyi, Z. N. A1 - Beránek, J. A1 - Cieciora, D. A1 - Ochman, G. A1 - e.t al., T1 - Metrologia International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM), find out more - KEY COMPARISON International comparison CCQM-K118 natural gas N2 - CCQM-K118 was an international key comparison on natural gas composition with two types of gases, i.e., a low calorific hydrogen-enriched natural gas and a high calorific LNG type of gas. There were 14 participating laboratories. The traveling standards (i.e., 14 mixtures each) were obtained from an external source and checked for homogeneity and stability before and after the participants' measurements at the two coordinating laboratories. The data evaluation was performed using a consensus value and a laboratory effect model. The results of the participants were benchmarked against a key comparison reference value computed from the largest consistent subset (LCS) of the submitted results, adjusted for the differences between the travelling standards. For the first time in a key comparison in gas analysis, the model included a term to account for excess variability in the LCS. Most of the participants reported one or a few (slightly) discrepant results. Partly this is due to the heterogeneity and heteroscedasticity of the datasets. In all, the results in this key comparison demonstrate the good comparability of the national measurement standards for natural gas composition maintained by the participating NMIs. Main text. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database kcdb.bipm.org/. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCQM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA). To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCQM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA). KW - CCQM-K PY - 2022 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/59/1A/08017 SN - 0026-1394 VL - 59 IS - 1A PB - IOP Publishing LTD AN - OPUS4-56308 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER -