TY - CONF A1 - Resch-Genger, Ute A1 - Nirmalananthan-Budau, Nithiya A1 - Tavernaro, Isabella T1 - Engineered Nanomaterials- Novel Approaches for Risk Assessment and Safe-by-Design N2 - The overall interest in nanotoxicity, triggered by the increasing use of nanomaterials in the material and life sciences, and the synthesis of an ever increasing number of new functional nanoparticles calls not only for standardized test procedures1,2 and for efficient approaches to screen the potential genotoxicity of these materials, but also for standardized and validated methods for surface analysis. 4,5 The analysis and quantification of surface chemistry is hence in the focus of an increasing number of standardization organizations and interlaboratory comparisons with different analytical methods are being done.5 For the monitoring of nanomaterial synthesis and the fast assessment of the number of functional groups such as carboxyl and amino functionalities, which are very commonly used functionalities in the life sciences, simple and validated methods are needed that can be performed with common laboratory instrumentation. 5,6 Here we provide a brief overview of the ongoing research in division Biophotonics employing quantitative NMR (qNMR), conductometry, and colorimetric and fluorometric optical assays for the determination of the total and the accessible number of carboxyl and amino groups on differently sized polymer and silica nano- and microparticles.5-7 T2 - Workshop NanoRiskSD project CY - Berlin, Germany DA - 09.06.2022 KW - Nanoparticle KW - Surface analysis KW - Standardization KW - Quality assurance KW - Validation KW - qNMR KW - Silica KW - Polymer KW - Fluorescence KW - Assay KW - Conductometry KW - Method comparison KW - Analytical sciences PY - 2022 AN - OPUS4-54999 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - CONF A1 - Resch-Genger, Ute A1 - Nirmalananthan-Budau, Nithiya A1 - Moser, Marko A1 - Roloff, Alexander A1 - Rühle, Bastian A1 - Borcherding, H. A1 - Thiele, T. A1 - Schedler, U. T1 - Cleavable probes and catch and release assays for surface group quantification on 2D- and 3D-supports N2 - Surface functionalization of 2D- and 3D-supports and nanomaterials are nowadays at the core of many applications of functional materials in the life and material sciences. Examples range from membranes and microarrays over bead-based assays, immunoseparation, and next generation sequencing to nanometer-sized optical reporters, nanosensors, and magnetic and optical contrast agents. Typically performed functionalization procedures include silanization and grafting reactions with reactive monomers to introduce functional groups like amino or carboxylic acid groups and the attachment of ligands like polyethylene glycol (PEG) molecules and biomolecules such as peptides, proteins, and DNA.[1-3] We present here a versatile concept to quantify the number of bioanalytically relevant functional groups like carboxyl, amino, and aldehyde moieties through the specific binding and subsequent release of small reporter molecules such as fluorescent dyes and non-fluorescent chromophores utilizing cleavable linkers or the formation of cleavable bonds as a reversible covalent labeling strategy. This is representatively demonstrated for different types of nano- and microparticles with different labeling densities of carboxyl, amino, and aldehyde groups. This strategy enables to separate the signal-generating molecule from the bead surface, thereby circumventing uncertainties associated with light scattering, binding-induced changes in reporter fluorescence, and fluorescence quenching dye-dye interactions on crowded material surfaces.[1-3] Moreover, the reporters are chosen to be detectable with different analytical methods as prerequisite for straightforward validation via method compari-sons and mass balances. Applications of these assays and multimodal cleavable probes range from a quantitative comparison of bead batches and process control to a qualitative prediction of the coupling efficiencies in bioconjugation reactions. T2 - ANAKON 2019 CY - Münster, Germany DA - 25.03.2019 KW - Nanoparticle KW - Surface group KW - Surface analysis KW - Cleavable probe KW - Optical assay KW - Quality assurance KW - Conductometry KW - Dye labeling KW - Methos comparision PY - 2019 AN - OPUS4-47628 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - CONF A1 - Resch-Genger, Ute A1 - Nirmalanthan-Budau, Nithiya A1 - Moser, Marko A1 - Roloff, Alexander A1 - Moldenhauer, Daniel T1 - Quantification of Surface Groups on Nanomaterials with Simple Optical Methods N2 - Surface functionalization of nanomaterials is nowadays at the core of many applications of functional materials in the life and material sciences. Examples range from membranes and microarrays over bead-based assays, and next generation sequencing to nanometer-sized optical reporters, nanosensors, and magnetic and optical contrast agents. Typical function-nalization steps include silanization and grafting reactions with reactive monomers to introduce functional groups like amino or carboxylic acid groups or the attachment of ligands like polyethylene glycol (PEG) molecules and biomolecules. [1-3] This enables to tune e.g., dis-persibility, hydrophilicity and biocompatibility, minimize unspecific interactions, improve biofunctionalization efficiencies, and enhance blood circulation times and allows for the use of nanomaterials as reporters in assays or the design of targeted probes for bioimaging. At the core of all functionalization strategies are reliable and validated methods for surface group and ligand quantification that can be preferably performed with routine laboratory instrumentation, require only small amounts of substances, and are suitable for many different types of nanomaterials. [3] There is meanwhile a considerable need to make these methods traceable. We present here versatile and simple concepts for the quantification of common functional groups, ligands, and biomolecules on different types of organic and inorganic nanomaterials, using conventional and newly developed cleavable and multimodal reporters, that can be detected with optical spectroscopy. [4-7] These reporters are chosen to enable method validation with the aid of method comparisons and mass balances. Also, strategies how to make these simple assays traceable to SI units using quantitative nuclear resonance spectroscopy (qNMR) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) are derived. T2 - JRC-NIST Workshop CY - Ispra, Italy DA - 04.12.2018 KW - Nanoparticle KW - Nanocrystal KW - Absolute fluorometry KW - Fluorescence KW - Surface chemistry KW - Assay KW - Cleavable probe KW - Conductometry KW - Quantification KW - Functional group PY - 2018 AN - OPUS4-46950 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Resch-Genger, Ute ED - Scholz, Norman ED - Behnke, Thomas T1 - Determination of the critical micelle concentration of neutral and ionic surfactants with fluorometry, conductometry, and surface tension - a method comparison JF - Journal of Fluorescence N2 - Micelles are of increasing importance as versatile carriers for hydrophobic substances and nanoprobes for a wide range of pharmaceutical, diagnostic, medical, and therapeutic applications. A key Parameter indicating the Formation and stability of micelles is the critical micelle concentration (CMC). In this respect, we determined the CMC of common anionic, cationic, and non-ionic surfactants fluorometrically using different fluorescent probes and fluorescence Parameters for Signal detection and ompared the results with conductometric and surface Tension measurements. Based upon These results, requirements, Advantages, and pitfalls of each methods are discussed. Our study underlines the versatility of fluorometric methods that do not impose specific requirements on surfactants and are especially suited for the quantification of very low CMC values. Conductivity and surface Tension measurements yield smaller uncertainties particularly for high CMC values, yet are more time- and substance consuming and not suitable for every surfactant. KW - Fluorescence KW - Methods KW - Critical micelle concentration (CMC) KW - Conductometry KW - Fluorescence probe KW - Dye KW - Nile Red KW - Pitfalls KW - Method evaluation KW - Uncertainty PY - 2017 DO - https://doi.org/10.1007/s10895-018-2209-4 SN - 1053-0509 SN - 1573-4994 VL - 28 IS - 1 SP - 465 EP - 476 AN - OPUS4-43905 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER -