<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<export-example>
  <doc>
    <id>65339</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2023</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>772</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>779</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>5</issue>
    <volume>6</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName>Wiley</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Berlin</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Multi‐risk assessment for bridges: The application of the Italian Guidelines</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Bridges are essential elements in the built environment since they underpin the functioning of transportation systems. Nevertheless, they are vulnerable due to aggressive environment, demand beyond the design level, and other contingencies such as extreme events. The management of bridges represents a significant challenge for improving transport performance and ensure the safety of users. In Italy, bridge management is addressed by the recent “Guidelines for risk classification and management, safety evaluation and monitoring of existing bridges” which were issued by the Italian Ministry for Public Work in 2020. The guidelines propose an operational approach with distinctive characteristics: (i) risk‐based, i.e., based on the typical parameters of hazard, vulnerability, and exposure; (ii) multi‐level, i.e., they include six assessment levels (0‐5) of increasing complexity; and (iii) multi‐risk, i.e., they assess structural/foundation, seismic, hydrological and landslide risk. This paper presents a general overview of the 2020 Italian Guidelines and their application to a selected case study. Lessons from the application to the case study are drafted and possible criticalities highlighted.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">ce/papers</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="issn">2509-7075</identifier>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1002/cepa.2046</identifier>
    <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:kobv:b43-653392</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus_doi_flag">true</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus_import_data">{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,8]],"date-time":"2026-01-08T02:38:03Z","timestamp":1767839883441,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":17,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,25]],"date-time":"2023-09-25T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1695600000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":24,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100012783","name":"Dipartimento della Protezione Civile, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["Accordo CSLLPP e ReLUIS WP2: \u201cApplicazioni delle Linee Guida a tratte sperimentali\u201d"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["Accordo CSLLPP e ReLUIS WP2: \u201cApplicazioni delle Linee Guida a tratte sperimentali\u201d"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100012783","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["ce papers"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,9]]},"abstract":"&lt;jats:title&gt;Abstract&lt;\/jats:title&gt;&lt;jats:p&gt;Bridges are essential elements in the built environment since they underpin the functioning of transportation systems. Nevertheless, they are vulnerable due to aggressive environment, demand beyond the design level, and other contingencies such as extreme events. The management of bridges represents a significant challenge for improving transport performance and ensure the safety of users. In Italy, bridge management is addressed by the recent \u201cGuidelines for risk classification and management, safety evaluation and monitoring of existing bridges\u201d which were issued by the Italian Ministry for Public Work in 2020. The guidelines propose an operational approach with distinctive characteristics: (i) risk\u2010based, i.e., based on the typical parameters of hazard, vulnerability, and exposure; (ii) multi\u2010level, i.e., they include six assessment levels (0\u20105) of increasing complexity; and (iii) multi\u2010risk, i.e., they assess structural\/foundation, seismic, hydrological and landslide risk. This paper presents a general overview of the 2020 Italian Guidelines and their application to a selected case study. Lessons from the application to the case study are drafted and possible criticalities highlighted.&lt;\/jats:p&gt;","DOI":"10.1002\/cepa.2046","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,25]],"date-time":"2023-09-25T08:27:12Z","timestamp":1695630432000},"page":"772-779","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["Multi\u2010risk assessment for bridges: the application of the Italian Guidelines"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"6","author":[{"given":"Silvia Di","family":"Sano","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Politecnico di Milano  Milan Italy"}]},{"given":"Giancarlo","family":"Costa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Politecnico di Milano  Milan Italy"},{"name":"BAM Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing  Berlin Germany"}]},{"given":"Pier Francesco","family":"Giordano","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Politecnico di Milano  Milan Italy"}]},{"given":"Maria","family":"Pregnolato","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Bristol  Bristol UK"},{"name":"Delft University of Technology  Delft Netherlands"}]},{"given":"Maria Pina","family":"Limongelli","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Politecnico di Milano  Milan Italy"},{"name":"Lund University  Lund Sweden"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,25]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_2_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5194\/nhess-22-795-2022"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_3_1","unstructured":"Centre for Studies and Expertise on Risks the Environment Mobility and Urban Planning (CEREMA) Analyse de risque des ponts en site affouillable.2019."},{"key":"e_1_2_2_4_1","unstructured":"Highways England Assessment of highway bridges and structures. Design Manual for Roads and Bridges.2020."},{"key":"e_1_2_2_5_1","unstructured":"Ministero dei Trasporti CSLP Linee Guida per la Classificazione e Gestione del Rischio la Valutazione della Sicurezza ed il Monitoraggio dei Ponti Esistenti.2020."},{"key":"e_1_2_2_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"M.Pregnolato P. F.Giordano D.Panici L. J.Prendergast andM. PinaLimongelli \u201cA comparison of the UK and Italian national risk\u2010based guidelines for assessing hydraulic actions on bridges \u201dStruct. Infrastruct. Eng. pp.1\u201314 Jun.2022 doi:10.1080\/15732479.2022.2081709.","DOI":"10.1080\/15732479.2022.2081709"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/suco.202100147"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_8_1","unstructured":"P.Baratono A.Cosentino S.Puggelli E.Renzi andW.Salvatore \u201cAnalisi delle Linee Guida per la classificazione e gestione del rischio la valutazione della sicurezza dei ponti.\u201d Ingenio Web 2020 [Online]. Available:https:\/\/www.ingenio-web.it\/articoli\/analisi-delle-linee-guida-per-la-classificazione-e-gestione-del-rischio-la-valutazione-della-sicurezza-dei-ponti\/."},{"key":"e_1_2_2_9_1","unstructured":"Ministero dei Trasporti NTC 2018 \u2010 DM 17 gennaio 2018: Aggiornamento delle Norme tecniche per le costruzioni Suppl. or. n.30 alla G.U. n.29 del 4\/2\/2008.2018."},{"key":"e_1_2_2_10_1","unstructured":"Ministero dell'interno Nuovo Codice della strada \u2010 Decreto Legislativo 30 aprile 1992 n. 285 \u2010 G.U. 18 maggio 1992 n. 114.1992."},{"key":"e_1_2_2_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"G.Burattiet al. \u201cThe New Guidelines of Italian Ministry of Infrastructures for the Structural Risk Classification of Existing Bridges: Genesis Examples of Application and Practical Considerations \u201cLecture Notes in Civil Engineering. pp.835\u2013844 2021 doi:https:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-91877-4_95.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-91877-4_95"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_12_1","unstructured":"P.Franchetti M.Frizzarin andA.Leonardi \u201cPonti italiani: la parola ai gestori delle reti stradali.\u201d Ingenio Web 2020 [Online]. Available:https:\/\/www.ingenio-web.it\/articoli\/ponti-italiani-la-parola-ai-gestori-delle-reti-stradali\/."},{"key":"e_1_2_2_13_1","unstructured":"Dipartimento della Protezione Civile Classificazione sismica al 31 marzo 2022.2022."},{"key":"e_1_2_2_14_1","unstructured":"Ministero dei Trasporti Normale n. 8 del 15.9.1933.1933."},{"key":"e_1_2_2_15_1","unstructured":"Midas \u201cAnalysis for Civil Structures Manual.\u201d2012."},{"key":"e_1_2_2_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"M. J.Fox M.Furinghetti andA.Pavese \u201cApplication of the new Italian assessment guidelines to a 1960s prestressed concrete road bridge \u201dStruct. Concr. no. November pp.1\u201316 2022 doi:10.1002\/suco.202200884.","DOI":"10.1002\/suco.202200884"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"P. F.Giordano Z. I.Turksezer andM. P.Limongelli \u201cRisk\u2010based scour assessment of bridges: Italian VS French guidelines \u201dBridg. Safety Maintenance Manag. Life\u2010Cycle Resil. Sustain. no. June pp.1393\u20131399 2022 doi:10.1201\/9781003322641-169.","DOI":"10.1201\/9781003322641-169"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/infrastructures6080111"}],"container-title":["ce\/papers"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/cepa.2046","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,16]],"date-time":"2024-08-16T04:53:34Z","timestamp":1723784014000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/cepa.2046"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,9]]},"references-count":17,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,9]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/cepa.2046"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/cepa.2046","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["2509-7075","2509-7075"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2509-7075","type":"print"},{"value":"2509-7075","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2023-09-25","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="local_crossrefDocumentType">journal-article</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="local_crossrefLicence">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="local_import_origin">crossref</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="local_doiImportPopulated">PersonAuthorFirstName_1,PersonAuthorLastName_1,PersonAuthorFirstName_2,PersonAuthorLastName_2,PersonAuthorFirstName_3,PersonAuthorLastName_3,PersonAuthorFirstName_4,PersonAuthorLastName_4,PersonAuthorFirstName_5,PersonAuthorLastName_5,PublisherName,TitleMain_1,Language,TitleAbstract_1,TitleParent_1,PageFirst,PageLast,Issue,Volume,PublishedYear,IdentifierIssn,Enrichmentlocal_crossrefLicence</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">doi-import</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.doi.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.urn.autoCreate">true</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="date_peer_review">09.01.2026</enrichment>
    <licence>Creative Commons - CC BY-NC-ND - Namensnennung - Nicht kommerziell - Keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International</licence>
    <author>Silvia Di Sano</author>
    <author>Giancarlo Costa</author>
    <author>Pier Francesco Giordano</author>
    <author>Maria Pregnolato</author>
    <author>Maria Pina Limongelli</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Bridge management</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Infrastructures</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Italian guidelines</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Structural safety</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Risk assessment</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Risk classification</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="624">Ingenieurbau</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">7 Bauwerkssicherheit</collection>
    <collection role="themenfelder" number="">Infrastruktur</collection>
    <collection role="literaturgattung" number="">Verlagsliteratur</collection>
    <collection role="fulltextaccess" number="">Datei für die Öffentlichkeit verfügbar ("Open Access")</collection>
    <collection role="unnumberedseries" number="">Wissenschaftliche Artikel der BAM</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">7.0 Abteilungsleitung und andere</collection>
    <collection role="themenfelder" number="">Verkehrsinfrastrukturen</collection>
    <thesisPublisher>Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung (BAM)</thesisPublisher>
    <file>https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-bam/files/65339/10_1002_cepa_2046.pdf</file>
  </doc>
</export-example>
