TY - JOUR A1 - Sikora, A. A1 - Bartczak, D. A1 - Geißler, Daniel A1 - Kestens, V. A1 - Roebben, G. A1 - Ramaye, Y. A1 - Varga, Z. A1 - Palmai, M. A1 - Shard, A.G. A1 - Goenaga-Infante, H. A1 - Minelli, C. T1 - A systematic comparison of different techniques to determine the zeta potential of silica nanoparticles in biological medium T2 - Analytical methods N2 - The surface charge density of nanoparticles plays an important role in the way they interact with biological systems. The ability to measure the surface charge density of nanoparticles in biological media is therefore of importance in understanding the magnitude of such interactions. There are a number of methods which may be used to assess surface charge density through the measurement of electrophoretic mobility. In order to better understand the comparability of these methods, the ζ-potential of silica nanoparticles in water, buffer and serum-based biological medium was measured by one ensemble and two particle-by-particle techniques: electrophoretic light scattering (ELS), tunable resistive pulse sensing (TRPS) and zeta particle tracking analysis (z-PTA). To allow the comparability of results from different techniques, test samples were prepared according to an established protocol, although some variations were necessary to meet specific instrument requirements. Here we compare, for the first time, measurement results from the different techniques and discuss how modifications related to parameters such as environmental pH, dilution factor and presence of biomolecules influence the charge measurements. PB - RSC Publ. CY - Cambridge PY - 2015 UR - https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-bam/frontdoor/index/index/docId/34966 AN - OPUS4-34966 SN - 1759-9660 SN - 1759-9679 VL - 7 IS - 23 SP - 9835 EP - 9843 AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany