@article{GraeskeKoppeNeumannetal., author = {Gr{\"a}ske, Johannes and Koppe, Louise and Neumann, Fr{\"a}nze and Forbrig, Theresa A.}, title = {Services for homeless people in Germany during the COVID-19-pandemic: A descriptive study}, series = {Public Health Nursing}, journal = {Public Health Nursing}, publisher = {Wiley}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.13027}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1533-opus-4725}, pages = {1 -- 7}, abstract = {Design:Across-sectional study was conducted inDecember 2020/January 2021 in the five significant cities of Germany. Sample: 135 of 244 identified service institutions took part in the evaluation. Measurements: This evaluation included changes in institutions' operating hours as well as capacity for homeless people. Service institutions described changes in guests' characteristics, moods, and mental burden. Finally, equipment including face masks, coveralls, and gloves was investigated. In addition, the study examined how the cooperation with the health authorities works. Results: Institutions reduced their operating hours and capacity for guests (62.4\%). Increased costs, which they had to cover themselves, were reported by 70.9\% of institutions. Institutions reported, that guests showed more symptoms of aggression (15\%), anxiety (25\%), and desperation (32\%) and fewer signs of being relaxed (75\%). The institutions reported room for improvement in PPE supplies and collaboration with health authorities. Conclusions: Services are limited for a vulnerable population, which shows changes in moods and mental health. Health authorities are not sufficiently engaged to take over the role of institutions in caring for homeless people. In the future, in-depth investigation to improve this is necessary.}, language = {en} } @article{LengertBrzozowskiHuppertzGraeske, author = {Lengert-Brzozowski, Sandra and Huppertz, Christian and Gr{\"a}ske, Johannes}, title = {Rapid Review zu Interaktionen sozial assistiver Roboter mit Senior_innen}, series = {Pflegewissenschaft}, volume = {1-2022}, journal = {Pflegewissenschaft}, publisher = {hpsmedia}, address = {Hungen}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1533-opus-4937}, pages = {1 -- 16}, abstract = {Vor dem Hintergrund der Diskrepanz zwischen Angebot und Nachfrage nach Pflegepersonal wird seit einigen Jahren im Bereich sozial assistiver Roboter (SAR) geforscht. SAR nutzen dabei verschiedene F{\"a}higkeiten, um {\"a}ltere Menschen in der H{\"a}uslichkeit zu unterst{\"u}tzen. Ziel der Arbeit: Beschreibung der Interaktion der SAR mit Senior_innen und Identifizierung von m{\"o}glichen positiven und negativen Effekten der Intervention. Material und Methoden: F{\"u}r die {\"U}bersichtsarbeit wurde eine Literaturrecherche in den Datenbanken MEDLINE (PubMed) und CINAHL durchgef{\"u}hrt. Ergebnisse: Zum Einsatz kommt SAR unter anderem zur Unterst{\"u}tzung bei Alltagsaktivit{\"a}ten. Es lassen sich positive (bspw. Akzeptanz des SAR als Kommunikationspartner) wie negative (bspw. Angst vor dem Verlust der Eigenst{\"a}ndigkeit) Effekte identifizieren. Diskussion: SAR k{\"o}nnen vielf{\"a}ltig zur Unterst{\"u}tzung der Alltagsaktivit{\"a}ten von Senior_innen eingesetzt werden. Einsatzszenarien und die Evaluation sind allerdings h{\"a}ufig limitiert.}, language = {de} } @article{ForbrigGellertBinioketal., author = {Forbrig, Theresa A. and Gellert, Paul and Biniok, Maria and Gr{\"a}ske, Johannes}, title = {Facilitator competency rubric in nursing simulations: transcultural adaptation and validation of the German version}, series = {BMC Nursing}, volume = {2023}, journal = {BMC Nursing}, number = {139}, publisher = {BMC}, isbn = {1472-6955}, doi = {10.1186/s12912-023-01317-6}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1533-opus-5470}, pages = {1 -- 9}, abstract = {Background Simulations are part of nursing education. To obtain good results, simulation facilitators need to be competent in simulation pedagogy. Part of this study was the transcultural adaptation and validation of the Facilitator Competency Rubric into German (FCRG) and the evaluation of the factors associated with higher competencies. Method A written-standardized cross-sectional survey was conducted. N = 100 facilitators (mean age: 41.0 (9.8), female: 75.3\%) participated. Test-re-test, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and ANOVAs were conducted to evaluate the reliability and validity of, and the factors associated with, FCRG. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values > .9 indicate excellent reliability. Results The FCRG achieved good intra-rater reliability (all ICC > .934). A moderate correlation (Spearman-rho .335, p < .001) with motivation indicates convergent validity. The CFA showed sufficient to good model fits (CFI = .983 and SRMR = .016). Basic simulation pedagogy training is associated with higher competencies (p = .036, b = 17.766). Conclusion The FCRG is a suitable self-assessment tool for evaluating a facilitator's competence in nursing simulation.}, language = {en} } @article{BiniokForbrigGellertetal., author = {Biniok, Maria and Forbrig, Theresa A. and Gellert, Paul and Gr{\"a}ske, Johannes}, title = {Analysis of cybersickness in virtual nursing simulation: a German longitudinal study}, series = {BMC Nursing}, volume = {2024}, journal = {BMC Nursing}, number = {23}, publisher = {BMC}, isbn = {1472-6955}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-01833-z}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1533-opus-6356}, pages = {14}, abstract = {Background Innovative educational approaches such as simulation-based nursing education using virtual reality (VR) technologies provide new opportunities for nursing education. However, there is a lack of information on side effects, especially health-related side effects, of head-mounted displays (HMDs) on the human body when using VR devices for nursing simulation. This study aims to validate the German version of the Virtual Reality Sickness Questionnaire (VRSQ) and to evaluate its associations with sex and age, as reflected in the VRSQG scores (total score oculomotor, and disorientation) over time. Methods A longitudinal-sectional study was conducted. In addition to the VRSQG (pre-, post-, and 20 min postintervention), participants (all nursing students) completed data on personal characteristics. Participants completed a VR simulation of a blood draw. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to evaluate whether the measured construct was consistent with the original. In addition to the validity, internal consistency was analyzed and generalized linear models (GLMs) were used for data analysis. Results A total of 38 nursing students (mean age 26.8 years; SD = 7.1, 79.0\% female) participated. The mean time spent in the VR simulation was 21 min. All participants completed the entire simulation. The CFA indicates (CFI = 0.981, SRMR = 0.040) VRSQG structure is given. Internal consistency showed low values for the subdomain Oculomotor (Cronbach alpha 0.670). For Disorientation and the Total score values showed a sufficient internal consistency. GLMs showed significant between subject associations with age over time with VRSQG total score, oculomotor, and disorientation. Older nursing students start with higher VRSQG-Scores. Over time, an approximation occurs, so that all participants reach a similar level by the final measurement point. No associations were found between sex (male/ female) and VRSQG scores. Conclusions The VRSQG is a reliable and valid self-assessment for measuring cybersickness in VR based nursing simulations, with cybersickness symptoms positively associated with age. However, in depth-evaluation regarding age-associations with cybersickness should be done. As well as studies to explore additional associations and emphasizes the importance of establishing cut-off values to assess the clinical relevance of the scores.}, language = {en} }