Refine
Document Type
Language
- English (6)
Keywords
- kesterite (2)
- thin-film solar cells (2)
- Stream metabolism (1)
- ecosystem respiration (1)
- electronic surface structure (1)
- energy band alignment (1)
- smart tracer (1)
- transient storage modeling (1)
Institute
- JP Photovoltaik (4)
- FG Gewässerökologie (2)
The electronic structure of the CdS/Cu2ZnSnS4 (CZTS) heterojunction was investigated by direct and inverse photoemission. The effects of a KCN etch of the CZTS absorber prior to CdS deposition on the band alignment at the respective interface were studied. We find a “cliff”-like conduction band offset at the CdS/CZTS interface independent of absorber pretreatment and a significant etch-induced enhancement of the energetic barrier for charge carrier recombination across the CdS/CZTS interface.
The surface properties of CuInS 2 (CIS) thin-fi lm solar cell absorbers are
investigated by a combination of electron and soft X-ray spectroscopies.
Spatially separated regions of varying colors are observed and identifi ed to
be dominated by either CuS or Cu 2 S surface phases. After their removal by
KCN etching, the samples cannot be distinguished by eye and the CIS surface
is found to be Cu-defi cient in both regions. However, a signifi cantly more
pronounced off-stoichiometry in the region initially covered by Cu 2 S can be
identifi ed. In this region, the resulting surface band gap is also signifi cantly
larger than the E g Surf of the initially CuS-terminated region. Such variations
may represent a hidden parameter which, if overlooked, induces irreproducibility
and thus prevents systematic optimization efforts.
The chemical and electronic surface structure of Cu2ZnSnS4 thin-film solar cell absorbers has been investigated by direct and inverse photoemission. Particular emphasis was placed on the impact of KCN etching, which significantly alters the surface composition and is best explained by a preferred etching of Cu and, to a lesser degree, Sn. As a consequence the surface band gap increased from (1.53 +/- 0.15) eV, which agrees with optically derived bulk band gap values, to (1.91 +/- 0.15) ev.