TY - GEN A1 - Kraljevski, Ivan A1 - Duckhorn, Frank A1 - Tschöpe, Constanze A1 - Wolff, Matthias T1 - Machine Learning for Anomaly Assessment in Sensor Networks for NDT in Aerospace T2 - IEEE Sensors Journal N2 - We investigated and compared various algorithms in machine learning for anomaly assessment with different feature analyses on ultrasonic signals recorded by sensor networks. The following methods were used and compared in anomaly detection modeling: hidden Markov models (HMM), support vector machines (SVM), isolation forest (IF), and reconstruction autoencoders (AEC). They were trained exclusively on sensor signals of the intact state of structures commonly used in various industries, like aerospace and automotive. The signals obtained on artificially introduced damage states were used for performance evaluation. Anomaly assessment was evaluated and compared using various classifiers and feature analysis methods. We introduced novel methodologies for two processes. The first was the dataset preparation with anomalies. The second was the detection and damage severity assessment utilizing the intact object state exclusively. The experiments proved that robust anomaly detection is practically feasible. We were able to train accurate classifiers which had a considerable safety margin. Precise quantitative analysis of damage severity will also be possible when calibration data become available during exploitation or by using expert knowledge. KW - Machine learning KW - Non-destructive testing KW - Ultrasonic transducers Y1 - 2021 UR - https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9366491 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2021.3062941 SN - 1558-1748 VL - 21 IS - 9 SP - 11000 EP - 11008 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Uhlig, Sebastian A1 - Alkhasli, Ilkin A1 - Schubert, Frank A1 - Tschöpe, Constanze A1 - Wolff, Matthias T1 - A Review of Synthetic and Augmented Training Data for Machine Learning in Ultrasonic Non-Destructive Evaluation T2 - Ultrasonics N2 - Ultrasonic Testing (UT) has seen increasing application of machine learning (ML) in recent years, promoting higher-level automation and decision-making in flaw detection and classification. Building a generalized training dataset to apply ML in non-destructive evaluation (NDE), and thus UT, is exceptionally difficult since data on pristine and representative flawed specimens are needed. Yet, in most UT test cases flawed specimen data is inherently rare making data coverage the leading problem when applying ML. Common data augmentation (DA) strategies offer limited solutions as they don’t increase the dataset variance, which can lead to overfitting of the training data. The virtual defect method and the recent application of generative adversarial neural networks (GANs) in UT are sophisticated DA methods targeting to solve this problem. On the other hand, well-established research in modeling ultrasonic wave propagations allows for the generation of synthetic UT training data. In this context, we present a first thematic review to summarize the progress of the last decades on synthetic and augmented UT training data in NDE. Additionally, an overview of methods for synthetic UT data generation and augmentation is presented. Among numerical methods such as finite element, finite difference, and elastodynamic finite integration methods, semi-analytical methods such as general point source synthesis, superposition of Gaussian beams, and the pencil method as well as other UT modeling software are presented and discussed. Likewise, existing DA methods for one- and multidimensional UT data, feature space augmentation, and GANs for augmentation are presented and discussed. The paper closes with an in-detail discussion of the advantages and limitations of existing methods for both synthetic UT training data generation and DA of UT data to aid the decision-making of the reader for the application to specific test cases. KW - Non-destructive testing KW - NDT KW - Non-destructive evaluation KW - NDE KW - Ultrasonic testing KW - Ultrasonics KW - Flaw detection KW - Machine learning KW - Artificial intelligence KW - Deep learning KW - Synthetic training data KW - Data augmentation Y1 - 2023 UR - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041624X23001178 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2023.107041 SN - 1874-9968 IS - 134 ER -