TY - CHAP A1 - Ulrich, Rainer G. A1 - Schlegel, Matthias A1 - Mertens, Marc A1 - Groschup, Martin H. A1 - Schmidt-Chanasit, Jonas A1 - Plenge-Bönig, Anita A1 - Jacob, Jens A1 - Pelz, Hans-Joachim A1 - Freise, Jona A1 - Wenk, Matthias A1 - Thiel, Jörg A1 - Triebenbacher, Cornelia A1 - Schmolz, Eric A1 - Kurth, Andreas A1 - Krüger, Frank A1 - Rühe, Ferdinand A1 - Kiffner, Christian A1 - Ansorge, Hermann A1 - Gerwin, Werner A1 - Wegener, Wolfgang A1 - Müller, Jörg A1 - Bemmann, Margit A1 - Wolf, Ronny A1 - Otto, Lutz-Florian A1 - Oehme, Rainer A1 - Pfeffer, Martin A1 - Heckel, Gerald A1 - Schex, Susanne A1 - Essbauer, Sandra S. T1 - Netzwerk Nagetier-übertragene Pathogene: Monitoring von Hantavirus-Infektionen in Deutschland T2 - Wildhygiene, Wildtierkrankheiten, Parasiten, Epidemiologie Y1 - 2009 SN - 978-378-88131-2-3 SN - 1436-3895 SP - 229 EP - 250 PB - Ges. für Wildtier- und Jagdforschung CY - Halle/Saale ER - TY - GEN A1 - Werner, Jens Martin A1 - Zidek, Martin A1 - Kammerer, Sylvia A1 - Platz Batista da Silva, Natascha A1 - Jung, Friedrich A1 - Schlitt, Hans Jürgen A1 - Hornung, Matthias A1 - Jung, Ernst Michael T1 - Intraoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasound can have a crucial role in surgical decision-making during hepato-pancreatico-biliary surgery –Analysis of impact and input T2 - Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation N2 - OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact and procedural input of intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and ultrasound elastography on surgical decision making during the procedure and consequently the out-come after hepato-pancreatico-biliary (HPB) surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data of 50 consecutive patients, who underwent HPB surgery from 04/2018 to 07/2018 were prospectively collected for this study. During surgery, IOUS with a high-resolution ultrasound device using CEUS after bolus injection of 2.4–5 ml Sulphur hexafluoride microbubbles using a 6–9 MHz probe and a share wave and strain elastography was performed by an experienced examiner. Process and time analysis were carried out using mobile phone timer. RESULTS: The IOUS with CEUS and elastography correctly identified 42 malignant tumors and 4 benign lesions. In 3 cases, the examination provided false positive result (identifying 3 benign lesions as malignant) and in 1 case a malignant lesion was incorrectly assessed as benign (sensitivity 97,7%, specificity 57,1%, PPV 93,3% and NPV 80%). The specific question by the surgeon could be answered successfully in 98% of the cases. In 76% of the cases, there was a modification (42%) or a fundamental change (34%) of the planned surgical approach due to the information provided by the IOUS. Within the last group, the IOUS had a major impact on therapy outcome. In 7 patients an additional tumor resection was required, in 5 patients the tumor was assessed as inoperable, and in total in 5 patients an intraoperative RFA (4/5) or postoperative RITA (1/5) was required. Regarding procedural input, there was only a slight, but significant difference between the transport and set-up times before the intraoperative use (mean: 14 min 22 s) and the return transport (mean 13 min 6 s), (p = 0,038). The average examination time was 14 minutes, which makes only one third of the overall time demand. CONCLUSION: Combination of IOUS with CEUS and elastography in oncological HPB surgery provides valuable information that affects surgical decision-making. The procedural input of about 45 minutes seems to be a good investment considering the improvement of the surgical procedure and a significant modification of the therapy approach in the majority of the cases. KW - Surgical decision-making KW - hepato-pancreatico-biliary surgery KW - CEUS KW - elastography Y1 - 2021 UR - https://content.iospress.com/articles/clinical-hemorheology-and-microcirculation/ch201031 U6 - https://doi.org/10.3233/CH-201031 VL - 78 IS - 1 SP - 1 EP - 14 ER -