TY - GEN A1 - Iashchenko, Iryna A1 - Schüttig, Wiebke A1 - Bammert, Philip A1 - Schneider, Udo A1 - Spallek, Jacob A1 - Rattay, Petra A1 - Schneider, Sven A1 - Moor, Irene A1 - Pischke, Claudia A1 - Sundmacher, Leonie T1 - Can invitation systems increase participation in preventive health screening among adolescents? : an evaluation of a state-wide intervention in Germany using a difference-in-differences analysis of claims data T2 - European Journal of Public Health N2 - In Germany, routine screenings are used to monitor the health and development of children and adolescents, enabling timely discovery and treatment of health issues. One such screening, called J1, is recommended for adolescents aged 12-14 years, but participation is only 43%. In the state of Bavaria, a lack of awareness is the main reason cited for not attending. 'Your Ticket to J1' was an invitation system implemented across the state to inform adolescents about the screening. Our study investigated whether this intervention increased J1 participation and if its effects varied by family socioeconomic position (SEP). We used pseudonymized data from a large statutory health insurer from 2016 to 2018 and containing 267 650 observations. To investigate the effect of the intervention, we employed a difference-in-differences analysis at the individual level. Assuming parallel trends at the state level, we compared J1 participation rates between Bavaria and other German states before and after the intervention. We additionally stratified analyses by SEP. The intervention led to an increase in J1 participation by about 1%. In the stratified regressions, the effect size was larger for children from families with a lower SEP. J1 participation increased by about 4% among adolescents whose primary insured parent had the lowest occupational status. A state-wide invitation system had a small but statistically significant positive impact on J1 participation and might reduce socioeconomic inequities in healthcare utilization. Informing adolescents about J1 appears to increase participation, particularly among those from families with a lower SEP. KW - adolescent, child, germany, socioeconomic factors, health care use, prevention Y1 - 2025 UR - https://academic.oup.com/eurpub/advance-article/doi/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf026/8063708 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf026 SN - 1464-360X VL - 35 IS - 2 SP - 312 EP - 318 PB - Oxford University Press CY - Oxford ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Woldt, Thomas A1 - Gjardy, Georg A1 - Hildebrandt, Sven A1 - Grünewald, Holger A1 - Stock, Oliver A1 - Schneider, Bernd Uwe T1 - Systemintegration dezentraler Energieandlungsanlagen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung regenerativer Energieträger JF - Forum der Forschung Y1 - 2007 SN - 0947-6989 VL - 10 IS - 19 SP - 69 EP - 74 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Woldt, Thomas A1 - Gjardy, Georg A1 - Hildebrandt, Sven A1 - Grünewald, Holger A1 - Stock, Oliver A1 - Schneider, Bernd Uwe T1 - Systemintegration dezentraler Energiewandlungsanlagen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung regenerativer Energieträger T2 - Forum der Forschung KW - regenerative Energien Y1 - 2006 SN - 0947-6989 IS - 19 SP - 69 EP - 74 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Lampert, Thomas A1 - Kuntz, Benjamin A1 - Schneider, Sven A1 - Spallek, Jacob T1 - Soziale Ungleichheit und Gesundheit: die Entwicklung sozialepidemiologischer Forschung in Deutschland T2 - Public Health Forum N2 - Die Sozialepidemiologie befasst sich mit der sozialen Verteilung von Erkrankungsrisiken und Gesundheitschancen und den daraus resultierenden gesundheitlichen Ungleichheiten. Für die letzten 20 Jahre lässt sich ein kontinuierlicher Zuwachs an sozialepidemiologischen Forschungsbefunden in Deutschland konstatieren. Mit den gesundheitlichen Ungleichheiten und den sozialen Determinanten der Gesundheit adressiert die Sozialepidemiologie Kernbereiche von Public Health, deren Bearbeitung auch in Zukunft erheblichen Einfluss auf die wissenschaftlichen, politischen und praxisorientierten Perspektiven des Fachs haben dürfte. KW - gesundheitliche Ungleichheiten KW - Public Health KW - Sozialepidemiologie KW - soziale Ungleichheit Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1515/pubhef-2018-0062 SN - 0944-5587 SN - 1876-4851 VL - 26 IS - 3 SP - 212 EP - 215 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Schneider, Sven A1 - Spallek, Jacob A1 - Maul, Holger A1 - Schilling, Laura T1 - Schwangere, Nikotin und E-Zigaretten T2 - Gesundheitswesen 2019 N2 - Einleitung: In Deutschland raucht noch immer etwa jede fünfte junge Frau Tabakzigaretten. Gleichzeitig erfreuen sich E-Zigaretten auch in Deutschland insbesondere unter jungen Erwachsenen zunehmender Beliebtheit. Maternaler Nikotinkonsum birgt schwerwiegende Risiken für die Schwangere und das Kind. Das Ziel dieser Studie war es, den Konsum von Tabak- und E-Zigaretten sowie die Risikowahrnehmung bezüglich E-Zigaretten unter Schwangeren zu erfassen. Methode: In der STudy on E-cigarettes and Pregnancy (STEP) wurden im Rahmen eines quantitativen Studienteils für 575 Schwangere an einer Geburtsklinik in Hamburg von April 2018 bis Januar 2019 die Tabak- und die E-Zigarettennutzung erfasst. In einem qualitativen netnographischen Studienteil wurden insgesamt über 1.000 Posts in webbasierten Schwangerschaftsforen inhaltsanalytisch ausgewertet. Ergebnisse: Unmittelbar vor der Schwangerschaft nutzten 26,9% der Schwangeren Tabakzigaretten und 7,8% E-Zigaretten. Die Prävalenzen reduzierten sich dann im ersten Trimenon auf 9,0% für Tabakzigaretten und 0,5% für E-Zigaretten. Am Ende der Schwangerschaft rauchten noch 3,1% aller Befragten Tabakzigaretten – darunter jede Vierte mehr als 10 Zigaretten/Tag – und 0,2% nutzten durchgängig E-Zigaretten. Die netnographische Analyse zeigte eine große Verunsicherung bei Schwangeren hinsichtlich der Risiken der E-Zigarettennutzung. Diskussion: Die Ergebnisse zeigten für das hier untersuchte Kollektiv, dass noch immer etwa jede zehnte Schwangere zu Beginn der Schwangerschaft Tabakzigaretten raucht. Dagegen ist E-Zigarettenkonsum in der Schwangerschaft nur wenig verbreitet, wenngleich er im Internet teilweise als unschädlich, harmlos und als Alternative zur Tabakzigarette diskutiert wird. Im Rahmen der Prävention sollten die potenziellen Gesundheitsgefahren und die umstrittene Wirksamkeit der E-Zigarette als Tabakentwöhnungshilfe thematisiert und von der E-Zigarettennutzung in der Schwangerschaft dringend abgeraten werden. KW - Nikotin KW - E-Zigaretten KW - Schwangerschaft Y1 - 2019 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1694440 VL - 81 IS - 08/09 SP - 691 EP - 691 PB - Georg Thieme Verlag KG CY - Stuttgart ER - TY - GEN A1 - Richter, M. A1 - Dragano, Nico A1 - Lampert, Thomas A1 - Schneider, Sven A1 - Spallek, Jacob A1 - Sundmacher, Leonie T1 - Understanding the institutional context of health inequalities among young people: Study protocol for a multi-center research unit T2 - Gesundheitswesen 2019 N2 - Background: While health inequalities among young people are well described, the underlying mechanisms have been explored far less. Compositional and contextual characteristics of institutional contexts (e.g. kindergartens, schools) are likely to shape health inequalities among young people and may have an impact above and beyond individual-level determinants. The general research objectives of the research unit are to empirically study if characteristics of different institutional contexts are associated with the emergence of individual-level inequalities in health and c) to integrate findings from different life stages into a comprehensive theoretical model about the key mechanisms at individual and contextual levels. Methods and analysis: Building upon reviews of the existing evidence, each of the five subprojects of the research unit will analyse secondary data (cross-sectional and longitudinal surveys). The subprojects will focus on institutional contexts that serve as major socialization agents in society, such as the family, kindergarten, school, tertiary education/work, as well as the health care system. Linear or logistic multilevel modelling will be applied in order to examine the role of institutional characteristics for young people's health and health inequalities at the individual level. Ethics and dissemination: The dissemination activities include the publication of results in peer-reviewed journals, at international and national scientific conferences, as well as press releases in written and broadcast media to inform relevant stakeholders and the lay public. In the first funding stage, the research unit only uses secondary data of existing datasets. Therefore, ethical approval is not required. KW - Health inequalities KW - young people Y1 - 2019 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1694623 VL - 81 IS - 08/09 SP - 750 EP - 751 PB - Georg Thieme Verlag KG CY - Stuttgart ER - TY - GEN A1 - Schilling, Laura A1 - Spallek, Jacob A1 - Maul, Holger A1 - Schneider, Sven T1 - E-Zigaretten und Tabakzigaretten in der Schwangerschaft – eine Analyse von aktiver und passiver Exposition und Einstellung unter Schwangeren in Deutschland T2 - 14. Jahrestagung der DGEpi, 11.-13. Septmeber 2019, Ulm N2 - Hintergrund: In Deutschland greift ein Zehntel der Schwangeren zur Tabakzigarette. Gleichzeitig verbreiten sich E-Zigaretten insbesondere unter jungen Erwachsenen in Deutschland zunehmend. Das Ziel dieser Studie war es, die aktive und passive Exposition durch E-Zigaretten- und Tabakzigaretten sowie die Einstellung zur E-Zigarette unter Schwangeren in Deutschland zu erforschen. Methoden: Im Rahmen der STEP (STudy on E-cigarettes and Pregnancy) beantworteten 575 Schwangere an einer Geburtsklinik in Hamburg von April 2018 bis Januar 2019 Fragen zur E-Zigaretten- und Tabakzigarettenexposition sowie ihren Einstellungen zur E-Zigarette. Ergebnisse: Insgesamt nutzten 1,2% der Befragten ausschließlich E-Zigaretten, 6,7% E- und Tabakzigaretten und 20,3% ausschließlich Tabakzigaretten vor der Schwangerschaft. In der Schwangerschaft nutzten 0,5% E-Zigaretten und 9,1% Tabakzigaretten. 86,9% aller Schwangeren waren der Ansicht, dass E-Zigaretten nicht als Alternative zu Tabakzigaretten genutzt werden sollten. Befragte, die die Tabakzigarette während der Schwangerschaft nutzten, vertraten seltener diese Einstellung als Nichtnutzer (78,0% vs. 88,0%; p=0,045). Der aktuelle Konsum der E-Zigarette (bzw. Tabakzigarette) durch den Partner erfolgte bei 5,5% (bzw. 24,4%) der Befragten. 18,5% (bzw. 9,3%) der Partner mit E-Zigarettenkonsum (bzw. Tabakzigarettenkonsum) konsumierten zuhause. Schlussfolgerungen: Die aktive E-Zigarettenexposition ist – im Gegensatz zur aktiven Tabakzigarettenexposition - in der Schwangerschaft bisher gering. Gleichzeitig kommt eine passive Exposition durch den konsumierenden Partner von Schwangeren häufiger bei der E-Zigarette vor. Die Ergebnisse betonen die Wichtigkeit der weiterführenden Tabakprävention und der Erforschung der Gesundheitsrisiken des Passivdampfes in der Schwangerschaft. KW - E-Zigaretten KW - Tabakzigaretten KW - Schwangerschaft Y1 - 2019 UR - https://www.eventclass.org/contxt_dgepi2019/online-program/session?s=AG13%7C1 SP - 117 EP - 117 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Schilling, Laura A1 - Schneider, Sven A1 - Karlheim, Christoph A1 - Maul, Holger A1 - Tallarek, Marie A1 - Spallek, Jacob T1 - Perceived threats, benefits and barriers of e-cigarette use during pregnancy. A qualitative analysis of risk perception within existing threads in online discussion forums T2 - Midwifery N2 - Objective Previous studies have shown that e-cigarettes are perceived as being less harmful than tobacco cigarettes by pregnant women and might be used to quit smoking during pregnancy. Our aim was to further explore and characterise perceived threats, benefits and barriers of e-cigarette use during pregnancy. Methods Our STudy on E-cigarettes and Pregnancy (STEP) was, among others, based on a netnographic approach of analysing existing threads in German-speaking online discussion forums dealing with perceived threats and benefits of e-cigarette use during pregnancy. For the analysis, we used an inductive-deductive qualitative content analysis. Findings Based on 25 online discussion threads containing 1552 posts, we identified perceived threats, perceived benefits and perceived barriers to e-cigarette use during pregnancy, among others, as main themes. Subthemes identified within the main theme perceived threats were severe nicotine related health risks, potential health risks of additional ingredients, relative risks and lack of knowledge and research studies. As perceived benefits, we identified possibility and facilitation of smoking cessation, harm reduction and financial benefits. Perceived barriers were lack of satisfaction and social stigma. Conclusion Our qualitative results suggest that the perception of the health threats related to e-cigarette use during pregnancy varies according to the nicotine content and the perception of relative risks compared with tobacco cigarettes. In addition to this, risk perception is defined through further health and non-health related barriers and benefits (e.g. suitability of e-cigarettes as a smoking cessation aid, social stigma). KW - Electronic cigarette KW - Pregnancy KW - Risk perception KW - Health beliefs KW - Online forums Y1 - 2019 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2019.102533 SN - 0266-6138 VL - 79 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Schilling, Laura A1 - Schneider, Sven A1 - Maul, Holger A1 - Spallek, Jacob T1 - STudy on E-Cigarettes and Pregnancy (STEP)–Study Protocolof a Mixed Methods Study on Risk Perception of E-Cigarette UseDuring Pregnancy and Sample Description T2 - Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde N2 - Introduction: During pregnancy, the motherʼs healthy life-style is crucial for the health of the fetus. Potential risk factorsfor maternal and child health should therefore be identifiedand reduced as early as possible. The consumption of e-ciga-rettes represents one of these potential risk factors. Exploringrisk perceptions about e-cigarette use during pregnancy canprovide early indications of possible user motives. Therefore,our mixed methodsSTudy onE-cigarettes andPregnancy(STEP) aimed to comprehensively analyze risk perceptionsabout e-cigarette use during pregnancy based on anInte-gratedHealthBeliefModel (IHBM). This paper describes thestudy design, methods, sample population and limitations ofSTEP. Methods: Our sequential mixed methods study combinedqualitative and quantitative approaches. In the qualitativesection of the study which preceded the quantitative part ofthe study, we aimed to characterize risk perceptions aboute‑cigarette use during pregnancy. We used a netnographic re-search approach which analyzed discussion threads in onlineforums dealing with e-cigarette use during pregnancy. Theanalysis was based on an IHBM. Identified themes were incor-porated in the questionnaire which was developed for the quantitative part of the study. The quantitative section aimedto quantify, among other things, perceived threats, barriersand benefits and to explore differences in risk perception ac-cording to sociodemographic characteristics and tobacco ande-cigarette usage. Results: In the qualitative section, 1552 posts in 25 online dis-cussion threads dealing, inter alia, with e-cigarette use duringpregnancy were identified. The quantitative part looked atthe responses in the questionnaires handed in by 575 preg-nant women who attended a hospital in Hamburg (Germany)from April 2018 to January 2019 (response rate: 27.5%). Conclusion: Data collection was successful for both the qual-itative and quantitative parts of the study. When interpretingthe results of STEP, different limitations should be taken intoaccount. The results of STEP provide starting points for thedevelopment of tailored preventive measures for pregnantwomen. KW - e‑cigarette KW - pregnancy KW - risk perception KW - mixed methods study KW - Health Belief Model Y1 - 2020 UR - https://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/pdf/10.1055/a-1061-7288.pdf U6 - https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1061-7288 SN - 1438-8804 SN - 0016-5751 VL - 80 IS - 01 SP - 66 EP - 75 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Hilger-Kolb, Jennifer A1 - Schneider, Sven A1 - Herr, Raphael A1 - Osenbruegge, Nina A1 - Hoffmann, Stephanie A1 - Herke, Max A1 - Pischke, Claudia R. A1 - Sundmacher, Leonie A1 - Diehl, Katharina T1 - Associations between contextual and compositional characteristics of early childcare facilities with health, health behaviours and well-being among young children aged 06 years: protocol for a scoping review T2 - BMJ Open N2 - Introduction: Early childhood is an important life stage which is crucial for determining health and health inequalities in later life. At the meso-level (institutional-level), early childcare facilities (eg, kindergartens, preschools) are the most important agent of socialisation next to families in young children aged 06 years. In recent years, an increasing amount of studies has focused on contextual and compositional characteristics of early childcare facilities and their association with health (eg, self-rated health), health behaviour (eg, physical activity) and well-being (eg, emotional well-being) in this age group. However, as currently no overview of the available literature on this topic exists, we will conduct a scoping review including various study designs (eg, cross-sectional studies, prospective studies, qualitative studies). Methods and analysis: We will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. A systematic search of the following scientific databases will be conducted: PubMed/Medline, PsycInfo, Sociological Abstracts, Education Resources Information Center and The Cochrane Library. During the selection process, we will follow a two-step process. First, two reviewers will independently screen titles/abstracts of all potentially eligible articles by applying a set of previously defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. After the completion of the title/abstract screening, full texts of the remaining articles will be screened following the same procedure. To determine inter-rater agreement between reviewers, we will calculate Cohen’s Kappa after both steps. Key characteristics (eg, country of origin, sample size, study design) of included articles will be extracted. We will map the evidence available by providing a summary table on the key characteristics extracted and by presenting the associations using various types of illustrations. Ethics and dissemination: Since no primary data will be collected for this review, ethical approval is not required. Our findings will be published in an international peer-reviewed journal and presented at national and international conferences. KW - childcare facilities KW - health KW - health behaviour KW - well-being KW - children KW - scoping review Y1 - 2020 UR - https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/9/e037038 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037038 SN - 2044-6055 VL - 10 IS - 9 ER -