TY - GEN A1 - Kopkow, Christian T1 - Alles nicht so einfach – Verletzungsprävention im Sport T2 - Sportpysio Y1 - 2018 SN - 2196-5951 SN - 2196-596X VL - 6 IS - 3 SP - 139 EP - 142 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Döding, Rebekka A1 - Braun, Tobias A1 - Ehrenbrusthoff, Katja A1 - Elsner, Bernhard A1 - Kopkow, Christian A1 - Lange, Toni A1 - Lüdtke, Kerstin A1 - Jung, Andres A1 - Miller, Clint A1 - Owen, Patrick J A1 - Saueressig, Tobias A1 - Schäfer, Axel A1 - Schäfer, Robin A1 - Schleimer, Tim A1 - Shala, Rilind A1 - Szikszay, Tibor A1 - Zebisch, Jochen A1 - Belavý, Daniel L T1 - Evidence gaps in conservative non-pharmacological interventions and guideline implementation for high-burden non-communicable diseases: protocol for an overview of reviews T2 - BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine N2 - Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) represent a high burden for the society and affected individuals. Conservative non-pharmacological interventions play a first-line role in the treatment and management of most NCDs. Systematic reviews (SRs) provide the highest level of evidence and significantly influence clinical decision-making. The primary aim of this study is to provide an overview of the evidence on the effectiveness of recommended conservative non-pharmacological interventions for highly burdensome NCDs. The secondary aim is to provide an overview of the evidence for guideline implementation. A literature search was performed in Medline (PubMed), EMBASE and Cochrane CENTRAL. Six reviewers will, in duplicate, independently screen and select studies following eligibility criteria. The population will include individuals with NCDs from disease categories chosen based on WHO burden of disease data and the importance of conservative rehabilitation for their management. Eligible interventions will encompass conservative non-pharmacological approaches recommended by clinical practice guidelines (ie, physical, psychological and education/advice). Eligible comparator will include no or minimal intervention and other competitive interventions. Outcomes will comprise proposed core outcomes for the respective diseases, including patient-reported (eg, pain) and performance-based (eg, physical functioning) outcomes. SRs published in the last 5 years as peer-reviewed journal article in the English language will be eligible. The overview will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of reviews. Y1 - 2024 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002032 SN - 2055-7647 VL - 10 IS - 4 PB - BMJ ER - TY - GEN A1 - Bahns, Carolin A1 - Happe, Lisa A1 - Kopkow, Christian T1 - Barriers and facilitators to the use of clinical practice guidelines in osteoarthritis care: a qualitative study among German physiotherapists T2 - BMJ Open N2 - Objectives The objective of this study was to explore barriers and facilitators to the use of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) in osteoarthritis (OA) care among German physiotherapists. Design Qualitative semistructured interviews were conducted with German physiotherapists. An interview topic guide based on the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) was developed to explore perceived barriers and facilitators to the use of CPGs in OA care. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. In a first step, the data were coded inductively using thematic analysis. Subsequently, the emerged themes were deductively reassigned to the relevant domains of the TDF and categorised as barriers and facilitators. Setting Outpatient physiotherapy practices in Germany. Participants Physiotherapists working in an outpatient setting in Germany and involved in the management of patients with hip and knee OA were eligible to participate. Results Eleven physiotherapists (7 women, 4 men) were interviewed between February and September 2023. The mean age was 34.2 years (± 9.9, range 23–57). Most factors influencing guideline-recommended care were identified in the TDF domains ‘knowledge’, ‘beliefs about consequences’, ‘environmental context and resources’ and ‘social influences’. For example, physiotherapists perceived low awareness of existing CPGs, loss of individuality in treatment, time constraints and dissonant patient expectations as barriers to the use of CPGs. Discussion of guideline recommendations within the team and the expectation of improved patient outcomes and resource savings were reported as facilitators. Conclusions Multiple factors were identified that were perceived to influence clinical practice in Germany. The results of this study can inform the development of theory-based interventions aimed at changing physiotherapists’ behaviour to support them in providing optimal OA care. Y1 - 2024 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085349 SN - 2044-6055 VL - 14 IS - 10 PB - BMJ ER - TY - GEN A1 - Bahns, Carolin A1 - Kopkow, Christian T1 - Physiotherapy for patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis in Germany: a survey of current practice T2 - BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders N2 - Backround Osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip and the knee is common and leads to pain, stiffness and disability. Clinical practice guidelines (CPG) provide recommendations to assist healthcare professionals in clinical decision-making. Although evidence-based physiotherapy has been shown to be effective in the management OA, a gap between clinical practice and guideline recommendations exists. Little is known about OA management provided by physiotherapists in Germany and whether treatment aligns with CPGs. The objectives of this study were (1) to investigate the current physiotherapy practice in patients with hip and/or knee OA in Germany, (2) to evaluate physiotherapists’ adherence to guideline recommendations and (3) to explore barriers and facilitators to guideline use. Methods A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among physiotherapists. The questionnaire collected information on demographic characteristics, physiotherapists’ management of hip and knee OA and the use of CPGs in clinical practice. Guideline adherence was evaluated by comparing the survey findings with guideline recommendations. Full adherence was assumed if all recommended treatment options were chosen. Results In total, 447 (74.9%) of 597 eligible physiotherapists completed the survey. Data from 442 participants (mean age 41.2 ± 12.8 years; 288 female (65.1%)) were included in the analysis. The most common treatment choices for both hip and knee OA were exercise therapy (hip OA: 424/442, 95.9%; knee OA: 426/442, 96.4%), self-management advice (hip OA: 413/442, 93.2%; knee OA: 395/442, 89.4%) and education (hip OA: 325/442, 73.5%; knee OA: 331/442, 74.9%), followed by manual therapy (hip OA: 311/442, 70.4%; knee OA: 311/442, 70.4%) and joint traction (hip OA: 208/442, 47.1%; knee OA: 199/442, 45.0%). Full guideline adherence was found in 17.2% (76/442) of physiotherapists for hip OA management and in 8.6% (38/442) for knee OA. Less than half of the respondents (212/430, 49.3%) were aware of an OA guideline. Conclusions In accordance with current guideline recommendations, most physiotherapists provide exercise therapy and education for patients with hip and/or knee OA. Interventions with low or conflicting evidence were also frequently provided. The limited awareness of existing OA guidelines and the low guideline adherence indicate an insufficient implementation of CPGs in German physiotherapy practice. KW - Arthrose KW - Knie KW - Hüfte KW - Physiotherapie Y1 - 2023 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06464-0 SN - 1471-2474 VL - 24 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Bahns, Carolin A1 - Scheffler, Bettina A1 - Kopkow, Christian T1 - Guideline-Adherent Physiotherapy for Patients With Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis in Germany: Protocol for an Implementation Research Project Using the Theoretical Domains Framework and the Behavior Change Wheel T2 - JMIR Research Protocols N2 - Background: Hip and knee osteoarthritis is common and leads to pain, stiffness, and disability. Clinical practice guidelines provide recommendations based on the best available evidence to assist health care professionals and patients in clinical decision-making. However, several studies have reported a gap between guideline recommendations and clinical practice in physiotherapy. Improved implementation strategies and the removal of existing barriers may facilitate the transfer of evidence into clinical practice and contribute to optimized quality of care. Objective: This paper presents the protocol for a study that aims to describe the current physiotherapy practice in patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis and to investigate physiotherapists’ adherence to clinical practice guidelines, to identify and specify barriers to and facilitators of guideline use and implementation, and to develop and pilot test a theory-based tailored implementation intervention aiming to increase guideline use in osteoarthritis care. Methods: The research project is divided into 4 parts. During the first part, we will conduct a nationwide web-based survey among German physiotherapists to evaluate the current management of hip and knee osteoarthritis and to evaluate whether treatment aligns with guideline recommendations. Subsequently, semistructured interviews will be conducted to specify barriers to and facilitators of guideline use and implementation among physiotherapists (part 2). On the basis of these findings, in part 3, we will develop a theory-driven implementation intervention based on the Theoretical Domains Framework and the Behavior Change Wheel, which will be evaluated in a controlled pilot study in terms of effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability (part 4). Results: Data collection of the web-based survey among German physiotherapists (part 1) was completed in December 2021. The semistructured interviews (part 2) were conducted between January and September 2023. Recruitment of physiotherapy practices to participate in the development of the implementation intervention is expected to start in January 2024. Conclusions: This research project aims to develop a theory-driven implementation intervention to facilitate the transfer of evidence from hip and knee osteoarthritis guidelines in physiotherapy practice. We hypothesize that successful implementation will lead to increased guideline adherence in physiotherapists, which in turn will improve the quality of care. The results from our project will provide valuable knowledge concerning the development process and effectiveness of tailored implementation interventions. KW - Physiotherapie KW - Evidenz-basierte Medizin KW - Leitlinien KW - Arthrose Y1 - 2023 UR - https://www.researchprotocols.org/2023/1/e47834/ U6 - https://doi.org/10.2196/47834 SN - 1929-0748 VL - 12 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Spieß, Pauline A1 - Bahns, Carolin A1 - Kopkow, Christian T1 - Einstellungen und Adhärenz zur evidenzbasierten Praxis von in Brandenburg tätigen Physiotherapeut*innen T2 - Physioscience N2 - Hintergrund Für Deutschland liegen noch unzureichende Daten zur Einstellung und Adhärenz von Physiotherapeut*innen gegenüber Evidenzbasierter Praxis (EBP) vor, insbesondere für im Bundesland Brandenburg tätige Physiotherapeut*innen. Ziel Erfassung der 1) Einstellungen und Adhärenz gegenüber EBP von in Brandenburg tätigen Physiotherapeut*innen und die 2) Ableitung von Barrieren und Förderfaktoren für die Einhaltung der EBP. Methodik Von März bis April 2022 wurde eine Online-Befragung unter in Brandenburg tätigen Physiotherapeut*innen durchgeführt. Die Teilnehmenden füllten die deutschsprachige Version des „Evidence-based Practice Inventory“ aus, einem Fragebogen mit 5 Dimensionen zur Erfassung von Barrieren und Förderfaktoren hinsichtlich EBP. Zusätzlich wurden soziodemografische Daten erfragt. Die Auswertung erfolgte deskriptiv. Ergebnisse Es nahmen 101 Physiotherapeut*innen an der Befragung teil, davon 75 (74 %) Frauen und 26 (26 %) Männer. Die Befragten waren im Durchschnitt 39 Jahre (± 13) alt und verfügten über eine Berufserfahrung von 16 Jahren (± 12). Mehr als 70 % der Teilnehmenden hatten eine positive Einstellung gegenüber EBP. Knapp 55 % der Physiotherapeut*innen fühlten sich in der Lage, Prinzipien der EBP in ihren klinischen Entscheidungen anzuwenden. Gleichzeitig gaben weniger als 20 % an, dass in ihrer Abteilung sehr darauf geachtet wird, Prinzipien der EBP in klinischen Entscheidungen anzuwenden. Im Durchschnitt wiesen 30 % der Befragten eine hohe EBP-Adhärenz in den 5 Dimensionen auf. Die wichtigsten Förderfaktoren für Adhärenz zur EBP bildeten die Autor*innenschaft oder Mitarbeit an wissenschaftlichen Veröffentlichungen und die Teilnahme an einem Kurs zur EBP. Schlussfolgerung Die Einstellung von in Brandenburg tätigen Physiotherapeut*innen gegenüber EBP ist grundlegend positiv. Es zeigte sich jedoch, dass die Adhärenz zur EBP nur bei einem geringeren Anteil der Physiotherapeut*innen stark ausgeprägt ist. Barrieren und Förderfaktoren sollten näher untersucht werden, um zielgerichtete Interventionen zu entwickeln und die Implementierung von EBP im klinischen Alltag zu verbessern. KW - Physiotherapie KW - Evidenz-basierte Medizin KW - Evidenz-basierte Praxis Y1 - 2024 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2079-6303 SN - 1860-3351 SN - 1860-3092 VL - 20 IS - 1 SP - 22 EP - 32 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Braun, Tobias A1 - Kopkow, Christian T1 - Research Integrity – Teil 1: Verantwortungsvolle Forschungspraktiken und Transparenz T2 - Physioscience N2 - Forschung ist die Suche nach Wissen durch systematisches Untersuchen und Erörtern, Beobachten und Experimentieren [1]. Für eine evidenzbasierte Versorgung und ebenso die Professionsentwicklung ist Forschung in der Physiotherapie unverzichtbar. Erfreulicherweise ist national und international eine deutliche Zunahme an physiotherapeutischer Forschung beobachtbar, die sich auch im Umfang relativ zur gesamten Gesundheitsforschung positiv entwickelt hat [2]. Grundsätzlich wird angenommen, dass Forschungsergebnisse und die wissenschaftliche Literatur von Forschenden, Interessenvertretungen und der Gesellschaft verwendet werden können, da sie vertrauenswürdig, robust, gründlich und vollständig sind [3]. Gleichzeitig zeigen Analysen der letzten Jahre, dass ein bedeutsamer Teil der biomedizinischen Forschung schlecht, unglaubwürdig, überflüssig oder sogar schädlich ist. Dieser sogenannte Research Waste („Forschungsmüll“) wurde bereits an anderen Stellen thematisiert [4] [5] [6] [7]. Wir möchten daher mit 2 aufeinander folgenden Editorials auf das Thema Forschungsintegrität (Research Integrity) aufmerksam machen. Forschungsintegrität berührt den Kern des wissenschaftlichen Arbeitens, hat einen engen Bezug zur Vermeidung von Research Waste sowie zur „Replikationskrise“ in der Wissenschaft [8] und spielt mit Blick auf die Weiterentwicklung der Physiotherapiewissenschaft eine überaus bedeutsame Rolle. KW - Research integrity KW - Forschungspraktiken KW - Transparenz Y1 - 2023 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1982-2858 SN - 1860-3351 SN - 1860-3092 VL - 19 IS - 1 SP - 1 EP - 4 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Kopkow, Christian A1 - Braun, Tobias T1 - Research Integrity Teil 2: Open Science T2 - Physioscience N2 - Nachdem im ersten Editorial zum Thema Forschungsintegrität (Research Integrity) in Heft 01/23 der physioscience verantwortungsvolle Forschungspraktiken thematisiert wurden [1], wird in diesem zweiten Editorial das Thema Open Science fokussiert. Dabei geht es auch darum, wie und wo Forschungsergebnisse veröffentlicht werden. KW - Research integrity KW - open science Y1 - 2023 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2025-5225 SN - 1860-3351 SN - 1860-3092 VL - 19 IS - 2 SP - 49 EP - 51 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Glaubitz, Andreas A1 - Napierala-Komp, Simone A1 - Hauke, Jeannine A1 - Strunk, Chiara A1 - Bahns, Carolin A1 - Kopkow, Christian T1 - „Good Life with osteoArthritis in Denmark“ (GLA:D®) in Deutschland T2 - MSK – Muskuloskelettale Physiotherapie KW - Physiotherapie KW - Arthrose Y1 - 2025 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2452-1503 SN - 2701-6986 VL - 29 IS - 01 SP - 27 EP - 33 PB - Georg Thieme Verlag KG ER - TY - GEN A1 - Stangenberg-Gliss, Kirsten A1 - Kopkow, Christian A1 - Borgetto, Bernhard T1 - Synchronous home-based telerehabilitation of the upper extremity following stroke—A Pyramid Review T2 - Healthcare N2 - Background: Stroke is a leading cause of long-term disability, often resulting in upper extremity impairment. Telerehabilitation offers a promising approach to deliver therapy in home settings. This review aimed to evaluate the effects of home-based telerehabilitation interventions delivered to address upper extremity function in stroke patients. Methods: A systematic review was conducted following the Pyramid Review methodology. Quantitative and qualitative studies examining home-based telerehabilitation for upper extremity function in stroke patients were included. Data were synthesized using meta-analysis where possible and narrative synthesis. Results: Thirty studies (24 quantitative, four qualitative, and two mixed-methods studies) were included. Telerehabilitation interventions demonstrated improvements in upper extremity function for both subacute and chronic stroke patients, with varying effect sizes across intervention types. Constraint-induced movement therapy adaptations and some sensor-based approaches showed consistently positive results. Qualitative findings revealed generally positive effects, with convenience, gamification, and social support as key motivators for adherence. Conclusions: Home-based telerehabilitation shows promise for improving upper extremity function in stroke patients. However, heterogeneity in intervention designs and outcomes limits definitive conclusions. Future research should focus on larger trials, observational studies, standardized outcome measures, and long-term follow-up as well as qualitative studies with focus on perceived effectiveness to optimize telerehabilitation approaches for stroke recovery. KW - Telerehabilitation KW - Review KW - Evidence-based practice KW - Home based KW - Stroke Y1 - 2025 U6 - https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13010090 SN - 2227-9032 VL - 13 IS - 1 SP - 1 EP - 34 PB - MDPI AG ER - TY - GEN A1 - Lützner, Jörg A1 - Deckert, Stefanie A1 - Lange, Toni A1 - Postler, Anne Elisabeth A1 - Aringer, Martin A1 - Berth, Hendrik A1 - Bork, Hartmut A1 - Dreinhöfer, Karsten E A1 - Günther, Klaus-Peter A1 - Heller, Karl-Dieter A1 - Hube, Robert A1 - Kirschner, Stephan A1 - Kladny, Bernd A1 - Kopkow, Christian A1 - Sabatowski, Rainer A1 - Stoeve, Johannes A1 - Wagner, Richard A1 - Lützner, Cornelia T1 - Evidenzbasierte und patientenorientierte Indikationsstellung zur Knieendoprothese – Update der Leitlinie T2 - Zeitschrift für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie N2 - ZusammenfassungDie Implantation einer Knieendoprothese zählt mit ca. 170000 Eingriffen pro Jahr zu den am häufigsten stationär durchgeführten Operationen in Deutschland. Eine einheitliche, angemessene und patientenorientierte ärztliche Indikationsstellung ist bei einem solchen Eingriff unerlässlich. Das Update der S2k-Leitlinie „Indikation Knieendoprothese“ beinhaltet auf aktueller Evidenz basierende und im breiten Konsens abgestimmte Empfehlungen und eine Checkliste im praxistauglichen Format.Für dieses Leitlinien-Update wurde eine systematische Literaturrecherche nach (inter-)nationalen Leitlinien und systematischen Übersichtsarbeiten zur Gonarthrose und Knieendoprothetik durchgeführt, um klinisch relevante Fragestellungen zu Diagnostik, Prädiktoren für das Outcome, Risikofaktoren und Kontraindikatoren zu beantworten.Eine Knieendoprothese soll nur bei radiologisch nachgewiesener fortgeschrittener Gonarthrose (Kellgren-Lawrence-Grad 3 oder 4), nach vorangegangener konservativer Therapie über mindestens 3 Monate sowie bei hohem subjektivem Leidensdruck hinsichtlich der kniebezogenen Beschwerden und nach Ausschluss möglicher Kontraindikationen (Infektionen, Begleiterkrankungen, BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2) erfolgen. Modifizierbare Risikofaktoren (wie Rauchen, Diabetes mellitus, Anämie) sollen zuvor adressiert und ggf. optimiert werden. Die Ziele der Patient*innen sollen erfragt und deren Eintrittswahrscheinlichkeit gemeinsam besprochen werden. Schließlich ist die Entscheidung zur Knieendoprothese von Patient*in und Operateur*in gemeinsam zu treffen, wenn der zu erwartende Nutzen die möglichen Risiken überwiegt.Das Update der S2k-Leitlinie wurde um die unikondyläre Knieendoprothese erweitert, die präoperative Optimierung modifizierbarer Risikofaktoren ergänzt sowie Konkretisierungen der Hauptindikationskriterien vorgenommen. Y1 - 2024 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2288-7254 SN - 1864-6697 PB - Georg Thieme Verlag KG ER - TY - GEN A1 - Elser, Alexander A1 - Kopkow, Christian A1 - Schäfer, Axel T1 - Implementation of a virtual reality tntervention in outpatient physiotherapy for chronic pain: protocol for a pilot implementation study T2 - JMIR Research Protocols N2 - Background Chronic pain is a global health issue that causes physical, psychological, and social disabilities for patients, as well as high costs for societies. Virtual reality (VR) is a new treatment that provides an opportunity to narrow the gap between clinical practice and recommended care in the use of patient education and behavioral interventions in the outpatient physiotherapy setting. However, there is currently no implementation strategy to integrate VR treatments into this setting. Objective This protocol outlines a pilot implementation study that aims to (1) identify barriers and facilitators for implementing a VR intervention in outpatient physiotherapy care for people with chronic pain and (2) develop and pilot test an implementation strategy in 5 practices in Germany. Methods The study consists of 4 phases. The first phase involves adapting the treatment protocol of the VR intervention to the local context of outpatient physiotherapy practices in Germany. The second phase includes the collection of barriers and facilitators through semistructured interviews from physiotherapists and the development of a theory-driven implementation strategy based on the Theoretical Domains framework and the Behavior Change Wheel. This strategy will be applied in the third phase, which will also include a 6-month span of using VR interventions in practices, along with a process evaluation. The fourth phase consists of semistructured interviews to evaluate the developed implementation strategy. Results The recruitment process and phase 1, including the adaptation of the treatment protocol, have already been completed. We recruited 5 physiotherapy practices in Lower Saxony, Germany, where the VR intervention will be implemented. The collection of barriers and facilitators through semistructured interviews is scheduled to begin in February 2024. Conclusions This pilot implementation study aims to develop a theory-driven implementation strategy for integrating a VR intervention into outpatient physiotherapy care for people with chronic pain. The identified barriers and facilitators, along with the implementation strategy, will serve as a starting point for future randomized controlled implementation studies in different settings to refine the implementation process and integrate VR interventions into the outpatient care of people with chronic pain. KW - Virtuelle Realität, chronischer Schmerz Y1 - 2024 UR - https://www.researchprotocols.org/2024/1/e58089 U6 - https://doi.org/10.2196/58089 SN - 1929-0748 VL - 13 PB - JMIR Publications Inc. ER - TY - GEN A1 - Neustadt, Katrin A1 - Deckert, Stefanie A1 - Heineck, R. A1 - Kopkow, Christian A1 - Preissler, A. A1 - Sabatowski, Rainer A1 - Schmitt, Jochen A1 - Kaiser, U. T1 - Patient perspectives in outcome research : Development of a focus group concept for collating patient perspectives on determination of effectiveness of multimodal pain therapy - A pilot study T2 - Der Schmerz Y1 - 2017 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00482-016-0171-0 SN - 1432-2129 SN - 0932-433X VL - 31 IS - 2 SP - 139 EP - 148 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Lange, Toni A1 - Struyf, Filip A1 - Schmitt, Jochen A1 - Lützner, Jörg A1 - Kopkow, Christian T1 - The reliability of physical examination tests for the clinical assessment of scapular dyskinesis in subjects with shoulder complaints: A systematic review T2 - Physical therapy in sport : official journal of the Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Sports Medicine Y1 - 2017 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2016.10.006 SN - 1466-853X SN - 1873-1600 VL - 26 SP - 64 EP - 89 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Lange, Toni A1 - Schmitt, Jochen A1 - Kopkow, Christian A1 - Rataj, Elisabeth A1 - Günther, Klaus-Peter T1 - What Do Patients Expect From Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Delphi Consensus Study on Patient Treatment Goals T2 - The Journal of arthroplasty Y1 - 2017 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.01.053 SN - 0883-5403 SN - 1532-8406 VL - 32 IS - 7 SP - 2093 EP - 2099 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Lange, Toni A1 - Matthijs, Omer A1 - Nitin, B. Jain A1 - Schmitt, Jochen A1 - Lützner, Jörg A1 - Kopkow, Christian T1 - Reliability of specific physical examination tests for the diagnosis of shoulder pathologies: a systematic review and meta-analysis T2 - British journal of sports medicine Y1 - 2017 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2016-096558 SN - 0306-3674 SN - 1473-0480 VL - 51 IS - 6 SP - 511 EP - 518 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Kaiser, Ulrike A1 - Deckert, Stefanie A1 - Kopkow, Christian A1 - Schmitt, Jochen A1 - Sabatowski, Rainer T1 - Dose or content? Effectiveness of pain rehabilitation programs for patients with chronic low back pain: A systematic review T2 - Pain Y1 - 2014 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2014.06.002 SN - 1872-6623 VL - 155 IS - 9 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Kopkow, Christian A1 - Lange, Toni A1 - Schmitt, Jochen A1 - Petzold, Thomas T1 - Versorgungsforschung in der Physiotherapie: systematisch aufbauen und synergetisch (weiter)entwickeln T2 - Das Gesundheitswesen Y1 - 2017 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-102137 SN - 1439-4421 SN - 0941-3790 VL - 79 IS - 3 SP - 162 EP - 163 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Kopkow, Christian A1 - Eschenbeck, Philipp T1 - Core Outcome Sets – Studien vergleichbar machen T2 - Ergopraxis Y1 - 2017 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-100242 SN - 1439-2283 SN - 1869-5507 VL - 10 IS - 5 SP - 10 EP - 11 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Blank, Julia A1 - Kopkow, Christian T1 - Schmerzhafte Schwimmerschulter T2 - Zeitschrift für Physiotherapeuten : Pt Y1 - 2019 SN - 1614-0397 IS - 12 SP - 56 EP - 60 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Girbig, Maria A1 - Freiberg, Alice A1 - Deckert, Stefanie A1 - Druschke, Diana A1 - Kopkow, Christian A1 - Nienhaus, Albert A1 - Seidler, Andreas T1 - Work-related exposures and disorders among physical therapists: experiences and beliefs of professional representatives assessed using a qualitative approach T2 - Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology Y1 - 2017 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12995-016-0147-0 SN - 1745-6673 VL - 12 IS - 1 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Kopkow, Christian A1 - Freiberg, Alice A1 - Kirschner, Stephan A1 - Seidler, Andreas A1 - Schmitt, Jochen T1 - Physical Examination Tests for the Diagnosis of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture T2 - Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy Y1 - 2013 U6 - https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2013.4906 SN - 1938-1344 SN - 0190-6011 VL - 43 IS - 11 SP - 804 EP - 813 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Dexel, Julian A1 - Kopkow, Christian A1 - Kasten, Philip T1 - Pathomechanismus, Diagnostik und Therapie der Skapuladyskinesie beim Wurfsportler T2 - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Sportmedizin Y1 - 2013 U6 - https://doi.org/10.5960/dzsm.2012.084 SN - 0344-5925 SN - 2510-5264 VL - 64 IS - 9 SP - 267 EP - 72 ER -