TY - RPRT A1 - Bozorgmehr, Kayvan A1 - Hintermeier, Maren A1 - Razum, Oliver A1 - Mohsenpour, Amir A1 - Biddle, Louise A1 - Oertelt‐Prigione, Sabine A1 - Spallek, Jacob A1 - Tallarek, Marie A1 - Jahn, Rosa T1 - SARS‐CoV‐2 in Aufnahmeeinrichtungen und Gemeinschaftsunterkünften für Geflüchtete: Epidemiologische und normativ‐rechtliche Aspekte N2 - Ziel des Factsheets ist es, das „Ausbreitungspotential“ (als kumulatives Inzidenzrisiko) von SARSCoV‐ 2 in Aufnahmeeinrichtungen und Gemeinschaftsunterkünften bei Auftreten eines Falls zu ermitteln, Zusammenhänge mit Einrichtungstyp und Strategie des Ausbruchsmanagements zu explorieren und normativ‐rechtliche Aspekte zu diskutieren. Zusammengefasst kann gesagt werden: - Das Risiko, mit dem weitere Bewohner*innen nach einem ersten nachgewiesenen Fall von SARS‐CoV‐2 (mittels PCR) positiv getestet werden ist in Aufnahmeeinrichtungen und Gemeinschaftsunterkünften mit durchschnittlich 17% als hoch einzuschätzen, wobei es eine große Varianz zwischen den Einrichtungen gibt. - Eine Kollektivquarantäne hat bezogen auf das Infektionsrisiko der unter Quarantäne gestellten Bewohner*innen gegenüber anderen Strategien keinen messbaren Vorteil. Ist innerhalb der Quarantäne eine physische Distanzierung nur bedingt möglich, ist von einer Erhöhung des Infektionsrisikos für die nicht‐infizierten Bewohner*innen auszugehen. Studien zur Quarantäne unter den vergleichsweisen günstigen Bedingungen von Kreuzfahrtschiffen bestätigen dies. Es gibt keine Daten darüber, ob die Kollektivquarantäne einen gesundheitlichen Nutzen für die Bevölkerung außerhalb der Einrichtung bedeutet. Da sie allerdings erhebliche normativ‐rechtliche Probleme birgt, ist die Kollektivquarantäne nach aktuellem Kenntnisstand zu vermeiden. - Die Unterbringung von Geflüchteten sollte grundsätzlich coronaschutzkonform erfolgen, d.h. möglichst dezentral bzw. bei zentralen Einrichtungen möglichst in Einzelunterbringung in kleinen Wohneinheiten, damit bei Auftreten eines Falls eine rasche Ausbreitung vermieden wird und eine adäquate Kontaktnachverfolgung möglich ist. - Nationale Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit SARS‐CoV‐2 in Aufnahmeeinrichtungen und Gemeinschaftsunterkünften unter Berücksichtigung der bisher vor Ort entwickelten Präventions‐ und Lösungsansätze sowie epidemiologischer und normativ‐rechtlicher Überlegungen sind dringend notwendig, um die beteiligten Akteur*innen in ihrem Engagement für die Gesundheit der Bewohner*innen zu unterstützen. Dieses Papier richtet sich an: Politikverantwortliche sowie Akteur*innen der Flüchtlingsversorgung und der Wissenschaft. KW - SARS‐CoV‐2 KW - COVID-19 KW - Aufnahmeeinrichtungen KW - Gemeinschaftsunterkünfte KW - Geflüchtete KW - Ausbreitungspotential KW - kumulatives Inzidenzrisiko Y1 - 2020 UR - https://www.public-health-covid19.de/ergebnisse.html U6 - https://doi.org/10.4119/UNIBI/2943665 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Ulrich, Hanna-Sophie A1 - Kohler, Emma A1 - Fach, Eva-Maria A1 - Spallek, Jacob A1 - Richter, Matthias A1 - Mlinarić, Martin T1 - Healthcare needs among unaccompanied minor refugees: a study protocol of a qualitative study explaining access and utilisation across place and gender T2 - BMJ Open N2 - Introduction: Several studies have identified that unaccompanied minor refugees (UMRs) are allegedly ‘vulnerable’ and belong to a high-risk group in terms of psychological distress and post-traumatic stress disorder due to their preflight, periflight and postflight experiences. Psychosocial care (PSC) is of high importance for UMRs, but little is known about barriers to access and utilisation of PSC across place and gender. The aims of this gender-sensitive qualitative study will be to build on the existing body of literature and to provide qualitative evidence on the contexts and mechanisms of PSC for male and female UMRs in Germany by comparing two German regions. Methods and analysis: Following the study preparing realist review, a qualitative study will be undertaken in Berlin and Central German cities. Approximately 24 experts from the field of PSC and 12 lay UMRs will participate in face-to-face, semistructured interviews. Data will be transcribed and analysed based on the grounded theory research paradigm. Ethics and dissemination: Only participants who have been informed in both German and their native tongue and who have signed a declaration of consent will be included in the study. The study will comply rigorously with German data protection standards. Approval from the Ethical Review Committee at Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Germany has been obtained and granted. The results of the study will be presented at several conferences and will be published in high-quality, peer-reviewed international journals. The results will display a differentiated picture of the PSC of UMRs in Germany. Such knowledge is a precondition for a ‘science of change’ that translates explanations into practical recommendations on how to improve healthcare policies. KW - Healthcare KW - unaccompanied minor refugees KW - access KW - utilisation KW - gender Y1 - 2020 UR - https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/9/e038882 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038882 SN - 2044-6055 VL - 10 IS - 9 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Wachtler, Benjamin A1 - Hoffmann, Stephanie A1 - Blume, Miriam A1 - Rattay, Petra A1 - Herr, Raphael A1 - Deindl, Christian A1 - Sundmacher, Leonie A1 - Richter, Matthias A1 - Spallek, Jacob A1 - Lampert, Thomas T1 - The impact of the family on health inequalities in children – A systematic scoping review T2 - European Journal of Public Health N2 - Background Health inequalities in school-aged children and adolescents were repeatedly reported across Europe but less is known about the contextual and compositional factors of families that might influence and reproduce those health inequalities. In this systematic scoping review we aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the available international literature on the mediating and moderating influence of the family on health inequalities in children and adolescents in Europe and North America. Methods This review follows the PRISMA guidelines for scoping reviews. After defining the research question a search strategy was developed in cooperation with a scientific librarian and the study protocol was registered. A search of three databases (Pubmed, Scopus, PsycINFO) was conducted to identify relevant literature in English or German published between the year 2000 and 2019. A qualitative data charting process was used to extract the relevant data. Results In total 11.838 records were identified through the multi database search (Pubmed n = 6370, PsycINFO n = 3505, Scopus n = 1963). After elimination of duplicates and records from excluded countries, 8862 abstracts were screened by two researchers independently. Different cluster of evidence of family influences on health inequalities were identified: Parental behaviors and children's obesity, parents' smoking and drinking habits and adolescents' risk behaviors, parenting style and children's common mental disorders, parental resources and children's quality of life. Conclusions There are different aspects of family's contextual and compositional characteristics on health inequalities identifiable in the international literature. These characteristics might be new targets for family-focused health promotion strategies. Key messages: -A systematic scoping review found different family aspects that influence health inequalities in children and adolescents. - The identified family traits are promising targets for family-focused health promotion strategies to reduce health inequalities. KW - Health inequalities KW - family KW - scoping review KW - children KW - adolescents Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaa166.898 SN - 1101-1262 SN - 1464-360X VL - 30 IS - Supplement_5 PB - Univ. Press CY - Oxford ER - TY - GEN A1 - Matos Fialho, Paula Mayara A1 - Dragano, Nico A1 - Reuter, Matthias A1 - Metzendorf, Maria-Inti A1 - Richter, Bernd A1 - Richter, Matthias A1 - Spallek, Jacob A1 - Diehl, Katharina A1 - Lampert, Thomas A1 - Pischke, Claudia R. T1 - Health inequalities during school-to-work transitions among young adults: Mapping the evidence T2 - European Journal of Public Health N2 - Background School-to-work transition is a sensitive period that can have a substantial impact on health over the life course. Previous studies suggest pronounced health inequalities during this period but little is known about the determinants at the individual, meso- and macro-levels. We aim to further elucidate possible health inequalities during school-to-work transitions with a focus on multilevel determinants, e.g. evidence on potential effects of contextual and compositional factors of specific institutions involved. Methods We are currently conducting a scoping review (funded by the German Research Foundation) to map the evidence on the above mentioned topic among young adults (aged 16-24 years), following the methodological framework proposed by Arksey and ÓMalley and PRISMA. The literature search was performed in Ovid MEDLINE, Web of Science, ILO and NIOSH, using sensitive search strategy developed by text-analysis. Only articles published between January 2000 - February 2020 and written in English or German are considered. The selection process is conducted following a two-step approach:1) screening of titles and abstracts 2) screening of full-texts by two independent reviewers. Any discrepancies in the selection process are resolved by a third researcher. Preliminary Results Following the five stages of the methodological framework, the scoping review is currently in stage 3 (study selection-screening phase). We found 25,069 potentially relevant articles in our primary search. 15,508 articles remained after the duplicates were removed. Up to now, 8,825 papers were screened of which 7,629 were excluded and 1,176 included which qualified for full-text reading. Complete results of the scoping review will be presented at the conference. Conclusions This scoping review will improve our knowledge about the emergence and development of health inequalities during school-to-work transitions by examining health of individuals in different institutional contexts. Key messages - Improving our knowledge of health inequalities during school-to-work transitions. - the role of determinants at the individual, meso- and macro-levels during this stage will also be examined. KW - Health inequalities KW - school-to-work transition KW - young adults KW - life course Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaa166.278 VL - 30 IS - Supplement_5 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Schilling, Laura A1 - Spallek, Jacob A1 - Maul, Holger A1 - Tallarek, Marie A1 - Schneider, Sven T1 - Active and Passive Exposure to Tobacco and e-Cigarettes During Pregnancy T2 - Maternal and Child Health Journal N2 - Objectives Active and passive exposure to tobacco cigarettes during pregnancy is associated with multiple negative health outcomes for the fetus. In addition, exposure to e-cigarettes has been progressively discussed as a new threat to fetal health. Until now, there has been a lack of studies examining active and passive exposure to tobacco and e-cigarettes among pregnant women. The objective of our current STudy on E-cigarettes and Pregnancy (STEP) was to advance and complement the current knowledge regarding active and passive exposure to tobacco and e-cigarettes before pregnancy and during early and late pregnancy. Methods One element of the STEP study was a quantitative cross-sectional design: A sample of 540 pregnant women recruited at an obstetrician clinic in Hamburg from April 2018 to January 2019 were surveyed once via a standardized questionnaire and provided complete information regarding their consumption of tobacco and e-cigarettes. We performed a descriptive analysis of tobacco and e-cigarette use before pregnancy and during early and late pregnancy, as well as bivariate analysis of these variables with sociodemographic determinants. Passive exposure was assessed by asking the participating pregnant women about the consumption of tobacco and e-cigarettes by their partners, in general, and in their homes. Results Before pregnancy, 20.0% of the participants used tobacco cigarettes exclusively, 1.3% used e-cigarettes exclusively, and 6.5% were dual users. Educational level was significantly associated with tobacco cigarette use (p < 0.001) and dual use (p = 0.047) before pregnancy. During early (late) pregnancy, 8.7% (2.8%) used tobacco cigarettes and 0.4% (0.0%) used e-cigarettes exclusively. Twenty-point nine percent of women’s partners consumed tobacco cigarettes exclusively, 2.7% consumed e-cigarettes exclusively, and 2.7% consumed both. A total of 8.5% (16.7%) of the partners who consumed tobacco cigarettes exclusively (e-cigarettes exclusively) did so in the women’s homes. Conclusions for Practice Among pregnant women, the use of tobacco cigarettes remains prominent before and during pregnancy, while e-cigarette use predominately occurs before pregnancy. Our study shows that pregnant women are frequently exposed to their partners’ tobacco and e-cigarette use within their homes. Strategies to reduce such exposure should be further intensified. Significance In the last decade, e-cigarettes have become popular, and e-cigarette use has been increasing, even among pregnant women. However, there is a lack of knowledge concerning the exposure to e-cigarettes before pregnancy and during early and late pregnancy, as well as studies comparing e-cigarettes and tobacco cigarettes. The current study found that active exposure to e-cigarettes before pregnancy is high, while exposure during pregnancy is marginal. In contrast, exposure to tobacco cigarettes before and in early pregnancy is high but decreases during late pregnancy. In addition, the results of our study show that pregnant women are passively exposed to tobacco and e-cigarettes at home. Pregnant women should be advised against exposing themselves, actively or passively, to tobacco and e-cigarette smoke. KW - E-cigarette KW - Tobacco cigarette KW - Nicotine KW - Passive exposure KW - Pregnancy Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-020-03037-8 SN - 1092-7875 SN - 1573-6628 VL - 25 IS - 4 SP - 656 EP - 665 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Tallarek, Marie A1 - Bozorgmehr, Kayvan A1 - Spallek, Jacob T1 - Towards inclusionary and diversity-sensitive public health: the consequences of exclusionary othering in public health using the example of COVID-19 management in German reception centres and asylum camps T2 - BMJ Global Health N2 - The German government’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic has been predominantly considered wellfounded. Still, the practice of mass quarantine in reception centres and asylum camps has been criticised for its discrimination of refugees and asylum seekers. Building on the concept of othering, this article argues that processes of othering are structurally anchored in German asylum regulations and they have further pervaded public health measures against COVID-19. The practice of mass quarantine made the negative consequences of exclusionary othering for public health particularly noticeable. In the light of recent data indicating this measure to be epidemiologically, legally and ethically insufficient, we apply the concept of othering to public health and discuss (1) exclusionary, (2) inclusionary and (3) diversity-sensitive approaches to public health. We finally conclude that a shift of perspective from exclusion to inclusion, from subordination to empowerment and from silencing to participation is urgently required. KW - inclusionary public health KW - exclusionary public health KW - diversity-sensitive public health KW - othering KW - COVID-19 KW - refugees KW - asylum seekers KW - mass quarantine Y1 - 2020 UR - https://gh.bmj.com/content/bmjgh/5/12/e003789.full.pdf U6 - https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003789 SN - 2059-7908 VL - 5 IS - 12 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Herke, Max A1 - Moor, Irene A1 - Winter, Kristina A1 - Hoffmann, Stephanie A1 - Spallek, Jacob A1 - Hilger-Kolb, Jennifer A1 - Pischke, Claudia R. A1 - Dragano, Nico A1 - Novelli, Anna A1 - Richter, Matthias T1 - Role of contextual and compositional characteristics of schools for health inequalities in childhood and adolescence: protocol for a scoping review T2 - BMJ Open N2 - Introduction Childhood and adolescence are crucial life stages for health trajectories and the development of health inequalities in later life. The relevance of schools for health and well-being of children and adolescents has long been recognised, and there is some research regarding the association of contextual and compositional characteristics of schools and classes with health, health behaviour and well-being in this population. Little is known about the role of meso-level characteristics in relation to health inequalities. The aim of this scoping review is to retrieve and synthesise evidence about the mediating or moderating role of compositional or contextual characteristics of schools for the association between students’ socioeconomic position and health in primary and secondary education. Methods and analysis We will conduct a systematic search of electronic databases in PubMed/Medline, Web of Science and Education Resources Information Center. Studies must meet the following inclusion criteria: (1) The population must be students attending primary or secondary schools in developed economies. (2) The outcomes must include at least one indicator for individual health, health behaviour or well-being. (3) The study must include at least one contextual or compositional characteristic of the school context and one individual determinant of socioeconomic position. (4) The study must also examine the mediating or moderating role of the contextual or compositional characteristic of the school context for the associations between socioeconomic position and health, health behaviour or well-being. (5) The study must be published since 1 January 2000 in English or German language. We will provide a narrative synthesis of findings. Ethics and dissemination We will not collect primary data and only include secondary data derived from previously published studies. Therefore, ethical approval is not required. We intend to publish our findings in an international peer-reviewed journal and to present them at national and international conferences. KW - contextual characteristics KW - compositional characteristics KW - schools KW - health inequalities KW - childhood KW - adolescence KW - scoping review Y1 - 2020 UR - https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/12/e038999 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038999 SN - 2044-6055 VL - 10 IS - 12 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Hintermeier, Maren A1 - Gencer, Hande A1 - Kajikhina, Katja A1 - Rohleder, Sven A1 - Santos-Hövener, Claudia A1 - Tallarek, Marie A1 - Spallek, Jacob A1 - Bozorgmehr, Kayvan T1 - SARS-CoV-2 among migrants and forcibly displaced populations: a rapid systematic review T2 - medRxiv N2 - The economic and health consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic pose a particular threat to vulnerable groups, such as migrants, particularly forcibly displaced populations. The aim of this review is (i) to synthesise the evidence on risk of infection and transmission among migrants, refugees, asylum seekers and internally displaced populations, and (ii) the effect of lockdown measures on these populations. We searched MEDLINE and WOS, preprint servers, and pertinent websites between 1st December 2019 and 26th June 2020. The included studies showed a high heterogeneity in study design, population, outcome and quality. The incidence risk of SARS-CoV-2 varied from 0.12% to 2.08% in non-outbreak settings and from 5.64% to 21.15% in outbreak settings. Migrants showed a lower hospitalisation rate compared to non-migrants. Negative impacts on mental health due to lockdown measures were found across respective studies. However, findings show a tenuous and heterogeneous data situation, showing the need for more robust and comparative study designs. KW - SARS-CoV-2 KW - migrants KW - displaced populations KW - rapid systematic review Y1 - 2020 UR - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.12.14.20248152v1.full.pdf+html U6 - https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.14.20248152 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Miani, Céline A1 - Batram-Zantvoort, Stephanie A1 - Wandschneider, Lisa A1 - Spallek, Jacob A1 - Razum, Oliver T1 - Potential of Standard Perinatal Data for Measuring Violation of Birth Integrity T2 - Frontiers in global women's health N2 - Background: Measuring the phenomenon of violation of birth integrity (vBI) (e.g., obstetric violence) relies in part on the availability and content of maternity care providers' data. The population coverage and linkage possibilities that these data provide make for a yet untapped potential. Although vBI is a complex phenomenon best measured with dedicated instruments, we argue that maternity care providers' data could contribute to enhance our knowledge of the manifestations and frequency of vBI, and allow for analyses across different sub-groups of the population. Looking into the German standardized perinatal data, we investigate which variables are relevant to vBI-related research, and how complete their reporting is. Methods: First, we analyse state-of-the-art frameworks and recommendations, and, for each vBI-related domain, we search for and list corresponding variables in the perinatal data which could contribute to a better understanding of vBI issues. Second, we use an example and analyse the content of perinatal data obtained between 2013 and 2016 in the context of the BaBi birth cohort study set in Bielefeld, Germany. We use descriptive statistics to assess the completeness of the data. Results: The vBI-related variables can be classified in three main categories: discrimination based on specific patient socio-demographic attributes (e.g., height and weight to calculate BMI before pregnancy, foreign origin), indication for medical interventions (i.e., medicalization-related variables: indication for cesarean sections and induction), and supportive care, in particular the mobilization dimension (e.g., continuous fetal heartbeat monitoring). The data analyses included 876 births, of which 601 were vaginal birth. We found poor reporting on demographic variables in terms of completeness. Medicalization and mobilization variables are better documented, although limited in scope. Conclusions: Putting more emphasis on the completeness of standardized data could increase their potential for vBI-related research. Perinatal data alone are insufficient to assess vBI, but a broader, theory-informed discussion of indicators to be included in standardized datasets would contribute to capturing the different aspects of integrity violation in a more systematic way and expand the evidence-base on different types of vBI. KW - childbirth KW - respectful maternity care KW - mistreatment KW - perinatal data KW - Germany KW - birth integrity KW - obstetric violence Y1 - 2021 U6 - https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2020.581244 SN - 2673-5059 IS - 1 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Schilling, Laura A1 - Spallek, Jacob A1 - Maul, Holger A1 - Schneider, Sven T1 - Study on E-Cigarettes and Pregnancy (STEP) – Results of a Mixed Methods Study on Risk Perceptionof E-Cigarette Use During Pregnancy T2 - Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde N2 - Introduction E-cigarette use during pregnancy is a risk factor for maternal and fetal health. Early studies on animals showed that in utero exposure to e-cigarettes can have negative health outcomes for the fetus. There has been only limited research into the risk perceptions of e-cigarette use during pregnancy. This study was conducted to comprehensively characterize the constructs of risk perceptions with regard to e-cigarette use during pregnancy using an Integrated Health Belief Model (IHBM). Methods Our STudy on E-cigarettes and Pregnancy (STEP)used a mixed methods approach, with the study divided intoan initial qualitative part and a quantitative part. A netno-graphic approach was used for the first part, which consistedof the analysis of 1552 posts from 25 German-language on-line discussion threads on e-cigarette use during pregnancy. Using these qualitative results, a quantitative questionnaire was developed to explore risk perception constructs about e‑cigarette use during pregnancy. This questionnaire was subsequently administered to pregnant women (n = 575) in onehospital in Hamburg, Germany. Descriptive and bivariate analysis was used to examine differences in risk perception ac-cording to participantsʼ tobacco and e-cigarette user status before and during pregnancy. While the study design, methods and sample have been extensively described in our recently published study protocol in the January 2020 issue of Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, this paper is devoted to apresentation of the results of our mixed methods study. Results Themes related to perceived threats identified in the qualitative study part were nicotine-related health risks and po-tential health risks of additional ingredients. Perceived benefits were possibility and facilitation of smoking cessationand a pre-sumed potential to reduce harm. The subsequent quantitative part showed that nearly all participants (99.3%) perceivede‑cigarettes which contained nicotine as constituting a threat to the health of the unborn child. The most commonly perceived barrier was health-related (96.6%), while the most commonly perceived benefit was a reduction in the amount of tobacco cigarettes consumed (31.8%). We found that partic-ularly perceived benefits varied depending on the partici-pantʼs tobacco and e-cigarette user status. Conclusion When considering future prevention strategies, the potential health risks and disputed effectiveness of e-cigarettes as a tool for smoking cessation need to be taken intoaccount and critically discussed. KW - electronic cigarette KW - pregnancy KW - risk perception KW - Health Belief Model KW - online forums KW - mixed methods Y1 - 2021 UR - https://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/pdf/10.1055/a-1308-2376.pdf U6 - https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1308-2376 SN - 0016‑5751 VL - 81 IS - 02 SP - 214 EP - 223 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Novelli, Anna A1 - Schüttig, Wiebke A1 - Spallek, Jacob A1 - Wachtler, Benjamin A1 - Diehl, Katharina A1 - Moor, Irene A1 - Richter, Matthias A1 - Dragano, Nico A1 - Sundmacher, Leonie T1 - Correlation of mesolevel characteristics of the healthcare system and socioeconomic inequality in healthcare use: a scoping review protocol T2 - BMJ Open N2 - Introduction Although the impact of macrolevel characteristics of health systems on socioeconomic inequity in health has been studied extensively, the impact of access characteristics on a smaller scale of health systems has received less attention. These mesolevel characteristics can influence access to healthcare and might have the potential to moderate or aggravate socioeconomic inequity in healthcare use. This scoping review aims to map the existing evidence of the association of socioeconomic inequity in healthcare use and mesolevel access characteristics of the health system. Methods and analysis In conducting the scoping review, we follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols Extension for Scoping Reviews. The search will be carried out in four scientific databases: MEDLINE (via PubMed), Web of Science, Scopus and PsycINFO. Main eligibility criteria are inclusion in the analysis of a measure of socioeconomic position, a measure of individual healthcare use and a mesolevel determinant of access to healthcare services. The selection process consists of two consecutive screening stages (first: title/abstract; second: full text). At both stages, two reviewers independently assess the eligibility of studies. In case of disagreement, a third reviewer will be involved. Cohen’s kappa will be calculated to report inter-rater agreement between reviewers. Results are synthesised narratively, as a high heterogeneity of studies is expected. Ethics and dissemination No primary data are collected for the presented scoping review. Therefore, ethical approval is not necessary. The scoping review will be published in an international peer-reviewed journal, and findings will be presented on national and international conferences. KW - mesolevel characteristics KW - healthcare KW - inequality KW - scoping review Y1 - 2021 UR - https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/2/e044301.info U6 - https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044301 SN - 2044-6055 VL - 11 IS - 2 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Lueckmann, Sara Lena A1 - Hoebel, Jens A1 - Roick, Julia A1 - Markert, Jenny A1 - Spallek, Jacob A1 - Knesebeck, Olaf von dem A1 - Richter, Matthias T1 - Socioeconomic inequalities in primary-care and specialist physician visits: a systematic review T2 - International journal for equity in health N2 - Background Utilization of primary-care and specialist physicians seems to be associated differently with socioeconomic status (SES). This review aims to summarize and compare the evidence on socioeconomic inequalities in consulting primary-care or specialist physicians in the general adult population in high-income countries. Methods We carried out a systematic search across the most relevant databases (Web of Science, Medline) and included all studies, published since 2004, reporting associations between SES and utilization of primary-care and/or specialist physicians. In total, 57 studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Results Many studies found socioeconomic inequalities in physician utilization, but inequalities were more pronounced in visiting specialists than primary-care physicians. The results of the studies varied strongly according to the operationalization of utilization, namely whether a physician was visited (probability) or how often a physician was visited (frequency). For probabilities of visiting primary-care physicians predominantly no association with SES was found, but frequencies of visits were higher in the most disadvantaged. The most disadvantaged often had lower probabilities of visiting specialists, but in many studies no link was found between the number of visits and SES. Conclusion This systematic review emphasizes that inequalities to the detriment of the most deprived is primarily a problem in the probability of visiting specialist physicians. Healthcare policy should focus first off on effective access to specialist physicians in order to tackle inequalities in healthcare. KW - Socioeconomic inequalities KW - primary-care KW - specialist physician KW - systematic review Y1 - 2021 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-020-01375-1 SN - 1475-9276 VL - 20 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Tallarek, Marie A1 - Spallek, Jacob T1 - Inclusionary und diversitätssensibles Public Health in der Pandemie T2 - Public Health Forum N2 - Othering beschreibt die Markierung von Menschen als „anders“ oder „nicht zugehörig“. Ausgehend von den Konzepten des exclusionary und inclusionary Othering diskutiert dieser Beitrag drei Ansätze zu i) exclusionary Public Health, ii) inclusionary Public Health und iii) diversitätssensiblem Public Health. Die Implikationen der Ansätze werden am Beispiel des Umgangs mit der COVID-19 Pandemie bei schutzsuchenden Menschen in Aufnahmeeinrichtungen und Sammelunterkünften in Deutschland aufgezeigt. KW - Othering KW - exclusionary public health KW - inclusionary public health KW - diversitätssensibles Public Health KW - Pandemie KW - Covid-19 Y1 - 2021 UR - https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/pubhef-2020-0112/html U6 - https://doi.org/10.1515/pubhef-2020-0112 SN - 1876-4851 SN - 0944-5587 VL - 29 IS - 1 SP - 22 EP - 26 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Spallek, Jacob A1 - Razum, Oliver ED - Spallek, Jacob ED - Zeeb, Hajo T1 - Epidemiologische Erklärungsmodelle für den Zusammenhang zwischen Migration und Gesundheit T2 - Handbuch Migration und Gesundheit : Grundlagen, Perspektiven und Strategien N2 - Migration beeinflusst die Gesundheit. Ob sich Migration gesundheitlich positiv oder negativ auswirkt, hängt von einer Vielzahl von Faktoren ab, die in verschiedenen Erklärungsmodellen in einen Zusammenhang gebracht werden. Wichtig bei der Beschreibung des Zusammenhangs sind eine zeitliche Komponente und die Einbeziehung der individuellen Lebensläufe der Migrant*innen mit ihren Lebensabschnitten vor, während und nach der Migration. KW - Epidemiologische Erklärungsmodelle KW - Migration KW - Gesundheit Y1 - 2021 SN - 978-3-456-85995-8 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1024/85995-000 SP - 81 EP - 90 PB - Hogrefe AG CY - Bern ET - 1 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Scholaske, Laura A1 - Spallek, Jacob A1 - Entringer, Sonja ED - Spallek, Jacob ED - Zeeb, Hajo T1 - Intergenerationale Übertragung von Migrationserfahrungen und fetale Programmierung von Krankheit und Gesundheit T2 - Handbuch Migration und Gesundheit : Grundlagen, Perspektiven und Strategien N2 - Gesundheitsdisparitäten manifestieren sich in der Nachkommengeneration von Migrant*innen teilweise schon in frühen Lebensjahren. Viele dieser Gesundheits-disparitäten werden durch sozioökonomische Benachteiligung und Akkulturation vermittelt. Anhand des Konzeptes der fetalen Pro-grammierung kann erklärt werden, dass das mütterliche Stresserleben – vermittelt über endokrine und immunologische Prozesse – die spätere Gesundheit und Krank-heitsvulnerabilität der Nachkommen bereits in der Schwangerschaft beeinflusst. Es gibt aus der internationalen Forschung zahlreiche Belege dafür, dass endokrine und immunologische Prozesse den Zusam-menhang zwischen mütterlichen migrationsbezogenen Stressoren und Schwangerschafts-, Geburts- und späteren Gesundheitsoutcomes des Kindes vermitteln. Bei Migrant*innen in Deutschland sind diese Zusammenhänge weitestgehend unterforscht. KW - Intergenerationale Übertragung KW - Migrationserfahrungen Y1 - 2021 SN - 978-3-456-85995-8 SP - 351 EP - 368 PB - Hogrefe AG CY - Bern ET - 1 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Ulrich, Hanna-Sophie A1 - Kohler, Emma A1 - Spallek, Jacob A1 - Richter, Matthias A1 - Clauß, Daniel A1 - Mlinarić, Martin T1 - Explaining psychosocial care among unaccompanied minor refugees: a realist review T2 - European child & adolescent psychiatry N2 - Research on the psychosocial care (PSC) of unaccompanied minor refugees (UMRs) has mainly taken a socioepidemiological approach and has focused on the perspectives of experts in the field. In contrast, the knowledge concerning the differing context factors and the underlying mechanisms of current PSC which could inform policy recommendations is scant. The study aims at unravelling the contexts, mechanisms and outcomes of PSC for UMRs. For a realist review (RR), scientific evidence and gray literature were synthesised consistent with the RAMESES publication standards for realist synthesis. Based on an iterative keyword search in electronic databases (e.g., PubMed) and screening, 34 works from 2005 to 2019 were included in a realist synthesis. Theory-informed context-mechanism-outcome configurations (CMOs) were extracted, to explain underlying processes and mechanisms. Characterised by their interrelatedness, the dominant CMOs included the UMRs' intersections of transitions (e.g., adolescence and migration), their needs for culture-, and gender-sensitive PSC, and the undersupply of PSC. These contexts and outcomes are mediated by pre-, peri- and post-migratory stressors as well as care structures and are moreover influenced by overarching discourses and concepts. They comprise adverse and beneficial mechanisms in the PSC of UMRs. The existing literature grasps the PSC of UMRs by different disciplines and approaches but does not offer a comprehensive overview on micro-macro intersections and included discourses. The inclusion of lay perspectives and an intersectional approach could inform health service research. The reflection of UMR-related categorical constructs of resilience and vulnerability, discourses of othering, as well as restrictive health policies may guide policy recommendations. KW - Migration KW - Psychosocial care KW - Realist review KW - Unaccompanied minor refugees KW - mental health Y1 - 2021 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-021-01762-1 SN - 1435-165X VL - 31(2022) IS - 12 SP - 1857 EP - 1870 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Tallarek, Marie A1 - Mlinarić, Martin A1 - Spallek, Jacob ED - Tiemann, Michael ED - Mohokum, Melvin T1 - Migration – Bedeutung und Implikationen für die Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung T2 - Springer Reference Pflege – Therapie – Gesundheit N2 - Die Bevölkerungsgruppe der Menschen mit Migrationshintergrund umfasst fast ein Viertel der Gesamtbevölkerung in Deutschland und ist höchst heterogen. Pauschalisierende Aussagen zum Gesundheitsstatus dieser Gruppe sind daher nicht möglich. Menschen mit Migrationshintergrund sind nicht grundsätzlich gesünder oder kränker als die Mehrheitsbevölkerung. Allerdings können sie sich aufgrund von Expositionen vor, während und nach der Migration in ihren Gesundheitschancen und -risiken von der Mehrheitsbevölkerung unterscheiden. Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung sollten daraus resultierende spezifische Bedarfe ebenso berücksichtigen wie die Diversität der Bevölkerung insgesamt. Erfolgversprechend ist eine Kombination aus diversitätssensiblen, für die Gesamtbevölkerung zugänglichen Angeboten und migrationsspezifischen Ansätzen in besonders risikoreichen Situationen. Kommunale, settingorientierte sowie soziokulturell angepasste Angebote verbessern die Erreichbarkeit der Zielgruppen maßgeblich. KW - Migration KW - Prävention KW - Gesundheitsförderung Y1 - 2021 SN - 978-3-662-62426-5 SN - 978-3-662-62425-8 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-62426-5_28 SN - 2662-6942 SN - 2662-6950 SP - 199 EP - 211 PB - Springer CY - Berlin, Heidelberg ER - TY - GEN A1 - Scholaske, Laura A1 - Spallek, Jacob A1 - Entringer, Sonja T1 - Fetale Programmierung von Gesundheitsdisparitäten bei Kindern mit Migrationshintergrund T2 - Public Health Forum N2 - Kinder von Migrant*innen zeigen bereits in frühen Lebensjahren häufig Gesundheitsdisparitäten, die mit mütterlicher Gesundheit und migrationsbezogenen Faktoren eng zusammenhängen. Zur Erklärung dieses Phänomens der intergenerationalen Transmission von Gesundheitsdisparitäten schlagen wir ein Modell vor, das eine Lebensverlaufsperspektive mit dem Konzept der fetalen Programmierung von Gesundheit und Krankheitsvulnerabilität zusammenbringt. KW - Fetale Programmierung KW - Gesundheitliche Ungleichheiten KW - Intergenerationale Übertragung KW - Migrant*innen Y1 - 2021 UR - https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/pubhef-2021-0015/html U6 - https://doi.org/10.1515/pubhef-2021-0015 SN - 1876-4851 VL - 29 IS - 2 SP - 131 EP - 134 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Spallek, Jacob A1 - Scholaske, Laura A1 - Duman, Elif Aysimi A1 - Razum, Oliver A1 - Entringer, Sonja T1 - Association of maternal migrant background with inflammation during pregnancy – results of a birth cohort study in Germany T2 - Brain, Behavior, and Immunity N2 - Background Health disparities in children of immigrants are prevalent from birth and are hypothesized to – in part – emerge as a biological consequence of migration’s unfavorable social and psychological sequelae. The aim of this study was to examine whether maternal migrant background is associated with inflammation during pregnancy - a key pathway by which maternal states and conditions during pregnancy may influence fetal development and subsequent pregnancy, birth, and child developmental and health outcomes. Material and Methods Data was available from 126 pregnant women who participated in a population based multi-site prospective birth cohort study in Bielefeld and Berlin, Germany. The study included two study visits in mid- and late pregnancy. At each visit, a composite maternal pro-inflammatory score was derived from circulating levels of plasma inflammatory markers (IL-6, CRP). Migrant background was defined by country of origin of participants and their parents’ (Turkey or other) and generation status (1st or 2nd generation). We applied hierarchical linear models (HLM) in order to quantify the relationship between different migrant background variables and inflammation during pregnancy after adjustment for potential confounders (including socioeconomic status). Results Migrant background was significantly associated with inflammation during pregnancy. When compared to women without migrant background, levels of inflammation were increased in 1) pregnant women with migrant background in general (B = 0.35, SE = 0.12, p < .01); 2) 1st (B = 0.28, SE = 0.15, p < .10) and 2nd generation (B = 0.40, SE = 0.15, p < .01); 3) women with a Turkish migrant background (B = 0.28, SE = 0.14, p < .10) and women with another migrant background (B = 0.42, SE = 0.15, p <.01); and 4) 2nd generation Turkish origin women (B = 0.38, SE = 0.20, p <.10), 1st generation women with other migrant background (B = 0.44, SE = 0.26, p <.10), and 2nd generation women with other migrant background (B=0.43, SE = 0.17, p <.05). Discussion Our findings support a role for maternal inflammation as a pathway of intergenerational transmission of migration-related health inequalities, suggest that the effect seems to persist in 2nd generation immigrants, and highlight the need for future research and targeted interventions in this context. KW - Transmission of Health Inequalities KW - Stress biology KW - Immigrants KW - Inflammation Y1 - 2021 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2021.06.010 SN - 1090-2139 VL - Vol. 96 SP - 271 EP - 278 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Hintermeier, Maren A1 - Gencer, Hande A1 - Kajikhina, Katja A1 - Rohleder, Sven A1 - Santos-Hövener, Claudia A1 - Tallarek, Marie A1 - Spallek, Jacob A1 - Bozorgmehr, Kayvan T1 - SARS-CoV-2 among migrants and forcibly displaced populations: a rapid systematic review T2 - Journal of Migration and Health N2 - The economic and health consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic pose a particular threat to vulnerable groups, such as migrants, particularly forcibly displaced populations. The aim of this review is (i) to synthesise the evidence on risk of infection and transmission among migrants, refugees, asylum seekers and internally displaced populations, and (ii) the effect of lockdown measures on these populations. We searched MEDLINE and WOS, preprint servers, and pertinent websites between 1st December 2019 and 26th June 2020. The included studies showed a high heterogeneity in study design, population, outcome and quality. The incidence risk of SARS-CoV-2 varied from 0•12% to 2•08% in non-outbreak settings and from 5•64% to 21•15% in outbreak settings. Migrants showed a lower hospitalisation rate compared to non-migrants. Negative impacts on mental health due to lockdown measures were found across respective studies. However, findings show a tenuous and heterogeneous data situation, showing the need for more robust and comparative study designs. KW - migrants KW - forcibly displaced KW - SARS-CoV-2 KW - COVID-19 KW - refugees KW - asylum seekers Y1 - 2021 UR - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666623521000234 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmh.2021.100056 SN - 2666-6235 VL - 4 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Hoffmann, Stephanie A1 - Tallarek, Marie A1 - Spallek, Jacob ED - Goldfriedrich, Martin ED - Hurrelmann, Klaus T1 - Gesundheitswissenschaftliche Grundlagen für den Gesundheitsunterricht. Gesundheit und Vielfalt in Schule, Ausbildung und Studium T2 - Gesundheitsdidaktik N2 - Dieses Kapitel stellt theoretische und empirische Grundlagen der Gesundheit, ihrer Determinanten und der gesundheitlichen Ungleichheit als Gegenstand eines systematischen Gesundheitsunterrichts vor (Goldfriedrich/Hurrelmann in diesem Band, Kern-Wert 2 des Gesundheitsunterrichtes). Das Wissen um die Komplexität menschlicher Vielfalt und deren Einfluss auf die gesundheitliche Situation bildet die Grundlage für das Verständnis zentraler Gesundheitsdimensionen (u. a. Müller/Porges in diesem Band) sowie die didaktische Schwerpunktsetzung in verschiedenen Institutionen im Entwicklungsverlauf, wie dem Gymnasium (Schwegmann in diesem Band), der Berufsschule (Trumpa/Dorn in diesem Band) oder in Hochschulen (Sprenger in diesem Band). In diesem Kontext erläutert das Kapitel die Problematik ungleich verteilter Gesundheitschancen und stellt die Bandbreite relevanter Einflussfaktoren am Beispiel der sozialen Lage, des Migrationshintergrunds und des Geschlechts bei Kindern und Jugendlichen vor. Es zeigt auf, wie dieses Wissen im Bildungskontext curricular implementiert werden kann, um bereits im Kindes- und Jugendalter einen Beitrag zur gesundheitlichen Chancengleichheit leisten zu können. KW - Gesundheitswissenschaft KW - Gesundheitsunterricht KW - Gesundheit KW - Vielfalt KW - Schule KW - Ausbildung KW - Studium Y1 - 2021 UR - https://www.beltz.de/fileadmin/beltz/leseproben/978-3-7799-6371-4.pdf SN - 978-3-7799-6371-4 SP - 134 EP - 155 PB - Beltz Juventa CY - Weinheim, Basel ET - 1 ER -