TY - CHAP A1 - Hübel, Hartwig T1 - Vereinfachte Fließzonentheorie mit ANSYS T2 - 17. CAD-FEM Users' Meeting, 8. Oktober 1999 in Sonthofen (Allgäu) N2 - Die Vereinfachte Fließzonentheorie beruht auf der Zarka-Methode und gestattet die näherungsweise Ermittlung der elastisch-plastischen Verzerrungen, Spannungen und Verformungen bei monotoner oder zyklischer Belastung. Bei zyklischer Belastung wird sofort der Einspielzustand berechnet, ohne das Belastungshistogramm Zyklus für Zyklus inkrementell durchrechnen zu müssen. Als Berechnungsaufwand fallen lediglich einige modifizierte linear elastische Analysen sowie „lokale“ Berechnungen an, so daß gegenüber den herkömmlichen inkrementellen Berechnungen nach der exakten Fließzonentheorie ein erheblicher Gewinn an Rechenzeit möglich ist. Bei einigen Beispielrechnungen wurde nur etwa 1/10.000 der Rechenzeit benötigt, um sowohl die Dehnungsschwingbreite (zur Ermittlung der Ermüdungsausnutzung) als auch die akkumulierten Verzerrungen (für einen Ratcheting-Nachweis) in guter Näherung abschätzen zu können. Die Vereinfachte Fließzonentheorie wurde mittels einer user-subroutine und einigen Makros in ANSYS implementiert. Es werden die Grundlagen der Vereinfachten Fließzonentheorie dargestellt, ihre Implementierung in ANSYS und einige Beispielrechnungen. KW - Vereinfachte Fließzonentheorie KW - Zarka-Methode KW - ANSYS Y1 - 1999 UR - https://www-docs.b-tu.de/fg-baustatik-fem/public/ubico/Huebel_Hartwig_16069.pdf ER - TY - RPRT A1 - Stange, Maren A1 - Hübel, Hartwig T1 - Verifikation der Vereinfachten Fließzonentheorie – bei Anwendung der Finite Elemente Methode (subroutine für ANSYS) KW - Vereinfachte Fließzonentheorie KW - ANSYS Y1 - 1999 PB - FH Lausitz CY - Cottbus ER - TY - RPRT A1 - Hübel, Hartwig T1 - Vereinfachte Fließzonentheorie zur Berechnung von Ermüdung und Ratcheting N2 - Es wird der Stand der Entwicklung der Vereinfachten Fließzonentheorie dargestellt, und wie die VFZT konform mit dem KTA-Regelwerk angewendet bzw. weiter ausgebaut werden könnte. Dies betrifft die Ermittlung des Faktors Ke für vereinfachte Ermüdungsanalysen sowie die Ratcheting-Nachweisführung, um erstmals bestehende Lücken im Regelwerk schließen zu können, weil die VFZT unabhängig ist von der speziellen Bauteilgeometrie und der Belastungsart. KW - Vereinfachte Fließzonentheorie KW - Ermüdung KW - Ratcheting KW - KTA Y1 - 1999 UR - https://www-docs.b-tu.de/fg-baustatik-fem/public/ubico/Huebel_Hartwig_16072.pdf ER - TY - GEN A1 - Hübel, Hartwig T1 - Erhöhungsfaktor Ke zur Ermittlung plastischer Dehnungen aus elastischer Berechnung T2 - Technische Überwachung N2 - Im Zuge einer Ermüdungsanalyse plastisch beanspruchter Komponenten von Kernkraftwerken werden Dehnungserhöhungsfaktoren Ke zur Ermittlung der plastischen Dehnschwingbreite aus elastisch berechneten Beanspruchungen verwendet. Ausgehend von einer Kritik an der derzeit üblichen Vorgehensweise nach ASME Code wird eine Modifikation vorgeschlagen. Der Vorschlag basiert wie der Ke-Faktor des ASME Code (der auch von diversen KTA-Regeln übernommen worden ist) auf dem Konzept eines einfachen Faktors. Er beseitigt die potentielle Unkonservativität des ASME Code bei Kerben (Rundungsradien) und reduziert gleichzeitig dessen Überkonservativität in vielen anderen Anwendungsbereichen, indem drei unterschiedliche Effekte berücksichtigt und individuelles Werkstoffverhalten erfasst werden können. Zudem beruht er im Gegensatz zu Ke-ASME auf möglichst realitätsnahen Werkstoffdaten, die eher den Charakter von Mittel- als von Mindestwerten besitzen. Ferner ist die Anwendung dieses Vorschlages insofern einfacher als die des ASME Code, als die Suche nach der ungünstigsten Orientierung eines Schnittes durch die Wand, die i. allg. nicht einfach zu identifizieren ist, entfällt. Eine Reihe detaillierter elastisch-plastischer Vergleichsrechnungen für hinsichtlich Bauteilgeometrie und Belastung typische Problemstellungen bei schnellen und Leichtwasserreaktoren bestätigen die Konservativität des Vorschlages. Es wird ein Potential zur weiteren Reduzierung der Konservativität bei Anwendung auf Bauteile von Leichtwasserreaktoren im Rahmen eventueller zukünftiger Entwicklungsarbeiten aufgezeigt. KW - Ke-Faktor KW - vereinfachte Ermüdungsanalyse KW - Dehnungserhöhung KW - KTA Y1 - 1994 SN - 1434-9728 VL - 35 IS - 6 SP - 268 EP - 278 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Hübel, Hartwig A1 - Vollrath, Bastian ED - Meschke, Günther ED - Freitag, Steffen ED - Birk, Carolin ED - Menkenhagen, Jochen ED - Ricken, Tim T1 - Das Phänomen Ratcheting - Auswirkung plastischen Materialverhaltens bei ortsveränderlicher Belastung T2 - Baustatik - Baupraxis 13, 20.-21. März 2017, Bochum N2 - Bei Belastungsänderungen kann eine progressive Deformation (Ratcheting) auftreten, sobald plastische Beanspruchungen im Tragwerk existieren. Dann akkumulieren sich Dehnungen und Verformungen im Falle zyklischer Belastung in jedem Belastungszyklus. Dieser Vorgang begrenzt die Lebensdauer eines Tragwerks, ist aber unabhängig von einer eventuell ebenfalls auftretenden Ermüdungsschädigung als eigenständige mögliche Schadensursache zu betrachten. Bekannt als Auslöser von Ratcheting und in manchen Regelwerken bereits berücksichtigt sind Konfigurationen, bei denen ein Tragwerk mindestens zwei unterschiedlichen Belastungsarten unterworfen ist, nämlich einer konstanten Belastung (der Primärlast) und einer überlagerten zyklischen Belastung. Selbst wenn letztere klein ist und für sich alleine keine plastischen Deformationen hervorruft, kann sie durch Zusammenwirkung mit der Primärlast dennoch eine progressive Deformation in Gang setzen. In der vorliegenden Arbeit wird ein weiterer, Ratcheting erzeugender Mechanismus vorgestellt, der allein auf ortsveränderliche Wirkung einer einzelnen Lastgröße zurück zu führen ist. Im einfachsten Fall lässt sich dieser erklären durch die sukzessive Aktivierung von (gegebenenfalls unendlich vielen existierenden) Fließgelenken. Die Inkremente der Dehnungen und Verformungen können von Zyklus zu Zyklus ab- oder zunehmen, wenn die Verfestigung des Werkstoffs berücksichtigt wird, elastische Bettung vorliegt, die Formulierung des Gleichgewichts am verformten System erfolgt (Theorie II. Ordnung) oder die wahre Verformungsgeometrie (Theorie III. Ordnung) berücksichtigt wird. KW - Ratcheting KW - progressive Deformation KW - Wanderlast KW - Plastizieren Y1 - 2017 SN - 978-3-00-055827-6 SP - 189 EP - 196 PB - Ruhr-Universität Bochum CY - Bochum ER - TY - GEN A1 - Hübel, Hartwig A1 - Vollrath, Bastian T1 - Ratcheting caused by moving loads T2 - International Journal of Advanced Structural Engineering N2 - Progressive deformation (ratcheting) can occur as a response to variable loads as soon as the elastic limit is exceeded. If this is the case, strains and displacements accumulate in the event of cyclic loading in each load cycle. Widely known as triggers for ratcheting and already being considered in some design codes are configurations, in which a structure is subjected to at least two different types of load, namely a constant load (the primary load) and a superimposed cyclic load. In this paper, another mechanism that generates ratcheting is introduced. It can be attributed solely to the effect of a single load. In the simplest case, this can be explained by the successive activation of (an infinite number of) plastic hinges if a load of constant magnitude is moved in space. The increments of strains and displacements can decrease or increase from cycle to cycle, when the material is hardening, or if elastic foundation is present, or if the equilibrium condition is formulated for the deformed system (second-order theory) or if “large” rotations are taken into account (third-order theory). KW - Ratcheting KW - Progressive deformation KW - Shakedown KW - Traveling load KW - Moving temperature front Y1 - 2017 UR - http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40091-017-0154-0/fulltext.html SN - 2008-6695 SN - 2008-3556 VL - 9 IS - 2 SP - 139 EP - 152 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Vollrath, Bastian A1 - Hübel, Hartwig ED - Burczynski, Tadeusz T1 - Determination of post-shakedown quantities of a pipe bend via the Simplified Theory of Plastic Zones compared with load history dependent incremental analysis T2 - 22nd International Conference on Computer Methods in Mechanics, CMM2017 N2 - The Simplified Theory of Plastic Zones (STPZ) may be used to determine post-shakedown quantities such as strain ranges and accumulated strains. The principles of the method are summarized succinctly and the practical applicability is shown by the example of a pipe bend subjected to internal pressure and cyclic in-plane bending. KW - Simplified Theory of Plastic Zones KW - pipe bend KW - cyclic loading KW - multiaxial ratcheting KW - post-shakedown quantities Y1 - 2017 SN - 978-83-7947-264-2 SP - MS11-1 EP - MS11-2 CY - Lublin ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Vollrath, Bastian A1 - Hübel, Hartwig ED - Podgórski, Jerzy ED - Borowa, Ewa-Błazik ED - Be̜c, Jarosław T1 - Determination of post-shakedown quantities of a pipe bend via the simplified theory of plastic zones compared with load history dependent incremental analysis T2 - Computer methods in mechanics (CMM2017), proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computer Methods in Mechanics, Lublin, Poland, 13-16 September 2017 N2 - The Simplified Theory of Plastic Zones (STPZ) may be used to determine post-shakedown quantities such as strain ranges and accumulated strains at plastic or elastic shakedown. The principles of the method are summarized. Its practical applicability is shown by the example of a pipe bend subjected to constant internal pressure along with cyclic inplane bending or/and cyclic radial temperature gradient. The results are compared with incremental analyses performed step-by-step throughout the entire load history until the state of plastic shakedown is achieved. KW - Simplified Theory of Plastic Zones KW - pipe bend KW - cyclic loading KW - plastic shakedown KW - post-shakedown quantities Y1 - 2018 SN - 978-0-7354-1614-7 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5019119 PB - AIP Publishing CY - Melville, New York ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Hübel, Hartwig A1 - Vollrath, Bastian T1 - Simplified Analysis of Strains Accumulated in the State of Elastic Shakedown Considering Multi-Parameter Loadings T2 - ASME 2018 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, Volume 3B: Design and Analysis, Prague, Czech Republic, July 15–20, 2018 N2 - In case of cyclic loading, strain may accumulate due to a ratcheting mechanism until the state of shakedown is possibly achieved. Design Codes frequently require strain limits to be satisfied at the end of the specified lifetime of the structure. However, this requirement is sometimes tied to misleading prerequisites, and little guidance is provided on how the strains accumulated in the state of shakedown can be calculated. Incremental elastic-plastic analyses which require to go step-by-step through many cycles of a given load histogram are rather costly in terms of engineering time and numerical effort. As an alternative, the Simplified Theory of Plastic Zones (STPZ) is used in the present paper. Being a direct method, effects from load history are disregarded. The theory is described shortly and exemplarily applied to a simplification of a pipe bend and a straight pipe, both subjected to combinations of several loads which vary independently from each other so that a multidimensional load domain is represented. It is shown that the Simplified Theory of Plastic Zones is well suited to provide reasonable estimates of strains accumulated in the state of elastic shakedown at the cost of few linear elastic analyses. KW - pipe bend KW - cyclic loading KW - simplified theory of plastic zones Y1 - 2018 UR - http://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/proceeding.aspx?articleid=2711770 SN - 978-0-7918-5163-0 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2018-84070 PB - ASME CY - New York, NY ER - TY - GEN A1 - Hübel, Hartwig A1 - Vollrath, Bastian T1 - Simplified determination of accumulated strains to satisfy design code requirements T2 - International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping N2 - In case of cyclic loading, strain may accumulate due to a ratcheting mechanism until the state of shakedown is possibly achieved. Design Codes frequently require strain limits to be satisfied at the end of the specified lifetime of the structure. In addition, the strain range is required for performing fatigue analyses in case of plastic shakedown. However, little guidance is usually provided by Design Codes on how the accumulated strains and strain ranges are to be calculated, and some of the guidelines implemented in Design Codes are not well founded and may therefore be misleading. This is, for example, true for the ASME B&PV Code, Section III. Of course, strains and strain ranges can be determined by means of incremental elastic-plastic analyses, which require to go step-by-step through many cycles of a given load histogram until the state of shakedown is reached. This is rather costly in terms of engineering time and numerical effort. As an alternative, simplified methods can be adopted, e.g. the Simplified Theory of Plastic Zones (STPZ) as used in the present paper. Being a direct method, effects from load history are disregarded. The theory is described shortly and illustrated by some examples. It is shown that the Simplified Theory of Plastic Zones is well suited to provide reasonable estimates of strains accumulated in the state of elastic and plastic shakedown at the cost of few linear elastic analyses. KW - Simplified elastic-plastic analysis KW - Simplified theory of plastic zones (STPZ) KW - Zarka's method KW - Shakedown KW - Ratcheting KW - Cyclic loading KW - Accumulated strains KW - Strain range KW - Residual stress Y1 - 2019 UR - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308016118304617 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2019.01.014 SN - 0308-0161 VL - 171 SP - 92 EP - 103 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Hübel, Hartwig A1 - Vollrath, Bastian T1 - Limited Versus Unlimited Strain Accumulation Due to Ratcheting Mechanisms T2 - Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology N2 - After distinguishing material ratcheting and structural ratcheting, different phenomena related to structural ratcheting are gathered. Ratcheting of elastic–plastic structures observed with stationary position of loads is distinguished from ratcheting with moving loads. Both categories are illustrated by examples. The effect of evolution laws for the internal variables describing kinematic hardening on the accumulation of strain due to a ratcheting mechanism, and whether the ratcheting mechanism ceases with the number of cycles so that the accumulated strains are limited, is discussed. Some conditions are shown, under which the Chaboche model can lead to shakedown. Scenarios where shakedown is guaranteed at every load level, or where it may or may not occur at a specific load level, or where it definitely cannot occur at any load level, are distinguished. Correspondingly, the usefulness of shakedown analyses, which are searching for maximum load factors assuring shakedown, or direct (or simplified) methods to obtain postshakedown quantities by avoiding incremental cyclic analyses is discussed. KW - Ratcheting KW - moving loads KW - cyclic loads KW - strain accumulation KW - hardening Y1 - 2019 UR - http://pressurevesseltech.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/article.aspx?articleid=2725462 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4042853 VL - 141 IS - 3 SP - 031206-1 EP - 031206-10 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Vollrath, Bastian A1 - Hübel, Hartwig T1 - Efficient Fatigue and Ratcheting Computation in Case of Multi-Parameter Loading T2 - ASME 2020 Pressure Vessels & Piping Conference : August 3, 2020 Virtual, Online N2 - Cyclic and over-elastic loading can lead to an accumulation of plastic strains. If there is a cyclic load, which is driven by a single parameter, the lifecycle design can be very costly in terms of computational effort. If more than one cyclic load parameter is to be taken into account, which is then a multi-parameter loading, this task can become even more complex and costly. To solve this problem efficiently, different techniques are proposed. One of these techniques is based on step-by-step calculations of the strain ranges for a reduced set of loadings. Once these strain ranges are known, the accumulated state for each individual load case can be estimated using the Simplified Theory of Plastic Zones (STPZ), which requires just a few linear elastic analyses. It is shown that cyclic loads, which occur in intervals, can be replaced by interval-free calculations, which reduce the computational effort enormously. All these techniques lead to a procedure, which delivers good estimations in terms of post-shakedown quantities with very low computational effort compared to incremental step-by-step calculations. The results of the STPZ are presented by an example. A thick-walled cylinder is loaded with a constant axial force and subjected to cyclic shear and cyclic internal pressure. In general, for structures exhibiting ratcheting, hundreds or more load cycles must be analysed via step-by-step calculations until the shakedown state is reached. Using the STPZ, post-shakedown quantities, including strain ranges and accumulated strains can be estimated efficiently and the structure can be designed according to the rules of the ASME Codes. The computational effort and the quality of the results of the STPZ are compared with a step-by-step calculation. KW - multi-parameter loading KW - fatigue KW - ratcheting KW - STPZ KW - direct shakedown analysis Y1 - 2020 UR - https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/PVP/proceedings-abstract/PVP2020/83815/V001T01A027/1089226 SN - 978-0-7918-8381-5 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2020-21089 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Hübel, Hartwig T1 - Plastic Limit Analysis Using the Simplified Theory of Plastic Zones T2 - Journal of pressure vessel technology N2 - The simplified theory of plastic zones (STPZ) was mainly developed to determine strain ranges and accumulated strains in the state of shakedown at cyclic loading between prescribed levels of loading. Kinematic hardening is an indispensable feature of the STPZ. The plastic limit load, however, is defined for monotonic loading and elastic–plastic material behavior without hardening. Simply assigning a zero value or a numerically very low value of the tangent modulus when applying the STPZ is generally not possible due to arising numerical instabilities. It is, therefore, not immediately obvious how the STPZ can be used to determine the maximum load level that can be applied to a structure without developing a kinematic mechanism. This paper describes the theory and the analysis steps required and provides some illustrative examples. Typically, between one and three linear elastic analyses and some local calculations are required to provide either the exact value or at least a reasonable estimate of a range of the plastic limit load, as well as of the associated stress and strain fields and displacements that are not provided by classical limit analysis. KW - limit load KW - simplified theory of plastic zones Y1 - 2021 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4049643 SN - 1528-8978 VL - 143 IS - 2 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Hübel, Hartwig A1 - Vollrath, Bastian T1 - Effect of stress stiffness on elastic-plastic strain range T2 - International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping N2 - Many pressure vessel and piping components have to withstand high internal pressures and are therefore thick-walled so that geometric effects such as stress stiffening need not be accounted for. However, thin-walled or moderately thick structures may be sensitive to these effects. Design Codes such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code usually provide little guidance on when they are to be accounted for. In the opinion of the authors, this effect deserves more attention. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to illuminate the effect of stress stiffening by investigating some examples, with particular attention to elastic-plastic strain ranges and the plastic strain range enhancement factor Ke used for fatigue analyses. KW - Ke KW - Elbow KW - Strain range KW - Stress stiffening KW - Plasticity KW - Twice Yield Y1 - 2021 UR - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308016121001174?via%3Dihub U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2021.104421 SN - 0308-0161 VL - 192 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Hübel, Hartwig A1 - Vollrath, Bastian T1 - Simplified Theory of Plastic Zones in the state of elastic shakedown with stress stiffening T2 - European Journal of Mechanics - A/Solids N2 - Cyclic loading may cause elastic-plastic strains to accumulate if a ratcheting mechanism is present. After a number of cycles, strain accumulation may cease so that a state of either elastic or plastic shakedown is reached. Determination of strains and other quantities in the state of shakedown (post-shakedown quantities) by means of incremental analyses is costly. Direct methods such as the Simplified Theory of Plastic Zones (STPZ) aim at providing estimates of the post-shakedown quantities, bypassing cycle-by-cycle analyses. If geometric effects such as stress stiffening play a role, determination of accumulated strains even becomes more complicated. The STPZ has been further developed in order to account for the combination of plasticity and stress stiffening with respect to elastic shakedown. The theory is described and illustrated using examples such as a pipe bend subjected to cyclic in-plane bending. The implications of cyclic as opposed to constant stress stiffness are discussed. The effect of stress stiffening on ratcheting interaction diagrams (RID), separating regions of elastic and plastic shakedown in the space of loading parameters, is discussed. KW - Cyclic strain accumulation KW - Shakedown KW - Ratcheting KW - Post-shakedown quantities KW - Stress stiffening KW - Geometric effects KW - Second order effects KW - Progressive buckling KW - Zarka's method Y1 - 2022 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechsol.2022.104613 SN - 0997-7538 VL - 95 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Hübel, Hartwig A1 - Vollrath, Bastian T1 - Ratcheting and strain ranges in the shakedown state with stress stiffening using the Simplified Theory of Plastic Zones T2 - International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping N2 - The behavior of elastic-plastic structures under cyclic loading can be determined by incremental elastic-plastic analyses where a given load histogram is analysed cycle-by-cycle until shakedown is achieved. Many cycles may be required for this, if a ratchet mechanism is causing plastic strains to accumulate in each cycle until either elastic or plastic shakedown is achieved. The complexity of the elastic-plastic response of a structure is further increased if geometric effects are present. It may be very costly to get the accumulated strains and strain ranges in the state of shakedown by incremental analyses so that simplified or direct methods have been developed as an alternative. The Simplified Theory of Plastic Zones (STPZ) has proven itself for estimating the required quantities in the state of elastic and plastic shakedown within the framework of the 1st order theory, i.e., if the equilibrium conditions are satisfied for the undeformed structure. It is shown in this paper, how the STPZ can be expanded to capture 2nd order effects introduced by the equilibrium of the deformed structure. Some examples are used to demonstrate its applicability and the quality of the results, but also its limitations with respect to determining the accumulated strains and elastic-plastic strain ranges. KW - Simplified theory of plastic zones KW - Cyclic strain accumulation KW - Shakedown KW - Ratcheting KW - Post-shakedown quantities KW - Stress stiffening Y1 - 2022 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2022.104727 SN - 0308-0161 VL - 199 SP - 1 EP - 11 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Vollrath, Bastian A1 - Hübel, Hartwig T1 - Direct Analysis of Elastic-Plastic Strain Ranges and Accumulated Strains Considering Stress Stiffening T2 - ASME 2022 Pressure Vessels & Piping Conference N2 - Many pressure vessel and piping components have to withstand high internal pressures and are therefore thick-walled so that geometric effects such as stress stiffening need not be accounted for. However, thin-walled, or moderately thick structures may be sensitive to these effects. Design Codes such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code usually provide little guidance on when they are to be accounted for. In general, the effects of stress stiffening are difficult to estimate even for experienced engineers and can only be estimated by detailed finite element analyses. In the opinion of the authors, this effect deserves more attention. This is particularly true for simplified elastic-plastic methods for fatigue and ratcheting assessment of structures subjected to cyclic loading. Cyclic loading may cause elastic-plastic strains to accumulate if a ratcheting mechanism is present. After a number of cycles, strain accumulation may cease so that a state of either elastic or plastic shakedown is reached. Determination of accumulated strains, strain ranges and other quantities in the state of shakedown (post-shakedown quantities) by means of incremental analyses is costly, in particular if geometric effects such as stress stiffening play a role. Direct methods aim at providing estimates of the post-shakedown quantities, bypassing cycle-by-cycle analyses. These methods claim to deliver the post-shakedown quantities with high accuracy and low computational effort. The Simplified Theory of Plastic Zones can account for the combination of plasticity and stress stiffening. The theory is described and illustrated by examples. The Simplified Theory of Plastic Zones (STPZ) has proven itself for estimating the post-shakedown quantities in the state of elastic and plastic shakedown within the framework of the 1st order theory, i.e. if the equilibrium conditions are satisfied for the undeformed structure. In this paper, the results of elbows subjected to various loading parameters are compared, considering and neglecting stress stiffening. Thus, the results show the influence 2nd order effects can generate. It is further shown that the STPZ can capture 2nd order effects introduced by the equilibrium of the deformed structure. Some examples are used to demonstrate its applicability and the quality of the results, e.g. for a pipe bend subjected to cyclic in-plane bending. KW - STPZ KW - direct methods KW - ratcheting KW - stress stiffening Y1 - 2022 UR - https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/PVP/proceedings-abstract/PVP2022/86144/V001T01A020/1149647 SN - 978-0-7918-8614-4 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2022-84241 ER - TY - BOOK A1 - Hübel, Hartwig T1 - Vereinfachte Fließzonentheorie : auf Grundlage der Zarka-Methode N2 - Für eine Lebensdauervorhersage veränderlich belasteter Tragwerke, etwa des Anlagen- und Maschinenbaus sowie des Bauingenieurwesens, werden die zyklisch akkumulierten Verzerrungen und ggf. auch die elastisch-plastischen Dehnschwingbreiten benötigt. Die Vereinfachte Fließzonentheorie (VFZT) ist eine direkte Methode, die Abschätzungen dieser und aller anderen mechanischen Größen im elastischen und im plastischen Einspielzustand liefert. Das vorliegende Buch stellt die VFZT ausführlich dar und legt Wert darauf, dass sich nicht nur Wissenschaftler, sondern auch in der Praxis tätige Ingenieure sowie Studierende höherer Semester ein Bild von den Möglichkeiten und Grenzen machen können. Zahlreiche Abbildungen und Anwendungsbeispiele unterstützen das Verständnis. KW - Plastizieren KW - Ratcheting KW - Shakedown KW - Vereinfachte Fließzonentheorie KW - progressive Deformation KW - zyklische Belastung Y1 - 2023 SN - 978-3-658-41832-8 SN - 978-3-658-41833-5 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-41833-5 PB - Springer Vieweg CY - Wiesbaden ET - 2., überarbeitete Auflage ER -