TY - GEN A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Bilz, Ludwig T1 - Interventionskompetenzen von Lehrkräften bei Mobbing: Der Stellenwert der motivationalen Orientierung T2 - Tagung der Fachgruppe Pädagogische Psychologie Y1 - 2021 UR - https://www.ph-heidelberg.de/fileadmin/sonstiges/PaePsy2021/Dokumente/Tagungsprogramm_PAEPSY_2021.pdf PB - Pädagogische Hochschule Heidelberg CY - Heidelberg ER - TY - GEN A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Bilz, Ludwig T1 - Teachers’ motivational orientations: Associations between teachers' self-efficacy, self-regulation, empathy, and interventions in bullying T2 - World Anti-Bullying Forum 2021 N2 - Introduction Teachers must have sufficient intervention competence to intervene successfully in bullying situations. In addition to knowledge and beliefs, motivational orientations are considered important components in teacher competence models (Kunter et al., 2013). Motivation can include all aspects that influence if, with which intensity, and how people act. In the context of bullying intervention, this includes self-efficacy, empathy, and self-regulation. However, while self-efficacy is one of the most investigated motivational aspects of teachers (Fischer et al., 2020; Kunter, 2013, Lauermann et al., 2020), the other aspects – self-regulation and empathy – have only been seldomly investigated in the context of student bullying (Berkovich, 2020; Fischer & Bilz, 2019). Method Based on findings from published single studies as well as unpublished analyses, the associations between teachers’ motivational orientations (self-efficacy, self-regulation, empathy) and their likelihood of intervention (reported by teachers and students) as well as their students’ bullying experiences (as bullies, victims, and bully-victims) will be presented. All analyses are based on a study that was conducted in Germany with more than 2,000 students and 556 teachers at 24 schools. Teachers’ likelihood of intervention was assessed in bullying situations that have been reported retrospectively by students and teachers. Logistic regression analyses (multilevel analyses when appropriate) have been conducted. Results Findings show that teachers’ self-efficacy was associated with teachers’ likelihood of intervention from the teachers’ perspectives. Also, students whose teachers reported higher self-efficacy and a higher tendency to reflect their behaviours thoroughly and choose wisely (a component of self-regulation) reported fewer bullying experiences. The students’ perspective on the teachers’ likelihood of intervention was associated with experiences as bullies, bullied, and bully-victims, but could not be explained by teachers’ motivational orientations. Conclusion Possible underlying pathways and areas requiring further research as well as practical and theoretical implications will be discussed. Y1 - 2021 UR - https://www.wabf2021.org/agenda UR - https://worldantibullyingforum.com/uploads/sites/2/2021/10/conference_program_WABF2021_digital.pdf CY - Stockholm ER - TY - THES A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. T1 - Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung, Selbstregulation und Empathie als Facetten der Interventionskompetenz von Lehrkräften bei Mobbing: Zusammenhänge zum Interventionshandeln von Lehrkräften und den Mobbingerfahrungen der Lernenden N2 - Lehrkräften und ihrem Interventionshandeln kann bei der Entstehung von Mobbing eine besondere Rolle zukommen, wobei eine ausreichend ausgeprägte Interventionskompetenz bedeutsam ist. Aus welchen Komponenten diese Interventionskompetenz aber konkret besteht, ist nicht eindeutig geklärt. Aus der Literatur ist ein Modell bekannt, welches vorschlägt, dass sich Interventionskompetenz aus den Bereichen Wissen, Überzeugung, Motivation und Selbstregulation zusammensetzt. Zur Motivation können dabei alle Aspekte gezählt werden, die Intensität und Art eines Verhaltens beschreiben. Dazu gehören die Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung und die Empathie der Lehrkräfte. Auch die Selbstregulation kann unter der international anschlussfähigen Perspektive von Prozessen der Zielauswahl und -verfolgung der Motivation zugeordnet werden. Damit kommt der motivationalen Orientierung eine besondere Bedeutung als nicht-kognitiver Teil der Interventionskompetenz zu. Ausgehend von diesen Annahmen wurde in der vorliegenden Arbeit der Kompetenzbereich der Motivation als Teil der Interventionskompetenz von Lehrkräften bei Mobbing näher untersucht. Dazu wurde ein spezifisches Kompetenzstrukturmodell entwickelt. Mit den Befunden von fünf Publikationen sowie ergänzenden Analysen wurde dieses theoretisch abgeleitete Modell empirisch überprüft. Es wurde untersucht, welche Zusammenhänge zwischen mobbingbezogener Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung, Selbstregulation (operationalisiert durch die zwei Dimensionen Locomotion und Assessment) und Empathie und dem Interventionshandeln von Lehrkräften sowie den Mobbingerfahrungen der Schüler:innen bestehen. Zunächst erfolgte eine systematische Untersuchung des vergleichsweise umfangreichen Forschungsstandes zur Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung von Lehrkräften im Mobbingkontext. Anschließend wurden Daten von 556 Lehrkräften und 2.071 Schüler:innen aus einer 2014 durchgeführten Querschnittstudie in Sachsen analysiert. Das Interventionshandeln der Lehrkräfte wurde dabei auf retrospektiv berichtete Mobbingsituationen bezogen, welche von den Lehrkräften und den Schüler:innen geschildert wurden. Logistische, zum Teil mehrebenenanalytische Regressionsanalysen wurden durchgeführt. Die Befunde zeigten, dass nur die Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung der Lehrkräfte mit einer höheren Interventionswahrscheinlichkeit aus Selbstsicht der Lehrkräfte in Verbindung stand. Schüler:innen, deren Klassenlehrkräfte eine höhere Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung und eine höhere Neigung zu überlegtem, selbstevaluierendem Verhalten (Assessment-Orientierung des Selbstregulation) zeigten, berichteten geringere Mobbingerfahrungen. Schüler:innen, deren Lehrkräfte schnell und weniger überlegt handelten (Locomotion-Orientierung der Selbstregulation), berichteten dagegen von stärkerem Mobbingaufkommen. Als besonders bedeutsam für die Mobbingerfahrungen der Schüler:innen zeigte sich zudem die Sicht der Schüler:innen auf die Interventionswahrscheinlichkeit der Lehrkräfte. N2 - Bullying among students is a special form of aggression that occurs repeatedly over a long time with the intention to harm. Bullying occurs in a complex social context of which not only the students, but also the teachers are part. Teachers can act as role models and socialisation partners for the students and thus influence the attitudes and actions of students. To fulfil the professional task of intervention in bullying situations successfully, teachers must have sufficient intervention competence. However, the concrete components of this intervention competence are not clear yet. There is one known model in the literature assuming that intervention competence consists of knowledge, beliefs, motivation, and self-regulation. Motivation can include all aspects that influence if, with which intensity, and how people act. In the context of bullying intervention, this includes self-efficacy and empathy. When defined as a goal-oriented process, self-regulation can also be assigned to motivation. Thus, motivational orientation is of particular importance as a non-cognitive part of intervention competence. Based on these assumptions, the present study examined motivation as a part of teacher intervention competence. Using the findings of five publications as well as supplementary analyses, the connections between bullying-related self-efficacy, self-regulation (following the Regulatory Mode Theory assessed with two dimensions called locomotion and assessment), empathy, and the intervention behaviour of teachers as well as students’ bullying experiences were analysed. First, the current state of research regarding teachers’ self-efficacy in bullying was systematically reviewed. Besides, data from 556 teachers and their 2,071 students from a cross-sectional study conducted in Saxony in 2014 were analysed. Teachers’ intervention behaviour was analysed in connection with retrospectively reported bullying situations chosen by the teachers and the students individually. Data were analysed using logistic regression analyses that were conducted in multilevel models when student and teacher data were connected. Findings showed that teachers’ self-efficacy was associated with teachers’ likelihood of intervention from the teachers’ perspectives. Also, students whose form tutors reported higher self-efficacy and a higher tendency to reflect their behaviours thoroughly and choose wisely (assessment orientation of self-regulation) reported fewer bullying experiences. In contrast, students whose teachers acted quickly and were less self-critical (locomotion orientation of self-regulation) reported higher incidences of bullying. The students’ perspective on the teachers’ likelihood of intervention was associated with all types of bullying experiences (as bullies, bullied, and bully-victims). However, the likelihood of intervention from the students’ perspective was not related to the teachers’ motivational orientation that was investigated. Y1 - 2021 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:co1-opus4-56946 PB - BTU Cottbus-Senftenberg CY - Cottbus ER - TY - GEN A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Aalst, Danelien van A1 - Paljakka, Antonia T1 - Research on teachers’ role in tackling bullying: How can be facilitate connections and cooperation among researchers and practitioners in this field? T2 - World Anti-Bullying Forum 2021 N2 - Bullying research has been conducted worldwide for decades, with ever-increasing frequency and intensity. Nevertheless, some areas of bullying research have not been very well studied so far. One of these areas is the role of teachers in preventing and reducing bullying, including, for example, their intervention strategies and effectiveness in tackling bullying, and supportive or hindering teacher competencies. Recently, studies in this area seem to be increasing. A special issue in the European Journal of Developmental Psychology and a Current Research Topic in Frontiers of Psychology show growing research interest in the role of teachers in student bullying. It seems that we are at the beginning of increasing research interest, which provides us with the opportunity to identify research priorities and to advance appropriate networking. This could facilitate cooperation and connection between researchers and studies, which would be beneficial for the growth of knowledge and enable more rapid findings relevant to practice. We, the founders of the newly established and currently growing European Young Researchers Network on Teachers' Role in School Bullying, would like to talk about connecting researchers and research. Purpose The workshop is aimed at researchers who study teachers in the bullying context as well as practitioners who identified research needs. Central questions of the workshop will be: Which research questions need to be addressed to understand the role of teachers in bullying better? What helps us or what hinders us to exchange and cooperate? How can we create networks that are beneficial and accessible for everyone who wants to participate? Which research projects would be suitable for comparative research or replication in another country? The workshop aims to develop creative ideas that can be implemented in the newly established network or other cooperation opportunities to advance research on the role of the teacher. Y1 - 2021 UR - https://worldantibullyingforum.com/wabf-2021/ SP - 485 CY - Stockholm ER - TY - GEN A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Aalst, Danelien van A1 - Paljakka, Antonia T1 - Introducing the European Young Researchers Network on Teachers’ Role in School Bullying T2 - Bullying Research Symposium Vienna 2020 Y1 - 2020 UR - https://bullyingresearchsymposium.univie.ac.at/program/ CY - Wien ER - TY - GEN A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Bilz, Ludwig A1 - Wachs, Sebastian T1 - Teachers‘ empathy and the likelihood that they will intervene in bullying: Differences between students’ and teachers’ perspectives T2 - Bullying Research Symposium 2020 N2 - Teachers play a crucial role in bullying interventions. Recent research has suggested that empathy is particularly important for this. But two important limitations arise. Firstly, all of these findings are based on artificial bullying scenarios presented in vignettes. Secondly, the likelihood that teachers will intervene is assessed solely from the teacher’s perspective. Based on data from 2,071 German students and their 93 teachers, the connection between teachers’ self-reported empathy and the likelihood that they will intervene in bullying was assessed using a bullying vignette as well as a retrospectively reported bullying situation that had been experienced by the teachers or the students in question. The associations were analysed in multilevel regression models from the teachers’ and the students’ perspective. Results showed that teachers who are more empathic are more likely to report that they would intervene in a hypothetical relational bullying situation. However, this finding could not be replicated when using real, remembered bullying situations. In addition, when based on students’ perspectives, no significant associations between teachers’ empathy and their actual or intended intervention behaviour were found. In this presentation we will discuss implications for the validity of existing research and for future research. Y1 - 2020 UR - https://bullyingresearchsymposium.univie.ac.at/program/ ER - TY - GEN A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - John, Nancy A1 - Bilz, Ludwig T1 - Teachers‘ bullying-related self-efficacy: A systematic review on connections to bullying interventions T2 - World Anti-Bullying Forum 2019 N2 - Recent research indicates that teacher self-efficacy as a belief to have enough capabilities to accomplish a given task successfully (Bandura, 1994) is an important competence for successful bullying prevention and intervention (e.g., Boulton, 2014; Bradshaw, Sawyer & O’Brennan, 2007; Yoon & Bauman, 2014). But studies vary concerning the definition and specificity of self-efficacy and concerning the samples used. Therefore, the findings differ greatly. Empirical studies on teacher self-efficacy in the context of student bullying were searched in relevant databases. 36 relevant publications were identified in a multi-staged process. Quality criteria were adapted from the Cochrane Collaboration. Most publications report consistently that teachers feel not very confident in dealing with bullying in general and feel least confident when dealing with cyberbullying. Results on differences according to gender, work experience and school type are very heterogeneous. Consistent findings are reported concerning the likelihood of intervention: Teachers who are more confident are more likely to intervene in bullying. But no consistent findings arise for the choice of specific intervention strategies. The heterogeneity of the findings can be explained by different types of self-efficacy, by differences in the measures, and by different educational contexts. In the presentation, this information will be combined to understand differences better and to integrate the existing results. Results indicate that the more specific self-efficacy is assessed, the more connections between self-efficacy and bullying interventions can be found. Y1 - 2019 UR - https://worldantibullyingforum.com/previous-forums/wabf-2019/ CY - Dublin ER - TY - GEN A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Bilz, Ludwig T1 - Bullying among students in the context of staff conflicts and class climate: Are there spillover effects? T2 - World Anti-Bullying Forum 2017 N2 - Bullying is a prevalent aggressive behavior with severe negative social and health consequences. It emerges from complex social interactions (Saarento, Garandeau, & Salmivalli, 2015). To understand the causes of bullying, different levels of the school environment and their interactions need to be considered. Bronfenbrenner’s ecological theory is an appropriate model for this (see figure 1). From analyses of children’s behaviors in the family context, spillover effects are known (e.g., Lux & Hudecek, 2015). Similar patterns may occur in schools: Conflicts at the staff level may serve as negative role models, may reduce teachers’ alliance and cooperation, and limit long-term interventions. These long-term interventions are especially important in reducing bullying (Bilz, Schubarth, Dudziak, Fischer, Niproschke, & Ulbricht, in press). Following the assumption of reciprocity, the occurrence of bullying may, at the same time, work as a stressor and increase staff conflicts. Connections between bullying occurrence and class climate are already known in the literature (Saarento et al., 2015), but have not yet been analyzed with staff conflicts simultaneously. Cross-sectional data of 556 teachers and 2,071 students will be analyzed as individual data and as aggregated data using multilevel structure equation modeling. Analyses are not finished yet, but will be presented and discussed at the conference presentation. Y1 - 2017 UR - https://worldantibullyingforum.com/previous-forums/wabf-2017/ CY - Stockholm ER - TY - GEN A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Bilz, Ludwig T1 - Professionswissen und Lehrerhandeln in realen Mobbingsituationen T2 - Tagung der AEPF in Rostock (18.-21.09.2016) Y1 - 2016 UR - https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314521023_Professionswissen_und_Lehrerhandeln_in_realen_Mobbingsituationen U6 - https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.33063.14240 CY - Rostock ER - TY - GEN A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Bilz, Ludwig T1 - Handeln oder Abwägen? Die Bedeutung der Selbstregulation für das Interventionshandeln von Lehrkräften bei Gewalt und Mobbing T2 - 25. DGfE-Kongress Y1 - 2016 UR - https://www.znl-ulm.de/Veroeffentlichungen/Abstractband_NEFS_2016.pdf SP - 41 PB - TransferZentrum für Neurowissenschaften und Lernen CY - Kassel ER - TY - GEN A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Bilz, Ludwig T1 - Selbstregulative Kompetenzen von Lehrkräften beim Umgang mit Mobbing T2 - 80. AEPF-Tagung Y1 - 2015 UR - http://www.aepf2015.de UR - http://www.aepf2015.de/AEPF2015_Abstractband.pdf SP - 104 CY - Göttingen ER - TY - GEN A1 - Kansok-Dusche, Julia A1 - Bilz, Ludwig A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Wachs, Sebastian T1 - Lehrpersoneninterventionen bei Hatespeech: Dimensionalität, Messinvarianz und Kriteriumsvalidität einer neuen Skala T2 - Bildung im digitalen Wandel. 9. GEBF Tagung Bamberg Y1 - 2022 UR - https://gebf2022.de/GEBF2022_Tagungsband_01-03-22.pdf SP - 78 PB - Otto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg CY - Bamberg ER - TY - GEN A1 - Dadaczynski, Kevin A1 - Rathmann, Katharina A1 - Schricker, Julia A1 - Bilz, Ludwig A1 - Sudeck, Gorden A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Janiczek, Oliver A1 - Quilling, Eike T1 - Digitale Gesundheitskompetenz von Schülerinnen und Schülern. Ausprägung und Assoziationen mit dem Bewegungs- und Ernährungsverhalten T2 - Bundesgesundheitsblatt N2 - Hintergrund. Während vermehrt Studienbefunde zur allgemeinen Gesundheitskompetenz (GK) vorliegen, mangelt es an Erkenntnissen zur digitalen GK im Jugendalter und deren Assoziationen mit Indikatoren des Gesundheitsverhaltens. Methodik. Empirische Basis bildet eine von Oktober 2019 bis Februar 2020 im Bundesland Hessen durchgeführte Querschnittstudie mit 490 Schülerinnen und Schülern der Klassenstufe 8 und 9. Die digitale GK wurde mithilfe von 5 Subskalen des Digital Health Literacy Instrument (DHLI) erfasst, während der Verzehr von Obst, Gemüse und Softdrinks sowie die körperliche Aktivität als Indikatoren des Gesundheitsverhaltens herangezogen wurden. Als soziales Merkmal wurde neben dem Geschlecht und der Klassenstufe der subjektive Sozialstatus (SSS) berücksichtigt. Die Datenauswertung erfolgte uni-, bi- und multivariat, wobei binärlogistische Regressionen für das Geschlecht und den SSS adjustiert wurden. Ergebnisse. Über alle Items hinweg berichten 15,3–37,5 % der befragten Jugendlichen Schwierigkeiten bei der Beschaffung von und im Umgang mit digitalen Informationen. Differenziert nach sozialen Merkmalen finden sich für 2 Dimensionen der digitalen GK Unterschiede zuungunsten der Mädchen sowie durchgehend ein sozialer Gradient zuungunsten von Befragten mit niedrigem SSS. Jugendliche mit mittlerer und geringer digitaler GK weisen ein höheres Maß an geringer körperlicher Aktivität, nichttäglichem Obstverzehr und täglichem Konsum von zuckerhaltigen Getränken auf. Diskussion. Die Befunde weisen auf einen Interventionsbedarf zur Förderung der digitalen GK insbesondere bei Jugendlichen mit geringem SSS hin. Die differenziellen Zusammenhangsmuster mit dem Gesundheitsverhalten bieten Ansatzpunkte für die Entwicklung spezifischer Interventionen. Als Lehr- und Lernort stellt die Schule u. a. aufgrund der Passung mit verpflichtenden Strategien der schulischen Medienkompetenzbildung ein geeignetes Setting dar. KW - Gesundheitsinformationen KW - Digital Public Health KW - Jugendgesundheit KW - Obst- und Gemüsekonsum KW - Körperliche Aktivität Y1 - 2022 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-022-03548-5 SN - 1436-9990 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Bilz, Ludwig A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Hoppe-Herfurth, Anne-Cathrin A1 - John, Nancy T1 - A Consequential Partnership. The Association Between Teachers’ Well-Being and Students’ Well-Being and the Role of Teacher Support as a Mediator T2 - Zeitschrift für Psychologie N2 - Many studies have focused on the effects of teachers’ well-being on the development of students, in particular their academic achievement. To date, little is known about the association between teachers’ well-being and students’ well-being. In the present study, we analyzed this relationship and examined the mediating role of teacher support using linked data from 2,686 students and 805 teachers from 48 schools in Germany. Multilevel regression analyses showed a relationship between teachers’ emotional exhaustion and students’ subjective health complaints and between teachers’ psychological well-being and students’ satisfaction with school. The latter association was mediated by teacher support as perceived by students. This study extends current knowledge about the relevance of teachers’ well-being to their students’ socio-emotional development and the mechanisms that underlie this association. Implications for promoting of mental health in schools and for future research are discussed. KW - teacher well-being KW - student well-being KW - teacher support KW - school mental health Y1 - 2022 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000497 SN - 2151-2604 VL - 230 IS - 3 SP - 264 EP - 275 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Bilz, Ludwig A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Hoppe-Herfurth, Anne-Cathrin A1 - John, Nancy T1 - A consequential partnership. The association between teachers‘ well-being and students‘ well-being and the role of teacher support as a mediator T2 - 26th Biennal Meeting of the ISSBD Y1 - 2022 UR - https://www.issbd2022.org/program/scientific-program U6 - https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.35890.48324 PB - International Society for the Study of Behavioural Development CY - Rhodos, Greece ER - TY - GEN A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Dadaczynski, Kevin A1 - Sudeck, Gorden A1 - Rathmann, Katharina A1 - Paakkari, Olli A1 - Paakkari, Leena A1 - Bilz, Ludwig T1 - Measuring Health Literacy in Childhood and Adolescence with the Scale Health Literacy in School-Aged Children – German Version T2 - Diagnostica N2 - Health literacy can help explain health inequalities in childhood and adolescence. However, suitable instruments for assessing health literacy in this age group are rare, especially in the German-speaking countries. One economical measure is the 10-item Health Literacy in School-Aged Children (HLSAC) scale, developed and reviewed as part of the WHO Child and Adolescent Health Study (HBSC, Health Behavior in School-Aged Children). In the present study, we tested dimensionality, measurement invariance, and associations with health-related measures of the German version of the scale (HLSAC–German), using data from the 2018 national German HBSC study (N = 4,347 students aged 11, 13, and 15 years). We also tested HLSAC–German with 11-year-olds, representing an expansion of the original scale. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses consistently demonstrated the unidimensionality of the scale (α = .88). Complete scalar measurement invariance was found for sex and partial scalar measurement invariance for age groups and school type, allowing for the comparison of means. Associations with indicators of health and health behavior further demonstrate the construct validity of the scale. The analyses show that the scale is suitable for the economic measurement of a general factor of health literacy in 11- as well as in 13- and 15-year-olds. KW - health literacy KW - childhood KW - adolescence KW - measurement invariance KW - validity Y1 - 2022 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924/a000296 SN - 0012-1924 SN - 2190-622X VL - 68 IS - 4 SP - 184 EP - 196 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Dadaczynski, Kevin A1 - Sudeck, Gorden A1 - Rathmann, Katharina A1 - Bilz, Ludwig T1 - „Health Literacy in School-Aged Children-German”: Vorstellung eines Messinstruments zur Erhebung der Gesundheitskompetenz im Kindes- und Jugendalter T2 - 52. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie. Programm. N2 - Gesundheitskompetenz ist ein international relevanter Forschungsgegenstand, der bereits im Kindes- und Jugendalter mit dem Gesundheitszustand, der Ausübung gesundheitsbezogenen Risikoverhaltens und gesundheitlicher Ungleichheit zusammenhängt. Dennoch steht die Erforschung der Gesundheitskompetenz in Deutschland insbesondere im Kindes- und Jugendalter im internationalen Vergleich noch weitgehend am Anfang. Ein ökonomisches Instrument zur Erhebung der Gesundheitskompetenz Heranwachsender stellt die 10-Item-Skala „Health Literarcy in School-Aged Children-German“ (HLSAC-German) dar. Dabei handelt es sich um die deutsche Version der Skala HLSAC, welche in der international durchgeführten HBSC-Studie eingesetzt wird. In diesem Beitrag werden die Skala selbst sowie Befunde zur Dimensionalität, zur Messinvarianz in Bezug auf Geschlecht, Alter und Schulform und zu Zusammenhängen zu Indikatoren der Gesundheit und des Gesundheitsverhaltens vorgestellt. Die Überprüfung der Skala erfolgt anhand der Daten der deutschen HBSC-Studie 2018 (N = 4 347 Schülerinnen und Schüler im Alter von 11, 13 und 15 Jahren). Die Überprüfung in der Gruppe der 11-Jährigen stellt dabei eine Erweiterung des Einsatzbereiches der Skala im internationalen Vergleich dar. Explorative und konfirmatorische Faktorenanalysen belegen die Eindimensionalität der Skala. Konfirmatorische Faktorenanalysen in multiplen Gruppen zeigen vollständige skalare Messinvarianz bezüglich des Geschlechts und partielle skalare Messinvarianz bezüglich Altersgruppen und Schulform. Erwartungsgemäß zeigen sich negative Zusammenhänge zu subjektiv eingeschätzten psychischen Gesundheitsproblemen und positive Zusammenhänge zur körperlichen Aktivität. Die Ergebnisse weisen insgesamt auf eine eindimensionale Skala hin, mit welcher Mittelwertsvergleiche zulässig sind. Der Einsatz der Skala in der Gruppe der 11-jährigen ist möglich, wobei punktuelle Schwierigkeiten bei der Beantwortung der Items und eine höhere Non-Response-Quote in dieser Altersgruppe erwartet werden müssen. Y1 - 2022 UR - https://www.uni-hildesheim.de/dgps2022/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/52._DGPs-Kongress_2022_Programm_Stand20220915_kl.pdf SP - 51 CY - Hildesheim ER - TY - GEN A1 - Wolgast, Anett A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Bilz, Ludwig T1 - Teachers’ Empathy for Bullying Victims, Understanding of Violence, and Likelihood of Intervention T2 - Journal of School Violence N2 - Relational bullying is still underappreciated by teachers. Based on the theoretical model of teachers’ intervention competence in bullying, the aim of the current research was to gain insights into the concurrent relationships between teachers’ empathy, understanding of violence, and likelihood of intervention. In this study, n = 556 teachers (79.4% female, Mage = 50.6) indicated on a questionnaire their empathy, understanding of relational violence, and likelihood of intervention in a relational bullying situation. The relationships were simultaneously estimated in a structural equation model. The results suggest significantly positive concurrent relations between these variables. We conclude that the effectiveness of teacher trainings could be increased through such elements as cognitive empathy training, raising awareness of violence, and teaching appropriate interventions in relational bullying situations. KW - bullying KW - empathy KW - likelihood of intervention KW - students KW - teachers’ understanding of violence Y1 - 2022 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2022.2114488 SN - 1538-8220 SN - 1538-8239 VL - 21 IS - 4 SP - 491 EP - 503 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Macaulay, Peter J. R. A1 - Bilz, Ludwig T1 - Broadening the contextual perspective on bullying: Direct and cross-level interaction effects between staff communication climate, classroom climate, and students’ bullying experiences T2 - 26th Workshop on Aggression. The Nature and Prevention of Political Violence. N2 - Research on the development of bullying is often based upon Bronfenbrenner’s socioecological model (Swearer & Hymel, 2015). Thus, various relevant contextual variables have been identified, including classroom climate and school climate (Thornberg et al., 2018; Zych et al., 2019). School climate has been defined in different ways, mostly including relationships between people in the school environment (Wang et al., 2016). Empirically, only the relationships between students (also summarised within the class as classroom climate) and between teachers and pupils are usually considered. However, teachers have been identified as particularly significant in the bullying process and as role models for students (Colpin et al., 2021). Because of this, it is assumed that relationships among teachers can also be significant risk factors for student bullying. In this study, we investigate communication climate among teachers as part of the school climate and its associations to student bullying. In addition, we follow Bronfenbrenner’s idea of interactions among contextual levels by considering both school climate and classroom climate and investigating moderation effects. Data was collected from more than 550 teachers and 2,000 students in 114 classes at 24 schools in Germany. The analyses involved three-level hierarchical binary regression analyses and cross-level interaction models. Findings suggest that staff communication climate is not associated directly with students’ experiences with bullying, but that the worse staff communication climate, the more students bully others in classrooms with high rates of rivalry (cross-level moderation). The associations will further be analysed under consideration of relevant control variables. Final results will be presented at the conference. The study broadens the contextual perspective on bullying by including more than one level at once and supports the importance of a whole-school perspective on bullying. Y1 - 2022 UR - http://www.woa.uni-jena.de/WoA2022-Program.pdf ER - TY - GEN A1 - Dadaczynski, Kevin A1 - Rathmann, Katharina A1 - Schricker, Julia A1 - Bilz, Ludwig A1 - Sudeck, Gorden A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Janiczek, Oliver A1 - Quilling, Eike T1 - Digital health literacy and health behaviors of eighth and ninth graders from Germany T2 - European Journal of Public Health N2 - Background: Due to the high availability and use of digital media, health- related information is increasingly shifting into the digital space. While there are increasing empirical findings on general health literacy (HL), there is a lack of evidence on digital HL in adolescence and its association with health behavior. Methods: A cross-sectional study of 490 secondary school students (grades eight and nine) from the federal state of Hesse was conducted from October 2019 to February 2020. Digital HL was assessed using five subscales of the Digital Health Literacy Instrument (DHLI), while consumption of fruits, vegetables, soft drinks, and weekly physical activity were used as indicators of health behavior. In addition to gender and grade level, subjective social status (SSS) was used as a social characteristic. Univariate, bivariate, and multivariate analyses were performed, with binary-logistic regression adjusted for gender and SSS. Results: Across all items, the percentage of adolescents reporting difficulties in acquiring and dealing with digital health information ranges from 15.3 % to 37.5 %. Stratified by social characteristics, gender and socioeconomic differences were found with girls and respondents reporting a lower SSS more often showing a limited digital HL. Adolescents with moderate and low digital HL report higher levels of low physical activity, non-daily fruit and daily soft drink consumption. Depending on the health behavior, different relationship patterns can be observed for the dimensions of digital HL. Conclusions: The findings suggest a need for interventions to promote digital HL among adolescents, particularly for those of low SSS. In this context, the differential relationship patterns with health behaviors provide an avenue for the development of specific interventions. Y1 - 2022 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.322 SN - 1101-1262 SN - 1464-360X VL - 32 IS - Supplement 3 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Bilz, Ludwig T1 - Traditional bullying and cyberbullying at schools in Germany: Results of the HBSC study 2022 and trends from 2009/10 to 2022 T2 - Journal of Health Monitoring N2 - Background: Bullying is a form of violence that is carried out repeatedly, with the intention of causing harm and with an imbalance of power between those involved. Bullying has serious negative effects on the mental health of adolescents and thus represents a significant health risk in childhood and adolescence. Methods: Based on data from the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study from the survey year 2022 in Germany (N = 6,475), the prevalence of school bullying and cyberbullying among 11-, 13- and 15-year-olds in Germany was analysed. In addition, the prevalence of school bullying and cyberbullying was analysed as a trend from 2009/10 to 2022 (bullying) and from 2017/18 to 2022 (cyberbullying). Results: Around 14 % of the learners surveyed reported direct experience of bullying at school, and around 7 % reported cyberbullying experiences as bullied and/or bullying victims. Adolescents who identified as gender diverse were particularly likely to report bullying experiences. School bullying decreased over time, but remained stable between 2017/18 and 2022. Cyberbullying, on the other hand, increased in 2022 compared to 2017/18. Conclusions: Experiencing bullying at school and online is an everyday experience for many children and young people, so there is still a need for the broad implementation of effective anti-bullying measures in schools. KW - Bullying KW - Cyberbullying KW - Prevalence KW - Distribution KW - Trends KW - School KW - Children KW - Adolescents KW - Violence KW - HBSC KW - Survey KW - Germany Y1 - 2024 UR - https://www.rki.de/EN/Content/Health_Monitoring/Health_Reporting/GBEDownloadsJ/Focus_en/JHealthMonit_2024_01_Bullying.pdf U6 - https://doi.org/10.25646/11872 SN - 2511-2708 VL - 9 IS - 1 SP - 42 EP - 61 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Bilz, Ludwig T1 - Mobbing und Cybermobbing an Schulen in Deutschland: Ergebnisse der HBSC-Studie 2022 und Trends von 2009/10 bis 2022 T2 - Journal of Health Monitoring N2 - Hintergrund: Mobbing ist eine Form der Gewalt, die wiederholt, mit der Absicht zu schädigen und mit einem Machtungleichgewicht zwischen den Beteiligten ausgeübt wird. Mobbing hat schwerwiegende negative Auswirkungen auf die psychische Gesundheit Heranwachsender und stellt damit ein bedeutsames Gesundheitsrisiko im Kindes- und Jugendalter dar. Methode: Basierend auf den Daten der „Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC)“-Studie aus dem Erhebungsjahr 2022 in Deutschland (N=6.475) wurde analysiert, wie verbreitet schulisches Mobbing und Cybermobbing in Deutschland unter 11-, 13- und 15-Jährigen waren. Zudem wurde die Verbreitung von schulischem Mobbing und Cybermobbing im Trendverlauf von 2009/10– 2022 (Mobbing) bzw. von 2017/18–2022 (Cybermobbing) analysiert. Ergebnisse: Rund 14% der befragten Lernenden gaben direkte Erfahrungen mit schulischem Mobbing an, rund 7% berichteten Cybermobbingerfahrungen als Gemobbte und/oder Mobbende. Heranwachsende, die sich als gender-divers identifizierten, gaben besonders häufig Mobbingerfahrungen an. Schulisches Mobbing nahm im Zeitverlauf ab, blieb zwischen 2017/18 und 2022 aber stabil. Cybermobbing nahm 2022 im Vergleich zu 2017/18 dagegen zu. Schlussfolgerungen: Mobbingerfahrungen in der Schule und online sind für viele Kinder und Jugendliche eine alltägliche Erfahrung, sodass weiterhin Bedarf für eine breite Implementierung wirksamer Anti-Mobbing-Maßnahmen an Schulen besteht. Y1 - 2024 U6 - https://doi.org/10.25646/11871 SN - 2511-2708 VL - 9 IS - 1 SP - 46 EP - 67 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Zeißig, Anke A1 - Kansok-Dusche, Julia A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Möller, Julia A1 - Bilz, Ludwig T1 - The association between boredom and creativity in educational contexts: A scoping review on research approaches and empirical findings T2 - Review of Education N2 - Assumptions around the association between boredom and creativity are contentious. Although studies suggest positive effects of boredom, it is also considered a negative predictor of creativity. Researchers also assume that creativity reduces boredom, but boredom can also occur during creative tasks. In this review, we identify and systematise the empirical evidence available to date on the association between creativity and boredom in educational contexts. The string‐guided electronic search yielded 2849 publications. Nineteen publications based on 27 empirical studies met the inclusion criteria. Two reviewers extracted definitions, theories, methods, operationalisations, measurement instruments, and outcomes from the studies using a coding scheme. We identified a range of different theoretical and methodological approaches. The largest cache of empirical evidence was obtained from experimental and quasi‐experimental studies (five positive associations, four negative, two contradictory, and three insignificant results). Correlation studies identified three negative, one contradictory, and seven insignificant correlations between boredom and creativity. In addition, two studies with exploratory, statistically not relevant results contributed to the body of research. The results from the identified and evaluated studies argue both for and against the sensitivity of creative processes in relation to boredom—but a clear causal, positive or negative effect of boredom on creativity is not currently supported by the empirical evidence available. Previous research has also not yet demonstrated an apparent effect of creative states or traits on academic boredom. Future research should aim to explore under what circumstances different relationships between boredom and creativity can be observed and reliably replicated. KW - Education Y1 - 2024 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3470 SN - 2049-6613 VL - 12 IS - 1 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Bilz, Ludwig A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Kansok-Dusche, Julia A1 - Wachs, Sebastian A1 - Wettstein, Alexander T1 - Teachers’ intervention strategies for handling hate-speech incidents in schools T2 - Social Psychology of Education N2 - Despite ongoing global efforts to combat discrimination, hate speech is a growing problem in many countries. Hate speech is also widespread among young people and thus also affects schools. Because of the negative consequences of hate speech for the targeted individuals and for society in general, schools and teachers are generally encouraged to moderate hate speech. This binational study examines intervention strategies for hate speech in schools using the newly developed Hate-Speech Interventions Scale for Teachers. Data from German and Swiss teachers (N = 486) were analyzed. Self-reported strategies were best described using a three-factor structure. Teachers primarily direct their interventions at those directly involved in hate speech and frequently employ teaching-oriented strategies. In comparison, external partners and colleagues are relatively rarely involved. Measurement invariance testing supported the scales’ construct validity. A link was found between the use of these strategies, teachers’ task-specific self-efficacy, gender, and professional experience. These results indicate that schools should play an important role in moderating hate speech and that increasing teachers’ confidence in their own ability to address this phenomenon could be an important element of teacher training. KW - Hate speech KW - Intervention KW - Teacher KW - School KW - Self-efficacy KW - Professional experience Y1 - 2024 UR - https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11218-024-09929-9 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-024-09929-9 SN - 1381-2890 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Bilz, Ludwig A1 - Kansok-Dusche, Julia A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Bartholomäus, Peter T1 - What works in hate speech intervention and prevention in schools? First results of a systematic review T2 - 28TH WORKSHOP ON AGGRESSION N2 - Hate speech is a global social problem with a multitude of negative consequences. Derogatory expressions against certain groups of people are not a new phenomenon. However, hate speech has become much more widespread in recent years. After the Internet, the school is a place where hate speech occurs and where children and young people perpetrate, witness, and become victims of hate speech (Castellanos et al., 2023; Kansok-Dusche et al., 2023). Schools represent a suitable location to address hate speech incidents and to prevent future hate speech. To date, there is limited evidence on the availability, quality, and effectiveness of school-based anti-hate speech programs. The objective of this systematic review is to compile a catalogue of available anti-hate speech programs, that are particularly aimed at children and youth and that can be used to deal with hate speech in schools. Furthermore, their quality and utility are to be evaluated on a criteria-driven basis by two independent reviewers. The presentation will provide an overview of the 27 programmes identified and the initial results regarding their quality. Recommendations are given for the implementation of these programmes in schools and for their further improvement. Y1 - 2024 UR - https://www.ntu.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0030/2539218/28th-Workshop-on-Aggression-Programme.pdf U6 - https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.35879.97440 CY - Nottingham ER - TY - GEN A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Bilz, Ludwig T1 - Mobbing und Cybermobbing unter Schüler*innen. Eine Herausforderung für die ganze Schule T2 - Dreizehn - Zeitschrift für Jugendsozialarbeit Y1 - 2024 UR - https://jugendsozialarbeit.de/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/KVJSA_Dreizehn_Nr32_Web.pdf SN - 1867-0571 VL - 32 SP - 16 EP - 19 ER - TY - RPRT A1 - HBSC Studienverbund Deutschland, A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Bilz, Ludwig T1 - Schulisches Mobbing und Cybermobbing von Kindern und Jugendlichen - Faktenblatt zur Studie Health Behaviour in School-aged Children 2022 Y1 - 2024 UR - https://hbsc-germany.de/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Faktenblatt_SchulischesMobbingUndCybermobbing_2022_0512_SF_PK.pdf ER - TY - GEN A1 - Schittenhelm, Catherine A1 - Kops, Maxime A1 - Moosburner, Maeve A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Wachs, Sebastian T1 - Cybergrooming victimization among young people: a systematic review of prevalence rates, risk factors, and outcomes T2 - Adolescent Research Review N2 - Adolescence is marked by a unique blend of factors, including adolescents’ exploration of their emerging sexuality and growing engagement with digital media. As adolescents increasingly navigate online spaces, cybergrooming victimization has emerged as a significant concern for the development and protection of young people. Yet, there is a lack of systematic analyses of the current state of research. To this end, the present systematic review aimed to integrate existing quantitative research on prevalence rates, risk factors, and outcomes of cybergrooming victimization, informed by an adaptation of the General Aggression Model. Studies providing self-reported data on cybergrooming victimization of people between the ages of 5 and 21 were included. A total of 34 studies met all inclusion criteria, with most focusing on adolescence. Reported prevalence rates were characterized by strong heterogeneity, which could largely be attributed to the underlying methodology. Overall, the included studies showed that at least one in ten young people experiences cybergrooming victimization. Findings further indicated that various factors, for example, being a girl, being older, engaging in risky behavior, displaying problematic Internet use, reporting lower mental well-being, and experiencing other types of victimization, are positively associated with cybergrooming victimization. However, most studies’ cross-sectional designs did not allow for an evidence-based classification into risk factors, outcomes, and co-occurrences, so findings were embedded in the proposed model based on theoretical considerations. In addition, there is a noted lack of studies that include diverse samples, particularly younger children, LGBTQIA+ youth, and young people with special educational needs. These findings emphasize that cybergrooming victimization is a prevalent phenomenon among young people that requires prevention and victim support addressing multiple domains. Y1 - 2024 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-024-00248-w SN - 2363-8346 PB - Springer Science and Business Media LLC ER - TY - GEN A1 - Zeißig, Anke A1 - Möller, Julia A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Bilz, Ludwig T1 - Bedürfnisbezogene Korrelate der Langeweile und Indikatoren der Kreativität im Unterrichtskontext T2 - 53. DGPs-Kongress / 15. ÖGP-Konferenz, 16.-19. September N2 - Langeweile ist eine der am häufigsten und intensivsten erlebten Emotionen im Unterricht. Studien zeigen, dass die Langeweile eine oberflächliche Verarbeitung von Informationen zur Folge haben kann, kognitive und metakognitive Fähigkeiten sowie anwendungsbezogenes, problemlösendes und nachhaltiges Lernen beeinträchtigen und sich negativ auf akademische Leistungen auswirken kann. Auf der anderen Seite sehen Forschende die Langeweile als ein Signal an, dass eine Ausrichtung mentaler Prozesse zu Sinnhaftigkeit und Kreativität ermöglichen und ungenutzte kognitive Potenziale erschließen könnte. Ein Schlüssel für das Verständnis und die Untersuchung dieser scheinbar widersprüchlichen Annahmen könnten bedürfnisbezogene Korrelate der Langeweile sein. Je nach assoziierter Bedürfnislage (z.B. Kompetenz, Autonomie, Stimulation, Sinnhaftigkeit) könnten sich unterschiedliche Verbindungen eines Zustandes der Langeweile zu kreativen Impulsen ergeben. Diese Annahme wird in einer Studie mit Lernenden der 9. Klassen in Gymnasien mit einer Experience-Sampling-Erhebung untersucht. Die aktuell laufenden Erhebungen finden jeweils eine Woche pro Klasse statt. Die Lernenden werden dabei jeweils mehrfach in verschiedenen Unterrichtssituationen untersucht. Wir wollen ermitteln, inwieweit das Aufkommen von Langeweile in Unterrichtssituationen mit unerfüllten psychischen Bedürfnissen assoziiert ist und ob ein empfundener Mangel an Stimulanz oder Sinnhaftigkeit mit Kreativitätsimpulsen verbunden ist. Wir stellen erste Ergebnisse vor und diskutieren diese vor dem Hintergrund einer differenziellen Betrachtung der Daten der Lernenden. KW - Langeweile KW - Kreativität KW - Psychische Bedürfnisse Y1 - 2024 UR - https://dgps2024.univie.ac.at/program/ U6 - https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.15449 CY - Wien ER - TY - GEN A1 - Bilz, Ludwig A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Maunder, Rachel A1 - Bauman, Sheri A1 - Scheithauer, Herbert T1 - Interventionen von Lehrkräften bei Mobbing in der Schule: Erste Ergebnisse eines systematischen Reviews T2 - Menschen Mitwelt Medien - 53. DGPs Kongress Wien Y1 - 2024 UR - https://dgps2024.univie.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/k_dgps2020/Abstractband_13092024.pdf U6 - https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.17765.41447 SP - 571 EP - 572 PB - Universität Wien CY - Wien ER - TY - GEN A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Macaulay, Peter J. R. A1 - Baraldsnes, Dziuginta A1 - Brett, Hannah A1 - Paljakka, Antonia T1 - Kooperationen zwischen Elternhaus und Schule bei der Prävention und Intervention bei Mobbing unter Schüler:innen T2 - 53. DGPs-Kongress Wien N2 - Die Forschung zur Prävention und Intervention von Mobbing und Cybermobbing wird sehr häufig vor dem theoretischen Hintergrund sozio-ökologischer Modelle durchgeführt. Die Bedeutung des sozialen Kontexts von Mobbing und somit auch des Handelns von Lehrpersonen bei der Prävention von Mobbing und bei der Intervention bei bestehendem Mobbing steht dabei mittlerweile außer Frage. Ebenso wird immer wieder auf die Notwendigkeit hingewiesen, das Elternhaus bzw. die Sorgeberechtigten in die Anti-Mobbing-Maßnahmen einzubeziehen. Sofern Anti-Mobbing-Programme oder Maßnahmen die Zusammenarbeit von Schule und Familie bzw. von Lehrpersonen und Eltern beinhalten, unterscheiden sich Form, Ausmaß und Qualität der Zusammenarbeit allerdings beträchtlich und reichen beispielsweise vom Versenden von Briefen nach Hause bis hin zum aktiven Einbezug der Eltern in die Mobbingprävention auf Schul-, Klassen- und individueller Ebene. Ziel des vorgestellten systematischen Reviews ist es, Forschungsergebnisse zu identifizieren, die Informationen über die Effektivität und Art der Zusammenarbeit zwischen Elternhaus und Schule bei der Prävention und Intervention von Mobbing und Cybermobbing liefern. Eine systematische Literaturrecherche in relevanten Datenbanken ist bereits abgeschlossen und die Ergebnisse umfassen gemäß der Suchstrategie sowohl qualitative als auch quantitative Studien in englischer und deutscher Sprache. Zum Zeitpunkt der Konferenz werden die Ergebnisse der Volltextanalyse bereits vorliegen und erste Auswertungen präsentiert, die die Struktur der Zusammenarbeit, Hürden und Herausforderungen, rechtliche Rahmenbedingungen und Aspekte der Zusammenarbeit, die eine erfolgreiche Kooperation unterstützen, aufzeigen. Y1 - 2024 U6 - https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/EUP94 CY - Wien ER - TY - GEN A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Wolgast, Anett A1 - Schütz, Raphael A1 - Bilz, Ludwig T1 - Mobbing-Erfahrungen von Kindern und Jugendlichen in der Schule und ihre psychische Gesundheit: Die Rolle ihrer erlebten Unterstützung durch Lehrkräfte, Mitschüler:innen, Familie und Freund:innen T2 - 53. DGPs-Kongress Wien N2 - Mobbing-Erfahrungen stellen einen Risikofaktor für die psychische Gesundheit von Heranwachsenden dar. Sozial-ökologische Modelle sprechen für die Annahme, dass erlebte soziale Unterstützung die negativen Auswirkungen von Mobbing auf die psychische Gesundheit verringern kann, wobei je nach Entwicklungsstufe der Heranwachsenden und der Unterstützungsquelle Unterschiede zu erwarten sind. Zur Rolle der sozialen Unterstützung bei Mobbing-Erfahrung liegen jedoch widersprüchliche Ergebnisse vor. Die vorliegende Studie ging der Frage nach, welche Effekte soziale Unterstützung auf den Zusammenhang zwischen Mobbing-Erfahrungen und psychischer Gesundheit von Heranwachsenden hat. Dafür wurden Querschnittsdaten von 3.801 Heranwachsenden der Jahrgangstufen 5, 7 und 9 (52.6 % weiblich, MAlter = 13.50 Jahre) aus der 2022er Brandenburger HBSC-Teilstudie („Health Behaviour in School-aged Children“) mittels Strukturgleichungsmodellierung analysiert. Die Ergebnisse zeigen erwartete negative Zusammenhänge zwischen Opfererfahrungen und psychischer Gesundheit, jedoch auch unerwartete positive Zusammenhänge zwischen der Mobbing-Ausübung und dem Wohlbefinden. Positive Zusammenhänge existieren zudem zwischen der psychischen Gesundheit und der erlebten sozialen Unterstützung durch die Familie, Lehrpersonen und Mitschüler:innen, jedoch nicht Freund:innen. Interaktionseffekte legen nahe, dass die erlebte soziale Unterstützung durch die Familie und die Lehrpersonen den negativen Zusammenhang zwischen Opfererfahrungen und psychischer Gesundheit verringern kann. Die Jahrgangsstufen moderieren diese komplexen Zusammenhänge. Die Ergebnisse unterstreichen die Bedeutung der sozialen Unterstützung als Schutzfaktor bei Mobbing und die Notwendigkeit, verschiedene Unterstützungsquellen separat zu betrachten. Es ergeben sich Implikationen für Maßnahmen der Gewaltprävention und der (psychischen) Gesundheitsförderung in der Schule. Y1 - 2024 U6 - https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/F5ZSJ ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Bilz, Ludwig ED - Hong, Jun S. ED - Chan, Heng C. ED - Fung, Annis L. C. ED - Lee, Jungip T1 - Teachers bullying intervention competence: a German study on aspects of crucial competence for bullying interventions in schools T2 - Handbook of School Violence, Bullying and Safety N2 - Teachers can play a crucial role when it comes to bullying among students. The way teachers respond to incidents of bullying can impact students’ attitudes and behaviors. Because of this, intervening successfully in bullying is an important part of teachers’ day-to-day work in school. Intervening successfully requires specific competence and, in 2015, a theoretical model of teacher bullying intervention competence was introduced, based on earlier teacher competence models and studies. This model suggests that teachers’ competencies in bullying interventions consist of four competence dimensions, namely knowledge, beliefs, motivational orientation, and self-regulation. Since then, several studies have been conducted on this model. In this chapter, we will summarize recent empirical findings on the model based on data from 556 teachers and 2,071 students in Germany. We then revise the model based on these empirical findings. Limitations and implications are discussed. KW - Teacher competence KW - Intervention KW - Bullying KW - School KW - Germany Y1 - 2024 SN - 9781035301355 U6 - https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035301362.00042 SP - 403 EP - 416 PB - Edward Elgar Publishing CY - Cheltenham ER - TY - GEN A1 - Bilz, Ludwig A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. T1 - Mobbing und Cybermobbing an Schulen in Deutschland von 2009/10 bis 2022 T2 - “Gesundheit – gemeinsam denken, forschen, handeln”. Kooperationstagung der GMDS, DGSMP, DGEpi, DGMS und DGPH KW - Mobbing KW - Cybermobbing KW - HBSC Y1 - 2024 UR - https://gesundheit-gemeinsam.de/dgsmp-dgepi-dgms-und-dgph/programm-dgsmp-dgepi-dgms-dgph/ U6 - https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.31663.96165 CY - Dresden ER - TY - GEN A1 - Kansok-Dusche, Julia A1 - Wettstein, Alexander A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Wachs, Sebastian A1 - Bilz, Ludwig T1 - Associations between teachers’ beliefs and their perception of hate speech in school: a study in Germany and Switzerland T2 - Frontiers in Education N2 - Hate speech is a global issue that is also prevalent among adolescents and requires an educational response. Teachers handle hate speech as part of their professional role. To date, we know little about their beliefs in relation to the early stages of their interventional actions, specifically to their perception of hate speech in school. Thus, this study examined associations between teachers’ social dominance orientation, their pluralist attitude, and their hate speech perception in school. A sample of 471 secondary school teachers from 38 schools (Germany: n = 251; Switzerland: n = 220) participated in a self-report survey from December 2020 to April 2021 (MAge = 42.8 years; 57.7% females; 21.0% with migration status). Data from a total of 3,560 students from grades 7–9 (Germany: n = 1,841; Switzerland: n = 1,719) were matched with teachers’ data to control for students’ hate speech perception in school. Fixed effects multilevel regressions were run, including covariates (teachers’ age, gender, migration status, students’ hate speech perception), teachers’ social dominance orientation, pluralist attitude, and their hate speech perception in school. Teachers perceived a higher frequency of offline hate speech than online hate speech. Contrary to the hypotheses, social dominance orientation was positively associated with offline and online hate speech perception. As predicted, teachers’ pluralist attitude was positively linked to their off- and online hate speech perception. Further research must now clarify how the investigated beliefs and attitudes and teachers’ hate speech perception in school relate to other aspects of their professional competence. KW - hate speech perception, teachers, school, beliefs, social dominance orientation, pluralist attitude Y1 - 2024 U6 - https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1432013 SN - 2504-284X VL - 9 PB - Frontiers Media SA ER - TY - GEN A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Maunder, Rachel A1 - Bauman, Sheri A1 - Bilz, Ludwig A1 - Scheithauer, Herbert T1 - Teachers‘ Responses to Incidents of Bullying among Students: A Systematic Review on How Teachers React To and Manage Bullying Situations T2 - World Anti-Bullying Forum 2023, October 25–27, 2023, North Carolina, U.S.A. N2 - Introduction Teachers play a vital part in bullying intervention in schools. Their front-line role in classrooms means they are often in a position to notice when bullying happens, and children may also report incidents directly to them (Colpin et al, 2021). Whether and how they respond to bullying sends important messages about the extent to which the behaviour is tolerated in school, and the relative success of actions has direct implications for the children involved, including whether the bullying stops, continues, or even worsens (Wachs et al, 2019). It is therefore important to understand the strategies they use to manage bullying. Whilst a body of empirical research has studied teacher intervention in bullying, the key aspects in the findings or the quality of this evidence has not been systematically examined. This systematic review therefore aims to answer the central question of ‘how do teachers identify and respond to bullying incidents among students?’ Subsidiary questions focus on how teachers determine if an incident of bullying has occurred; how teachers decide how to respond to bullying incident; what the strategies are that teachers use to respond to bullying incidents; the effectiveness of the responses for handling bullying situations, and how teachers’ bullying responses are measured. Method Following pre-registration via the Open Science Framework (Fischer et al., 2022), the following databases were selected for the literature search given their widespread access, reputation, and coverage: Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO, PubPsych, PubMed, and Cochrane Library. Each database was interrogated using following search terms: (bully* OR bullie*) AND (teacher OR school staff OR monitor OR whole school OR educator OR tutor OR teach* assist*) AND (interven* OR prevent* OR handl* OR respon* OR tackl* OR measure OR methods OR action OR strateg* OR reaction OR react* OR approach OR practice OR anti-bullying). Both quantitative and qualitative studies were included. The search was restricted to publications in English or German, and no date range was imposed. Publications in peer-reviewed journals, book chapters, as well as grey literature were included. Title, abstracts, and keywords of the identified publications will be screened for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria include the use of the term ‘bullying’ (or ‘mobbing’ for German-language publications), the school context and school age, and any responses to bullying incidents that are performed by teachers or other teaching staff. Exclusion criteria include solely theoretical publications, bullying at college, university, or workplace, bullying outside the school context, purely preventive strategies, and evaluations of complex anti-bullying programmes. For both the screening and the data extraction, the software Covidence will be used. The procedure and coding system was adapted from Fischer et al. (2021). Results The data extraction is based on a detailed coding manual that had been tested within the research team. Two members of the coding team will code each study included in the full-text analysis. The quality assessment will also be included in the data extraction process and will be done with two instruments: One instrument that was developed by the research team based on the GRADE system with a focus on clearly defined key concepts and research questions as well as methodological aspects (e.g., sample size, critical reflection on the methods used), and one instrument that is established and suitable for both qualitative and quantitative studies (Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool MMAT, Hong et al., 2018). This procedure simultaneously enables the evaluation of the newly developed quality assessment tool. The data extraction is currently underway. The search in the databases and screening of title, abstract, and keywords is planned for spring 2023, and the data extraction will follow. At the WABF, we are going to present results on the quality assessment and interrater reliability as well as on the body of literature. In particular, the presentation of the results will focus on the breadth of teacher responses to incidents of bullying presented in the literature. Conclusion This systematic review provides a contemporary oversight of our existing knowledge on teacher intervention in bullying and highlights important avenues for further research. We will present detailed conclusions based on the results obtained. The expected results will provide a significant overview of the growing research on teacher interventions for bullying and will help to identify research gaps in the existing literature. Further, the results will highlight tendencies towards certain research methods and approaches to study teacher intervention, which provides opportunities for researchers to seek alternative designs and techniques going forward, and will help to identify research gaps in the existing literature. The systematic analysis of previously studied teacher responses to incidents of bullying will provide a significant foundation for future research. The information on how teachers identify bullying cases and the decision-making pathways underlying their responses has not been systematically collected so far, so the expected findings will provide an important foundation for future research and practical teacher training on anti-bullying interventions. In particular, the findings gathered on the effectiveness of teacher responses will have significant implications for the training of teachers, and guidance that can be provided to support teacher practice in schools. Selected references Colpin, H., Bauman, S. & Menesini, E. (2021). Teachers’ responses to bullying: Unravelling their consequences and antecedents: Introduction to the special issue. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18(6), 781-797. Fischer, S. M., Bauman, S., Maunder, R., Scheithauer, H., & Bilz, L. (2022). Teachers‘ interventions in bullying among students – A systematic review on how teachers react to and manage bullying situations. Preregistration Template from AsPredicted-org. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7VNBZ Fischer, S. M., John, N. & Bilz, L. (2021). Teachers’ self-efficacy in preventing and intervening in school bullying: A systematic review. International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 3, 196-212. Hong, Q. N., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Dagenais, P., Gagnon, M.-P., Griffiths, F., Nicolau, B., O’Cathain, A., Rousseau, M.-C., & Vedel, I. (2018). Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) Version 2018. User Guide. Available under http://mixedmethodsappraisaltoolpublic.pbworks.com Wachs, S., Bilz, L., Niproschke, S., & Schubarth, W. (2019). Bullying intervention in schools: A multilevel analysis of teachers’ success in handling bullying from the students’ perspective. Journal of Early Adolescence, 39(5), 642–668. Y1 - 2023 UR - https://worldantibullyingforum.com/uploads/sites/2/2023/10/20231019_WABF-Program.pdf U6 - https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/UCREY SP - 56 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Paljakka, Antonia A1 - Demol, Karlien T1 - European Young Researchers Network on Teachers’ Role in School Bullying: Where Do We Stand and Where Do We Go? T2 - World Anti-Bullying Forum 2023, October 25–27, 2023, North Carolina, U.S.A. N2 - The European Young Researchers Network on Teachers’ Role in School Bullying has been founded in 2020 by young researchers from Germany, the Netherlands, and Austria. The aim is to take into account the growing research interest in the role of teachers in the bullying process (e.g., Colpin et al., 2021; De Luca et al., 2019; Eldrige & Jenkins, 2020; Yoon & Bauman, 2014) and, in particular, to network young researchers working on this topic and to help them maintain an overview of the body of literature on this topic. To this end, newsletters are sent out at regular intervals informing members about new relevant publications, conferences, and calls for papers. In addition, researchers can contribute to the next newsletter by sending topics and concerns. This includes cooperation requests for symposia or research projects and topic-specific questions. The network has about 50 members from 16 different countries. It was presented in 2020 at the Bullying Research Symposium in Vienna (held online) and in 2021 at the WABF in Stockholm, where it met lively interest, received a lot of positive feedback from members, and attracted new members. However, like any network, it faces the challenge of evolving. Requests from members and sharing publications within the network have been decreasing. The aim is to facilitate the exchange between members and to continue to provide an information platform via the newsletter, which benefits from the shared knowledge of the members. However, the active participation of the members is necessary for this. In the presentation, the wishes and needs of the current and future members of the network will be discussed. Concrete questions concerning the future of the network include whether the European focus and the focus on young scientists should be maintained. Selected References Colpin, H., Bauman, S. & Menesini, E. (2021). Teachers’ responses to bullying: Unravelling their consequences and antecedents: Introduction to the Special Issue. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18(6), 781–797. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2021.1954903 De Luca, L., Nocentini, A. & Menesini, E. (2019). The teacher's role in preventing bullying. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1830. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01830 Eldridge, M. A. & Jenkins, L. N. (2020). The Bystander Intervention Model: Teacher intervention in traditional and cyber bullying. International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 2, 253–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42380-019-00033-7 Yoon, J. & Bauman, S. (2014). Teachers: A critical but overlooked component of bullying prevention and intervention. Theory Into Practice, 53(4), 308–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2014.947226 Y1 - 2023 UR - https://worldantibullyingforum.com/uploads/sites/2/2023/10/20231019_WABF-Program.pdf SP - 60 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Schütz, Raphael A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Zeißig, Anke ED - Schütz, Raphael ED - Bilz, Ludwig T1 - Das Gesundheits- und Risikoverhalten von Kindern und Jugendlichen in Brandenburg T2 - Aufwachsen in Krisenzeiten. Gesundheit und Gesundheitsverhalten von Kindern und Jugendlichen in Brandenburg 2018 – 2022. Ergebnisse der HBSC-Gesundheitsstudie 2022 im Auftrag der WHO Y1 - 2023 UR - https://www-docs.b-tu.de/fg-paedagogische-psychologie/public/Forschung/HBSC_Brandenburg_2022.pdf SN - 978-3-95853-878-8 SP - 29 EP - 82 PB - Pabst Science Publishers CY - Lengerich ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Kansok-Dusche, Julia A1 - Schütz, Raphael A1 - Bilz, Ludwig ED - Schütz, Raphael ED - Bilz, Ludwig T1 - Personale und kontextuelle Einflussfaktoren für die Gesundheit und das Gesundheitsverhalten im Kindes- und Jugendalter T2 - Aufwachsen in Krisenzeiten. Gesundheit und Gesundheitsverhalten von Kindern und Jugendlichen in Brandenburg 2018 – 2022. Ergebnisse der HBSC-Gesundheitsstudie 2022 im Auftrag der WHO Y1 - 2023 UR - https://www-docs.b-tu.de/fg-paedagogische-psychologie/public/Forschung/HBSC_Brandenburg_2022.pdf SN - 978-3-95853-878-8 SP - 83 EP - 132 PB - Pabst Science Publishers CY - Lengerich ER - TY - GEN A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Maunder, Rachel A1 - Bilz, Ludwig A1 - Bauman, Sheri A1 - Scheithauer, Herbert T1 - Teachers‘ Responses to Incidents of Bullying among Students: Study Protocol and Preliminary Results of a Systematic Review on How Teachers React to and Manage Bullying Situations T2 - 27th Workshop on Aggression Y1 - 2023 UR - https://www.workshoponaggression.com/about-7 U6 - https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/QCGDX ER - TY - GEN A1 - Bilz, Ludwig A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Kansok-Dusche, Julia A1 - Wachs, Sebastian A1 - Wettstein, Alexander T1 - Teachers' intervention strategies for handling hate-speech incidents in schools T2 - https://gestioneventos.us.es/wcvs2023/programa-detallado Y1 - 2023 U6 - https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.23545.85608 PB - Universidad de Sevilla CY - Seville ER - TY - GEN A1 - Bilz, Ludwig A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. T1 - Results of the German HBSC Study: Bullying and cyberbullying at schools in Germany T2 - Sustainable Health in Children and Students - Reduce the GAP! KW - HBSC KW - bullying KW - cyberbullying Y1 - 2024 UR - https://eusuhm.org/congress/potsdam-2024/ U6 - https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.35917.65767 CY - Potsdam ER - TY - BOOK A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Kansok-Dusche, Julia A1 - Bartholomäus, Peter A1 - Bilz, Ludwig T1 - Schule ohne Hass : praxisbezogene Ergebnisse einer Untersuchung zur Qualität von Anti-Hatespeech-Programmen N2 - Junge Menschen werden online, aber auch im Schulalltag zunehmend Zeug:innen, Ziel und mitunter auch Ausübende von Hatespeech. Hatespeech ist eine Form menschenfeindlicher Äußerungen und stellt Schulen, zu deren Aufgaben auch Demokratiebildung gehört, vor besondere Herausforderungen. Um Schüler:innen für Hatespeech zu sensibilisieren, sie beim Umgang mit Hatespeech-Situationen zu unterstützen und ihnen erfolgreiche Strategien gegen Hatespeech zu vermitteln, steht eine Vielzahl an Anti-Hatespeech-Programmen zur Verfügung, deren Zielsetzungen, Umfang und Qualität sich stark voneinander unterscheiden. In einer durch das Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend im Rahmen des Bundesprogramms „Demokratie leben!“ geförderten Studie wurden national und international verfügbare Anti-Hatespeech-Programme ermittelt und einer systematischen Qualitätsanalyse unterzogen. Dabei wurden 16 Qualitätskriterien einbezogen, die sowohl aus wissenschaftlicher als auch aus praxisbezogener Perspektive ermittelt wurden. Insgesamt wurden 27 Anti-Hatespeech-Programme eingeschätzt. In dieser Publikation werden die zentralen Ergebnisse zu den 27 Programmen praxisnah vorgestellt, sodass Praktiker:innen an Schulen eine fundierte Auswahl treffen können. Dazu werden die zentralen Inhalte, Zielgruppen und Kontextbedingungen wie z. B. Dauer, Format und Kosten, aber auch die Ergebnisse der Qualitätseinschätzung für jedes der 27 Programme vorgestellt. Für ausgewählte Situationen und Zielstellungen werden einzelne Programme exemplarisch näher beschrieben. Generelle Empfehlungen für die Auswahl von Programmen inklusive einer Checkliste runden die Publikation für Praktiker:innen ab. KW - Hassrede KW - Programme KW - Qualität KW - Schule Y1 - 2025 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:co1-opus4-69497 UR - file:///Users/Bilz/Downloads/Schule_ohne_Hass-2.pdf SN - 978-3-940471-81-9 PB - Brandenburgische Technische Universität Cottbus-Senftenberg, Institut für Gesundheit CY - Cottbus ET - 1 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Macaulay, Peter J. R. A1 - Bilz, Ludwig T1 - Staff communication at school and student–student relationship quality in the classroom : direct and indirect effects on students’ experiences as bullies, bullied, and bully-victims T2 - International Journal of Bullying Prevention N2 - Bullying research is often based upon Bronfenbrenner’s socioecological model, focusing on contextual level aspects associated with individual bullying experiences. Thus, various relevant contextual determinants of bullying have been identified, including classroom climate and school climate. However, even if interpersonal relationships are defined broadly in the definitions of classroom and (especially) school climate, its empirical investigation is limited to student–student or student–teacher relationships. In the current study, we included aspects of teacher–teacher relationships in the analyses by investigating staff communication at school. We investigated the associations between staff communication, student–student relationship quality in the classroom, and students’ bullying experiences. In addition, we investigated if staff communication may be indirectly linked to students’ bullying experiences via student–student relationships in the classroom. The sample was drawn from 556 teachers (79% female, Mage = 50.6, SDage = 8.44) and 2,071 students (49% female, Mage = 13.63, SDage = 1.17) in 114 classes across 24 schools in Germany. Two-level- and three-level models were performed. Findings suggest that rivalry as an aspect of student–student relationships in the classroom (a part of the classroom climate) is associated with students’ bullying experiences as bullies, victims, and bully-victims. While staff communication is not directly associated with students’ bullying experiences, it is indirectly associated with it via rivalry in the classroom. The findings also show that staff communication at school is associated with student–student relationships in the classroom. The study has implications for school-wide anti-bullying measures that should also include teacher–teacher aspects, and that future research should endeavour to include both class-level and school-level contexts. Y1 - 2025 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s42380-024-00283-0 SN - 2523-3653 VL - 2025 PB - Springer Science and Business Media LLC ER - TY - GEN A1 - Macaulay, Peter J. R. A1 - Baraldsnes, Dziuginta A1 - Brett, Hannah A1 - Paljakka, Antonia A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. T1 - Parent-teacher collaborations in preventing and tackling bullying and cyberbullying : a systematic review T2 - World Anti-Bullying Forum 2023, October 25–27, 2023, North Carolina, U.S.A. N2 - Introduction Research on bullying prevention and intervention is very often conducted against the theoretical background of socio-ecological models (e.g., the socio-ecological diathesis-stress model; Swearer & Hymel, 2015). This leads to a special focus on different social contexts, without which the complexity of bullying processes cannot be understood. In recent years, the role of the teacher in the bullying process has received special attention in research (Colpin et al, 2021). The importance of the teacher's actions in reducing existing bullying or preventing further bullying has been highlighted in various works, and the need to include teachers in anti-bullying measures and to train them actively in bullying intervention behaviour is emphasised in meta-analyses (Gaffney et al., 2019, 2021; Van Verseveld et al., 2019). When it comes to concrete steps for teachers, many anti-bullying programmes also emphasise the involvement of parents, which in some countries also results from legal requirements. A meta-analysis showed that school-wide anti-bullying programs with a component of parental involvement can be successful in reducing bullying perpetration and victimization (Huang et al., 2019). Furthermore, the involvement of parents is also important against the background of socio-ecological theory models, as parents represent a significant socialisation context. Cooperation between home and school can influence the behaviour of students as an influence from the mesosystem. However, only a few studies go beyond the requirement of such cooperation, and also the information provided on parent components in anti-bullying programs are limited (Huang et al., 2019). The aim of the systematic review is to identify research findings that provide information on the effectiveness and nature of home-school cooperation in bullying prevention and intervention. Method The aim is to identify and analyse literature that looks at 1) both the school context and the family context and 2) the interaction of the two contexts in relation to bullying occurrence, bullying development, bullying prevention and bullying intervention. For this purpose, a systematic literature search is conducted in the databases Cochrane Library, EBSCO, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. In addition, a call for grey literature will be distributed in relevant networks (e.g., International Society for Research on Aggression, national psychological societies in Germany, Austria, England, and Norway). The search term has not yet been finalised, but will contain the terms "Bully*", "Parent* OR Home" and "School OR teacher", which will be connected by AND. Both qualitative and quantitative studies will be included with no restrictions on the publication period. Publications in English and German will be included (other languages cannot be included, as only one person in the research team speaks another language and thus no double coding can take place). In the coming months, the research group will create and test a detailed coding manual specific for the research questions of the review. The quality assessment will be done through an established tool for qualitative and quantitative publications (e.g., Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool MMAT, Hong et al., 2018). The screening of titles, abstracts, and keywords according to inclusion and exclusion criteria as well as the full coding of the included publications will each be carried out by two persons. Interrater reliability will be calculated. Results Results are not yet available. We will be able to present the first results at the WABF. These will include, in particular, an overview of the identified relevant literature (e.g., number, information on publication types, sample size and country, result of quality assessment) and its research questions, as well as the summary of the identified results. Conclusion Through the systematic review, we will provide an up-to-date, comprehensive overview of the current state of the literature on parent-teacher collaboration in the context of bullying prevention and intervention. Detailed conclusions will be drawn from the initial findings, which can be presented at WABF. Implications for research/practice The comprehensive and up-to-date research review will identify research gaps and provide suggestions for future research on parent-teacher cooperation in the bullying context. By processing findings on the effect of the family and school developmental context on bullying processes when both contexts are considered simultaneously, implications for practice can also be expected. Previous findings call for collaboration between home and school in addressing bullying, and in some cases, as in the meta-analysis by Huang et al. (2019), depict its impact. However, details on the design of this cooperation, on hurdles and challenges, on legal frameworks and on aspects of cooperation that support a successful effect of cooperation are largely missing. By systematically compiling the findings to date, we provide not only academics but also practitioners with an up-to-date overview of the findings. This will enable practitioners to train teachers on collaborating with parents when incidents of bullying has occurred under consideration of recent scientific findings, supporting the practical usage of scientific findings. Selected References Colpin, H., Bauman, S. & Menesini, E. (2021). Teachers’ responses to bullying: Unravelling their consequences and antecedents: Introduction to the special issue. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18(6), 781-797. Gaffney, H., Ttofi, M. M. & Farrington, D. P. (2019). Evaluating the effectiveness of school-bullying prevention programs: An updated meta-analytical review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45, 111–133. Gaffney, H., Ttofi, M. M. & Farrington, D. P. (2021). What works in anti-bullying programs? Analysis of effective intervention components. Journal of School Psychology, 85, 37–56. Hong, Q. N., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Dagenais, P., Gagnon, M.-P., Griffiths, F., Nicolau, B., O’Cathain, A., Rousseau, M.-C., & Vedel, I. (2018). Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) Version 2018. User Guide. Available under http://mixedmethodsappraisaltoolpublic.pbworks.com Huang, Y., Espelage, D. L., Polanin, J. R., & Hong, J. S. (2019). A meta-analytic review of school-based anti-bullying programs with a parent component. International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 1, 32–44. Swearer, S. M., & Hymel, S. (2015). Understanding the psychology of bullying. Moving toward a social-ecological diathesis-stress model. American Psychologist, 70(4), 344–353. Van Verseveld, M. D. A., Fukkink, R. G., Fekkes, M. & Oostdam, R. J. (2019). Effects of antibullying programs on teachers’ interventions in bullying situations. A meta‐analysis. Psychology in the Schools, 56(9), 1522–1539. Y1 - 2023 UR - https://osf.io/ex6m4 U6 - https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/BNDHG SP - 1 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Kansok-Dusche, Julia A1 - Bilz, Ludwig A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Bartholomäus, Peter T1 - What works in hate speech prevention and intervention in schools? : results of a systematic review of school-based programs to deal with hate speech T2 - World Anti-Bullying Forum, June 11 – 13, 2025, Stavanger, Norway N2 - Hate speech (HS) is a global issue. The intentional expression of group-related derogation has become more widespread in recent years and potentially bears negative consequences for individuals, communities, and societies (Kansok-Dusche et al., 2023). After the internet, the school is a context where children and adolescents perpetrate and witness HS or become victims of it (Castellanos et al., 2023). However, schools also represent a suitable location to address HS incidents and to prevent future HS. To date, there is limited evidence on the availability, quality, and effectiveness of school-based programs to deal with HS. This systematic review aims to compile a catalog of available school-based programs on HS that particularly target children and adolescents. Two independent reviewers evaluated the programs’ quality on a criteria-driven basis. The quality criteria combine perspectives from science (e.g., Nation et al., 2003) and secondary school teachers, and from students. The perspectives of the school practitioners were collected in qualitative interviews and focus group discussions. Two coders extracted the quality criteria using grounded theory methods. Of the 27 programs identified, 25 originate from Europe. The presentation will provide an overview of the programs and their quality results. Recommendations will be given for program implementation in schools and for further program improvement. Y1 - 2025 UR - https://friends.se/uploads/sites/2/2025/11/WABF-2025-Digital-program-for-web.pdf U6 - https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/MQWGJ SP - 1 EP - 17 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Zeißig, Anke A1 - Moeller, Julia A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Bilz, Ludwig T1 - How students’ unsatisfied needs in class situations relate to their current boredom : an experience sampling method study T2 - Preprint N2 - Boredom in classrooms is attributed to a lack of meaningfulness, over- or under challenging tasks, a lack of mental stimulation or a lack of autonomy. Previous research has mostly studied the effect of these few needs separately of each other, leaving questions about the comparative effects of different psychological needs on boredom unanswered. The present study integrates these predictors and combines them with six others in one joint study, to determine the respective contribution of each individual unsatisfied needs to boredom in the classroom in comparison with the others, differentiating between the situational and personal levels.A pre-registered study was conducted with 111 ninth-grade students at secondary schools. The study used the Experience Sampling Method (ESM), examining students’ boredom directly in classroom situations. Unsatisfied needs and boredom were recorded on average 15 times for each student in various teaching situations.Multilevel regression analyses showed that unsatisfied needs, particularly for mental stimulation, but also for competence, autonomy, and meaningfulness, predicted students' boredom in the classroom. The unsatisfied need for relatedness (i.e. sense of belonging or relationship) was not a direct predictor of boredom, but significantly interacted with gender in predicting boredom. Unsatisfied needs for luxury/aesthetics, influence, self-esteem, physical thriving and security had no predictive effect on boredom. Differences in boredom between individuals were partly explained by gender, as boys experienced higher boredom than girls. Within the individuals, there was a difference between school subjects, with higher boredom in language than in science lessons. The study augments the previously few and isolated findings on the association between unsatisfied psychological needs and boredom. KW - Boredom KW - Psychological Needs KW - Education KW - School KW - Experience Sampling Y1 - 2025 U6 - https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7211748/v1 PB - Research Square ER -