TY - GEN A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Schubarth, Wilfried A1 - Bilz, Ludwig T1 - Wie können Lehrkräfte zur Reduzierung von Mobbing beitragen? Interventionsmaßnahmen und Interventionskompetenzen von Lehrkräften T2 - Schulverwaltung aktuell. Zeitschrift für Schulentwicklung und Schulmanagement N2 - Obwohl seit vielen Jahr bekannt ist, dass Lehrkräfte für die Reduzierung von Mobbing wichtig sind, bestehen insbesondere in der deutschsprachigen Mobbingforschung viele Lücken zu der Frage, wie Lehrkräfte bei Mobbing eingreifen und was sie brauchen, um erfolgreich intervenieren zu können. Der folgende Beitrag gibt einen Überblick über den aktuellen Stand der Forschung. Y1 - 2021 SN - 2195–335X VL - 9 IS - 2 SP - 39 EP - 41 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Woods, Heather A. A1 - Bilz, Ludwig T1 - Class teachers’ bullying-related self-efficacy and their students’ bullying victimization, bullying perpetration, and combined victimization and perpetration T2 - Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma N2 - Teachers’ responses to incidents of bullying among students can be important for bullying dynamics. Theoretical models of teachers’ intervention competence and the theory of planned behavior suggest that teachers’ bullying intervention self-efficacy may be associated with teachers’ responses to bullying and students’ bullying behavior and bullying victimization experiences. Several studies report an association between teachers’ self-efficacy and their intervention behavior in incidents of bullying. However, the possible association with student bullying perpetration has rarely been examined so far. The current study explores the association between class teachers’ self-efficacy and students’ bullying victimization, perpetration, and combined bully-victim behavior in a sample of 2,071 students and their 93 class teachers in Germany. The results suggest an association between class teachers’ self-efficacy and students’ perpetration behavior. The higher teachers’ bullying intervention self-efficacy, the fewer students seem to bully other students. In contrast, teachers’ self-efficacy was not associated with students’ victimization experiences and students’ bully-victim behavior. Possible underlying mechanisms, as well as limitations of the present results, are discussed. Further research is needed to substantiate the findings. KW - bullying KW - teacher KW - self-efficacy KW - victimization KW - perpetration KW - bully-victim Y1 - 2021 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2021.1933290 SN - 1092-6771 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Bilz, Ludwig T1 - Mobbing und Cybermobbing bei Kindern und Jugendlichen in Deutschland – Querschnittergebnisse der HBSC-Studie 2017/2018 und Trends T2 - DGMP/DGMS Kongress 2021 - Psychosoziale Medizin in Zeiten des Umbruchs N2 - Mobbing ist eine spezifische Form der Gewalt, die mit vielfältigen und langfristigen negativen gesundheitlichen Auswirkungen einhergehen kann. Obwohl eine starke mediale Fokussierung insbesondere auf Cybermobbing zu beobachten ist, liegen nur wenige repräsentative Befunde zur Häufigkeit von (Cyber-)Mobbing in Deutschland vor. In diesem Beitrag wird untersucht, wie verbreitet Mobbing und Cybermobbing an Schulen in Deutschland ist, welche Unterschiede zwischen Mädchen und Jungen, verschiedenen Altersgruppen und Schulformen vorliegen und wie sich die Verbreitung von Mobbing von 2002 bis 2018 entwickelt hat. Dazu werden Daten der deutschen Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC)-Studie 2017/2018 (N = 4.347 Lernende, 53,0 % weiblich) sowie der vorangegangenen Erhebungswellen analysiert. Jungen übten 2018 insgesamt mehr Mobbing aus als Mädchen, wurden aber genauso häufig wie Mädchen gemobbt. 15-Jährige mobbten andere häufiger als 11- und 13-Jährige, wurden aber seltener selbst gemobbt. Schülerinnen und Schüler an Gymnasien waren am seltensten in Mobbing involviert. Nur wenige Kinder und Jugendliche berichteten von Cybermobbing. Im Vergleich zu allen vorherigen Erhebungsjahren berichteten 2018 die wenigsten Heranwachsenden davon, andere zu mobben. Die Häufigkeit der Erfahrung, gemobbt zu werden, hat sich dagegen kaum verändert. Die Befunde verdeutlichen die Notwendigkeit präventiver Anti-Mobbing-Bemühungen und von Interventionsmaßnahmen an allen allgemeinbildenden Schulformen. Y1 - 2021 UR - https://dgmp-dgms-2021.de/sessions-und-workshops/ PB - Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf CY - Hamburg ER - TY - GEN A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Bilz, Ludwig T1 - Interventionskompetenzen von Lehrkräften bei Mobbing: Der Stellenwert der motivationalen Orientierung T2 - Tagung der Fachgruppe Pädagogische Psychologie Y1 - 2021 UR - https://www.ph-heidelberg.de/fileadmin/sonstiges/PaePsy2021/Dokumente/Tagungsprogramm_PAEPSY_2021.pdf PB - Pädagogische Hochschule Heidelberg CY - Heidelberg ER - TY - GEN A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Bilz, Ludwig T1 - Teachers’ motivational orientations: Associations between teachers' self-efficacy, self-regulation, empathy, and interventions in bullying T2 - World Anti-Bullying Forum 2021 N2 - Introduction Teachers must have sufficient intervention competence to intervene successfully in bullying situations. In addition to knowledge and beliefs, motivational orientations are considered important components in teacher competence models (Kunter et al., 2013). Motivation can include all aspects that influence if, with which intensity, and how people act. In the context of bullying intervention, this includes self-efficacy, empathy, and self-regulation. However, while self-efficacy is one of the most investigated motivational aspects of teachers (Fischer et al., 2020; Kunter, 2013, Lauermann et al., 2020), the other aspects – self-regulation and empathy – have only been seldomly investigated in the context of student bullying (Berkovich, 2020; Fischer & Bilz, 2019). Method Based on findings from published single studies as well as unpublished analyses, the associations between teachers’ motivational orientations (self-efficacy, self-regulation, empathy) and their likelihood of intervention (reported by teachers and students) as well as their students’ bullying experiences (as bullies, victims, and bully-victims) will be presented. All analyses are based on a study that was conducted in Germany with more than 2,000 students and 556 teachers at 24 schools. Teachers’ likelihood of intervention was assessed in bullying situations that have been reported retrospectively by students and teachers. Logistic regression analyses (multilevel analyses when appropriate) have been conducted. Results Findings show that teachers’ self-efficacy was associated with teachers’ likelihood of intervention from the teachers’ perspectives. Also, students whose teachers reported higher self-efficacy and a higher tendency to reflect their behaviours thoroughly and choose wisely (a component of self-regulation) reported fewer bullying experiences. The students’ perspective on the teachers’ likelihood of intervention was associated with experiences as bullies, bullied, and bully-victims, but could not be explained by teachers’ motivational orientations. Conclusion Possible underlying pathways and areas requiring further research as well as practical and theoretical implications will be discussed. Y1 - 2021 UR - https://www.wabf2021.org/agenda UR - https://worldantibullyingforum.com/uploads/sites/2/2021/10/conference_program_WABF2021_digital.pdf CY - Stockholm ER - TY - THES A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. T1 - Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung, Selbstregulation und Empathie als Facetten der Interventionskompetenz von Lehrkräften bei Mobbing: Zusammenhänge zum Interventionshandeln von Lehrkräften und den Mobbingerfahrungen der Lernenden N2 - Lehrkräften und ihrem Interventionshandeln kann bei der Entstehung von Mobbing eine besondere Rolle zukommen, wobei eine ausreichend ausgeprägte Interventionskompetenz bedeutsam ist. Aus welchen Komponenten diese Interventionskompetenz aber konkret besteht, ist nicht eindeutig geklärt. Aus der Literatur ist ein Modell bekannt, welches vorschlägt, dass sich Interventionskompetenz aus den Bereichen Wissen, Überzeugung, Motivation und Selbstregulation zusammensetzt. Zur Motivation können dabei alle Aspekte gezählt werden, die Intensität und Art eines Verhaltens beschreiben. Dazu gehören die Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung und die Empathie der Lehrkräfte. Auch die Selbstregulation kann unter der international anschlussfähigen Perspektive von Prozessen der Zielauswahl und -verfolgung der Motivation zugeordnet werden. Damit kommt der motivationalen Orientierung eine besondere Bedeutung als nicht-kognitiver Teil der Interventionskompetenz zu. Ausgehend von diesen Annahmen wurde in der vorliegenden Arbeit der Kompetenzbereich der Motivation als Teil der Interventionskompetenz von Lehrkräften bei Mobbing näher untersucht. Dazu wurde ein spezifisches Kompetenzstrukturmodell entwickelt. Mit den Befunden von fünf Publikationen sowie ergänzenden Analysen wurde dieses theoretisch abgeleitete Modell empirisch überprüft. Es wurde untersucht, welche Zusammenhänge zwischen mobbingbezogener Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung, Selbstregulation (operationalisiert durch die zwei Dimensionen Locomotion und Assessment) und Empathie und dem Interventionshandeln von Lehrkräften sowie den Mobbingerfahrungen der Schüler:innen bestehen. Zunächst erfolgte eine systematische Untersuchung des vergleichsweise umfangreichen Forschungsstandes zur Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung von Lehrkräften im Mobbingkontext. Anschließend wurden Daten von 556 Lehrkräften und 2.071 Schüler:innen aus einer 2014 durchgeführten Querschnittstudie in Sachsen analysiert. Das Interventionshandeln der Lehrkräfte wurde dabei auf retrospektiv berichtete Mobbingsituationen bezogen, welche von den Lehrkräften und den Schüler:innen geschildert wurden. Logistische, zum Teil mehrebenenanalytische Regressionsanalysen wurden durchgeführt. Die Befunde zeigten, dass nur die Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung der Lehrkräfte mit einer höheren Interventionswahrscheinlichkeit aus Selbstsicht der Lehrkräfte in Verbindung stand. Schüler:innen, deren Klassenlehrkräfte eine höhere Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung und eine höhere Neigung zu überlegtem, selbstevaluierendem Verhalten (Assessment-Orientierung des Selbstregulation) zeigten, berichteten geringere Mobbingerfahrungen. Schüler:innen, deren Lehrkräfte schnell und weniger überlegt handelten (Locomotion-Orientierung der Selbstregulation), berichteten dagegen von stärkerem Mobbingaufkommen. Als besonders bedeutsam für die Mobbingerfahrungen der Schüler:innen zeigte sich zudem die Sicht der Schüler:innen auf die Interventionswahrscheinlichkeit der Lehrkräfte. N2 - Bullying among students is a special form of aggression that occurs repeatedly over a long time with the intention to harm. Bullying occurs in a complex social context of which not only the students, but also the teachers are part. Teachers can act as role models and socialisation partners for the students and thus influence the attitudes and actions of students. To fulfil the professional task of intervention in bullying situations successfully, teachers must have sufficient intervention competence. However, the concrete components of this intervention competence are not clear yet. There is one known model in the literature assuming that intervention competence consists of knowledge, beliefs, motivation, and self-regulation. Motivation can include all aspects that influence if, with which intensity, and how people act. In the context of bullying intervention, this includes self-efficacy and empathy. When defined as a goal-oriented process, self-regulation can also be assigned to motivation. Thus, motivational orientation is of particular importance as a non-cognitive part of intervention competence. Based on these assumptions, the present study examined motivation as a part of teacher intervention competence. Using the findings of five publications as well as supplementary analyses, the connections between bullying-related self-efficacy, self-regulation (following the Regulatory Mode Theory assessed with two dimensions called locomotion and assessment), empathy, and the intervention behaviour of teachers as well as students’ bullying experiences were analysed. First, the current state of research regarding teachers’ self-efficacy in bullying was systematically reviewed. Besides, data from 556 teachers and their 2,071 students from a cross-sectional study conducted in Saxony in 2014 were analysed. Teachers’ intervention behaviour was analysed in connection with retrospectively reported bullying situations chosen by the teachers and the students individually. Data were analysed using logistic regression analyses that were conducted in multilevel models when student and teacher data were connected. Findings showed that teachers’ self-efficacy was associated with teachers’ likelihood of intervention from the teachers’ perspectives. Also, students whose form tutors reported higher self-efficacy and a higher tendency to reflect their behaviours thoroughly and choose wisely (assessment orientation of self-regulation) reported fewer bullying experiences. In contrast, students whose teachers acted quickly and were less self-critical (locomotion orientation of self-regulation) reported higher incidences of bullying. The students’ perspective on the teachers’ likelihood of intervention was associated with all types of bullying experiences (as bullies, bullied, and bully-victims). However, the likelihood of intervention from the students’ perspective was not related to the teachers’ motivational orientation that was investigated. Y1 - 2021 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:co1-opus4-56946 PB - BTU Cottbus-Senftenberg CY - Cottbus ER - TY - GEN A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Aalst, Danelien van A1 - Paljakka, Antonia T1 - Research on teachers’ role in tackling bullying: How can be facilitate connections and cooperation among researchers and practitioners in this field? T2 - World Anti-Bullying Forum 2021 N2 - Bullying research has been conducted worldwide for decades, with ever-increasing frequency and intensity. Nevertheless, some areas of bullying research have not been very well studied so far. One of these areas is the role of teachers in preventing and reducing bullying, including, for example, their intervention strategies and effectiveness in tackling bullying, and supportive or hindering teacher competencies. Recently, studies in this area seem to be increasing. A special issue in the European Journal of Developmental Psychology and a Current Research Topic in Frontiers of Psychology show growing research interest in the role of teachers in student bullying. It seems that we are at the beginning of increasing research interest, which provides us with the opportunity to identify research priorities and to advance appropriate networking. This could facilitate cooperation and connection between researchers and studies, which would be beneficial for the growth of knowledge and enable more rapid findings relevant to practice. We, the founders of the newly established and currently growing European Young Researchers Network on Teachers' Role in School Bullying, would like to talk about connecting researchers and research. Purpose The workshop is aimed at researchers who study teachers in the bullying context as well as practitioners who identified research needs. Central questions of the workshop will be: Which research questions need to be addressed to understand the role of teachers in bullying better? What helps us or what hinders us to exchange and cooperate? How can we create networks that are beneficial and accessible for everyone who wants to participate? Which research projects would be suitable for comparative research or replication in another country? The workshop aims to develop creative ideas that can be implemented in the newly established network or other cooperation opportunities to advance research on the role of the teacher. Y1 - 2021 UR - https://worldantibullyingforum.com/wabf-2021/ SP - 485 CY - Stockholm ER - TY - GEN A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Aalst, Danelien van A1 - Paljakka, Antonia T1 - Introducing the European Young Researchers Network on Teachers’ Role in School Bullying T2 - Bullying Research Symposium Vienna 2020 Y1 - 2020 UR - https://bullyingresearchsymposium.univie.ac.at/program/ CY - Wien ER - TY - GEN A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Bilz, Ludwig A1 - Wachs, Sebastian T1 - Teachers‘ empathy and the likelihood that they will intervene in bullying: Differences between students’ and teachers’ perspectives T2 - Bullying Research Symposium 2020 N2 - Teachers play a crucial role in bullying interventions. Recent research has suggested that empathy is particularly important for this. But two important limitations arise. Firstly, all of these findings are based on artificial bullying scenarios presented in vignettes. Secondly, the likelihood that teachers will intervene is assessed solely from the teacher’s perspective. Based on data from 2,071 German students and their 93 teachers, the connection between teachers’ self-reported empathy and the likelihood that they will intervene in bullying was assessed using a bullying vignette as well as a retrospectively reported bullying situation that had been experienced by the teachers or the students in question. The associations were analysed in multilevel regression models from the teachers’ and the students’ perspective. Results showed that teachers who are more empathic are more likely to report that they would intervene in a hypothetical relational bullying situation. However, this finding could not be replicated when using real, remembered bullying situations. In addition, when based on students’ perspectives, no significant associations between teachers’ empathy and their actual or intended intervention behaviour were found. In this presentation we will discuss implications for the validity of existing research and for future research. Y1 - 2020 UR - https://bullyingresearchsymposium.univie.ac.at/program/ ER - TY - GEN A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - John, Nancy A1 - Bilz, Ludwig T1 - Teachers‘ bullying-related self-efficacy: A systematic review on connections to bullying interventions T2 - World Anti-Bullying Forum 2019 N2 - Recent research indicates that teacher self-efficacy as a belief to have enough capabilities to accomplish a given task successfully (Bandura, 1994) is an important competence for successful bullying prevention and intervention (e.g., Boulton, 2014; Bradshaw, Sawyer & O’Brennan, 2007; Yoon & Bauman, 2014). But studies vary concerning the definition and specificity of self-efficacy and concerning the samples used. Therefore, the findings differ greatly. Empirical studies on teacher self-efficacy in the context of student bullying were searched in relevant databases. 36 relevant publications were identified in a multi-staged process. Quality criteria were adapted from the Cochrane Collaboration. Most publications report consistently that teachers feel not very confident in dealing with bullying in general and feel least confident when dealing with cyberbullying. Results on differences according to gender, work experience and school type are very heterogeneous. Consistent findings are reported concerning the likelihood of intervention: Teachers who are more confident are more likely to intervene in bullying. But no consistent findings arise for the choice of specific intervention strategies. The heterogeneity of the findings can be explained by different types of self-efficacy, by differences in the measures, and by different educational contexts. In the presentation, this information will be combined to understand differences better and to integrate the existing results. Results indicate that the more specific self-efficacy is assessed, the more connections between self-efficacy and bullying interventions can be found. Y1 - 2019 UR - https://worldantibullyingforum.com/previous-forums/wabf-2019/ CY - Dublin ER - TY - GEN A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Bilz, Ludwig T1 - Bullying among students in the context of staff conflicts and class climate: Are there spillover effects? T2 - World Anti-Bullying Forum 2017 N2 - Bullying is a prevalent aggressive behavior with severe negative social and health consequences. It emerges from complex social interactions (Saarento, Garandeau, & Salmivalli, 2015). To understand the causes of bullying, different levels of the school environment and their interactions need to be considered. Bronfenbrenner’s ecological theory is an appropriate model for this (see figure 1). From analyses of children’s behaviors in the family context, spillover effects are known (e.g., Lux & Hudecek, 2015). Similar patterns may occur in schools: Conflicts at the staff level may serve as negative role models, may reduce teachers’ alliance and cooperation, and limit long-term interventions. These long-term interventions are especially important in reducing bullying (Bilz, Schubarth, Dudziak, Fischer, Niproschke, & Ulbricht, in press). Following the assumption of reciprocity, the occurrence of bullying may, at the same time, work as a stressor and increase staff conflicts. Connections between bullying occurrence and class climate are already known in the literature (Saarento et al., 2015), but have not yet been analyzed with staff conflicts simultaneously. Cross-sectional data of 556 teachers and 2,071 students will be analyzed as individual data and as aggregated data using multilevel structure equation modeling. Analyses are not finished yet, but will be presented and discussed at the conference presentation. Y1 - 2017 UR - https://worldantibullyingforum.com/previous-forums/wabf-2017/ CY - Stockholm ER - TY - GEN A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Bilz, Ludwig T1 - Professionswissen und Lehrerhandeln in realen Mobbingsituationen T2 - Tagung der AEPF in Rostock (18.-21.09.2016) Y1 - 2016 UR - https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314521023_Professionswissen_und_Lehrerhandeln_in_realen_Mobbingsituationen U6 - https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.33063.14240 CY - Rostock ER - TY - GEN A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Bilz, Ludwig T1 - Handeln oder Abwägen? Die Bedeutung der Selbstregulation für das Interventionshandeln von Lehrkräften bei Gewalt und Mobbing T2 - 25. DGfE-Kongress Y1 - 2016 UR - https://www.znl-ulm.de/Veroeffentlichungen/Abstractband_NEFS_2016.pdf SP - 41 PB - TransferZentrum für Neurowissenschaften und Lernen CY - Kassel ER - TY - GEN A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Bilz, Ludwig T1 - Selbstregulative Kompetenzen von Lehrkräften beim Umgang mit Mobbing T2 - 80. AEPF-Tagung Y1 - 2015 UR - http://www.aepf2015.de UR - http://www.aepf2015.de/AEPF2015_Abstractband.pdf SP - 104 CY - Göttingen ER - TY - GEN A1 - Kansok-Dusche, Julia A1 - Bilz, Ludwig A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Wachs, Sebastian T1 - Lehrpersoneninterventionen bei Hatespeech: Dimensionalität, Messinvarianz und Kriteriumsvalidität einer neuen Skala T2 - Bildung im digitalen Wandel. 9. GEBF Tagung Bamberg Y1 - 2022 UR - https://gebf2022.de/GEBF2022_Tagungsband_01-03-22.pdf SP - 78 PB - Otto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg CY - Bamberg ER - TY - GEN A1 - Dadaczynski, Kevin A1 - Rathmann, Katharina A1 - Schricker, Julia A1 - Bilz, Ludwig A1 - Sudeck, Gorden A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Janiczek, Oliver A1 - Quilling, Eike T1 - Digitale Gesundheitskompetenz von Schülerinnen und Schülern. Ausprägung und Assoziationen mit dem Bewegungs- und Ernährungsverhalten T2 - Bundesgesundheitsblatt N2 - Hintergrund. Während vermehrt Studienbefunde zur allgemeinen Gesundheitskompetenz (GK) vorliegen, mangelt es an Erkenntnissen zur digitalen GK im Jugendalter und deren Assoziationen mit Indikatoren des Gesundheitsverhaltens. Methodik. Empirische Basis bildet eine von Oktober 2019 bis Februar 2020 im Bundesland Hessen durchgeführte Querschnittstudie mit 490 Schülerinnen und Schülern der Klassenstufe 8 und 9. Die digitale GK wurde mithilfe von 5 Subskalen des Digital Health Literacy Instrument (DHLI) erfasst, während der Verzehr von Obst, Gemüse und Softdrinks sowie die körperliche Aktivität als Indikatoren des Gesundheitsverhaltens herangezogen wurden. Als soziales Merkmal wurde neben dem Geschlecht und der Klassenstufe der subjektive Sozialstatus (SSS) berücksichtigt. Die Datenauswertung erfolgte uni-, bi- und multivariat, wobei binärlogistische Regressionen für das Geschlecht und den SSS adjustiert wurden. Ergebnisse. Über alle Items hinweg berichten 15,3–37,5 % der befragten Jugendlichen Schwierigkeiten bei der Beschaffung von und im Umgang mit digitalen Informationen. Differenziert nach sozialen Merkmalen finden sich für 2 Dimensionen der digitalen GK Unterschiede zuungunsten der Mädchen sowie durchgehend ein sozialer Gradient zuungunsten von Befragten mit niedrigem SSS. Jugendliche mit mittlerer und geringer digitaler GK weisen ein höheres Maß an geringer körperlicher Aktivität, nichttäglichem Obstverzehr und täglichem Konsum von zuckerhaltigen Getränken auf. Diskussion. Die Befunde weisen auf einen Interventionsbedarf zur Förderung der digitalen GK insbesondere bei Jugendlichen mit geringem SSS hin. Die differenziellen Zusammenhangsmuster mit dem Gesundheitsverhalten bieten Ansatzpunkte für die Entwicklung spezifischer Interventionen. Als Lehr- und Lernort stellt die Schule u. a. aufgrund der Passung mit verpflichtenden Strategien der schulischen Medienkompetenzbildung ein geeignetes Setting dar. KW - Gesundheitsinformationen KW - Digital Public Health KW - Jugendgesundheit KW - Obst- und Gemüsekonsum KW - Körperliche Aktivität Y1 - 2022 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-022-03548-5 SN - 1436-9990 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Bilz, Ludwig A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Hoppe-Herfurth, Anne-Cathrin A1 - John, Nancy T1 - A Consequential Partnership. The Association Between Teachers’ Well-Being and Students’ Well-Being and the Role of Teacher Support as a Mediator T2 - Zeitschrift für Psychologie N2 - Many studies have focused on the effects of teachers’ well-being on the development of students, in particular their academic achievement. To date, little is known about the association between teachers’ well-being and students’ well-being. In the present study, we analyzed this relationship and examined the mediating role of teacher support using linked data from 2,686 students and 805 teachers from 48 schools in Germany. Multilevel regression analyses showed a relationship between teachers’ emotional exhaustion and students’ subjective health complaints and between teachers’ psychological well-being and students’ satisfaction with school. The latter association was mediated by teacher support as perceived by students. This study extends current knowledge about the relevance of teachers’ well-being to their students’ socio-emotional development and the mechanisms that underlie this association. Implications for promoting of mental health in schools and for future research are discussed. KW - teacher well-being KW - student well-being KW - teacher support KW - school mental health Y1 - 2022 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000497 SN - 2151-2604 VL - 230 IS - 3 SP - 264 EP - 275 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Bilz, Ludwig A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Hoppe-Herfurth, Anne-Cathrin A1 - John, Nancy T1 - A consequential partnership. The association between teachers‘ well-being and students‘ well-being and the role of teacher support as a mediator T2 - 26th Biennal Meeting of the ISSBD Y1 - 2022 UR - https://www.issbd2022.org/program/scientific-program U6 - https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.35890.48324 PB - International Society for the Study of Behavioural Development CY - Rhodos, Greece ER - TY - GEN A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Dadaczynski, Kevin A1 - Sudeck, Gorden A1 - Rathmann, Katharina A1 - Paakkari, Olli A1 - Paakkari, Leena A1 - Bilz, Ludwig T1 - Measuring Health Literacy in Childhood and Adolescence with the Scale Health Literacy in School-Aged Children – German Version T2 - Diagnostica N2 - Health literacy can help explain health inequalities in childhood and adolescence. However, suitable instruments for assessing health literacy in this age group are rare, especially in the German-speaking countries. One economical measure is the 10-item Health Literacy in School-Aged Children (HLSAC) scale, developed and reviewed as part of the WHO Child and Adolescent Health Study (HBSC, Health Behavior in School-Aged Children). In the present study, we tested dimensionality, measurement invariance, and associations with health-related measures of the German version of the scale (HLSAC–German), using data from the 2018 national German HBSC study (N = 4,347 students aged 11, 13, and 15 years). We also tested HLSAC–German with 11-year-olds, representing an expansion of the original scale. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses consistently demonstrated the unidimensionality of the scale (α = .88). Complete scalar measurement invariance was found for sex and partial scalar measurement invariance for age groups and school type, allowing for the comparison of means. Associations with indicators of health and health behavior further demonstrate the construct validity of the scale. The analyses show that the scale is suitable for the economic measurement of a general factor of health literacy in 11- as well as in 13- and 15-year-olds. KW - health literacy KW - childhood KW - adolescence KW - measurement invariance KW - validity Y1 - 2022 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924/a000296 SN - 0012-1924 SN - 2190-622X VL - 68 IS - 4 SP - 184 EP - 196 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Dadaczynski, Kevin A1 - Sudeck, Gorden A1 - Rathmann, Katharina A1 - Bilz, Ludwig T1 - „Health Literacy in School-Aged Children-German”: Vorstellung eines Messinstruments zur Erhebung der Gesundheitskompetenz im Kindes- und Jugendalter T2 - 52. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie. Programm. N2 - Gesundheitskompetenz ist ein international relevanter Forschungsgegenstand, der bereits im Kindes- und Jugendalter mit dem Gesundheitszustand, der Ausübung gesundheitsbezogenen Risikoverhaltens und gesundheitlicher Ungleichheit zusammenhängt. Dennoch steht die Erforschung der Gesundheitskompetenz in Deutschland insbesondere im Kindes- und Jugendalter im internationalen Vergleich noch weitgehend am Anfang. Ein ökonomisches Instrument zur Erhebung der Gesundheitskompetenz Heranwachsender stellt die 10-Item-Skala „Health Literarcy in School-Aged Children-German“ (HLSAC-German) dar. Dabei handelt es sich um die deutsche Version der Skala HLSAC, welche in der international durchgeführten HBSC-Studie eingesetzt wird. In diesem Beitrag werden die Skala selbst sowie Befunde zur Dimensionalität, zur Messinvarianz in Bezug auf Geschlecht, Alter und Schulform und zu Zusammenhängen zu Indikatoren der Gesundheit und des Gesundheitsverhaltens vorgestellt. Die Überprüfung der Skala erfolgt anhand der Daten der deutschen HBSC-Studie 2018 (N = 4 347 Schülerinnen und Schüler im Alter von 11, 13 und 15 Jahren). Die Überprüfung in der Gruppe der 11-Jährigen stellt dabei eine Erweiterung des Einsatzbereiches der Skala im internationalen Vergleich dar. Explorative und konfirmatorische Faktorenanalysen belegen die Eindimensionalität der Skala. Konfirmatorische Faktorenanalysen in multiplen Gruppen zeigen vollständige skalare Messinvarianz bezüglich des Geschlechts und partielle skalare Messinvarianz bezüglich Altersgruppen und Schulform. Erwartungsgemäß zeigen sich negative Zusammenhänge zu subjektiv eingeschätzten psychischen Gesundheitsproblemen und positive Zusammenhänge zur körperlichen Aktivität. Die Ergebnisse weisen insgesamt auf eine eindimensionale Skala hin, mit welcher Mittelwertsvergleiche zulässig sind. Der Einsatz der Skala in der Gruppe der 11-jährigen ist möglich, wobei punktuelle Schwierigkeiten bei der Beantwortung der Items und eine höhere Non-Response-Quote in dieser Altersgruppe erwartet werden müssen. Y1 - 2022 UR - https://www.uni-hildesheim.de/dgps2022/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/52._DGPs-Kongress_2022_Programm_Stand20220915_kl.pdf SP - 51 CY - Hildesheim ER - TY - GEN A1 - Wolgast, Anett A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Bilz, Ludwig T1 - Teachers’ Empathy for Bullying Victims, Understanding of Violence, and Likelihood of Intervention T2 - Journal of School Violence N2 - Relational bullying is still underappreciated by teachers. Based on the theoretical model of teachers’ intervention competence in bullying, the aim of the current research was to gain insights into the concurrent relationships between teachers’ empathy, understanding of violence, and likelihood of intervention. In this study, n = 556 teachers (79.4% female, Mage = 50.6) indicated on a questionnaire their empathy, understanding of relational violence, and likelihood of intervention in a relational bullying situation. The relationships were simultaneously estimated in a structural equation model. The results suggest significantly positive concurrent relations between these variables. We conclude that the effectiveness of teacher trainings could be increased through such elements as cognitive empathy training, raising awareness of violence, and teaching appropriate interventions in relational bullying situations. KW - bullying KW - empathy KW - likelihood of intervention KW - students KW - teachers’ understanding of violence Y1 - 2022 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2022.2114488 SN - 1538-8220 SN - 1538-8239 VL - 21 IS - 4 SP - 491 EP - 503 ER -