TY - GEN A1 - Windus, Marvin A1 - Kopkow, Christian A1 - Bremer, Alexander T1 - Modified Parkinson Activity Scale – deutsche Version Übersetzung und interkulturelle Anpassung eines Assessments zur Beurteilung funktions- und aktivitätsbezogener Einschränkungen bei Morbus Parkinson T2 - 7. Forschungssymposium Physiotherapie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Physiotherapiewissenschaft e.V. KW - Physiotherapie, Parkinson Y1 - 2024 UR - https://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/abstract/10.1055/s-0043-1777942 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1777942 VL - 20 IS - S 01 PB - Thieme ER - TY - GEN A1 - Bremer, Alexander A1 - Iden, Laurin A1 - Kopkow, Christian A1 - Scheffler, Bettina T1 - Evidenzbasierte Leitlinienempfehlungen für die Physiotherapie bei Individuen mit dem Idiopathischen Parkinson Syndrom – eine systematische Übersichtsarbeit T2 - 7. Forschungssymposium Physiotherapie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Physiotherapiewissenschaft e.V. KW - Physiotherapie, Parkinson Y1 - 2024 UR - https://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/abstract/10.1055/s-0043-1777933 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1777933 VL - 20 IS - S 01 PB - Thieme ER - TY - GEN A1 - Bahns, Carolin A1 - Bremer, Alexander A1 - Menke, Chiara Julia A1 - Napierala-Komp, Simone A1 - Hauke, Jeannine A1 - Glaubitz, Andreas A1 - Kopkow, Christian T1 - Programmevaluation von GLA:D ® Deutschland: vorläufige Ergebnisse einer Mixed-Methods-Studie unter Verwendung des RE-AIM QuEST Frameworks T2 - 7. Forschungssymposium Physiotherapie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Physiotherapiewissenschaft e.V. KW - Arthrose, Knie, Hüfte, Physiotherapie Y1 - 2023 UR - https://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/abstract/10.1055/s-0043-1777893 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1777893 VL - 20 IS - S 01 PB - Thieme ER - TY - GEN A1 - Bahns, Carolin A1 - Bremer, Alexander A1 - Menke, Chiara Julia A1 - Napierala-Komp, Simone A1 - Hauke, Jeannine A1 - Glaubitz, Andreas A1 - Kopkow, Christian T1 - Implementierung von GLA:D ® in Deutschland – Effektivität im Nachuntersuchungszeitraum von 3 Monaten T2 - 7. Forschungssymposium Physiotherapie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Physiotherapiewissenschaft e.V. KW - Arthrose, Knie, Hüfte, Physiotherapie Y1 - 2023 UR - https://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/abstract/10.1055/s-0043-1777892 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1777892 VL - 20 IS - S 01 PB - Thieme ER - TY - GEN A1 - Bahns, Carolin A1 - Scheffler, Bettina A1 - Bremer, Alexander A1 - Kopkow, Christian T1 - Measuring guideline adherence in physiotherapy : a scoping review of methodological approaches T2 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice N2 - RationaleClinical practice guidelines summarise the existing evidence on specific health conditions and aim to optimise quality of care by providing evidence‐based recommendations. Studies have reported a gap between research findings and clinical practice in physiotherapy. Guideline adherence is often used as a measure of agreement between therapeutic care and guideline recommendations. However, there is currently no standardised methodological approach for measuring guideline adherence.Aims and ObjectiveThe objective of this scoping review was to summarise the methods and results of studies that assessed guideline adherence in physiotherapy.MethodsMEDLINE, EMBASE, PEDro and CENTRAL databases were searched for relevant literature up to December 2022. Published reports of observational studies and controlled clinical trials that provided information on the assessment of guideline adherence in physiotherapists were included. The selection process was performed independently by two reviewers. The methodological quality of the identified reports was not assessed. Results were summarised narratively.ResultsFrom a total of 2560 potentially relevant records, 53 reports were included in the analysis. Physiotherapists' adherence to guidelines was primarily assessed in the context of musculoskeletal conditions, such as low back pain (n = 25, 47.2%) and osteoarthritis (n = 8, 15.1%). A wide range of measurement approaches were used with the majority of reports using web‐based surveys (n = 21, 39.6%), followed by chart reviews (n = 17, 32.1%). Most reports (n = 21, 39.6%) provided information on the level of adherence in terms of frequency dichotomising (self‐reported) clinical practice as adherent or non‐adherent. Adherence rates varied widely between included reports.ConclusionsAlthough the large number of included reports indicates a high level of interest in the topic of guideline adherence, there is considerable heterogeneity between studies regarding the methodological approaches used to assess guideline adherence in physiotherapists. This reduces the comparability of the study results.Trial RegistrationINPLASY (registration no. 202250081). Registered on 12th May 2022. Y1 - 2024 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.14218 SN - 1356-1294 SN - 1365-2753 SP - 1 EP - 10 PB - Wiley ER -