TY - GEN A1 - Krause, Norman A1 - Ballaschk, Cindy A1 - Schulze-Reichelt, Friederike A1 - Kansok-Dusche, Julia A1 - Wachs, Sebastian A1 - Schubarth, Wilfried A1 - Bilz, Ludwig T1 - „Ich lass mich da nicht klein machen!“ Eine qualitative Studie zur Bewältigung von Hatespeech durch Schüler/innen T2 - Zeitschrift für Bildungsforschung N2 - Von Hass und Hetze geprägte Kommunikationsformen im Internet stehen seit einigen Jahren im Fokus der öffentlichen Aufmerksamkeit. Kaum beachtet wurden bisher jedoch die Fragen, ob sich solche als Hatespeech bezeichneten Ausdrucksweisen auch in der Schule zeigen und wie Schüler/innen derartige Vorfälle bewerten und bewältigen. Um Antworten auf diese Fragen zu finden, wurden 21 leitfadengestützte, episodische Interviews (nach Flick) mit Jugendlichen aus Berlin und Brandenburg zu ihren Erfahrungen und Bewältigungsstrategien in Bezug auf Hatespeech im schulischen Kontext ausgewertet. Die Ergebnisse machen deutlich, dass Hatespeech-Erfahrungen von Schüler/innen als belastend wahrgenommen und die eigenen Potenziale zur Bewältigung individuell und situativ unterschiedlich bewertet werden. Insbesondere die subjektive Beeinflussbarkeit bzw. Kontrollierbarkeit des stressauslösenden Hatespeech-Vorfalls sowie die soziale Unterstützung im Setting der Schulklasse scheinen sich auf die Bewältigung auszuwirken. Die berichteten Bewältigungsstrategien lassen sich, dem Transaktionalen Stressmodell entsprechend, in emotionsfokussiert (Einbezug sozialer Unterstützung, Verdrängung und Vermeidung) und problemfokussiert (aktives Ignorieren und Counterspeech) kategorisieren. Die Ergebnisse stützen Forderungen nach Präventionsarbeit in Schulen. Schüler/innen sollten dabei als Expert/innen der Lebenswelt Schule einbezogen werden. Außerdem scheinen Maßnahmen zur Stärkung sozialer und personaler Ressourcen sinnvoll zu sein, um konstruktive Bewältigungsstrategien zu ermöglichen. Zur Konkretisierung und Quantifizierung der Forschungsergebnisse ist weitere Forschung notwendig. KW - Hate Speech KW - Hassrede KW - Bewältigung KW - Schule KW - Diskriminierung Y1 - 2021 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s35834-021-00291-w SN - 2190-6904 SN - 2190-6890 VL - 11 SP - 169 EP - 185 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Wachs, Sebastian A1 - Schubarth, Wilfried A1 - Krause, Norman A1 - Ballaschk, Cindy A1 - Schulze-Reichelt, Friederike A1 - Bilz, Ludwig ED - Wachs, Sebastian ED - Koch-Priewe, Barbara ED - Zick, Andreas T1 - Hate Speech als Herausforderung für Schule und Lehrkräftebildung T2 - Hate Speech - Multidisziplinäre Analysen und Handlungsoptionen. Theoretische und empirische Annäherungen an ein interdisziplinäres Phänomen N2 - Hate Speech betrifft die Lebenswelt von Kindern und Jugendlichen in einem erheblichen Maße. Deshalb sind auch Schulen und Lehrkräfte mit dem Phänomen zunehmend konfrontiert. Der Bildungs- und Erziehungsauftrag der Schule erfordert eine kritische Auseinandersetzung mit rassistischen und menschenverachtenden Positionen. Um diesem Auftrag gerecht zu werden, bedarf es beim Umgang mit Hate Speech vermehrter Anstrengungen in Schule und Lehrkräftebildung. Erste Leitlinien und Perspektiven zeichnen sich schon heute ab. KW - Hate Speech KW - Schule KW - Lehrkräftebildung KW - Prävention KW - Demokratiebildung Y1 - 2021 SN - 978-3-658-31792-8 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-31793-5_12 SP - 279 EP - 297 PB - Springer VS CY - Wiesbaden ET - 1. Auflage ER - TY - GEN A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Woods, Heather A. A1 - Bilz, Ludwig T1 - Class teachers’ bullying-related self-efficacy and their students’ bullying victimization, bullying perpetration, and combined victimization and perpetration T2 - Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma N2 - Teachers’ responses to incidents of bullying among students can be important for bullying dynamics. Theoretical models of teachers’ intervention competence and the theory of planned behavior suggest that teachers’ bullying intervention self-efficacy may be associated with teachers’ responses to bullying and students’ bullying behavior and bullying victimization experiences. Several studies report an association between teachers’ self-efficacy and their intervention behavior in incidents of bullying. However, the possible association with student bullying perpetration has rarely been examined so far. The current study explores the association between class teachers’ self-efficacy and students’ bullying victimization, perpetration, and combined bully-victim behavior in a sample of 2,071 students and their 93 class teachers in Germany. The results suggest an association between class teachers’ self-efficacy and students’ perpetration behavior. The higher teachers’ bullying intervention self-efficacy, the fewer students seem to bully other students. In contrast, teachers’ self-efficacy was not associated with students’ victimization experiences and students’ bully-victim behavior. Possible underlying mechanisms, as well as limitations of the present results, are discussed. Further research is needed to substantiate the findings. KW - bullying KW - teacher KW - self-efficacy KW - victimization KW - perpetration KW - bully-victim Y1 - 2021 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2021.1933290 SN - 1092-6771 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Ballaschk, Cindy A1 - Wachs, Sebastian A1 - Krause, Norman A1 - Schulze-Reichelt, Friederike A1 - Kansok-Dusche, Julia A1 - Bilz, Ludwig A1 - Schubarth, Wilfried T1 - „Dann machen halt alle mit.“ Eine qualitative Studie zu Beweggründen und Motiven für Hatespeech unter Schüler*innen T2 - Diskurs Kindheits- und Jugendforschung N2 - Das Thema Hatespeech rückt immer mehr in den Fokus der Öffentlichkeit und der Forschung. Im Gegensatz zu Hatespeech im Internet wird jedoch Hatespeech unter Jugendlichen, die von Angesicht zu Angesicht im Schulkontext ausgeübt wird, kaum beachtet. Hier setzt die vorliegende Studie an, in der Schüler*innen (n = 55), Lehrkräfte (n = 18) und Sozialpädagog*innen (n =16) auf der Basis leitfadengestützter Interviews dazu befragt wurden, was mögliche Beweggründe und Motive dafür sind, dass Schüler*innen Hatespeech in der Lebenswelt Schule und online ausüben. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass mögliche Beweggründe für Hatespeech Angst vor Statusverlust, Gruppendruck, Provokation, Spaß, politisch-ideologische Überzeugung und Kompensation von Frust- und Minderwertigkeitsgefühlen sind. Darüber hinaus wird verdeutlicht, dass sich hinter diesen Gründen für Hatespeech oftmals Grundmotive nach Macht und Zugehörigkeit abzeichnen. Die Ergebnisse werden in Bezug auf anschließende Forschung und praktische Implikationen diskutiert. KW - Hatespeech KW - Hassrede KW - Gründe KW - Motive KW - Schule Y1 - 2021 UR - https://www.budrich-journals.de/index.php/diskurs/article/view/37689 U6 - https://doi.org/10.3224/diskurs.v16i4.01 SN - 1862-5002 VL - 16 IS - 4 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Zeißig, Anke A1 - Möller, Julia A1 - Bilz, Ludwig T1 - Scoping Review: Langeweile und Kreativität - Gegensatz oder Zusammenhang? T2 - Tagung der Fachgruppe Pädagogische Psychologie Y1 - 2021 UR - https://www.ph-heidelberg.de/fileadmin/sonstiges/PaePsy2021/Dokumente/Tagungsprogramm_PAEPSY_2021.pdf PB - Pädagogische Hochschule Heidelberg CY - Heidelberg ER - TY - GEN A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Bilz, Ludwig T1 - Mobbing und Cybermobbing bei Kindern und Jugendlichen in Deutschland – Querschnittergebnisse der HBSC-Studie 2017/2018 und Trends T2 - DGMP/DGMS Kongress 2021 - Psychosoziale Medizin in Zeiten des Umbruchs N2 - Mobbing ist eine spezifische Form der Gewalt, die mit vielfältigen und langfristigen negativen gesundheitlichen Auswirkungen einhergehen kann. Obwohl eine starke mediale Fokussierung insbesondere auf Cybermobbing zu beobachten ist, liegen nur wenige repräsentative Befunde zur Häufigkeit von (Cyber-)Mobbing in Deutschland vor. In diesem Beitrag wird untersucht, wie verbreitet Mobbing und Cybermobbing an Schulen in Deutschland ist, welche Unterschiede zwischen Mädchen und Jungen, verschiedenen Altersgruppen und Schulformen vorliegen und wie sich die Verbreitung von Mobbing von 2002 bis 2018 entwickelt hat. Dazu werden Daten der deutschen Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC)-Studie 2017/2018 (N = 4.347 Lernende, 53,0 % weiblich) sowie der vorangegangenen Erhebungswellen analysiert. Jungen übten 2018 insgesamt mehr Mobbing aus als Mädchen, wurden aber genauso häufig wie Mädchen gemobbt. 15-Jährige mobbten andere häufiger als 11- und 13-Jährige, wurden aber seltener selbst gemobbt. Schülerinnen und Schüler an Gymnasien waren am seltensten in Mobbing involviert. Nur wenige Kinder und Jugendliche berichteten von Cybermobbing. Im Vergleich zu allen vorherigen Erhebungsjahren berichteten 2018 die wenigsten Heranwachsenden davon, andere zu mobben. Die Häufigkeit der Erfahrung, gemobbt zu werden, hat sich dagegen kaum verändert. Die Befunde verdeutlichen die Notwendigkeit präventiver Anti-Mobbing-Bemühungen und von Interventionsmaßnahmen an allen allgemeinbildenden Schulformen. Y1 - 2021 UR - https://dgmp-dgms-2021.de/sessions-und-workshops/ PB - Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf CY - Hamburg ER - TY - GEN A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Bilz, Ludwig T1 - Interventionskompetenzen von Lehrkräften bei Mobbing: Der Stellenwert der motivationalen Orientierung T2 - Tagung der Fachgruppe Pädagogische Psychologie Y1 - 2021 UR - https://www.ph-heidelberg.de/fileadmin/sonstiges/PaePsy2021/Dokumente/Tagungsprogramm_PAEPSY_2021.pdf PB - Pädagogische Hochschule Heidelberg CY - Heidelberg ER - TY - GEN A1 - Hoppe-Herfurth, Anne-Cathrin A1 - Burkhardt, Birgit A1 - John, Nancy A1 - Bilz, Ludwig T1 - Two aspects of health literacy and their importance for the use of health-promotion measures by teachers in the school setting T2 - Health Education N2 - Purpose. Teachers are exposed to many stressors. Compared to other occupational groups, they are more frequently affected by psychosomatic complaints. In recent decades, numerous prevention and intervention measures for promoting health have been developed and implemented for this target group. However, it remains unclear how the uptake of health-promotion measures (HPMs) by teachers can be increased in order to prevent stress-related disorders. This paper examines two facets of health literacy—health awareness and health value—in terms of their importance in both the take-up and intended take-up of HPMs. Design/methodology/approach. In the 2017/2018 school year, data were collected by paper and pencil from a representative sample of 830 teachers across all school types in the German State of Brandenburg. Findings. Teachers who place great value on their own health show significantly higher levels of take-up and intended take-up of HPMs. The findings regarding health awareness are more heterogeneous. Further associations were found with age and psychosocial stress. Originality/value. While there has been growing academic interest in developing HPMs for teachers, there has been relatively little focus on the factors that may influence the implementation and uptake of these measures. The paper contributes to addressing this gap by shedding light on the relevance of two facets of health literacy. Strengthening the perceived importance of health could be a starting point for increasing the use of HPMs by teachers and thus improving their health. KW - Health promotion KW - Health literacy KW - Teacher health KW - Health care utilization KW - Health value Y1 - 2021 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1108/HE-06-2021-0091 SN - 0965-4283 IS - 6 SP - 554 EP - 568 PB - Vol. 121 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Bilz, Ludwig T1 - Teachers’ motivational orientations: Associations between teachers' self-efficacy, self-regulation, empathy, and interventions in bullying T2 - World Anti-Bullying Forum 2021 N2 - Introduction Teachers must have sufficient intervention competence to intervene successfully in bullying situations. In addition to knowledge and beliefs, motivational orientations are considered important components in teacher competence models (Kunter et al., 2013). Motivation can include all aspects that influence if, with which intensity, and how people act. In the context of bullying intervention, this includes self-efficacy, empathy, and self-regulation. However, while self-efficacy is one of the most investigated motivational aspects of teachers (Fischer et al., 2020; Kunter, 2013, Lauermann et al., 2020), the other aspects – self-regulation and empathy – have only been seldomly investigated in the context of student bullying (Berkovich, 2020; Fischer & Bilz, 2019). Method Based on findings from published single studies as well as unpublished analyses, the associations between teachers’ motivational orientations (self-efficacy, self-regulation, empathy) and their likelihood of intervention (reported by teachers and students) as well as their students’ bullying experiences (as bullies, victims, and bully-victims) will be presented. All analyses are based on a study that was conducted in Germany with more than 2,000 students and 556 teachers at 24 schools. Teachers’ likelihood of intervention was assessed in bullying situations that have been reported retrospectively by students and teachers. Logistic regression analyses (multilevel analyses when appropriate) have been conducted. Results Findings show that teachers’ self-efficacy was associated with teachers’ likelihood of intervention from the teachers’ perspectives. Also, students whose teachers reported higher self-efficacy and a higher tendency to reflect their behaviours thoroughly and choose wisely (a component of self-regulation) reported fewer bullying experiences. The students’ perspective on the teachers’ likelihood of intervention was associated with experiences as bullies, bullied, and bully-victims, but could not be explained by teachers’ motivational orientations. Conclusion Possible underlying pathways and areas requiring further research as well as practical and theoretical implications will be discussed. Y1 - 2021 UR - https://www.wabf2021.org/agenda UR - https://worldantibullyingforum.com/uploads/sites/2/2021/10/conference_program_WABF2021_digital.pdf CY - Stockholm ER - TY - GEN A1 - Kansok-Dusche, Julia A1 - Ballaschk, Cindy A1 - Krause, Norman A1 - Seemann-Herz, Lisanne A1 - Zeißig, Anke A1 - Schulze-Reichelt, Friederike A1 - Wachs, Sebastian A1 - Bilz, Ludwig T1 - A systematic review on hate speech among children and adolescents: Definitions, frequencies and overlap with bullying T2 - World Anti-Bullying Forum 2021, Stockholm N2 - Hate speech is unequivocally seen as harmful to individuals and communities (United Nations, 2019), but little is yet known about the current state of research on the frequency of hate speech among children and adolescents. Evidence suggests that definitional ambiguities of hate speech exist in academic research (e.g., Brown, 2017). But without a precise theoretical definition of hate speech, standardized assessment methods and the ability to soundly differentiate it from related phenomena, empirical research may lack validity and comparability. For research on children and adolescents in particular, hate speech needs to be differentiated from bullying (e.g., Lehmann, 2019). In a systematic review, we thus identified and systematized empirical studies on hate speech. Y1 - 2021 UR - https://worldantibullyingforum.com/uploads/sites/2/2021/10/conference_program_WABF2021_digital.pdf U6 - https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.10336.61448 CY - Stockholm ER - TY - GEN A1 - Wachs, Sebastian A1 - Wettstein, Alexander A1 - Bilz, Ludwig A1 - Krause, Norman A1 - Ballaschk, Cindy A1 - Kansok-Dusche, Julia A1 - Wright, Michelle F. T1 - Playing by the Rules? An Investigation of the Relationship Between Social Norms and Adolescents’ Hate Speech Perpetration in Schools T2 - Journal of Interpersonal Violence N2 - Hate speech is often discussed and investigated as an online phenomenon, while hate speech among adolescents in the real world (e.g., in schools) has rarely been researched. Consequently, not much is known about potential interpersonal correlates and theoretical frameworks that might help us better understand why adolescents engage in hate speech in offline environments. To add to the literature, this study investigates hate speech perpetration among young people by utilizing the Social Cognitive Theory; more specifically, the association between witnessing and perpetrating hate speech in schools, and whether this relation is weakened or strengthened by anti-hate speech injunctive norms and deviant peer pressure. The sample consists of 1719 young people (45.1% boys, 53.6% girls, 1.3% gender diverse) between 11 and 18 years old (Mage = 13.96; SD = .98) from 22 schools in Switzerland. Self-report questionnaires were administered to measure hate speech involvement and adolescents’ perception of social norms (i.e., anti-hate speech injunctive norms and deviant peer pressure). Multilevel regression analyses revealed that witnessing and perpetrating hate speech were positively associated. Moreover, injunctive anti-hate speech norms were negatively related and deviant peer pressure positively related to hate speech perpetration. Finally, increasing levels of injunctive anti-hate speech norms weakened the relation between witnessing and perpetrating hate speech, whereas higher levels of deviant peer pressure strengthened this association. The findings demonstrate that the Social Cognitive Theory is a useful framework for understanding hate speech perpetration in schools. The results also highlight the importance of taking into account social norms and interpersonal relationships (e.g., within the class) when designing anti-hate speech prevention programs and not focusing solely on intrapersonal factors. KW - hate crimes KW - hate speech KW - social norms KW - school violence KW - discrimination KW - adolescents Y1 - 2021 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211056032 SN - 0886-2605 VL - 37 IS - 21-22 SP - 21143 EP - 21164 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Bilz, Ludwig A1 - Wachs, Sebastian T1 - Teachers‘ empathy and the likelihood that they will intervene in bullying: Differences between students’ and teachers’ perspectives T2 - Bullying Research Symposium 2020 N2 - Teachers play a crucial role in bullying interventions. Recent research has suggested that empathy is particularly important for this. But two important limitations arise. Firstly, all of these findings are based on artificial bullying scenarios presented in vignettes. Secondly, the likelihood that teachers will intervene is assessed solely from the teacher’s perspective. Based on data from 2,071 German students and their 93 teachers, the connection between teachers’ self-reported empathy and the likelihood that they will intervene in bullying was assessed using a bullying vignette as well as a retrospectively reported bullying situation that had been experienced by the teachers or the students in question. The associations were analysed in multilevel regression models from the teachers’ and the students’ perspective. Results showed that teachers who are more empathic are more likely to report that they would intervene in a hypothetical relational bullying situation. However, this finding could not be replicated when using real, remembered bullying situations. In addition, when based on students’ perspectives, no significant associations between teachers’ empathy and their actual or intended intervention behaviour were found. In this presentation we will discuss implications for the validity of existing research and for future research. Y1 - 2020 UR - https://bullyingresearchsymposium.univie.ac.at/program/ ER - TY - GEN A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - John, Nancy A1 - Bilz, Ludwig T1 - Teachers‘ bullying-related self-efficacy: A systematic review on connections to bullying interventions T2 - World Anti-Bullying Forum 2019 N2 - Recent research indicates that teacher self-efficacy as a belief to have enough capabilities to accomplish a given task successfully (Bandura, 1994) is an important competence for successful bullying prevention and intervention (e.g., Boulton, 2014; Bradshaw, Sawyer & O’Brennan, 2007; Yoon & Bauman, 2014). But studies vary concerning the definition and specificity of self-efficacy and concerning the samples used. Therefore, the findings differ greatly. Empirical studies on teacher self-efficacy in the context of student bullying were searched in relevant databases. 36 relevant publications were identified in a multi-staged process. Quality criteria were adapted from the Cochrane Collaboration. Most publications report consistently that teachers feel not very confident in dealing with bullying in general and feel least confident when dealing with cyberbullying. Results on differences according to gender, work experience and school type are very heterogeneous. Consistent findings are reported concerning the likelihood of intervention: Teachers who are more confident are more likely to intervene in bullying. But no consistent findings arise for the choice of specific intervention strategies. The heterogeneity of the findings can be explained by different types of self-efficacy, by differences in the measures, and by different educational contexts. In the presentation, this information will be combined to understand differences better and to integrate the existing results. Results indicate that the more specific self-efficacy is assessed, the more connections between self-efficacy and bullying interventions can be found. Y1 - 2019 UR - https://worldantibullyingforum.com/previous-forums/wabf-2019/ CY - Dublin ER -