TY - BOOK A1 - Amelina, Anna A1 - Lutz, Helma T1 - Gender, Migration, Transnationalisierung : eine intersektionelle Einführung Y1 - 2017 SN - 978-3-8376-3796-0 SN - 978-3-8394-3796-4 PB - Transcript Verlag CY - Bielefeld ER - TY - BOOK A1 - Amelina, Anna T1 - Transnationalizing inequalities in Europe : Sociocultural boundaries, assemblages and regimes of intersection Y1 - 2017 SN - 978-1-138-67987-0 PB - Routledge CY - London ER - TY - GEN A1 - Amelina, Anna A1 - Horvath, Kenneth A1 - Peters, Karin T1 - Re-thinking the politics of migration : on the uses and challenges of regime perspectives for migration research T2 - Migration Studies Y1 - 2017 SN - 2049-5846 SN - 2049-5838 VL - 5 IS - 3 SP - 301 EP - 314 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Amelina, Anna A1 - Barglowski, Karolina A1 - Bilecen, Başak T1 - Coming Out within Transnational Families: Intimate Confessions under Western Eyes T2 - Social identities : journal for the study of race, nation and culture Y1 - 2017 SN - 1363-0296 SN - 1350-4630 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Amelina, Anna A1 - Horvath, Kenneth ED - Korgen, Kathleen T1 - Sociology of Migration, Vol. 1 T2 - The Cambridge Handbook of Sociology Y1 - 2017 SP - 465 EP - 474 PB - Cambridge University Press CY - New York ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Amelina, Anna A1 - Bilecen, Başak ED - Lutz, Helma ED - Schiebel, Martina ED - Tuider, Elisabeth T1 - Egozentrierte Netzwerkanalyse in der Biographieforschung: Methodologische Potenziale und empirische Veranschaulichung T2 - Handbuch Biographieforschung Y1 - 2017 SN - 978-3-658-18170-3 SN - 978-3-658-18171-0 SP - 597 EP - 610 PB - Springer CY - Wiesbaden ER - TY - RPRT A1 - Amelina, Anna T1 - After the Reflexive Turn in Migration Studies: Toward the Doing Migration approach Y1 - 2017 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:hebis:30:3-450041 PB - Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Department of Social Sciences CY - Frankfurt am Main ER - TY - RPRT A1 - Bilecen, Başak A1 - Amelina, Anna T1 - A Network Approach to Migrants Transnational Biographies Y1 - 2017 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:hebis:30:3-450037 PB - Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Department of Social Sciences CY - Frankfurt am Main ER - TY - RPRT A1 - Zabransky, Florian A1 - Amelina, Anna T1 - Intra-EU Mobility and Selective European Social Citizenship: Profiles of Welfare Inclusion and Exclusion in the Context of EU Social Security Coordination Y1 - 2017 PB - WSF Working Paper Series, NORFACE Welfare Statue Futures CY - Berlin ER - TY - BOOK A1 - Amelina, Anna T1 - Transnationalizing inequalities in Europe. Sociocultural boundaries, assemblages and regimes of intersection Y1 - 2017 SN - 978-1-138-67987-0 SN - 978-1-315-54379-6 PB - Routledge CY - London ER - TY - BOOK A1 - Amelina, Anna A1 - Lutz, Helma T1 - Gender and migration. Transnational and intersectional prospects Y1 - 2019 SN - 978-1-138-47920-3 PB - Routledge CY - London ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Amelina, Anna A1 - Barglowski, Karolina ED - Cohen, Robin ED - Fischer, Carolin T1 - Key Methodological Tools for Diaspora Studies: Combining Transnational and Intersectional Approaches T2 - Routledge handbook of diaspora studies Y1 - 2019 SN - 978-1-138-63113-7 SN - 978-1-315-20905-0 SP - 31 EP - 39 PB - Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group CY - London ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Amelina, Anna A1 - Schäfer, Jana T1 - Intersectionality as critical social theory, Patricia Hill Collins, 2019 JF - Ethnic and Racial Studies Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2019.1707252 VL - 43 IS - 8 SP - 1478 EP - 1480 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Amelina, Anna A1 - Trzeciak, Miriam Friz ED - Röder, Antje ED - Zifonun, Darius T1 - Gender Mobile und Gendered Mobilities. Paradigmatische Grundlagen der gendersensiblen Migrationsforschung. T2 - Handbuch Migrationssoziologie N2 - Der Beitrag bietet einen Überblick über die zentralen Ansätze der gendersensiblen Migrationsforschung. Im ersten Schritt werden deren historische Anfänge nachgezeichnet und die wesentlichen Grundlagen der Geschlechterforschung eingeführt. Im zweiten Schritt werden die thematischen Leitlinien innerhalb der aktuellen gendersensiblen Migrationsforschung vorgestellt, zu denen die Dekonstruktion der zentralen Begriffe der Migrationsforschung, gendersoziologische Ansätze zu Fürsorgearbeit und transnationalen Familien sowie makro-orientierte Ansätze zur Analyse von vergeschlechtlichtem Wissen, Institutionen und Macht gehören (insbesondere Migrations-/Grenzregime-Ansätze, gendersensible Analysen von Bürgerschaft sowie de- und postkoloniale Ansätze). Im letzten Schritt werden Herausforderungen der zukünftigen gendersensiblen Migrationsforschung benannt, unter anderem die Weiterentwicklung anti-essenzialistischer Positionen, die Einbettung gendersensibler Forschung in den gesellschaftstheoretischen und zeitdiagnostischen Rahmen sowie die Reflexion der vielfältigen Positionalitäten im Forschungsprozess. KW - Gender Migration Mobilität Doing Gender Queer Theory Intersektionalität Doing Migration Queer Diaspora Studies Regime Care De- und postkoloniale Theorien Y1 - 2019 SN - 978-3-658-20773-1 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-20773-1_13-1 SP - 1 EP - 28 PB - Springer VS CY - Wiesbaden ER - TY - GEN A1 - Amelina, Anna A1 - Schäfer, Jana A1 - Trzeciak, Miriam Friz T1 - Classificatory Struggles Revisited: Theorizing Current Conflicts over Migration, Belonging and Membership T2 - Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies Y1 - 2021 UR - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15562948.2020.1854918 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2020.1854918 SN - 1556-2956 VL - 19 IS - 1 SP - 1 EP - 8 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Amelina, Anna A1 - Schäfer, Jana T1 - Rezension: Birgit Blättel-Mink, Torsten Noack, Corinna Onnen, Katrin Späte und Rita Stein-Redent (Hrsg.): Flüchtigkeiten. Sozialwissenschaftliche Debatten JF - Z´flucht. Zeitschrift für Flucht- und Flüchtlingsforschung Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.5771/2509-9485-2020-1-152 VL - 4 IS - 1 SP - 152 EP - 156 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Trzeciak, Miriam Friz A1 - Amelina, Anna ED - Faist, Thomas T1 - Gender on the Move : Paradigmatische Impulse für eine gendersensible Migrationsforschung T2 - Soziologie der Migration KW - gendersensible Migrationsforschung, postkoloniale Studien, queer diaspora studies, gender studies, intersektionalität Y1 - 2020 SN - 978-3-11-068062-1 SP - 399 EP - 423 PB - De Gruyter CY - Oldenbourg ET - 1. Auflage ER - TY - GEN A1 - Amelina, Anna A1 - Schäfer, Jana T1 - Re-centring class-making across borders at various durées: Translocational optic, coloniality of class theory and multi-scalar capitalist dynamics T2 - Global Networks N2 - Sociological research on cross-border class-making often centres on contemporary dynamics of social inequality in the context of migration and mobility. Relying on the cultural–sociological and processual understanding of 'class', the article integrates three bodies of literature to study complexities of global and transnational class-making to overcome the 'presentist' bias. Building on the accounts of the Annales School, and specifically on Fernand Braudel's famous distinction between courte durée, moyenne durée and longue durée of historic time periods, the article brings together three different bodies of research: (i) transnational and intersectional approaches; (ii) conceptual history of class theory and (iii) theories of racial and multi-scalar capitalist dynamics to develop a flexible and relational, but historic-sensitive toolkit for the analysis of global and transnational class-making. One of the greatest advantages of this multi-temporal outlook is that it allows to avoid over-generalizing accounts on the logics of class-making and to unpick potentially heterogeneous dynamics of class (re)production. Y1 - 2024 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12457 SN - 1470-2266 SP - 1 EP - 15 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Amelina, Anna T1 - Knowledge production for whom? Doing migrations, colonialities and standpoints in non-hegemonic migration research T2 - Ethnic and Racial Studies N2 - Building on the representation problem of migration studies, this article identifies current alternative knowledge production strategies in social scientific migration research. After reviewing calls for denaturalization, demigranticization and decolonization, it elaborates on an integrated “umbrella” perspective – the doing-migration approach – for implementing these alternative strategies. First, building on the socioconstructivist and performativist accounts, the article pleads for studying the institutional and non-institutional sayings and doings about “migration” that generate historic-specific and changeable migranticized societal orders. Second, the article synthesizes the doing-migration approach and coloniality/ies-sensitive approaches to explicitly study long-term, large-scale power asymmetries and patterns of inequalities in the context of the postcolonial, postsocialist and neo-colonial dynamics. Finally, in addressing the question “Who has the power of definition within migration studies?”, this article differentiates between the concepts of standpoint and positionality. KW - Sociology and Political Science KW - Anthropology KW - Cultural Studies Y1 - 2022 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2022.2064717 SN - 0141-9870 VL - 45 IS - 13 SP - 2393 EP - 2415 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Amelina, Anna T1 - Theorizing large-scale societal relations through the conceptual lens of cross-border assemblages T2 - Current Sociology N2 - The concept of assemblage has recently become fashionable in studies of cross-border, global and transnational relations. In addressing the most important elements of this approach, the article provides an analytical vocabulary for analysing the processes of societalization in the context of global and transnational realms. After critically reflecting on the classical sociological approaches to society and social differentiation, the article argues that, because of its poststructuralist basis, the concept of assemblage is the appropriate conceptual tool for studying societal macro-relations of power and inequality while avoiding the modernist heritage of classical social theory. Furthermore, by synthesizing poststructuralist thinking, intersectional theory and multiscalar approaches to space, the article suggests that the assemblage theory can be used to better understand the current forms of cross-border social inequalities in the multiple and partly overlapping contexts of postcolonialism, postsocialism and the EU political project. In a nutshell, it is not a plea to adopt the assemblage approach as a new ‘grand theory’ but rather as a flexible conceptual tool that allows an inductive theory-building. KW - Sociology and Political Science Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392120931145 SN - 0011-3921 VL - 69 IS - 3 SP - 352 EP - 371 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Amelina, Anna A1 - Boatcă, Manuela A1 - Bongaerts, Gregor A1 - Weiß, Anja T1 - Theorizing societalization across borders: Globality, transnationality, postcoloniality T2 - Current Sociology N2 - The editorial summarizes the main conceptual and epistemological challenges of theorizing on society across borders. Its particular aim is to initiate the dialogue between theories of society and cross-border studies that address global, transnational and postcolonial relations. In essence, this special issue addresses four interrelated concerns of studying societal processes across borders. The first of these concerns is prompted by a decades-old critique of methodological nationalism. The second concern addresses the question of how can ‘society’ and the boundaries of ‘societalization’ be conceptualized, if global, transnational and postcolonial processes straddle the boundaries of nation-states? The third concern relates to the fact that sociological ‘grand’ theories have been criticized for failing to analyze recent developments of societies on a meso- and micro-level. Fourthly, a conversation between social theory and cross-border studies is also challenged by epistemic inequalities. Therefore, theories of society should be able to take into account not only the ‘grand scale’ of societal contexts and societal changes but also the positionality of the theorizing subject within global asymmetries of power. KW - Sociology and Political Science Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392120952119 SN - 0011-3921 VL - 69 IS - 3 SP - 303 EP - 314 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Lutz, Helma A1 - Amelina, Anna ED - Mora, Claudia ED - Piper, Nicola T1 - Intersectionality and Transnationality as Key Tools for Gender Sensitive Migration Research T2 - The Palgrave Handbook of Gender and Migration Y1 - 2021 SN - 978-3-030-63346-2 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63347-9_4 SP - 55 EP - 72 PB - Palgrave Macmillan and Springer Nature CY - Cham ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Amelina, Anna ED - Giraud, Olivier ED - Lallement, Michel T1 - Decentring Comparative Strategies in Cross-Border Studies: Towards a Comparative Analysis of Scale-Making within Assemblages T2 - Decentring Comparative Analysis in the Globalized World Y1 - 2021 SN - 978-90-04-46660-9 SN - 978-90-04-46658-6 SN - 978-90-04-52444-6 SP - 87 EP - 113 PB - Brill CY - Leiden und Boston ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Amelina, Anna ED - Amelina, Anna ED - Carmel, Emma ED - Runfors, Ann ED - Scheibelhofer, Elisabeth T1 - European welfare between complex regulatory frameworks and mobile Europeans’ experiences of social (in)security T2 - Boundaries of European Social Citizenship. Governance, Discourses and Experiences of European Social Security Y1 - 2020 SN - 978-0-367-24983-0 SN - 978-1-032-08808-2 SP - 1 EP - 18 PB - Routledge CY - London ER - TY - GEN A1 - Amelina, Anna A1 - Horvath, Kenneth T1 - Regimes of Intersection: Facing the Manifold Interplays of Discourses, Institutions, and Inequalities in the Regulation of Migration T2 - Migration Letters N2 - This article proposes to move towards an intersectional regime perspectives to enhance our understanding of the interrelations of borders, boundaries, and inequalities in migration contexts. It addresses a conspicuous mismatch in current research: While the contingencies and context-dependencies of migration regimes are widely acknowledged, little attention has been paid to the actual interwoven mechanisms and processes that link political orders to social formations. We suggest amending already existing analyses of intersectional effects of migration-related ‘lines of oppression’ in two regards. First, we argue for focusing on the intersectional dynamics of political rationalities that give rise to boundaries and borders (the securitisation, the economisation, and the humanitarianisation of migration). Second, we highlight the need to investigate the intersections between different fields of practice involved in the implementation and enactment of boundaries and borders. We conclude by identifying key challenges and promises of an intersectional regime perspective for migration research. KW - Geography KW - Demography KW - Planning and Development Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.33182/ml.v17i4.710 SN - 1741-8992 VL - 17 IS - 4 SP - 487 EP - 497 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Amelina, Anna A1 - Bause, Niklaas T1 - Forced migrant families' assemblages of care and social protection between solidarity and inequality T2 - Journal of Family Research N2 - The article analyses various forms of care and social protection that forced-migrant transnational families exchange despite their individual members living in different countries. It presents outcomes of a small-scale empirical study of the family practices of mobile individuals from Syria and Afghanistan who arrived in Germany during and after the "long summer of 2015". Building on social protection research and transnational care studies, the article introduces the concept of care and protection assemblages, which highlights the heterogeneity, processuality and multi-scalar quality of migrant families’ efforts to improve well-being. It includes an empirical analysis that illustrates key elements of the proposed concept and shows the significance of cross-border circulation of remittances, the selectivity in the cross-border circulation of emotions and limitations on the cross-border circulation of hands-on and practical care. These findings are framed by an analysis of solidarity organizations at the meso-level and (multiscalar) securitized asylum policies at the macro-level in the German context. The proposed conceptual framework takes into consideration migrant families’ simultaneity of solidarity and inequality experiences by locating the examination of family-making at the micro-, meso-, and macro-levels of analysis. KW - Applied Mathematics KW - General Mathematics Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.20377/jfr-375 SN - 2699-2337 VL - 32 IS - 3 SP - 415 EP - 434 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Schäfer, Jana A1 - Amelina, Anna T1 - Book Review: Anthias, Floya: Translocational Belongings: Intersectional Dilemmas and Social Inequalities. London : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2021 JF - European Journal of Women’s Studies Y1 - 2021 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1177/13505068211039729 SN - 1461-7420 VL - 28 IS - 4 SP - 547 EP - 551 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Amelina, Anna ED - Amelina, Anna ED - Carmel, Emma ED - Runfors, Ann ED - Scheibelhofer, Elisabeth T1 - Theorizing European Social Citizenship: Governance, Discourses, and Experiences of Transnational Social Security T2 - Boundaries of European Social Citizenship. Governance, Discourses and Experiences of European Social Security Y1 - 2020 SN - 978-0-367-24983-0 SN - 978-1-032-08808-2 SP - 19 EP - 45 PB - Routledge CY - London ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Amelina, Anna A1 - Fingarova, Jana ED - Amelina, Anna ED - Carmel, Emma ED - Runfors, Ann ED - Scheibelhofer, Elisabeth T1 - From Subordination to Empowerment? Mobile Europeans’ Access to and Portability of Social Security Rights between Bulgaria and Germany T2 - Boundaries of European Social Citizenship. Governance, Discourses and Experiences of European Social Security Y1 - 2020 SN - 978-0-367-24983-0 SN - 978-1-032-08808-2 SP - 133 EP - 154 PB - Routledge CY - London ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Amelina, Anna A1 - Carmel, Emma A1 - Runfors, Ann A1 - Scheibelhofer, Elisabeth ED - Amelina, Anna ED - Carmel, Emma ED - Runfors, Ann ED - Scheibelhofer, Elisabeth T1 - Labyrinths of European Social Citizenship: Variations in and Levels of Comparison T2 - Boundaries of European Social Citizenship. Governance, Discourses and Experiences of European Social Security Y1 - 2020 SN - 978-0-367-24983-0 SN - 978-1-032-08808-2 SP - 199 EP - 212 PB - Routledge CY - London ER - TY - GEN A1 - Amelina, Anna T1 - After the reflexive turn in migration studies: Towards the doing migration approach T2 - Population, Space and Place N2 - What processes transform (im)mobile individuals into ‘migrants’ and geographic movements across political‐territorial borders into ‘migration’? Addressing this question, the article develops the doing migration approach that combines socio constructivist, praxeological and the sociology of knowledge and performativity perspectives. ‘Doing migration’ starts with the processes of social attribution that separate between ‘migrants’ and ‘nonmigrants’ and that are embedded into institutional, organisational and interactional routines which generate unique social order(s) of migration. Illustrating these conceptual ideas, the article provides insights into the elements of the contemporary European order of ‘migration’. The institutional routines contribute to the emergence of the European migration regime that includes narratives of economisation, securitisation and humanitarisation. The organisational routines of European migration order realise bordering, surveillance and othering contributing to the disciplining effects on those defined as ‘migrants’. Furthermore, the routines of daily face‐to‐face interactions generate various microforms of ‘migration’ by stigmatisation, while also giving the potential to resist the social attribution as ‘migrant’. KW - doing migration KW - European migration order KW - intersectionality KW - migration regime KW - reflexive turn KW - social constructivism Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2368 SN - 1544-8444 VL - 27(2021) IS - 1 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Amelina, Anna A1 - Molitor, Verena A1 - Schäfer, Jana A1 - Vasilache, Andreas A1 - Zimenkova, Tatiana T1 - Vulnerable (im)mobilities between imperial legacies and colonial logics of war T2 - Mobilities N2 - The article conceptualizes war-related mobilities and immobilities during Russia’s war against Ukraine as shaped by two interconnected dynamics: cross-border solidarity and entanglement between Ukraine and Europe, and cross-border disentanglement of both from Russia’s authoritarian political context. Building on mobility studies, the article argues that these frameworks gain analytical depth when combined with critical refugee and migration studies. The editorial proposes four key directions to expand mobility studies: (i) the notion of ‘entangled (im)mobilities’: highlighting temporal and spatial interdependencies between mobility and immobility in times of war; (ii) empire-sensitive approaches: treating post-Soviet spaces as postcolonial contexts shaped by imperial legacies; (iii) intersectional vulnerability: examining how vulnerability is produced through overlapping forms of marginalization; (iv) reflexive knowledge production: interrogating how war shapes epistemologies and research practices. Together, these perspectives enable a more nuanced understanding of war-induced (im)mobility dynamics, collective suffering, and selective immobilization. The article concludes with an overview of the contributions in the special issue. KW - Entangled (im)mobilities KW - Post-Soviet imperiality KW - Vulnerability KW - Necropolitics KW - Gender KW - Epistemic authority Y1 - 2026 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2025.2605054 SN - 1745-0101 VL - 21 IS - 1 SP - 1 EP - 17 PB - Routledge, Taylor & Francis CY - London ER - TY - GEN A1 - Schäfer, Jana A1 - Amelina, Anna T1 - Gendered and sexualized violence on the move : unravelling collective (im)mobilization in the name of post-Soviet imperial membership T2 - Mobilities N2 - Contemporary discourses of the Russian Federation reproduce images of militarized heterosexual masculinity and frame its full-scale invasion of Ukraine. This war encouraged the large-scale displacement and caused Ukrainian citizens’ horrible experiences of gendered and sexualized violence. Relying on the secondary data, the article studies these war-torn forms of gendered and sexualized violence as framed by the military coercion taking place in three different realms: in Ukraine, on the route to the Russian Federation, and on the route to the EU. First, the article introduces the imperiality-sensitive ideas with the goal to interpret the nexus of embodied violence and war-torn state-led (im)mobilization strategies as articulations of post-Soviet imperial membership. Second, it specifies the concept of politics and policies of (sociospatial) (im)mobilization to address the ways in which (state) actors coercively channel movement by relying on the carceral apparatus. Third, the article delineates Russian ethnic dominance, anti-Westernism, neo-Stalinist elements, and heteronormative-patriarchal organization as four dimensions of post-Soviet membership and relates them to RF’s war-related discourses, politics, and policies. The subsequent empirical section zooms into the forms of gendered and sexualized violence (in Ukraine, on the route to the Russian Federation and to the EU) as embodied practices of post-Soviet membership. KW - Imperiality KW - Post-Soviet membership; KW - Displacement KW - (Im)mobilization KW - Gendered and sexualized violence KW - Necropolitics Y1 - 2025 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2025.2532393 SN - 1745-0101 VL - 21 IS - 1 SP - 1 EP - 17 PB - Routledge, Taylor & Francis CY - London ER -