<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<export-example>
  <doc>
    <id>25789</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2020</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber>14</pageNumber>
    <edition/>
    <issue>3</issue>
    <volume>13</volume>
    <type>articler</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2020-07-08</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">From nonequilibrium initial conditions to steady dryland vegetation patterns: How trajectories matter</title>
    <abstract language="eng">The multiscale nature of ecohydrological processes and feedbacks implies that vegetation patterns arising in water‐limited systems are directly linked to water redistribution processes occurring at much shorter timescales than vegetation growth. This in turn suggests that the initially available water in the system can play a role in determining the trajectory of the system, together with the well‐known role of the rainfall gradient. This work explores the role of initial hydrological conditions on vegetation dynamics and vegetation patterns. To do so, the HilleRisLambers–Rietkerk model was solved with different rainfall amounts and a large range of initial hydrological conditions spanning from near‐equilibrium to far‐from‐equilibrium conditions. The resulting vegetation patterns and ecohydrological signatures were quantitatively studied. The results show that not only do initial hydrological conditions play a role in the ecohydrological dynamics but also they can play a dominating one even resulting in divergent vegetation patterns that exhibit convergent mean‐field properties, including a new set of hybrid patterns. Our results highlight the relevance of assessing both global ecological and hydrological signatures and quantitatively assessing patterns to describe and understand system dynamics and in particular to determine if the systems are transient or steady. Furthermore, our analysis shows that the trajectories the system follows during its transient stages cannot be neglected to understand complex dependencies of the long‐term steady state to environmental factors and drivers.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Ecohydrology</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1002/eco.2199</identifier>
    <identifier type="url">https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/eco.2199</identifier>
    <identifier type="issn">1936-0584</identifier>
    <enrichment key="BTU">an der BTU erstellt / created at BTU</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="Artikelnummer">e2199</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="Fprofil">3 Globaler Wandel und Transformationsprozesse / Global Change and Transformation Processes</enrichment>
    <author>
      <firstName>Daniel</firstName>
      <lastName>Caviedes-Voullième</lastName>
    </author>
    <submitter>
      <firstName>Uta</firstName>
      <lastName>Warstat</lastName>
    </submitter>
    <author>
      <firstName>Christoph</firstName>
      <lastName>Hinz</lastName>
    </author>
    <collection role="institutes" number="2406">FG Hydrologie</collection>
  </doc>
</export-example>
