<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<export-example>
  <doc>
    <id>27182</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2021</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>deu</language>
    <pageFirst>22</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>26</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <volume>29</volume>
    <type>articler</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2021-03-18</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="deu">Inclusionary und diversitätssensibles Public Health in der Pandemie</title>
    <abstract language="deu">Othering beschreibt die Markierung von Menschen als „anders“ oder „nicht zugehörig“. Ausgehend von den Konzepten des exclusionary und inclusionary Othering diskutiert dieser Beitrag drei Ansätze zu i) exclusionary Public Health, ii) inclusionary Public Health und iii) diversitätssensiblem Public Health. Die Implikationen der Ansätze werden am Beispiel des Umgangs mit der COVID-19 Pandemie bei schutzsuchenden Menschen in Aufnahmeeinrichtungen und Sammelunterkünften in Deutschland aufgezeigt.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="deu">Public Health Forum</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="url">https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/pubhef-2020-0112/html</identifier>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1515/pubhef-2020-0112</identifier>
    <identifier type="issn">1876-4851</identifier>
    <identifier type="issn">0944-5587</identifier>
    <enrichment key="BTU">an der BTU erstellt / created at BTU</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="Fprofil">2 Gesundheit und Lifes Sciences / Health and Life Sciences</enrichment>
    <author>
      <firstName>Marie</firstName>
      <lastName>Tallarek</lastName>
    </author>
    <submitter>
      <firstName>Marie</firstName>
      <lastName>Tallarek</lastName>
    </submitter>
    <author>
      <firstName>Jacob</firstName>
      <lastName>Spallek</lastName>
    </author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Othering</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>exclusionary public health</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>inclusionary public health</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>diversitätssensibles Public Health</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Pandemie</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Covid-19</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="institutes" number="4102">FG Gesundheitswissenschaften</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>27825</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2021</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber>2</pageNumber>
    <edition/>
    <issue>Issue Supplement_3</issue>
    <volume>31</volume>
    <type>conferenceobject_ref</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2021-10-25</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Othering in public health using the example of Covid-19 management in German asylum camps</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Issue/problem&#13;
&#13;
In 2020, several German reception centers and asylum camps were imposed mass quarantine after single residents had been infected with SARS-CoV-2. Civil and research networks criticized this measure, as crowded housing conditions limited the implementation of infection protection measures, and mass quarantine further increased the risk of infection. This raised the question why public health (PH) measures in these settings differed from those implemented in the general population, and which implications for future PH approaches can be identified.&#13;
Problem description&#13;
&#13;
Considering the epidemiological evidence and ethical perspectives on the PH strategies described above, we applied the concepts of “Exclusionary Othering” and “Inclusionary Othering” to PH. We further discussed the Covid-19 management in German reception centers and asylum camps.&#13;
Results&#13;
&#13;
We identified three conceptual approaches: 1) exclusionary, 2) inclusionary, and 3) diversity-sensitive approaches to PH. Exclusionary PH is characterized by an exclusion of less powerful groups despite negative health consequences. Inclusive approaches seek to empower less powerful groups in order to understand each other's needs, build cooperations, protect everyone and to prevent the development of “hot spots”. Diversity-sensitive PH approaches avoid othering and seek to implement measures for everyone, taking into account diverse needs, conditions, and resources.&#13;
Lessons&#13;
&#13;
We propose a paradigm shift towards inclusionary and diversity-sensitive PH that benefits the entire population, including those forced to flee other countries. This requires a critical reflection of power dynamics and discrimination. The proposed concepts can be transferred to other social groups, regions, and areas of PH.&#13;
&#13;
Key messages&#13;
&#13;
Public health needs to shift its perspective from exclusion and subordination to inclusion and involvement.&#13;
&#13;
Inclusionary and diversity-sensitive PH approaches promote health equity.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">European Journal of Public Health</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="url">https://academic.oup.com/eurpub/article/31/Supplement_3/ckab164.795/6406172?searchresult=1</identifier>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1093/eurpub/ckab164.795</identifier>
    <enrichment key="BTU">an der BTU erstellt / created at BTU</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.doi.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.urn.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="Fprofil">2 Gesundheit und Lifes Sciences / Health and Life Sciences</enrichment>
    <author>
      <firstName>Marie</firstName>
      <lastName>Tallarek</lastName>
    </author>
    <submitter>
      <firstName>Marie</firstName>
      <lastName>Tallarek</lastName>
    </submitter>
    <author>
      <firstName>Jacob</firstName>
      <lastName>Spallek</lastName>
    </author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>SARS-CoV-2</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Covid-19</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Othering</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Public Health</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Inclusionary Othering</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>asylum camps</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>mass quarantine</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>reception centers</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="institutes" number="4102">FG Gesundheitswissenschaften</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>29211</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2022</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>1</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>13</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume>22</volume>
    <type>articler</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2022-08-05</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Psychosocial burden in nurses working in nursing homes during the Covid-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study with quantitative and qualitative data</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Background: The Covid-19 pandemic led to increased work-related strain and psychosocial burden in nurses worldwide, resulting in high prevalences of mental health problems. Nurses in long-term care facilities seem to be especially affected by the pandemic. Nevertheless, there are few findings indicating possible positive changes for health care workers. Therefore, we investigated which psychosocial burdens and potential positive aspects nurses working in long-term care facilities experience during the Covid-19 pandemic.&#13;
&#13;
Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods study among nurses and nursing assistants working in nursing homes in Germany. The survey contained the third German version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ III). Using Welch's t-tests, we compared the COPSOQ results of our sample against a pre-pandemic reference group of geriatric nurses from Germany. Additionally, we conducted semi-structured interviews with geriatric nurses with a special focus on psychosocial stress, to reach a deeper understanding of their experiences on work-related changes and burdens during the pandemic. Data were analysed using thematic coding (Braun and Clarke).&#13;
&#13;
Results: Our survey sample (n = 177) differed significantly from the pre-pandemic reference group in 14 out of 31 COPSOQ scales. Almost all of these differences indicated negative changes. Our sample scored significantly worse regarding the scales 'quantitative demands', 'hiding emotions', 'work-privacy conflicts', 'role conflicts', 'quality of leadership', 'support at work', 'recognition', 'physical demands', 'intention to leave profession', 'burnout', 'presenteeism' and 'inability to relax'. The interviews (n = 15) revealed six main themes related to nurses' psychosocial stress: 'overall working conditions', 'concern for residents', 'management of relatives', 'inability to provide terminal care', 'tensions between being infected and infecting others' and 'technicisation of care'. 'Enhanced community cohesion' (interviews), 'meaning of work' and 'quantity of social relations' (COPSOQ III) were identified as positive effects of the pandemic.&#13;
&#13;
Conclusions: Results clearly illustrate an aggravation of geriatric nurses' situation and psychosocial burden and only few positive changes due to the Covid-19 pandemic. Pre-existing hardships seem to have further deteriorated and new stressors added to nurses' strain. The perceived erosion of care, due to an overemphasis of the technical in relation to the social and emotional dimensions of care, seems to be especially burdensome to geriatric nurses.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">BMC health services research</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="url">https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35883124/</identifier>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1186/s12913-022-08333-3</identifier>
    <identifier type="issn">1472-6963</identifier>
    <enrichment key="BTU">an der BTU erstellt / created at BTU</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="Artikelnummer">949</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="Fprofil">2 Gesundheit und Lifes Sciences / Health and Life Sciences</enrichment>
    <author>
      <firstName>Susanne</firstName>
      <lastName>Schulze</lastName>
    </author>
    <submitter>
      <firstName>Marie</firstName>
      <lastName>Tallarek</lastName>
    </submitter>
    <author>
      <firstName>Sibille</firstName>
      <lastName>Merz</lastName>
    </author>
    <author>
      <firstName>Anne</firstName>
      <lastName>Thier</lastName>
    </author>
    <author>
      <firstName>Marie</firstName>
      <lastName>Tallarek</lastName>
    </author>
    <author>
      <firstName>Franziska</firstName>
      <lastName>König</lastName>
    </author>
    <author>
      <firstName>Greta</firstName>
      <lastName>Uhlenbrock</lastName>
    </author>
    <author>
      <firstName>Matthias</firstName>
      <lastName>Nübling</lastName>
    </author>
    <author>
      <firstName>Hans-Joachim</firstName>
      <lastName>Lincke</lastName>
    </author>
    <author>
      <firstName>Michael A.</firstName>
      <lastName>Rapp</lastName>
    </author>
    <author>
      <firstName>Jacob</firstName>
      <lastName>Spallek</lastName>
    </author>
    <author>
      <firstName>Christine</firstName>
      <lastName>Holmberg</lastName>
    </author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>COPSOQ</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Covid-19</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Mixed-methods study</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Nurses</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Nursing home</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Psychosocial burden</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="institutes" number="4102">FG Gesundheitswissenschaften</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>29350</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2022</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>conferenceobject_ref</type>
    <publisherName>German Medical Science GMS Publishing House</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Düsseldorf</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2022-10-06</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Psychosocial burden in nurses working in nursing homes during the Covid-19 pandemic</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Background: Nurses’ work-related strain and psychological burden increased during the Covid-19 pandemic, resulting in high prevalences of mental health problems among nurses worldwide. Nurses in long-term care facilities seem to be particularly prone to overall heightened burden and poor mental health.&#13;
&#13;
Research question: We investigated which work-related psychosocial burdens and potential positive aspects nurses working in nursing homes experience during the Covid-19 pandemic.&#13;
&#13;
Method: We conducted a mixed-methods study. Eligible for participation were nurses and nursing assistants working in nursing homes within the state of Brandenburg, Germany. Between August and October 2020, we distributed an anonymous survey containing the third German version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ III). Using Welch’s t-tests, we compared the COPSOQ results of our sample against a pre-pandemic reference group of geriatric nurses, drawn from the German COPSOQ databank and kindly shared by the Freiburg Research Centre for Occupational Science. In June 2021, we also conducted semi-structured interviews with geriatric nurses to reach a deeper understanding of their experiences on work-related changes and burdens during the first phases of the pandemic. Data were analysed using thematic coding (Braun and Clarke).&#13;
&#13;
Results: Our survey sample (n=177) differed significantly from the reference group in 14 out of 31 COPSOQ scales. Amongst others, our sample scored significantly worse regarding the scales ‘support at work’, ‘recognition’, ‘quantitative demands’, ‘hiding emotions’, ‘role conflicts’, ‘intention to leave profession’, ‘burnout’ and ‘inability to relax’. The interviews (n=17) revealed five main themes related to nurses’ psychosocial stress: ‘overall working conditions under the hygiene measures’, ‘concern for isolated residents’, ‘management of relatives’, ‘inability to provide terminal care‘, ‘tensions between being infected and infecting others’ and ‘technicisation of care’. ‘Enhanced community cohesion’ and ‘meaning of work’ were identified as positive effects of the pandemic.&#13;
&#13;
Discussion: Results indicate that nurses in nursing homes experience enhanced psychosocial and work-related strain. The comparisons with the pre-pandemic reference group suggest that the situation further aggravated during the pandemic. Nurses exhibited high psychosocial burden, e.g., due to strongly impeded possibilities to fulfill the emotional and social dimensions of care and the constant fear of infection or transmission. Deteriorated working conditions (e.g., higher workload through staff shortages and additional tasks) further exacerbated these burdens. Few positive aspects of the pandemic may be important sources of resilience.&#13;
&#13;
Practical implications: The reduction of nurses’ strain through psychosocial support and the improvement of working conditions is crucial for the protection of nurses’ health.&#13;
&#13;
Appeal for practice in one sentence: Political players as well as care facilities should take measures to improve nurses’ situation in order to maintain a healthy workforce and high-quality care.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="deu">21. Deutscher Kongress für Versorgungsforschung (DKVF) : 05.10.-07.10.2022, Potsdam</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="url">https://www.egms.de/static/de/meetings/dkvf2022/22dkvf025.shtml</identifier>
    <identifier type="doi">10.3205/22dkvf025</identifier>
    <enrichment key="BTU">an der BTU erstellt / created at BTU</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.doi.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.urn.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="Fprofil">2 Gesundheit und Lifes Sciences / Health and Life Sciences</enrichment>
    <author>
      <firstName>Susanne</firstName>
      <lastName>Schulze</lastName>
    </author>
    <submitter>
      <firstName>Marie</firstName>
      <lastName>Tallarek</lastName>
    </submitter>
    <author>
      <firstName>Sibille</firstName>
      <lastName>Merz</lastName>
    </author>
    <author>
      <firstName>Hans-Joachim</firstName>
      <lastName>Lincke</lastName>
    </author>
    <author>
      <firstName>Matthias</firstName>
      <lastName>Nübling</lastName>
    </author>
    <author>
      <firstName>Michael A.</firstName>
      <lastName>Rapp</lastName>
    </author>
    <author>
      <firstName>Jacob</firstName>
      <lastName>Spallek</lastName>
    </author>
    <author>
      <firstName>Marie</firstName>
      <lastName>Tallarek</lastName>
    </author>
    <author>
      <firstName>Anne Kathrin</firstName>
      <lastName>Thier</lastName>
    </author>
    <author>
      <firstName>Christine</firstName>
      <lastName>Holmberg</lastName>
    </author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Psychosocial burden</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Nursing home</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Covid-19</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="institutes" number="4102">FG Gesundheitswissenschaften</collection>
  </doc>
</export-example>
