<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<export-example>
  <doc>
    <id>34742</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2024</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>1020</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>1027</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume>130</volume>
    <type>articler</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2024-11-28</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Paving the Green Path: a Maturity Model for Digital Decarbonization</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Digital transformation has been employed across all industries to enhance business operations. Its potential lies in optimising existing business models and creating innovative ones based on various technologies, making them fit for the future by reducing greenhouse gas emissions and fulfilling future decarbonization goals. In order to ensure a successful digital transformation towards decarbonization, managers have to assess the capabilities of their organisation and competently oversee their journey by defining a clear path employing digital maturity models. For this purpose, the analysis focused on published literature concerning digital maturity models developed to guide organisations in navigating their digital transformation journey. A systematic literature review of 36 selected digital maturity models is presented in this paper. These models overlook decarbonisation measures and focus solely on demonstrating digital capabilities, efficiency and profit growth. Therefore, a maturity model for digital decarbonization encompassing dimensions of decarbonization goals, business model innovation, customers and suppliers, products and services, employees, collaboration, processes and activities, data, and IT-infrastructure, -security and -technology has been developed. It assists organisations in reducing their carbon footprint by strategically and effectively leveraging digital technologies. The proposed model has five maturity levels: assess and align, engage and refine, innovate and collaborate, optimize and personalize, and transform and decarbonize. This paper aims to assess the current level of digital decarbonization and determine the position of the organizations. Additionally, it endeavours to identify the specific opportunities for growth that digitalization presents, thereby enabling the creation of a new digital carbon-free existence.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Procedia CIRP</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="issn">2212-8271</identifier>
    <identifier type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2024.10.201</identifier>
    <enrichment key="BTU">an der BTU erstellt / created at BTU</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="Publikationsweg">Open Access</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="Fprofil">1 Energiewende und Dekarbonisierung / Energy Transition and Decarbonisation</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="Fprofil">3 Globaler Wandel und Transformationsprozesse / Global Change and Transformation Processes</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.doi.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.urn.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <author>
      <firstName>Tamer</firstName>
      <lastName>Abdulghani</lastName>
    </author>
    <submitter>
      <firstName>Tamer</firstName>
      <lastName>Abdulghani</lastName>
    </submitter>
    <author>
      <firstName>Herwig</firstName>
      <lastName>Winkler</lastName>
    </author>
    <author>
      <firstName>Nizar</firstName>
      <lastName>Abdelkafi</lastName>
    </author>
    <author>
      <firstName>Hans-Rüdiger</firstName>
      <lastName>Lange</lastName>
    </author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Maturity Model</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Digital Decarbonization</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Digital Transformation</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Review</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="institutes" number="3407">FG Produktionswirtschaft</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>35013</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2024</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>1334</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>1339</pageLast>
    <pageNumber>6</pageNumber>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume>130 (2024)</volume>
    <type>articler</type>
    <publisherName>Elsevier BV</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2025-01-07</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Identification and analysis of barriers in co-innovation projects in the manufacturing and energy industry</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Innovation is critical to a company’s growth in today’s competitive environment. Co-innovation projects, where companies pool resources, represent a promising way to achieve this goal. This study, based on a focus group of industry experts from the manufacturing and energy sectors, aims to identify the challenges of such collaborations and propose suitable solutions. The study relies on the innovation phase model and identifies several obstacles such as short technology lifecycles, data management overload, and organizational shortcomings in co-innovation projects. Effective management, communication and intellectual property (IP) can be a significant challenge in co-innovation projects, particularly due to uncertainties surrounding the release of sensitive data and inadequate contractual support. Uncoordinated communication can also result in project delays or failure. Furthermore, the absence of access protocols for online applications presents risks such as unauthorized access and document change tracking issues, further complicating complex engineering projects. Despite the availability of digital providers, many of them still require physical platforms for efficient innovation projects due to insufficient support for e.g., data management and caused by communication limitations. In conclusion, this study emphasizes the urgent need for research on co-innovation projects and recommends a collaborative framework to address the complexities triggered by this kind of projects and increase collaboration effectiveness.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Procedia CIRP</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1016/j.procir.2024.10.248</identifier>
    <identifier type="issn">2212-8271</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus_doi_flag">true</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus_doi_json">{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,30]],"date-time":"2024-12-30T05:01:44Z","timestamp":1735534904986,"version":"3.32.0"},"reference-count":32,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,1]],"date-time":"2024-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1704067200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,1]],"date-time":"2024-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1704067200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,30]],"date-time":"2024-10-30T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1730246400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":303,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100002347","name":"Bundesministerium f\u00fcr Bildung und Forschung","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100002347","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Procedia CIRP"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.procir.2024.10.248","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,27]],"date-time":"2024-11-27T18:56:33Z","timestamp":1732733793000},"page":"1334-1339","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Identification and analysis of barriers in co-innovation projects in the manufacturing and energy industry"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"130","author":[{"given":"Arian","family":"Lamann","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Herwig","family":"Winkler","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Hans-R\u00fcdiger","family":"Lange","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Nizar","family":"Abdelkafi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.procir.2024.10.248_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"301","DOI":"10.1109\/TEM.2019.2949714","article-title":"Managing open innovation: A project-level perspective","volume":"68","author":"Bagherzadeh","year":"2021","journal-title":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management"},{"doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bajracharya, A.: Public transportation and private car: a system dynamics approach in under-standing the mode choice. IJSDA 5 1\u201318. 2016","key":"10.1016\/j.procir.2024.10.248_bib2","DOI":"10.4018\/IJSDA.2016040101"},{"doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bogers M, Chesbrough H and Moedas C.: Open innovation: research, practices, and policies. California Manage. Rev. 60 5\u201316. 2018","key":"10.1016\/j.procir.2024.10.248_bib3","DOI":"10.1177\/0008125617745086"},{"doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bogers M, Foss N.J, and Lyngsie J.: The human side of open innovation: the role of em-ployee diversity in firm-level openness. Res. Policy 47 218\u2013231. 2018","key":"10.1016\/j.procir.2024.10.248_bib4","DOI":"10.1016\/j.respol.2017.10.012"},{"unstructured":"Chesbrough H.W.: Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting From Technology. Harvard Business Press 2003","key":"10.1016\/j.procir.2024.10.248_bib5"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.procir.2024.10.248_bib6","first-page":"35","article-title":"The future of open innovation: the future of open innovation is more extensive, more collaborative, and more engaged with a wider variety of participants","volume":"60","author":"Chesbrough","year":"2017","journal-title":"Res.-Technol. Manage."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.procir.2024.10.248_bib7","first-page":"35","article-title":"The era of open innovation","volume":"44","author":"Chesbrough","year":"2003","journal-title":"Manage. Rev."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.procir.2024.10.248_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"699","DOI":"10.1016\/j.respol.2010.01.013","article-title":"How open is innovation","volume":"39","author":"Dahlander","year":"2010","journal-title":"Res. policy"},{"doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Enkel E, Gassmann O and Chesbrough H.W.: Open R&amp;D and open innovation: exploring the phenomenon. R&amp;D Manage. 39311\u2013316. 2009","key":"10.1016\/j.procir.2024.10.248_bib9","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9310.2009.00570.x"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.procir.2024.10.248_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"641","DOI":"10.1142\/S1363919611003258","article-title":"Innovation and business performance in small enterprises: an enterprise-level analysis","volume":"15","author":"Forsman","year":"2011","journal-title":"Int. J. Innov. Manage."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.procir.2024.10.248_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"578","DOI":"10.1177\/0266242616654957","article-title":"Appropriation strategies and open innovation in SMEs","volume":"35","author":"Freel","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int. Small Bus. J."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.procir.2024.10.248_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1080\/13662716.2018.1496815","article-title":"Open innovation in Russian state-owned enterprises","volume":"26","author":"Gershman","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ind. Innov."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.procir.2024.10.248_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1080\/09537325.2018.1484442","article-title":"Benefits and costs of open innovation: the BeCO framework","volume":"31","author":"Greco","year":"2019","journal-title":"Technol. Anal. Strategic Manage."},{"year":"2011","author":"Herzog","series-title":"Open and closed innovation: Different cultures for different strategies","key":"10.1016\/j.procir.2024.10.248_bib14"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.procir.2024.10.248_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"354","DOI":"10.12720\/joams.3.4.354-361","article-title":"Mapping of the challenges for the open innovation model\u2019s implementation in service sector","volume":"3","author":"Ibarra","year":"2015","journal-title":"J. Adv. Manage. Sci."},{"unstructured":"Jaruzelski B, Staack V, Goehle B,. Global Innovation 1000: Proven Paths to Innovation Success, Available at: http:\/\/www.strategyand.pwc.com\/global\/home\/what-we-think\/reports-white-papers\/article-display\/2014-global-innovation-1000-study. 2014.","key":"10.1016\/j.procir.2024.10.248_bib16"},{"doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kerzner H. Innovation Project Management: Methods, Case Studies, and Tools for Managing Innovation Projects. United Kingdom: Wiley. 2022.","key":"10.1016\/j.procir.2024.10.248_bib17","DOI":"10.1002\/9781119931270"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.procir.2024.10.248_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"347","DOI":"10.1016\/j.techfore.2017.02.034","article-title":"The internet of things: building a knowledge management system for open innovation and knowledge management capacity","volume":"136","author":"Santoro","year":"2018","journal-title":"Technol. Forecasting Soc. Change"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.procir.2024.10.248_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"537","DOI":"10.1007\/s11187-012-9453-9","article-title":"Open innovation practices in SMEs and large enterprises","volume":"41","author":"Spithoven","year":"2013","journal-title":"Small Bus. Econ."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.procir.2024.10.248_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"655","DOI":"10.1142\/S1363919608002138","article-title":"Factors influencing an organization\u2019s ability to manage innovation: a structured literature review and conceptual model","volume":"12","author":"Smith","year":"2008","journal-title":"Int. J. Innov. Manage."},{"year":"2014","author":"Tidd","series-title":"Strategic innovation management","key":"10.1016\/j.procir.2024.10.248_bib21"},{"year":"2017","author":"Vanhaverbeke","series-title":"The Importance of Connecting Open Innovation to Strategy","key":"10.1016\/j.procir.2024.10.248_bib22"},{"unstructured":"Hernandez-Munoz L, Torane M, Amini A, and Dhukaram A. A state-of-the-art analysis of innovation models and innovation software tools. 2015.","key":"10.1016\/j.procir.2024.10.248_bib23"},{"doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Munir H, Runeson P, Krzysztof W. A theory of openness for software engineering tools in software organizations. Proceedings of the 97th Information and Software Technology. 2018","key":"10.1016\/j.procir.2024.10.248_bib24","DOI":"10.1016\/j.infsof.2017.12.008"},{"doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hrastinski S, Kviselius N, Ozan H, and Edenius M. A Review of Technologies for Open Innovation: Characteristics and Future Trends. Proceedings of the 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 2010, p.1 - 10.","key":"10.1016\/j.procir.2024.10.248_bib25","DOI":"10.1109\/HICSS.2010.29"},{"doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Adamides E, Giarelis N, Kanakaris N, Karacapilidis N, Konstantinopoulos K and Siachos I. Leveraging Open Innovation Practices Through a Novel ICT Platform. 2023.","key":"10.1016\/j.procir.2024.10.248_bib26","DOI":"10.1007\/978-981-99-3424-9_1"},{"doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chesbrough H. \u201cThe era of open innovation\u201d, MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. 44 No. 3, 2003, p. 78-89","key":"10.1016\/j.procir.2024.10.248_bib27","DOI":"10.1177\/000812560304500301"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.procir.2024.10.248_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1360","DOI":"10.1086\/225469","article-title":"\u201cThe strength of weak ties\u201d","volume":"76","author":"Granovetter","year":"1973","journal-title":"American Journal of Sociology"},{"doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Westerlund M and Rajala R. \u201cLearning and innovation in inter-organizational network collaboration\u201d, Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, Vol. 25 No. 6, 2010, p. 435-442","key":"10.1016\/j.procir.2024.10.248_bib29","DOI":"10.1108\/08858621011066026"},{"unstructured":"Porter M. E. \u201cThe Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance\u201d, NY: Free Press, 1998.","key":"10.1016\/j.procir.2024.10.248_bib30"},{"doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nidumolu R, Prahalad C.K., Rangaswami M.R., \u201cWhy Sustainability Is Now the Key Driver of Innovation\u201d, Engineering Management Review, IEEE. No. 41. 2013, p. 30-37.","key":"10.1016\/j.procir.2024.10.248_bib31","DOI":"10.1109\/EMR.2013.6601104"},{"unstructured":"Westerman G, Bonnet, D, McAfee, A. \u201cLeading Digital: Turning Technology into Business Transformation\u201d, Harvard Business Review Press, 2014.","key":"10.1016\/j.procir.2024.10.248_bib32"}],"container-title":["Procedia CIRP"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2212827124014057?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2212827124014057?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,29]],"date-time":"2024-12-29T05:36:02Z","timestamp":1735450562000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S2212827124014057"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024]]},"references-count":32,"alternative-id":["S2212827124014057"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.procir.2024.10.248","relation":{},"ISSN":["2212-8271"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"2212-8271"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Identification and analysis of barriers in co-innovation projects in the manufacturing and energy industry","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Procedia CIRP","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.procir.2024.10.248","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2024 Published by Elsevier B.V.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus_crossrefDocumentType">journal-article</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus_crossrefLicence">https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus_import_origin">crossref</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus_doiImportPopulated">PersonAuthorFirstName_1,PersonAuthorLastName_1,PersonAuthorFirstName_2,PersonAuthorLastName_2,PersonAuthorFirstName_3,PersonAuthorLastName_3,PersonAuthorFirstName_4,PersonAuthorLastName_4,PublisherName,TitleMain_1,Language,TitleParent_1,PageNumber,PageFirst,PageLast,Volume,PublishedYear,IdentifierIssn,Enrichmentopus_crossrefLicence</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="BTU">an der BTU erstellt / created at BTU</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="Referiert">Beitrag ist referiert / Article peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="ConferencePlace">Portugal</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="ConferenceTitle">57.CIRP CMS 2024</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">doi-import</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.doi.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.urn.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <author>
      <firstName>Arian</firstName>
      <lastName>Lamann</lastName>
    </author>
    <submitter>
      <firstName>Anne-Katrin</firstName>
      <lastName>Meister</lastName>
    </submitter>
    <author>
      <firstName>Herwig</firstName>
      <lastName>Winkler</lastName>
    </author>
    <author>
      <firstName>Hans-Rüdiger</firstName>
      <lastName>Lange</lastName>
    </author>
    <author>
      <firstName>Nizar</firstName>
      <lastName>Abdelkafi</lastName>
    </author>
    <collection role="institutes" number="3407">FG Produktionswirtschaft</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>36217</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2025</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>514</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>519</pageLast>
    <pageNumber>6</pageNumber>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume>134</volume>
    <type>articler</type>
    <publisherName>Elsevier</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Amsterdam</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2025-06-17</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Co-innovation tools, mechanisms and methods : status quo and potentials</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Co-innovation and open innovation are approaches to innovation management that are designed to stimulate innovation in organizations. This study analyzes technical offline and online support tools that can aid co-innovation projects by identifying appropriate functionalities. A systematic literature review and analysis of co-innovation tools reveals a lack of support, particularly in the areas of (i) intellectual property management, (ii) compliance and legal management, (iii) planning and analysis management, and (iv) performance and monitoring management. Physical toolkits show advanced development in meeting the criteria, while software solutions lag behind. The findings highlight the need for comprehensive innovation support tools.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Procedia CIRP</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="issn">2212-8271</identifier>
    <identifier type="url">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212827125005360</identifier>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1016/j.procir.2025.02.165</identifier>
    <enrichment key="BTU">an der BTU erstellt / created at BTU</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="ConferenceTitle">58th CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems 2025</enrichment>
    <licence>Creative Commons - CC BY - Namensnennung 4.0 International</licence>
    <author>
      <firstName>Arian</firstName>
      <lastName>Lamann</lastName>
    </author>
    <submitter>
      <firstName>Anne-Katrin</firstName>
      <lastName>Meister</lastName>
    </submitter>
    <author>
      <firstName>Herwig</firstName>
      <lastName>Winkler</lastName>
    </author>
    <author>
      <firstName>Hans Rüdiger</firstName>
      <lastName>Lange</lastName>
    </author>
    <author>
      <firstName>Nizar</firstName>
      <lastName>Abdelkafi</lastName>
    </author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Innovation projects; Innovation management; Support tools</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="institutes" number="3407">FG Produktionswirtschaft</collection>
  </doc>
</export-example>
