<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<export-example>
  <doc>
    <id>27115</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2021</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>deu</language>
    <pageFirst>181</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>193</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition>1</edition>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>bookpart</type>
    <publisherName>Hogrefe AG</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Bern</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2021-03-08</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="deu">Interkulturelle Kompetenz in der beruflichen Pflegeausbildung: Herausforderungen und Empfehlungen für die pädagogische Praxis</title>
    <abstract language="deu">Die Diversität der Auszubildenden, Lehrkräfte und Praxisanleiter*innen in der Pflegeausbildung nimmt zu. Interkulturelle Kompetenzen sollten deshalb bereits in die pflegepädagogische und  pflegerische Ausbildung integriert werden.&#13;
Eine kulturell kompetente Pflegeausbildung basiert auf der Wertschätzung aller Beteiligten in ihrer kulturellen Vielfalt. Sie  bedarf der steten Reflexion  "eigener" un  "fremder"  Prägungen und der eigenen  kulturellen Befangenheit und Begrenztheit.&#13;
Machtasymmetrien, Kollektiverfahrungen, Fremdbilder und differente  Kulturmuster können zu kommunikativen Herausforde-rungen in der interkulturellen  Begegnung führen. Über die  individuelle Selbstreflexion hinaus ist es entscheidend, die sozialen, rechtlichen,   ökonomischen, institutionel-len und organisationalen Rahmenbedingungen des Lernens und Lehrens zu verbessern.&#13;
Für die Pflegeausbildung  empfehlenswert sind&#13;
- die Integration  interkultureller Kompetenzen in die Ausbildung von Lehrenden,&#13;
- die Entwicklung kultursensibler Pflege-curricula,&#13;
- die Förderung von (Selbst-)reflexion in  kollegialen Fallberatungen,&#13;
- das Antworten auf Vielfalt durch entsprechende Leitungs- und  Anstellungsstrategien,&#13;
- der reflektierte und verständnisvolle Umgang mit unterschiedlichen Sprachkennt-nissen,&#13;
- das Nutzen entzerrter, dialogischer und kooperativer Lernstrukturen sowie&#13;
- die Begleitung von Lernenden durch So-zialarbeiter*innen.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="deu">Handbuch Migration und Gesundheit : Grundlagen, Perspektiven und Strategien</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="isbn">978-3-456-85995-8</identifier>
    <enrichment key="BTU">an der BTU erstellt / created at BTU</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.doi.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.urn.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="Fprofil">2 Gesundheit und Lifes Sciences / Health and Life Sciences</enrichment>
    <author>
      <firstName>Marie</firstName>
      <lastName>Tallarek</lastName>
    </author>
    <editor>
      <firstName>Jacob</firstName>
      <lastName>Spallek</lastName>
    </editor>
    <submitter>
      <firstName>Marie</firstName>
      <lastName>Tallarek</lastName>
    </submitter>
    <author>
      <firstName>Heike</firstName>
      <lastName>Jacobi-Wanke</lastName>
    </author>
    <editor>
      <firstName>Hajo</firstName>
      <lastName>Zeeb</lastName>
    </editor>
    <author>
      <firstName>Florian</firstName>
      <lastName>Schimböck</lastName>
    </author>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Interkulturelle Kompetenz</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Pflegeausbildung</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="institutes" number="4102">FG Gesundheitswissenschaften</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>27754</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2021</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>deu</language>
    <pageFirst>209</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>212</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>3</issue>
    <volume>29</volume>
    <type>articler</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2021-09-13</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="deu">Community Child Health Nursing: Ein Konzept für Deutschland?</title>
    <title language="eng">Community Child Health Nursing: Conceptual ideas for Germany</title>
    <abstract language="deu">Soziale Ungleichheit führt bereits im Kindesalter zu gesundheitlicher Benachteiligung. Gesundheitsfördernde Angebote in Deutschland sind noch unzureichend miteinander verknüpft und erreichen sozialbenachteiligte Familien nur bedingt. International ist Community Child Health Nursing (CCHN) verbreitet und bietet einen möglichen Ansatz, um die gesundheitliche Chancengleichheit von Kindern zu stärken. Dieser Beitrag diskutiert das Berufsbild der CCH-Nurses und konzeptionelle Aspekte für die Implementierung in Deutschland.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="deu">Public Health Forum</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="url">https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/pubhef-2021-0063/html</identifier>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1515/pubhef-2021-0063</identifier>
    <enrichment key="BTU">an der BTU erstellt / created at BTU</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.doi.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.urn.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="Fprofil">2 Gesundheit und Lifes Sciences / Health and Life Sciences</enrichment>
    <author>
      <firstName>Lisa</firstName>
      <lastName>Scholz</lastName>
    </author>
    <submitter>
      <firstName>Marie</firstName>
      <lastName>Tallarek</lastName>
    </submitter>
    <author>
      <firstName>Florian</firstName>
      <lastName>Schimböck</lastName>
    </author>
    <author>
      <firstName>Jacob</firstName>
      <lastName>Spallek</lastName>
    </author>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Community Child Health Nursing</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Gesundheitliche Ungleichheit</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Kinder</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="institutes" number="4102">FG Gesundheitswissenschaften</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>29213</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2022</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>1</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>10</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume>13</volume>
    <type>articler</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2022-08-05</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Tailored GuideLine Implementation in STrokE Rehabilitation (GLISTER) in Germany. Protocol of a Mixed Methods Study Using the Behavior Change Wheel and the Theoretical Domains Framework</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Objective: Evidence-based guidelines are important for informing clinical decision-making and improving patient outcomes. There is inconsistent usage of guidelines among physical therapists involved in stroke rehabilitation, suggesting the existence of a gap between theory and practice. Addressing the German guideline “evidence-based rehabilitation of mobility after stroke (ReMoS),” the aims of this project are (1) to describe the current physical therapy practice within the context of stroke rehabilitation in Germany, (2) to evaluate barriers and facilitators of guideline usage, (3) to develop, and (4) to pilot test a theory-based, tailored implementation intervention for the benefit of guideline recommendations.&#13;
&#13;
Materials and Methods: This study uses a stepwise mixed methods approach for implementing a local guideline. A self-reported online questionnaire will be used to survey the current physical therapy practice in stroke rehabilitation. The same survey and systematic-mixed methods review will be used to evaluate the barriers and facilitators of guideline usage quantitatively. Semi-structured interviews will add a qualitative perspective on factors that influence ReMoS guideline implementation. The Behavior Change Wheel and Theoretical Domains Framework will be used to support the development of a tailored implementation intervention which will be pilot tested in a controlled study. Patient and physical therapy-related outcomes, as well as the appropriateness, such as acceptance and feasibility of the tailored implementation intervention, will be analyzed.&#13;
&#13;
Conclusion: This will be the first endeavor to implement a guideline in German stroke rehabilitation with a focus on changing care provider behavior based on the knowledge of current practice and determining factors using a tailored and theory-based intervention.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Frontiers in Neurology</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="url">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2022.828521/full</identifier>
    <identifier type="doi">10.3389/fneur.2022.828521</identifier>
    <identifier type="issn">1664-2295</identifier>
    <enrichment key="BTU">an der BTU erstellt / created at BTU</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="Artikelnummer">828521</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="Fprofil">2 Gesundheit und Lifes Sciences / Health and Life Sciences</enrichment>
    <author>
      <firstName>Bettina</firstName>
      <lastName>Scheffler</lastName>
    </author>
    <submitter>
      <firstName>Marie</firstName>
      <lastName>Tallarek</lastName>
    </submitter>
    <author>
      <firstName>Florian</firstName>
      <lastName>Schimböck</lastName>
    </author>
    <author>
      <firstName>Almut</firstName>
      <lastName>Schöler</lastName>
    </author>
    <author>
      <firstName>Katrin</firstName>
      <lastName>Rösner</lastName>
    </author>
    <author>
      <firstName>Jacob</firstName>
      <lastName>Spallek</lastName>
    </author>
    <author>
      <firstName>Christian</firstName>
      <lastName>Kopkow</lastName>
    </author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Stroke</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Rehabilitation</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Mixed-methods study</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Guideline</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Implementation</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="institutes" number="4102">FG Gesundheitswissenschaften</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="4106">FG Physiotherapie</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>29212</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2022</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>1</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>13</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume>22</volume>
    <type>articler</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2022-08-05</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Current physical therapy practice and implementation factors regarding the evidence-based ‘Rehabilitation of Mobility after Stroke (ReMoS)’ guideline in Germany: a cross-sectional online survey</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Background&#13;
&#13;
Evaluation of the current physical therapy practice for German stroke rehabilitation with respect to the ‘Rehabilitation of Mobility after Stroke (ReMoS)’ guideline recommendations and the associated implementation factors.&#13;
Methods&#13;
&#13;
A descriptive cross-sectional study employing an online survey was performed among German physical therapists in 2019. The survey consisted of three sections with open and closed questions: 1) self-reported use of ReMoS recommendations, 2) barriers of guideline use and 3) socio-demographic characteristics. The benchmark level for guideline adherent physical therapy was set at &gt; 80%.&#13;
Results&#13;
&#13;
Data from 170 questionnaires were eligible for analysis. Participants’ mean age was 41.6 years, 69.4% were female, while 60.1% had no academic degree. The ReMoS guideline was unknown to 52.9% of the responders. Out of all the 46 ReMoS guideline recommendations, only ‘intensive walking training without a treadmill’ was reported to be performed in a guideline adherent manner. Respondents usually denied any personal limitations, such as limited knowledge, or that the ReMoS guideline did not fit their routine practice.&#13;
Conclusions&#13;
&#13;
Among German physical therapists, the ReMoS guideline is not well-known and many interventions are not performed as recommended, illustrating the discrepancies between the ReMoS guideline recommendations and current physical therapy practice. Interventions aimed at overcoming this gap should consider both knowledge of existing barriers and facilitators of guideline usage.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">BMC neurology</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="url">https://bmcneurol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12883-022-02780-5</identifier>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1186/s12883-022-02780-5</identifier>
    <identifier type="issn">1471-2377</identifier>
    <enrichment key="BTU">an der BTU erstellt / created at BTU</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="Artikelnummer">284</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="Fprofil">2 Gesundheit und Lifes Sciences / Health and Life Sciences</enrichment>
    <author>
      <firstName>Bettina</firstName>
      <lastName>Scheffler</lastName>
    </author>
    <submitter>
      <firstName>Marie</firstName>
      <lastName>Tallarek</lastName>
    </submitter>
    <author>
      <firstName>Florian</firstName>
      <lastName>Schimböck</lastName>
    </author>
    <author>
      <firstName>Almut</firstName>
      <lastName>Schöler</lastName>
    </author>
    <author>
      <firstName>Katrin</firstName>
      <lastName>Rösner</lastName>
    </author>
    <author>
      <firstName>Jacob</firstName>
      <lastName>Spallek</lastName>
    </author>
    <author>
      <firstName>Christian</firstName>
      <lastName>Kopkow</lastName>
    </author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Stroke</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Rehabilitation</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Physical therapy</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Guideline adherence</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Implementation factors</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Cross-sectional study</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Online survey</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="institutes" number="4102">FG Gesundheitswissenschaften</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="4106">FG Physiotherapie</collection>
  </doc>
</export-example>
